Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Tango on February 06, 2007, 08:20:16 PM

Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Tango on February 06, 2007, 08:20:16 PM
Just wondering.
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Ack-Ack on February 06, 2007, 08:21:33 PM
Because HiTech doesn't like you.



ack-ack
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Krusty on February 06, 2007, 10:13:09 PM
DANGIT!!! Hitech said that if we could go for 10 days without anybody asking, we'd get it next update, but if we couldn't keep quiet we'd never get it! This was DAY 9!!!


Thanks a LOT, man!! :furious :furious :furious
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: rabbidrabbit on February 06, 2007, 10:32:59 PM
its 14 days not 10.. get it straight!
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Mark Luper on February 06, 2007, 10:33:20 PM
I beleive when the game was in it's infancy it was decided to come up with a "different" two engined bomber than the B-25. Seems like at the time everyone had a B-25, noone had the B-26. In fact, I remember thinking the B-26 would be the one to have vrs the B-25. Pyro agreed with that so we got the B-26. I'm not saying that I had anything to do with it, Pyro and I just happened to think the same thing at the same time.

I would like to see the B-25 but it is slower than the B-26 and not near as sexy ;)

Mark
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Fianna on February 06, 2007, 10:36:38 PM
I'd rather have an A-26 than a B-25, although both would be nice.
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Krusty on February 06, 2007, 10:49:35 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Mark Luper
I beleive when the game was in it's infancy it was decided to come up with a "different" two engined bomber than the B-25.


I think that applies to several choices made in the first generation of aircraft, like having the G-10, which was K-4 data (WB had a K-4) but with 20mm, gondolas, and rockets, to simulate the G-10 options.

I think there are a handful that were chosen "just to be different".
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: hubsonfire on February 06, 2007, 11:23:18 PM
While I can respect that, since HTC has made "those other games" look like a bunch of mooks, maybe it's time to add a few "bbs dork favorites" despite the fact that they were used in now defunct games. Like, as an example, the B-25, the P-39, the SeaHurri, the A-26, or anything else that I personally would like to have.
Title: Re: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Ball on February 07, 2007, 01:19:26 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Tango
Just wondering.


Only aircraft which served in WWII can make the cut, sorry!!!1! :furious
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: dtango on February 07, 2007, 08:09:53 AM
Just guessing but for WarBirds Pyro and HT had created the B-25 so it might have been to avoid potential issues with WB.

BTW- having multiple Tango's is now getting a bit confusing!!! :rolleyes:

Tango, XO
412th FS Braunco Mustangs
Title: Re: Re: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Slash27 on February 07, 2007, 09:58:41 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Ball
Only aircraft which served in WWII can make the cut, sorry!!!1! :furious


but...:huh
Title: Re: Re: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Donzo on February 07, 2007, 10:38:12 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Ball
Only aircraft which served in WWII can make the cut, sorry!!!1! :furious


huh? :huh
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Tango on February 07, 2007, 04:36:15 PM
Quote
BTW- having multiple Tango's is now getting a bit confusing!!! :rolleyes:

Tango, XO
412th FS Braunco Mustangs [/B]


I'm not confused. I'm the XO of the 78th Intruders. :D

Actually my in game tag is Tango78.
Title: Re: Re: Re: Why no B-25?????
Post by: 715 on February 07, 2007, 08:22:44 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Ball  
Only aircraft which served in WWII can make the cut, sorry!!!1!

Quote
Originally posted by Donzo
huh? :huh


Maybe he's dyslexic and was thinking B52?
Title: Re: Re: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Mark Luper on February 07, 2007, 09:17:44 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Ball
Only aircraft which served in WWII can make the cut, sorry!!!1! :furious


B-25 IS WWII or did you possibly read it wrong?

