Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: LYNX on January 11, 2007, 10:50:33 AM

Title: 50 50 capture
Post by: LYNX on January 11, 2007, 10:50:33 AM
I feel the 50 % capture percentage is a little to strong.  Resets near impossible at these rates especially with 4 uncapturable fields per side.

Folk will have to get a whole new mind set about porking bases just to keep 50% of one sides fields whilst going after the other 50% reset.

Not impossible just to hard .... 35 or 40 % would be hard enough.
Title: 50 50 capture
Post by: Tilt on January 11, 2007, 10:58:02 AM
(Number of starting bases minus uncapturables)/2 would seem appropriate.

If the smallest map has 13 bases per side then the above yeilds 38%

A spoiler condition would be to require the winning side to hold 100% of its own bases which would mean that the side about to win could be forced to defend some deep spoiling attacks no matter howmany other bases it had captured. Particularly relevant where maps have invasion access across their centre.

Hence 100% of starting fields plus 38% of both the opposing countries.
Title: 50 50 capture
Post by: 1Boner on January 11, 2007, 11:06:58 AM
i think its still 90/30/30 in the ew and mw.

why the change in lw???

you,re right lynx------50% i way outta line
Title: 50 50 capture
Post by: RELIC on January 11, 2007, 03:43:46 PM
I agree.  I preferred the previous setup of 30%.
Title: 50 50 capture
Post by: Lusche on January 11, 2007, 04:13:06 PM
I concur, 50% is too much.
Title: 50 50 capture
Post by: DREDger on January 11, 2007, 04:25:44 PM
Didn't realize it had changed.  But in agrreement, 50 to much
Title: 50 50 capture
Post by: viper215 on January 11, 2007, 04:47:09 PM
50% is wack man lol
Title: 50 50 capture
Post by: Vudak on January 11, 2007, 05:14:59 PM
Heaven forbid something be hard...

Take down the fighter hangers!

Fly the fastest plane, constantly in one direction!

Don't make taking the maps a challenge!

What's next, armor the goons?

:rolleyes:
Title: 50 50 capture
Post by: john9001 on January 11, 2007, 06:25:54 PM
the fighter town dweebs are taking over.
Title: 50 50 capture
Post by: Meatwad on January 11, 2007, 06:30:55 PM
I thought it was just fine the way it was back in AH1. If your country wanted to win the war, you had to work down to the last base.


Also porking a field down to 25% fuel was pretty nice too
Title: 50 50 capture
Post by: Booz on January 11, 2007, 09:30:07 PM
50/50 makes the 2 country double team less viable, I'm for it
Title: 50 50 capture
Post by: LYNX on January 11, 2007, 10:43:52 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Booz
50/50 makes the 2 country double team less viable, I'm for it


I appreciate your sentiments especially if your a knight in these times.  However, I feel it will lead to a form of stagnation in that everyone, including the Knights, will relish the Skuzzy reset.  I can't see any one particular side resetting in the near future.  Sure, it's not impossible.  Folk will adapt in time I guess.  

Vudak we had 33% which was do-able with some juggling but 50 50 is way out there in my opinion.  35% to 40% would be more like it just so there is a chance of a team reset in one week.  As you are aware with all the time zones and player base around the planet, what you take in your game day is recaptured in your work or sleep period.  So hard to stay on top and 50 50 with 4 uncapturables never had those before, makes the prospect of the tooth fairy a reality.
Title: What he said
Post by: 4deck on January 11, 2007, 11:48:18 PM
Too much
Title: 50 50 capture
Post by: sonic23 on January 12, 2007, 12:04:00 AM
50/50 is to much