Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: DREDIOCK on February 24, 2007, 03:21:29 PM
-
As whacky as she has become
I'm gonna haveta side with her on this one
I keep hoping someone puts a serious buttwhipping on one of these clowns. They are IMO among the lowest form of animal
Her only fault is she stopped and she didnt use a baseball bat
Spears goes nuts (http://youtube.com/watch?v=KUWckawfUNo)
Personallly I think any paparazzi caught following someone around like this should be charged,convicted and jailed with stalking and harrassment
-
Paparazzi = Lower than Pond Scum. Good for her.
-
i thinx suzanne lucci is long overdue for moar daytime emmies
-
They should have periodic paparazzi cullings in LA and New York.
-
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
Personallly I think any paparazzi caught following someone around like this should be charged,convicted and jailed with stalking and harrassment
i think they have to break a law before you can do that.
-
Originally posted by john9001
i think they have to break a law before you can do that.
Hmmm Lets see. if you or I followed someone around taking pictures wherever they went even after they asked you to stop. We'd be arrested and jailed on both counts
Why? you arent one of those scumbag paparazzi are you?
-
Paparazzi are scum. I don't envy that part of celebrity lives but they dang well knew it came with the territory. They seek fame and fortune, and they must take the negatives that come with it. They don't like it, get off the radar screen.
Britney Spears has obviously suffered a breakdown, probaby precipitated by some sort of addiction. It doesn't help that she was thrust into fame way to young, taken advantage of buy money hungry parasites. Of course, being a not very intelligent person hasn't helped her either.
-
Originally posted by Dago
Paparazzi are scum. I don't envy that part of celebrity lives but they dang well knew it came with the territory. They seek fame and fortune, and they must take the negatives that come with it. They don't like it, get off the radar screen.
Britney Spears has obviously suffered a breakdown, probaby precipitated by some sort of addiction. It doesn't help that she was thrust into fame way to young, taken advantage of buy money hungry parasites. Of course, being a not very intelligent person hasn't helped her either.
True. and they've always been there But it seems like in the old days they at least showed some amount of respect. or at least human decency
These dirtbags today have no couth whatsoever
Yanno what I would do if I were a celbrity.
Is hire someone to follow one of them around catch and take pictures of them in compromising positions. Then put them out for the media. :D
-
it's not illegal to photograph a celebrity in a public place.
-
Originally posted by john9001
it's not illegal to photograph a celebrity in a public place.
it should be illegal to photograph anybody without their consent.
-
Originally posted by john9001
it's not illegal to photograph a celebrity in a public place.
there is a difference between following someone all over the place and then jamming a camera in their faces and taking a million and one pictures and simply photographing someone in a public place.
the way they went about it I would consider an attempted assault and probably would have beat the guys brains in in self defence And when you follow someone all over creation.
Sorry but thats stalking.
You or I go to jail for that
-
You can take the girl out of the trailer park...
-
Originally posted by dmf
it should be illegal to photograph anybody without their consent.
I dont think the government would like that much.
shamus
-
I have more respect for her now, not that it's saying much.
Way to go girl... :aok
-
a public figure in a public place can be photographed for editorial purposes without their consent.
that is the law now, are some of you nanny state lovers saying you want to restrict a free press? don't we have enough laws now, you want more?
-
I don't believe its a problem to photograph a celebrity in public. That's one of the prices they pay for their profession. However, these "photographers" aren't out to get a shot. They're out to provoke the very kind of confrontation you see. It's over the line and unnecessary.
-
I wonder how many think it is okay for paparazzi to hide in the persons bushes to get photos of the celebrity and their children? That is common.
Or, to sit off with a huge lense and shoot pictures of them in thier own backyards at their own (private) pools. They do that too. Nothing is ever done about that.
How about chasing celebritys in cars? That has caused a few accidents, as the Princess Diana tragedy illustrated.
No, they are way over the top and thier behavior is closer to stalking and harrassing than "taking a picture in a public place".
Might be time to consider a law establishing some limits.
-
Originally posted by john9001
a public figure in a public place can be photographed for editorial purposes without their consent.
that is the law now, are some of you nanny state lovers saying you want to restrict a free press? don't we have enough laws now, you want more?
I bet if I tried to do that to the President I'd get shot by the SS. But it seems the media thinks their above the law. And who decides who the media is, does that stupid press pass some sort of Golden Key that makes you superior to everyone else?
