Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: ForrestS on January 20, 2007, 08:56:03 PM
-
I think it would be kinda cool if we could have CG4A Waco gliders. Think of it, you get towed up to 20,000 feet and u get to glide down to the enemy base and make a landing right on there runway if the ack is down. I think that would be cool. Especially cause i like flying the me163 just cause it glides really good after the gas is out.
http://www.wingsoverkansas.com/photos/historic-i/waco-cg-4a-glider.jpg(http://www.wingsoverkansas.com/photos/historic-i/waco-cg-4a-glider.jpg)
-
good idea,but if the acks up when u attempt this ur dead meat:eek:
-
its been requested before , why make the C-47 slower than it already is?
-
cause noone will hear u coming in a glider:noid
-
Originally posted by Wes14
cause noone will hear u coming in a glider:noid
Fly to 20K in a C-47, cut the engine and glide in. Have fun.
-
Didn't the C-47 used to tow gliders, back before formations? Or was that the Ar234? I swear I once saw something towing 2 gliders. This was a long time ago, though.
-
This sounds like a "Totally Boss" way to get shot down...
Of course a new flavor of whine would add texture to the game...
-
its also an addation to the do insanely-dumb stuff with planes:D
if this idea is implemented u can amost bet that ull see me divebombing gliders into enemy planes taking off:lol :D
-
Thanks for replying :aok
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/31/Aerial_view_of_a_C-47_Dakota_as_it_tows_off_a_glider.jpg/464px-Aerial_view_of_a_C-47_Dakota_as_it_tows_off_a_glider.jpg)
-
They were used to carry troops behind enemy lines, correct? C47 does a better job without the glider, unless you just want a couple extra troops added for the drop or something.
-
If you think about it, the glider is mostly made of a wood frame surrounded by wood, and cloth. It could be used as a "Stealth Plane" because it wouldn't show up on radar. The glider could be useful because it wouldn't show up on radar, and you could sneak into an enemy base and capture it.
Up at 15k in your C47 with two other guys towing gliders and down low at 3k you have like 5 guys with C47s and no gliders and the guys at 15k release their gliders and the gliders fly on a different course then come from behind, land near the town, as the other 8 C47s get owned, and gliders land and drop there troops, because they didn't show up on radar and the base becomes yours.
Yes the C47 is faster and a better choice, but the glider can be used for "Stealth Missions" or used to supply maybe GVs on the ground as the C47 flys to another base to capture it, or to supply other GVs in a different area. I can see some use in the gliders. Maybe make it, if you land close to one of your guys in a GV and you hit tower, you land succesfully and you get some perks.
-
The Mossie is made of wood and cloth but it still shows up on radar. I'm just being cynical about the whole idea though.
-
It still has metal parts (the engines) and some other stuff. I'm just saying the glider wouldn't just show up on the radar, but the Mossy would.
-
Originally posted by VooWho
It still has metal parts (the engines) and some other stuff. I'm just saying the glider wouldn't just show up on the radar, but the Mossy would.
What about the C-47 that towed it till it was a mile from landing site that would show up on radar:D
-
Not only the Mossie, Spits and Hurries were largely wood as well.
-
Originally posted by VooWho
Up at 15k in your C47 with two other guys towing gliders and down low at 3k you have like 5 guys with C47s and no gliders and the guys at 15k release their gliders and the gliders fly on a different course then come from behind, land near the town, as the other 8 C47s get owned, and gliders land and drop there troops, because they didn't show up on radar and the base becomes yours.
I highly doubt that would work in an MA arena with a terrain such as ndisles. MA folks know that if there is an attempt to capture a base you need to watch the map room(s) for any moving creatures. Plus with the ID tags still working, I don't think a glider would get far not being seen by radar.
-
I think this is a fantastic idea. I posted a thread on this last month, but didn't get much suport.
People seemed to fixated on how it would make C-47's more slow and that was a bad thing. I felt that if the pilot was ok with that, then so be it no big deal.
My idea was when someone 'joined' the C-47 pilot, they would then be in the seat of the glider and could release and fly down, land glider and let troops out.
Would take a good deal of effort to program this, so I've been saving up for that expensive bottle of scotch to send to HTC with my request.
Cheers
-
Originally posted by VooWho
It still has metal parts (the engines) and some other stuff. I'm just saying the glider wouldn't just show up on the radar, but the Mossy would.
Gliders have a lot of metal in them as well...... support structures, the landing gear, control wires, fasteners......heck the weapons inside the plane carried by the troops.
