Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Ripsnort on February 15, 2007, 03:39:59 PM

Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: Ripsnort on February 15, 2007, 03:39:59 PM
Boeing announced today a big order for 27 767 Freighters for UPS. (actually they announced it a couple weeks ago, but finalized the deal today)

I've not been keeping up lately, but weren't these suppose to be A380 freighter orders? Anyone?

Boeing today confirmed an order by UPS for 27 Boeing 767-300 Freighters, which will nearly double the UPS 767 Freighter fleet. The order pushes the total number of 767s ordered to 1,005 airplanes, including 77 freighters. The new UPS airplanes are slated for delivery from 2009 through 2012. This is the third 767F order by UPS, the model's launch customer. "The Boeing 767-300ER Freighter already is part of our current air fleet and we know from experience what a great workhorse it is," said Bob Lekites, UPS vice president for Airline and International Operations.
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: eskimo2 on February 15, 2007, 03:43:37 PM
Only 77 out of 1,005 airplanes are Freighters?  What else would UPS do with planes?
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: Debonair on February 15, 2007, 05:36:42 PM
they should get the one with the kewl wingtips
then the could be all like :cool: :cool: :cool: duuuude check out my wingtips :aok :aok :aok :cool: :cool:
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: Bodhi on February 15, 2007, 05:39:32 PM
Quote
Originally posted by eskimo2
Only 77 out of 1,005 airplanes are Freighters?  What else would UPS do with planes?


I think you are misunderstanding the total orders for 767's ordered by all customers.
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: Ripsnort on February 15, 2007, 05:43:02 PM
I think he's pointing out bad penmanship by the story writer...it should have read "The order pushes the total number of 767s ordered to 1,005 airplanes, including 77 freighters ordered by UPS."

Course I could be wrong, he is, after all, an native Alaskan. :D
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: eskimo2 on February 15, 2007, 06:34:18 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Bodhi
I think you are misunderstanding the total orders for 767's ordered by all customers.


That makes more sense; I read it wrong.
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: AquaShrimp on February 15, 2007, 07:13:09 PM
I work for UPS at the main airhub, heres the scoop:

According to the official company line, the 767s ordered are only being used to increase the capacity of medium and short distance cargo pathways.  The A380s are still being considered to increase long distance (trans-pacific) cargo pathways.  However, the A380 delays are causing alot of frustration as UPS is expanding and growing at a very high rate.

So UPS is going to be buying planes no matter what, and it looks like the A380 is still going to be purchased.
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: Ripsnort on February 15, 2007, 07:19:32 PM
Quote
Originally posted by AquaShrimp
I work for UPS at the main airhub, heres the scoop:

According to the official company line, the 767s ordered are only being used to increase the capacity of medium and short distance cargo pathways.  The A380s are still being considered to increase long distance (trans-pacific) cargo pathways.  However, the A380 delays are causing alot of frustration as UPS is expanding and growing at a very high rate.

So UPS is going to be buying planes no matter what, and it looks like the A380 is still going to be purchased.

Thanks for the update.
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: john9001 on February 15, 2007, 07:36:36 PM
Quote
Originally posted by AquaShrimp

So UPS is going to be buying planes no matter what, and it looks like the A380 is still going to be purchased.


which will happen first, AH's CT arena launched or the first A380 delivered?
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: Viking on February 15, 2007, 08:21:10 PM
Awww ... Poor Ripsnort. Better luck next time! :aok
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: Ripsnort on June 18, 2007, 12:36:13 PM
Quote
Originally posted by LambChop
According to the Singapore Airlines website, the first A380s will be delivered to them in October 2007. I read that today. Details of the contract may have been amended, but remain a private matter between Airbus and SIA.


Beet1e's back.
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: Chairboy on June 18, 2007, 12:51:19 PM
Competition means better products.  This is a positive development for the people that matter, the end users.
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: Yeager on June 18, 2007, 01:12:29 PM
which will happen first, AH's CT arena launched or the first A380 delivered?
====
Im confident the euros are going to take this one.
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: Ripsnort on June 18, 2007, 01:16:11 PM
This thread is 4 months old.
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: moot on June 18, 2007, 01:22:14 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
This thread is 4 months old.

Not old enough for trolls to neglect.. Beggars can't be choosers.
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: Ripsnort on June 18, 2007, 01:27:20 PM
Quote
Originally posted by LambChop
LOL! I was confident of that back in 2004, and said so in a poll on Mr. DoubleStandard's BBS. (I've since been banned from there - simply for quoting something Lazs said, many moons ago)
How's that stock investment in EADS doing Beet? ;)
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: john9001 on June 18, 2007, 02:05:20 PM
does airbus still glue their tails on the planes and then limit pilots from making "excessive movements" of the control surfaces?
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: Chairboy on June 18, 2007, 02:43:28 PM
The 747 tail is "glued" together too, has been since the beginning.  I prefer Boeing, but I'd rather it wins on its own merits, not misunderstanding.
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: Ripsnort on June 18, 2007, 03:04:59 PM
Quote
Originally posted by john9001
does airbus still glue their tails on the planes and then limit pilots from making "excessive movements" of the control surfaces?
To be fair, all airline manufacturers have had their fair share of design problems. Airbus is not alone in design flaws.
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: john9001 on June 18, 2007, 04:17:53 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Chairboy
The 747 tail is "glued" together too, has been since the beginning.  I prefer Boeing, but I'd rather it wins on its own merits, not misunderstanding.


the 747 uses different glue.
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: culero on June 18, 2007, 04:47:29 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
Beet1e's back.


Has he stopped beating up women? :)
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: Holden McGroin on June 18, 2007, 09:32:54 PM
Airbus enjoyed a good home field advantage in Paris...

Quote
entire article (http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/320314_airshow19.html) But by the end of the day, Airbus said it had received orders or commitments for 339 planes worth about $43 billion at list prices.

It was a very good day for Airbus, highlighted by the long-awaited decision from US Airways on whether it would choose the A350 XWB from Airbus or the 787.  
Title: OOPS! er, I mean, UPS--Weren't these supposed to be Airbus A380 orders?
Post by: DiabloTX on June 18, 2007, 09:49:42 PM
What ever happend to Debonair, btw?

He's been awfully quiet the last couple of months.