P.S. And them taking pictures of their kids looks like pedophilia to me.
P.P.S. The media of today is the Nanny State.
-
Originally posted by Dago
They seek fame and fortune, and they must take the negatives that come with it. They don't like it, get off the radar screen.
That's about the size of it. But instead she runs around with Paris Hilton with her beaver hanging out for the world to see and wonder why the cameras are following. She's the one who needs to be beat, not the papparoni
-
Originally posted by Sixpence
That's about the size of it. But instead she runs around with Paris Hilton with her beaver hanging out for the world to see and wonder why the cameras are following. She's the one who needs to be beat, not the papparoni
Yeah, she hasn't exactly tried to go low profile.
I wonder if someday 20 years or so down the line (if she lives that long) if she will say "dang I was acting like a dumbarse"?
-
Originally posted by john9001
a public figure in a public place can be photographed for editorial purposes without their consent.
that is the law now, are some of you nanny state lovers saying you want to restrict a free press? don't we have enough laws now, you want more?
nope. less. repeal the laws that restrict people from pumelling paparazzi into mush when they act the way that they do.
-
It's a vicious circle. The paparazzi pay attention to Spears... and Spears continues to be a celebrity because of the paparazzi.
There's a simple solution... stay home.
-
Originally posted by Sandman
It's a vicious circle. The paparazzi pay attention to Spears... and Spears continues to be a celebrity because of the paparazzi.
There's a simple solution... stay home.
Well, pictures of a family going out to dinner or shopping once a week will get old after a few months and won't sell.
But hanging with the likes of paris hilton and running around in a mini with no underwear, well..
-
if i were a celeb id use my money and hire my own paparrazzi... to photograph the paparazzi at home, their kids at school, the owner of the paper and his family...
and id publish them.
it aint illegal right?
-
Originally posted by Tac
if i were a celeb id use my money and hire my own paparrazzi... to photograph the paparazzi at home, their kids at school, the owner of the paper and his family...
and id publish them.
it aint illegal right?
you'd have to pick just one, or a few to focus on in order for it work.
the worst of the worst.
-
Originally posted by Tac
if i were a celeb id use my money and hire my own paparrazzi... to photograph the paparazzi at home, their kids at school, the owner of the paper and his family...
and id publish them.
it aint illegal right?
No ****ing way. I had thought about this before (for when I become a politician) and this is the exact thing I would do.
-
Originally posted by john9001
a public figure in a public place can be photographed for editorial purposes without their consent.
that is the law now, are some of you nanny state lovers saying you want to restrict a free press? don't we have enough laws now, you want more?
Restrict a free press?
Only to the point where you cant go jamming a camera within arms reach of the person your photographing.
A free press should also be respectful of people and their privacy too
what these guys do is push that right to a free press to its verymost limit.
to the point where they it more closely resembles assaulting the person with the camera then it does simply taking their picture
you want to take a picture fine. Just stay back.
there is absolutely no reason why you have to get within 6 feet of someone to take their picture let alone inches, or 2 or 3.
Try pulling that crap on me and I take your camera and shove it up your arse. No lube
Somewhere along the line there has to be a balance between a free and RESPONCABLE press and the rights of the person being covered.
Exercising your rights to a press does not givbe you carte blanch to violate individuals right.
Not to mention that original intent was that the goverment could not prevent the press from criticism of it. Not in allowing them to report how many hairs a person in the public has growing on their arse or what color underwear they might wear
the way things are now these guys are not acting in a responcable manner and are certainly in violation of the rights of alot of the people they are taking pictures of in the manner in which they take their pictures
Free press is no excuse for the practices these guys use.
And if your one of them. that would include you
"The founders of the United States enacted the First Amendment to distinguish their new government from that of England, which had long censored the press and prosecuted persons who dared to criticize the British Crown. As Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart explained in a 1974 speech, the "primary purpose" of the First Amendment was "to create a fourth institution outside the government as an additional check on the three official branches" (the executive branch, the legislature and the judiciary).
"The protection of the First Amendment extends beyond press reports concerning major government policies and well-known public figures. The Supreme Court has held that if the press "lawfully obtains truthful information about a matter of public significance then [the government] may not constitutionally punish publication of the information, absent a need to further a state interest of the highest order," Smith v. Daily Mail Publishing Co., 443 U.S. 97 (1979).