They might not have quite as strong a radar signature compared to similarly sized plane, but still easily detectable by radar.
Besides, in-game, we'd see the dot miles out, and the red icon at 6K (since you can't fly a glider on the deck like a goon). Survivability chances = 0%.
Want to experiment, try the suggestion of lifting a light goon, 25% fuel, then glide into your target.... see how well you do.
-
Originally posted by tedrbr
Want to experiment, try the suggestion of lifting a light goon, 25% fuel, then glide into your target.... see how well you do.
Being from a not so active gaming section, it's still a terrible tradgedy when you attempt to glide.
-
If u take them up to 30,000 and if your a good pilot u should be able to detach from the C47 a pretty good distance away and still make it. They should make it where the gliders tags dont show up. That would be cool.:)
Thats the only thing we don't have in AH is gliders.
Wingspan 11.0 m (36 ft)
Length 6.4 m (21 ft)
Height 3.0 m (10 ft)
Weight Empty, 101 kg (225 lb)
The airspeed could not exceed a maximum of 105 kph (65 mph).
A pilot could expect the machine to take off and touch down at 32 kph (20 mph) and to glide 4.2 m (14 ft) horizontally for every 0.3 m (1 ft) of altitude loss.
(http://free.prohosting.com/mawey/images/39.jpg)
-
Remember forrests, unless you have oxygen you will start getting hypoxia at higher elevations.
I think FAA requires oxgen above 12.5k for a percentage of hour at that elevation, and full time above 15k or something (been a while since I studied that regulation)
In WW2 I dont think those gliders were ever towed above 10k, but I'm just guessing.
-
Originally posted by ForrestS
Thats the only thing we don't have in AH is gliders.
We don't have seaplanes either and I'd rather see those first (PBY Catalina).
-
The only reason to add gliders to this game (accept for scenario purposes, but they were not generally -- if ever -- risked where an air2air threat was remotely likely) is if they can perform a task that the C-47 can't. So, what unique uses could they be used for? In addition to carrying troops, they could carry cargo, jeeps, artillery pieces, and (occasionally) light armored vehicles. They also had the attribute of costing a fraction of what a C-47 did, and could be piloted by minimally trained soldiers (a dozen hours of flight time versus hundreds for a powered a/c pilot). Remember also that C-47's were worth their weight in gold, according to Eisenhower and Kenny, who both felt the Skytrain was the most important air asset to their repective theaters. So, where does that leave us? Here's what I suggest...
1) Perk the C-47, such that it becomes the high-value asset it really was. Not real high, maybe 10 or so points, so that they're still relatively affordable...just not so expendable. They would still be capable of all the current payloads.
2) Add gliders (zero perk cost). With a glide ratio of 14:1, as suggested by Forrest's data, taking one up to 10K before releasing it would give it a maximum gliding range of 26.5 miles; that's better than one sector, and enough to keep the C-47 out of the most hazardus airspace around the target. It would be capable of all the same tasks as a C-47, but could also carry:
3a) 2 Jeeps or 1 halftrack (with any currently available options);
3b) 1 Jeep with a towed howetzer;
3c) 1 M-8, with glide ratio cut in half (i.e. 7:1).
With these additions, the glider has a unique purpose, with built in incentive to choose it over a Goon. Plus, it would open up interesting capture dynamics, where spawn camping the GV spawn points is no longer a sure-fire way to prevent a ground assault.
-
Originally posted by VooWho
It still has metal parts (the engines) and some other stuff. I'm just saying the glider wouldn't just show up on the radar, but the Mossy would.
Radar is not a metal detector, it bounces microwaves off objects. The
slab sided gliders would give a pretty fair return.
-
Rino is correct, as far as he goes. However, since I believe the gliders had fabric skins, they would in fact reflect almost nothing. However, the frame and all the stuff under that fabric would potentially provide a fairly sizable radar return. All objects have an electromagetic reflectivity (call it r) and, its inverse, electromagnetic transmissivity (call this t). Metal has an r = ~1.0 and a t = ~ 0.0, meaning all energy is reflected and none transmitted through the metal. Even wood has an r > 0, but with the radars of WWII the range at which a usuable return comes back from wood is much less than for metal object of the same shape. However, any metal objects inside the glider will act as reflector, and can give a return even worse than if the skin were metal; this is dependent on the shape and orientation (with respect to the radar's polarization) of the skin versus the scattering object. That is not to say the Waco will have as large a return as a similarly sized metal-skinned a/c; rather it is possible that its return could still be significant.