Mark
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: megadud on February 07, 2007, 09:32:29 PM
i think ball was thinking....i don't know what the hell he was thinking.

but he is retarded so maybe that has something to do with it.
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Tango on February 07, 2007, 09:32:36 PM
Not having a B-25 in a WW2 sim is like not having the Zero in a Pearl Harbor movie.
Title: Re: Re: Re: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Slash27 on February 07, 2007, 10:21:37 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Mark Luper
B-25 IS WWII or did you possibly read it wrong?

Mark


Ball was being a wise ass:D
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: tedrbr on February 07, 2007, 11:01:40 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Fianna
I'd rather have an A-26 than a B-25, although both would be nice.



What he said!  Though.... not so much that second part....   :D
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Ball on February 08, 2007, 03:36:33 AM
B-25 wasnt in WWII :mad:
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Keiler on February 08, 2007, 05:09:52 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-25_Mitchell
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: blkmgc on February 08, 2007, 05:16:08 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Ball
B-25 wasnt in WWII :mad:


uh....ooooo..k..:huh


Anywho, I'd take the defensive  armament of a B25 H for low attack opps anyday over the A20's speed. Adding in parafrags and skip bombs would just be a bonus. :D
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: TexInVa on February 08, 2007, 05:19:15 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Ball
B-25 wasnt in WWII :mad:


Are you sure you aren't thinking B-52?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-25_Mitchell


opps... too slow
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Tango on February 08, 2007, 05:31:38 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Ball
B-25 wasnt in WWII :mad:


What did Doolittle and his men fly off that carrier?

http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/events/wwii-pac/misc-42/doolt-a.htm
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: NHawk on February 08, 2007, 05:56:57 AM
All of the photos of Dolittle's raid were doctored to hide what they were really flying. The B25 never served in WWII, this is what they were actually flying...

(http://www.brewsterbuffalos.com/htc/XWING.jpg)
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Ball on February 08, 2007, 06:54:02 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Tango
What did Doolittle and his men fly off that carrier?

http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/events/wwii-pac/misc-42/doolt-a.htm


I am nto good at trivia.  flying fortresses?
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: SuperDud on February 08, 2007, 06:54:56 AM
B29 flying fortresses?
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Ball on February 08, 2007, 07:03:41 AM
yea!! what ^he sed"!
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Laurie on February 08, 2007, 07:37:47 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Mark Luper
I beleive when the game was in it's infancy it was decided to come up with a "different" two engined bomber than the B-25. Seems like at the time everyone had a B-25, noone had the B-26. In fact, I remember thinking the B-26 would be the one to have vrs the B-25. Pyro agreed with that so we got the B-26. I'm not saying that I had anything to do with it, Pyro and I just happened to think the same thing at the same time.

I would like to see the B-25 but it is slower than the B-26 and not near as sexy ;)

Mark


our one is as sexy as bush senior sitting in a pool of molten lard, lol
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Mark Luper on February 08, 2007, 05:09:08 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Laurie
our one is as sexy as bush senior sitting in a pool of molten lard, lol


I've always heard that beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.

:)

Mark
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Donzo on February 08, 2007, 09:37:55 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Ball
B-25 wasnt in WWII :mad:


Then what was it in?
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: FiLtH on February 08, 2007, 11:19:28 PM
Great pic Nhawk!
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: Raptor on February 09, 2007, 01:37:58 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Donzo
Then what was it in?

War of the Roses, duh! Everyone knows that...
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: nickf620 on February 09, 2007, 02:24:37 PM
Quote
Originally posted by NHawk
All of the photos of Dolittle's raid were doctored to hide what they were really flying. The B25 never served in WWII, this is what they were actually flying...

(http://www.brewsterbuffalos.com/htc/XWING.jpg)





omg i almost died laughing
Title: Why no B-25?????
Post by: oboe on February 09, 2007, 04:03:48 PM
IIRC, the B-26 was referred to as "the flying prostitute" because the aircraft had such a small wing and therefore high wingloading, the pilots claimed it had "no visible means of support".

Apparently during WWII at least, prostitutes were considered sexy.   But you didn't hear that from me. ;)