Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Yeager on February 19, 2007, 12:02:26 PM
-
Your doing amazing things with this war on terror. They will write songs about you and praise your decisionating capacabilities.....
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/19/world/asia/19intel.html?ei=5065&en=58e0a514945fef35&ex=1172552400&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print
Seriously folks, what should good old Georgie do about the tribal lands in Pakistan? Get Muskratsherriff to go hunt em down and smoke em out???
-
For all of GWB's faults, you'd think the Dem's would have had someone "smarter" or "brighter" than he is. 1st time around, said Democrat couldn't win his home state (which was conveniently forgotten by the Butterfly Ballets). The 2nd time around "someone who didn't want to discuss Vietnam, brought up Vietnam every chance he could.
-
On the other hand, the GOP played the electorate like a flute with their campaign. They knew the public considered the DNC to be weak on security and they cashed in on it.
-
Gotta wonder why the electorate considered the DNC to be weak on security; could be that history thing, I guess.
Ya pack rats into a small area in a high concentration they go all weird and freaky. Pretty much explains the last two election maps to me. :)
-
Yeager, what would you do ? invade Pakistan?
once more , all you have is criticism, but nothing constructive to add.
tell us , how would you get bin laden out of pakastan?
oh, i know, you would send in 500,000 troops that you don't have.
-
nice try john keep working at it.
-
The U.S. can't go into the region of Pakistan, even if we had the numbers because Pakistan said no we can't go in there with soldiers or planes. If we invaded Pakistan might see insurgencies using car bombs in their cities and the people of Pakistan would go Anti America and Pakistan might be forced to fight us to keep peace within their country. Who knows maybe NATO will go in but I dought it. What I would do personaly is drop MOAB bombs on those training camps.
-
Originally posted by Toad
Gotta wonder why the electorate considered the DNC to be weak on security; could be that history thing, I guess.
You're going to have to be more specific than that.
-
Well, how could they possibly get that reputation?
I know! Karl Rove used mind control! Has to be it.
It couldn't possibly be that the Dem's ARE weak in the national security area.
-
Thanks.
-
Originally posted by Yeager
Your doing amazing things with this war on terror. They will write songs about you and praise your decisionating capacabilities.....
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/19/world/asia/19intel.html?ei=5065&en=58e0a514945fef35&ex=1172552400&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print
Seriously folks, what should good old Georgie do about the tribal lands in Pakistan? Get Muskratsherriff to go hunt em down and smoke em out???
Musharaff is hanging on by a thread (remember the assassination plot?) in a country who's majority approves of 'honor' killings and the idea of killing western 'non-believers'--this is as good as we are gonna get out of them
-
George The Buck Stops Here has around 300 million other Americans whose wisdom surely affects his decisions in some manner. Yet he is blamed for most everything and credited for little.
If solutions to the world's vexing problems were so easy, surely we would have heard many of them by now.
Regarding villains, the problem is many have refuges that for one reason or the other we cannot get to except through perhaps the most clandestine ways. And when/if done that way, the results will be unknown to most of us for years and maybe forever.
For example, if Osama is ever zonked, would it will be blared all over the world? Trigger successors or demonstrations or riots?
Maybe smarter not to tell if/when Osama is taken out? If he ever is. :noid
-
http://www.break.com/index/screwing_the_country.html
-
The Islamic militants have been comitting acts of war on us directly since 1979. We are just now starting to return the favor. I cannot stand GWB but even though the war on terror has been mishandled at least we are fighting back on a greater scale.
Personally I like the fact that Iraq has become such a magnet for all of those terrorist wannabe fighters... It sorta makes Iraq our giant Terrorist A-Hole bug zapper... They come from far and wide just to get zapped by uncle sam...
We have taken some losses in Iraq and it is a shame that plenty of them have been needless from lack of equipment or poor tactics... I do not mean to belittle the loss of even one American life but the truth is here in World War 4 (I count the cold war as #3) Our losses have been paltry compared to what we have inflicted upon the enemy.
Partial list of their actions since 1979:
*** In 1979,the U.S. embassy in Iran was taken over
*** During the 1980's a number of Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon
*** In 1981, Pope John Paul II was shot 4 times in an assasination attempt
*** In 1983, the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up
*** In 1985 the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked, and a 70 year old American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard
*** In 1985 TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens, and a U.S. Navy diver was murdered
*** In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed
*** In 1993 the World Trade Center was bombed the first time
*** In 1996 19 Americans were killed and hundreds more woulded at
the U.S. Military complex at Khobar Towers, Saudi Arabia
*** In 1998, the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed
*** In 2000, The USS Cole was attacked and more than 15 American Sailors were killed
*** On 9/11/01, four airliners were hijacked and destroyed and thousands of people were killed
*** In 2002 reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and murdered
*** On July 4th 2002, 2 Innocent Airline Passengers Were Killed, And 3 Others Injured at the ticket counter of El Al Airlines in the LAX International terminal
*** On October 12th 2002 more than 200 innocent civilians (including 200 Australians and 5 Americans) were brutally murdered
We have had ENOUGH of these guys over the years and we tried hard to play nice with them, to do business with them but you see what has happened, they have continued and we are killing them since that is the only thing they understand... I don't want anyone to come back home until the job is DONE and the militant islamic movement grinds to a halt.
Islam : The Religion of Peace
(Believe it - Or Else!)
-
Hey..Clinton tried to fight back...remember the aspirin factory we lobbed some missiles at? THAT showed em we meant business:aok
-
Originally posted by bj229r
Hey..Clinton tried to fight back...remember the aspirin factory we lobbed some missiles at? THAT showed em we meant business:aok
They were trained and briefed repeatedly to instill accuracy. Under no circumstances were they to hit the cigar rolling facility nearby.