Stealth a/c don't hide from radar by absorbing EM energy, or by allowing it to pass through it. Rather, 80-85% of radar signature reduction is accomplished with the shape of the skin, which is designed to control the direction radar waves bounce off it. The idea is to prevent a return from reflecting back to the radar station that it came from. The skin is reflective on purpose, to hide all the metal frame, engines, wiring, and of course the pilot's ego (the most visible component :)). Radar absorbing materials (RAM) are only used to control second order scattering that can't be controlled by the basic airframe shape.
-
Wow, Sabre really did a good job up there on his description, I'm sold.
So what he says, but with;
1. 10 troops as well (maybe that goes w/o saying)
2. No perk on C-47...eeek, nobody would fly goons in my missions.
-
Thanks, Dredger. Yeah, number (2) states that glider could carry same payload options as C-47, in addition to 3a,b, and c. Regarding perks, 10 may be too high (or not; hard to say without trying it), but I think some kind of nominal perk value would make their worth more in line with history. Perhaps add a new perk catagory, called "Combat Support", so as not to burn buff or fighter perks. The added capabilities might be enough to get the gliders used, but I think the nominal perk cost for Goons is still worth considering.
-
Sabre your idea seems so well thought out(and what I want as well) I hate to disagree on the perk thing. Perhaps some nominal amount as you say.
I know they were valuable to the war effort, but I think the USA cranked those things out like nobodies business at the time. I guess what I am getting at is, it doesn't seem a C-47 would be as difficult, industrially speaking, as creating at 262 or any other perked planes; presumably requiring more expensive parts and being labor intensive (just my gut, can't back up with facts)
One more thing about your plan
-The C-47 would get to tow two(2) gliders right?:aok
Now we just need to throw in together on that bottle of scotch for HTC.
-
Two gliders seems good to me. Once it lands, the pilot could roll out the GV, if that's what he/she was carrying. Count me in for half the cost of that bottle, my friend. Regarding perks, as I said, the unique abilities of gliders I've suggested may be enough to dispense with perking the C-47. I guess it's something that would have to be tried to know for sure.
From a historical perspective, the shortage of transport a/c was not a function of their difficulty to produce. Instead, it had to do with the fact that they were in such high demand, coupled with competition with the fighter and bomber mafias for available industrial capacity and strategic resources. There simply were never enough to satisfy all the theaters, and they were so useful to everyone. While they were built in relatively high numbers, their high operational and strategic value made them assets that commanders didn't knowngly risk if you could avoid it. The D-Day invasion was one such instance, but even then the air-to-air threat was minimal and the drops were made in the pre-dawn darkness.
As far as perk planes and vehicle in AH, my understanding of why they're perked is because of their impact on gameplay (due to their performance), rather than how rare they were. In any case, I'd be happy either way, so peace.:aok
-
I've taken a couple of bases, by landing a C47 near the town. Once under fire. After I landed, The Mustang that was dogging me went after something else. A glider could be used this way. It would be a tough, so it should award high perks.
-
Originally posted by BaldEagl
Fly to 20K in a C-47, cut the engine and glide in. Have fun.
lol bald...its the easy way
-
no real point in gliders.....sure...fun for a while...but it will become a hanger queen, only if it carried GV, jeep or somthing, then it might be used, another thing is, it would be a risk to take one up, because you kill the glider 1st (in process of towing to 5-10K) , thats 1 kill. The c47 is another. Thats 2 right there
-
Thanks every1 mainly, sabre for replying to my post. Yeah i heard about the gliders on D-day. They came in under the darkness of night. I heard a lot of them wrecked though. Anyways it would be sweet to have a plane to carry vehicles, just fly in and land around 30 mph and let a m-3 out. And if radar was a problem u could just use only troops unless you knew no one was in the area.
Could u give me a percentage on how likely it will be for gliders to be in AH2
(http://www.315group.org/309history_files/image024.jpg):D
-
with HTC?
id say 1% chance
idk, maybe someday
i believe they were a later invention
-
Originally posted by VooWho
It still has metal parts (the engines) and some other stuff. I'm just saying the glider wouldn't just show up on the radar, but the Mossy would.
