Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: Geary420 on March 09, 2007, 03:03:47 AM

Title: More Guncam AC vs. Tank
Post by: Geary420 on March 09, 2007, 03:03:47 AM
Hey all, the stuka thread reminded me of this very short guncam clip I have had on my hard drive forever.  Don't remember where I found it but it wasn't labeled very good.  Anyone know what aircraft this is?  It is deffinatley a BFG!

Download Strafing.mpg (http://putstuff.putfile.com/56073/1753429)
Title: More Guncam AC vs. Tank
Post by: frank3 on March 09, 2007, 11:53:06 AM
In any case it's a tankbuster, since no fighter would shoot at tanks with less than .50's!
It could very well be a Ju-87?
Title: More Guncam AC vs. Tank
Post by: Meyer on March 09, 2007, 01:07:21 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54PSlFEEE7Q
Title: More Guncam AC vs. Tank
Post by: Krusty on March 09, 2007, 01:19:53 PM
EDIT: It says Hs129 at the link you've given us. It was a german ground attack aircraft. If I recall it had special 30mm guns
Title: More Guncam AC vs. Tank
Post by: Ball on March 09, 2007, 01:38:16 PM
The HS-129 carried a lots of different guns, including a 75mm and 37mm if i remember correctly.

I think the 75mm messed up its already pretty poor performance though - aircraft was very much underpowered from what i have read.

Nice clip.  Thanks for sharing.
Title: More Guncam AC vs. Tank
Post by: Krusty on March 09, 2007, 01:39:47 PM
From what I understand the 75mm put the pilot's life in jeopardy every time he flew it. But in that clip, the aircraft doesn't have a huge pack/kit slung underneath so I'd think something smaller (internal) was used.
Title: More Guncam AC vs. Tank
Post by: Lusche on March 09, 2007, 01:57:06 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
From what I understand the 75mm put the pilot's life in jeopardy every time he flew it. But in that clip, the aircraft doesn't have a huge pack/kit slung underneath so I'd think something smaller (internal) was used.


Be careful with judgement. The plane doing the flyby can be a totally different than the one providing the guncam footage. Not saying that it is a 75mm, though.
Title: More Guncam AC vs. Tank
Post by: Ball on March 09, 2007, 02:00:45 PM
The slug is big... but the rate of fire also seems pretty fast, gets two rounds off in quick succession.

Anyone know the ROF of the 75mm?

You can see the second round looks like it goes right through the tank and hits the ground the other side.
Title: More Guncam AC vs. Tank
Post by: Krusty on March 09, 2007, 02:03:27 PM
Good point... they did have a knack for editing together unrelated footage...
Title: More Guncam AC vs. Tank
Post by: Meyer on March 09, 2007, 02:25:48 PM
My guess would be MK101..
Title: More Guncam AC vs. Tank
Post by: Airscrew on March 09, 2007, 02:29:59 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Ball
The slug is big... but the rate of fire also seems pretty fast, gets two rounds off in quick succession.

Anyone know the ROF of the 75mm?

You can see the second round looks like it goes right through the tank and hits the ground the other side.

I dont know but it looks to me like its the third round and it looks like it ricocheted of the back of the tank.

You can see the recoil in the film, I would think the 75mm was hand loaded like the B-25?  I go for the 37mm
Title: More Guncam AC vs. Tank
Post by: Krusty on March 09, 2007, 02:31:59 PM
Negative, the 75mm wasn't hand-loaded. There was only 1 crew member.

However I don't think any self-loading 75mm can fire a round in a second or two. I think 30mm. My 2c.
Title: More Guncam AC vs. Tank
Post by: Lusche on March 09, 2007, 02:39:46 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
Negative, the 75mm wasn't hand-loaded. There was only 1 crew member.

However I don't think any self-loading 75mm can fire a round in a second or two. I think 30mm. My 2c.


I agree. I think it`s the 30mm MK101 some versions were using. The 101 has a very low ROF of only about 260rpm.
Title: More Guncam AC vs. Tank
Post by: Airscrew on March 09, 2007, 02:48:52 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Lusche
I agree. I think it`s the 30mm MK101 some versions were using. The 101 has a very low ROF of only about 260rpm.


ok its hard to count, but it looks like from 5 almost 6 sec mark to 9 sec mark he fires 4 rounds,  3 on the tank and 1 over the tank.   from 5 to 8 sec 3 shots are fairly close together.  thats 1 round per sec, 60 rpm. course dont know if he's holding the fire button down or firing each round individually
Title: More Guncam AC vs. Tank
Post by: Krusty on March 09, 2007, 02:53:50 PM
Maybe not all rounds are tracers? (*shrug*)
Title: More Guncam AC vs. Tank
Post by: Airscrew on March 09, 2007, 02:55:43 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
Maybe not all rounds are tracers? (*shrug*)

well maybe but I wasnt counting tracers, I was counting the recoil showing up in the film,  each time it fires you see the camera shake from the recoil.  at least thats how it looks to me.
Title: More Guncam AC vs. Tank
Post by: Krusty on March 09, 2007, 02:58:11 PM
Good point. In the youtube one I've watched it over and over, and I think there's actually a little black bulge very briefly visible under the fuselage, as the aircraft flies past.

As Lusche pointed out, it doesn't mean anything, as it could be unrelated footage. However, if it is the same craft, it could mean a heavier weapon than 30mm. Not large enough to be 75mm, but maybe 37mm?
Title: More Guncam AC vs. Tank
Post by: Viking on March 09, 2007, 03:22:54 PM
My bet is the Bk 3,7. It is basically the same gun as on the Ostwind, but with AP ammo.