While it has been extended well beyond being critical of the government it Information does have to be gathered in a lawful manner.
When you voilate someones rights. such as the right to privacy you are breaking the law
"Legal Definitions
Legal definitions vary but many states define stalking as willful, malicious, and repeated following and harassment.
- Isolated acts may not fall under this type of law, but where there is a pattern, the behavior is generally illegal.
- In some states, for stalking laws to apply, the commission of the offense requires an explicit threat of violence against the victim, but elsewhere an implied threat is sufficient.
- Under most state laws, Montana's included, the victim's fearful response is built into the legal definition of stalking. This recognizes that the perpetrator's repeated, uninvited pursuit of the victim is by its nature frightening and threatening
Not to mention several courts have ruled that a peson has a right to personal space
even if the thirs isnt violated. it certainly seems to me that many paparazzi gather their material by violating the first two.
-
Course there is one other option.
Make yourself so available that you become boring
-
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
True. and they've always been there But it seems like in the old days they at least showed some amount of respect. or at least human decency.
Yer kidding, right? Back in the "old days" before there was TV there was 10 times the papparazzi and they did things much worse than today because there was 10 times the scandal rags to sell the pics to. Ever watch L.A. Confidential or The Aviator? Those are fairly represenative of the way things worked in "the good ol' days".
-
Even celebrities deserve some privacy. Just because someone happens to be a celebrity doesn't mean they just gave up all rights to their privacy.
-
can anyone here in the ladie's knitting circle give me a link to teh 0club?
-
Originally posted by Debonair
can anyone here in the ladie's knitting circle give me a link to teh 0club?
:lol
shaddup.
-
Originally posted by Sixpence
Well, pictures of a family going out to dinner or shopping once a week will get old after a few months and won't sell.
But hanging with the likes of paris hilton and running around in a mini with no underwear, well..
So called "regular" girls her age do the same things, are scantily clad / 2/3 necked in public.. and I personally thank the young sluts for it. I applaud her and the other celeb party chicks for going out and having fun like everyone else with $$, despite what anyone has to say about it.
-
Originally posted by x0847Marine
So called "regular" girls her age do the same things, are scantily clad / 2/3 necked in public.. and I personally thank the young sluts for it. I applaud her and the other celeb party chicks for going out and having fun like everyone else with $$, despite what anyone has to say about it.
Well, that's fine, if it's attention you seek don't cry about it(btw, i'm sure the 'regular' girls dream about the popparoni following them around someday)
-
(http://www.ex-parrot.com/~pete/cats/kittens-on-chair.jpg)
-
learn how to resize
-
Originally posted by Shamus
I dont think the government would like that much.
shamus
And I really don't care what the govt thinks, since they don't care about me.
-
No need to resize when all you have to do is click and drag image into address bar.
Click on backarrow to get out.
-
this thread is now about cats
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/180_1172447066_cuddleingcats01.jpg)
-
Originally posted by Debonair
i thinx suzanne lucci is long overdue for moar daytime emmies
i had to do some research here but susan lucci (you spelled it wrong btw) plays a character named erica kane.
from wikipedia:
The Erica character has done everything from staging a helicopter prison break to hunting down terrorists in Bosnia. She even confronted a grizzly bear while in the forest. For a brief time, Erica was a Las Vegas showgirl.
In 1983 she fled Pine Valley for the Hollywood Hills, posing as a nun. She did this because her former lover, Kent Bogard, was killed in a struggle with a gun. Erica committed no crime, but her jealous "half-sister" (actually Connie) accused her of murder. In 1989 she went undercover in a traveling circus to locate her missing father, who had faked his own death years before. She discovered him working as a clown named Barney.
The character has written three bestselling books: "Raising Kane" (her autobiography), "Erica Kane: Beyond the Pain", and "Erica Kane: Having It All". She has hosted her own talk show, was addicted to painkillers after a debilitating fall from the catwalk in 1995 (later receiving treatment at the Betty Ford Center), kidnapped Edmund and Maria Grey's baby in 1997 after having a miscarriage, and received an intervention for alcohol abuse in 2004.
