Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Trukk on February 26, 2007, 07:13:49 PM
-
(http://www.78th.org/harm/media/8th.jpg) (http://www.78th.org/harm/8th_next.htm)
This mission was a real brawl and the group had to fight it's way into and out of the target area.
After Action Report (http://www.78th.org/harm/8th_aar.htm)
Screenshots (http://www.78th.org/harm)
It was lots of fun, thanks to everyone who participated!
-
Damn 163s everywhere. hehe
-
Run it in the arena with no 163s then :)
Missed it, but I'm trying to catch one. Maybe next week.
-
Heh, 31 looked like Laguardia with all the jets taking off.:lol
Is there an arena without jets (and with Heavy Bombers) Trieze?
-
Midwar I believe, but running it there may cut down turnout. Then , it might not too.
-
We came over from WW2OL a few months ago and are still learning the game. Didn't know that 163s were available at the AF near the city.
I'm gonna make sure Trukk remebers that the next time he plans a mission near a city again.
It was a blast though. Bombers in tight formations are able to defend themselves better against attackers. Even 163s.
-
I think the Orange (or is it Blue? I can never remember) has the 163 disabled. I know they're usually only in one of the LW arenas.
-
348th FG would like to participate in conjunction with our soon to be finalized squad night. We like P-47's and would be most interested. Curious as to what country we need to be to join the missions?
-
Jugs! I'd love to see Jugs flying overhead!
We try to vary what country we fly the mission in and it also depends on the state of the Arena/Map, etc. So what we do is post an update half an hour before launch here (http://www.78th.org/forum/phpbb/viewforum.php?f=10).
-
Phil, your Inbox is full.
-
Originally posted by Trukk
Jugs! I'd love to see Jugs flying overhead!
I like to see jugs too, only just below eye level. :aok
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
-
About the screenshot page: You might want to put the thumbnails in multiple rows as you don't see the picture displayed in the centre of the screen ... you have to scroll right to see it.
(1024/768 res on laptop here).
-
1280 x 1024
Looks just fine to me, Love those screenies.
-
Originally posted by Saintaw
About the screenshot page: You might want to put the thumbnails in multiple rows as you don't see the picture displayed in the centre of the screen ... you have to scroll right to see it.
(1024/768 res on laptop here).
Hmmm, the page is only 950 pixels wide.
Most likely your browser is blocking the script for the photo viewer and this preventing the thumbnail scroll functionality.
Example:
(http://www.78th.org/media/broken.jpg)
-
Originally posted by 68Ripper
I like to see jugs too, only just below eye level. :aok
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
P-47's are best flown high above everything else...uh, wait a minute...
:o
-
Originally posted by Trukk
Hmmm, the page is only 950 pixels wide.
Most likely your browser is blocking the script for the photo viewer and this preventing the thumbnail scroll functionality.
See the 1st part of your screenshot, you have to scroll to the right to see the displayed media. It isn't "natural", a lot of (older) folks will miss it. WAI (http://www.w3.org/WAI/) etc...
-
Thanks for organizing these, Trukk!
Great fun. See you at the next one.
-Mo
-
Originally posted by Saintaw
See the 1st part of your screenshot, you have to scroll to the right to see the displayed media. It isn't "natural", a lot of (older) folks will miss it.[/i]
The 1st part is the "you've disabled scripts" example, the 2nd part is the "your browser is working normally" example.
I try to keep the website as "light" and "plain vanilla" as possible so folks with dialup, or browsers other than IE, will still have a good experience when they go to the website. But it's darn hard to accomodate all the flavours of browsers/configs that are out there.
So basically, if you don't allow any active content, yeah it's not going to look as nice. But where I'm doing very basic stuff, I consider that to be more of a client issue (ie your choice) as opposed to a website issue.
-
Originally posted by big-mo
Thanks for organizing these, Trukk!
Great fun. See you at the next one.
-Mo
Thanks! :)
-
Originally posted by Trukk
The 1st part is the "you've disabled scripts" example, the 2nd part is the "your browser is working normally" example.
I try to keep the website as "light" and "plain vanilla" as possible so folks with dialup, or browsers other than IE, will still have a good experience when they go to the website. But it's darn hard to accomodate all the flavours of browsers/configs that are out there.
So basically, if you don't allow any active content, yeah it's not going to look as nice. But where I'm doing very basic stuff, I consider that to be more of a client issue (ie your choice) as opposed to a website issue.
My browsers work as intended, thank you :) (Nothing disabled)
You coded this for IE I take it.
IE7: works
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/19_1172841832_browser_ie_07.jpg)
FF 202: kaput
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/19_1172841859_browser_ff202.jpg)
OP 09: kaput
(http://www.onpoi.net/ah/pics/users/19_1172841845_browser_opera_09.jpg)
click (http://www.webstandards.org/)
-
LOL. Loads of effort required to grab the bar at the bottom and slide it right. I'd report it to the standards commitee.:lol
-
Yeah it's a hobby site built for the average browser (for better or worse), IE.