-
Sadly I think VooWho is right. There will be no way for us to increase the hunting of terrorists within Pakistan with out undermining Musharaff and risk a nuclear armed country falling into the hands of a bunch of Islamic nut jobs... The only option I can see would be a NATO strike. Or, talk Russia into doing it for us, which I highly doubt they'd consider.
-
Originally posted by Yeager
Your doing amazing things with this war on terror. They will write songs about you and praise your decisionating capacabilities.....
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/19/world/asia/19intel.html?ei=5065&en=58e0a514945fef35&ex=1172552400&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print
Seriously folks, what should good old Georgie do about the tribal lands in Pakistan? Get Muskratsherriff to go hunt em down and smoke em out???
btw yeager, you are quick to criticize, but what is your "big plan" to stop them there? Maybe you would send a UN fact finding mission?
-
Bush should send his buddy Yeager over there so Yeager can come back and tell the rest of us how to proceed ...
-
yeah yeager, how dare you have an opinion.
-
look guys. This is all my opinion, but Bush has mismanaged this war grossly, not just in the average to be expected manner. The fact that he fired rumsfled the very next day after losing the mid term elections simply confirmed for me what had been an ever building suspicion that he (bush) really was a not too bright simpleton operating in a tragically complex world. Bush is not the one needed to lead this country. He has proven his worth and he is unworthy, in my opinion.
The only real option now is John McCain.
http://www.johnmccain.com/
-
It's funny. 6 months ago he was one of you guys lobbing witty insults.
-
Originally posted by Bodhi
btw yeager, you are quick to criticize, but what is your "big plan" to stop them there? Maybe you would send a UN fact finding mission?
Yeager...quick to criticize????!!!
Holy crap! Yeager supported Bush for years! It's only recently that he's changed his tune.
"good speech
things are looking up in Iraq, the sunnis are even starting to come to their senses.
For months the democrats have been pounding on Bush about his failed iraq policy...now that the policy appears to be working they are attacking the patriot act and the presidents authority to order emergency wiretaps on americans communicating with al qaeda. Im starting to think the democrats are being paid by OBL"
Yeager - Dec, 19, 2005
-
Originally posted by Yeager
...The only real option now is John McCain.
he wants it to bad. what is he willing to do/sell to get it?
-
Well I guess it ain't liberals the terrorists want in power, either :)
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A New York man accused of trying to help terrorists in Afghanistan has donated some $15,000 to the House Republicans' campaign committee over three years.
Abdul Tawala Ibn Ali Alishtari pleaded not guilty Friday in U.S. District Court in Manhattan to charges that include terrorism financing, material support of terrorism and money laundering.
From April 2002 until August 2004, the man also known as "Michael Mixon" gave donations ranging from $500 to $5,000 to the National Republican Congressional Committee, according to Federal Election Commission reports and two campaign donor tracking Web sites, http://www.politicalmoneyline.com and http://www.opensecrets.org.
The NRCC did not immediately return a phone message seeking comment Tuesday about whether it would return the donations.
In the federal indictment, the government said Alishtari, 53, of Ardsley, N.Y., accepted an unspecified amount of money to transfer $152,000 to Pakistan and Afghanistan to support an Afghanistan terrorist training camp. He also stands accused of causing the transfer of about $25,000 from a bank account in New York to an account in Montreal, money the government says was to be used to provide material support to terrorists.
Also, the indictment says, Alishtari schemed to defraud investors by obtaining millions of dollars in a loan investment scheme that he called the "Flat Electronic Data Interchange" and that promised high guaranteed rates of return. The charges carry a potential penalty of 95 years in prison.
Alishtari was detained pending a court appearance this week. Prosecutors said he was a danger to the community and a flight risk.
On campaign finance forms, Alishtari identified his occupation as either the owner, president or chief executive of a business called Global Protector Inc., or GlobalProtector.Net, Inc. In some filings he listed the business as being located in the Bronx and in other filings in Scarsdale, N.Y.
A resume listed in his name and posted on an MSN group Web site on Jan. 8, 2007, identifies him as being an "industrialist and philanthropist" and references previous connections to the Republican Party.
The resume says that in 2003 Alishtari was named a National Republican Senatorial Committee "Inner Circle Member for Life" and was appointed to the NRCC's "White House Business Advisory Committee." The resume also says Alishtari was named the NRCC's New York state businessman of the year in 2002 and 2003. The 2007 resume identifies him as the founder of IDPixie LLC, which is described as an "ID theft protection agency."
-
Damn straight, Yeager. You can't possibly be able to recognize that something is broken unless you also know how to fix it.
-
Redtail,
That's just the proof point created by a vast left wing conspiracy. :rolleyes:
:p
-
Originally posted by Toad
Well, how could they possibly get that reputation?
I know! Karl Rove used mind control! Has to be it.
It couldn't possibly be that the Dem's ARE weak in the national security area.
Please provide non oxyrush links to prove your point.
-
Originally posted by bj229r
Hey..Clinton tried to fight back...remember the aspirin factory we lobbed some missiles at? THAT showed em we meant business:aok
Yeah... That was almost as funny as the war in Iraq.........
-
Originally posted by Silat
Yeah... That was almost as funny as the war in Iraq.........
silat is upset the terrorists are losing the war in iraq and that means the democrats are losing the 2008 elections.
what to do...what to do...
-
Originally posted by Silat
Please provide non oxyrush links to prove your point.
As I said in the first post Sandy had trouble understanding, just link to history.
It's all there; start with them selling out the South Viets by cutting off all funding.
Doing stuff like that gets you the weak on defense reputation and they've continued to build their resume in the same fashion right up to the present day.
Did you see Schumer's statement?