For much of the 1990s and early 2000s, Erica ran Enchantment, a cosmetics company. After losing it to Cambias Industries in 2003, she focused most of her attention on her relationship with Jackson. In the fall of 2005, however, she returned to work, this time as the host and executive producer of her own talk show, New Beginnings."
------------------------------------------------------
talk about a ladies knitting circle...
:huh
-
wow. all she needs is a f16 and a scorpion bite
-
:rofl
-
Originally posted by vorticon
wow. all she needs is a f16 and a scorpion bite
Silly, silly Canadians.
Scorpions don't bite.
They rock you like a hurricane.
-
(http://jenrathy.free.fr/gallery/Chats/IseeWhatYouDidThere02.jpg)
(http://jenrathy.free.fr/gallery/Chats/Huge%20Cat.jpg)
-
(http://www.cisnky.com/images/blog/ceiling_cat.jpg)
-
What about ZippoCat?
-
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/180_1172454899_longcat.jpg)
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/180_1172454928_hugstiem.jpg)
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/180_1172454792_ipoastthrad.jpg)
-
Hmmm...Think it's time to leave out some radiator fluid.
-
Originally posted by JB88
(http://www.cisnky.com/images/blog/ceiling_cat.jpg)
another /b/ tard outs itself?
-
I wanna see ZippoCat.:t
-
So your saying that if I went to school and started following a hot girl and taking pictures of her in public and private and asked her personal questions I wouldn't get in trouble. (I think not) But If went to Hollywood and took pictures of a famous person in public and private and followed them everywhere and asked person questions I would get in trouble (I think not)
Something is wrong with this picture.
Its a Puma.
(http://www.halo.fr/images/dossiers/20041119203434reel.gif)
-
i looked up "zippocat".
not very funny.
:mad:
-
Originally posted by JB88
i looked up "zippocat".
not very funny.
:mad:
Sucker...:t
-
Originally posted by JB88
i looked up "zippocat".
not very funny.
:mad:
I've seen another one just like it with the aforementioned in a cage in an animated gif :mad: :furious
there's some sick sick sick sick stuff in the internets
-
Originally posted by Xargos
I wanna see ZippoCat.:t
That's just some sick ****. I can't believe I read that on this board.
-
Originally posted by rpm
That's just some sick ****. I can't believe I read that on this board.
I ran across it at another site, and told him about it, and told him it would NOT go over here well, but he insisted on seeing if anyone would look it up.
if there was a way I could find and help prosecute the maker of that I would, but it is internet folklore now. the other site I mentioned, it is posted on daily, along with many others of similar nature.
I actually kind of wish he hadn't posted it, as some are going to look it up not knowing what they are in for, and will most definitely be offended, heck it deeply offends me, and I'm the one who say's "I'd hit it" to most any female form posted here.
-
sum1 beet u to it w/this chick
(http://jenrathy.free.fr/gallery/GIF/Pwned.gif)
uhhh poor vid quality, may b not a chick...
(http://jenrathy.free.fr/gallery/Divers/cat%20vegas%20parano.jpg)
-
This same lonely desert was the last known home of the morris family; will he make that grim connection when mittens starts screaming about flying balls of yarn and huge packs of un-neutered dogs raining down on the car?
-
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/180_1172523846_inpc01.jpg)
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/180_1172524014_w00tcatbiteshandwoot.gif)
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/180_1172524616_pubichair.jpg)
-
Omg that poor cat. I can't believe people would do such a thing. I went to this site thats like Wiki and it showed pictures of a girl smashing a cats head with her shoe. People like this should get there head smashed by a hammer, or burn on the cross like a witch.
-
Originally posted by VooWho
Omg that poor cat. I can't believe people would do such a thing. I went to this site thats like Wiki and it showed pictures of a girl smashing a cats head with her shoe. People like this should get there head smashed by a hammer, or burn on the cross like a witch.
"smush" videos and pictures have been around for literally years, surprised you never heard about them, there was a piece on national news maybe 5 years ago.
-
Tha real Britney rampage
http://english.pravda.ru/photo/report/bald_britney_spears_paparazzi-1486
-
Originally posted by 1K3
Tha real Britney rampage
http://english.pravda.ru/photo/report/bald_britney_spears_paparazzi-1486
Same rampage Just from someone who took stills.
She doesnt exactly have models legs does she.
To top it off you can just tell there is a very fat chick inside just waiting to pop out
-
(http://mfrost.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/circus.png)