The Mossie had a low radar signature, lower than the Spitfire due to it's wooden construction. Some even consider it the first "stealth" plane.
ack-ack
-
Originally posted by RAIDER14
What about the C-47 that towed it till it was a mile from landing site
w00t. I cant wait to put my 8 hours flying gliders to work here. You give me 20k, I can take that glider 25 miles. Keep in mind they had a glide ratio of like 20:1. Thats not the best but its good enough. I like this idea, that they wouldnt show up on radar OR make a base flash. That would be a great idea. Perhaps we can have B-17Gs tow them. Its not historically accurate, but picture this: 4 pilots. 3 B-17G pilots, 1 glider pilot. 3 blips on radar, climb to 28k (the blips are the 17s, one of which is towing the glider) they bomb the base and town, and appear to be n00bs bombing a base 100 miles from the front lines. They drop their bombs and release the glider. Me-163s and ta-152s intercept the bombers and kill them. Base stops flashing, they land their kills and leave. 10 minutes later, base is mysteriously captured with no flashes. Horsa Glider is t3h 1337!!! And imagine the Gigant...
-
Also, during world war two, my grandfather was a fighter pilot, P-38s I beleive. But after they finished training, but before they were deployed, for some reason their squadron was dissasembled. They were given the option of becoming test pilots or assault glider pilots. Every one except my grandfather decided to become a Glider pilot. My granddad became a tes pilot, while all of his old buddies flew gliders into D-Day. Only one landed, and even fewer survived.
-
Originally posted by Serenity
w00t. I cant wait to put my 8 hours flying gliders to work here. You give me 20k, I can take that glider 25 miles. Keep in mind they had a glide ratio of like 20:1. Thats not the best but its good enough. I like this idea, that they wouldnt show up on radar OR make a base flash. That would be a great idea. Perhaps we can have B-17Gs tow them. Its not historically accurate, but picture this: 4 pilots. 3 B-17G pilots, 1 glider pilot. 3 blips on radar, climb to 28k (the blips are the 17s, one of which is towing the glider) they bomb the base and town, and appear to be n00bs bombing a base 100 miles from the front lines. They drop their bombs and release the glider. Me-163s and ta-152s intercept the bombers and kill them. Base stops flashing, they land their kills and leave. 10 minutes later, base is mysteriously captured with no flashes. Horsa Glider is t3h 1337!!! And imagine the Gigant...
about the b17 thing, it could be 2 for 1, b17s could bomb the base, then the glider could come in, (if all the acks were down)
-
Thanks yeah the b17 wouldent be accurate but o well, it still would be really fun. Do u like gliders like i do.(I LOVE THEM) thanks for replying
:aok
-
id be fun to fly sometimes (the c47 does get boring)
-
I think I saw a "Wings" on Discovery channel or History channel about German Gliders being towed by bombers. I don't recall if the bombers were loaded with bombs, though. Maybe that would even the Germans up on AH, if they had cargo and troops from the air.
-
'Wings Over the Luftwaffe is what you saw it on, I believe.
Historicly, a B17, or later B24 towed a glider..most of the time a C47 would tow them though
-
Originally posted by Ack-Ack
The Mossie had a low radar signature, lower than the Spitfire due to it's wooden construction. Some even consider it the first "stealth" plane.
ack-ack
To the best of my knowledge, the claim that the Mosquito had a smaller radar signature than the Spitfire is anecdotal, rather than factual. It is most likely based on an incomplete understanding of radar and radar signatures. Depending on the wavelength and aspect (the direction the radar beam intersects the target from) the Mossie quite possibly had a significantly larger radar cross-section (RCS) than a Spitfire. While the skin and frame were wood (which has a lower reflectivity than metal, but not zero reflectivity), that simply means that all the “ugly” reflectors inside the skin – such as engines, fuel tanks, fuel and hydraulic lines, wires, control cables, guns, ammo, armor plate to name but a few – are all visible to the radar, and contribute to the RCS. Instead of getting a rather sizable but narrow specular return from the skin, all those individual reflectors inside the skin add together. The result is a radar return that is somewhat lower in amplitude in some directions, but is on average nearly just as large.
Did the Mosquito have a lower RCS than a metal-skinned aircraft of comparable size? Probably. Smaller than a Spitfire? I’ve been unable to locate any actual RCS measurements of both to compare them, but my professional opinion is that it is unlikely. Without going into details, my thesis was, shall we say, related to the topic.
On a historical note, the Mossie’s unusual construction had nothing to due with RCS reduction (an as yet little considered question in 1938). Rather it was a brilliant idea to tap into an under-utilized segment of the workforce, using non-strategic materials, to construct very fast and light combat plane. The RAF didn’t want anything to do with the project…until De Havilland showed them the specs on the Mosquito.
If I ever get to another AH Con, and there is sufficient interest, I would happily host a discussion on radar and RCS measurement and reduction (a.k.a. "stealth").