Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: AAolds on April 12, 2007, 11:14:26 AM
-
Since the new terrain features have been implemented, I and others have had many issues with tanks tipping over or being spawned on to position that cause unrecoverable spin--film of the spin has been sent in. This has cost me perks, and caused me give up proxie kills. I refuse to tank anymore until these problems are fixed. It is no fun spawning into battle only to end up spinning or be driving along and then wham, tip over and giving some knucklehead gets a proxie just for being there.
The new terrein looks good, but way too few places for GVs to hide now. The Sherman Firefly is cool, but its missing the flamethrower to be a true Firefly.
-
Flamethrower?
Gonna have to explain that comment. Don't recall a Firefly having a Flamethrower.
-
Originally posted by Guppy35
Flamethrower?
Gonna have to explain that comment. Don't recall a Firefly having a Flamethrower.
Look it up
-
Originally posted by AAolds
Look it up
According to my knowledge, Sherman Firefly had no flamethrower. So would you please state a source to back up your claim?
-
FireFly did not have a flamethrower. Is it possible one was attached in the field, sure. There were other versions of the Sherman that did have flamethrowers...
-
I think he's confusing the Sherman VC Firefly with the Sherman CG Weber. The Weber has a flamethrower, and is prone to tipping over in high winds, on rough terrain, or when you're drinking too much to be using it.
-
Originally posted by AAolds
Look it up
hehe i think you are the one who needs to look it up ;)
-
Originally posted by hubsonfire
I think he's confusing the Sherman VC Firefly with the Sherman CG Weber. The Weber has a flamethrower, and is prone to tipping over in high winds, on rough terrain, or when you're drinking too much to be using it.
:D :lol
-
Originally posted by Lusche
According to my knowledge, Sherman Firefly had no flamethrower. So would you please state a source to back up your claim?
Combat Footage on the Military Channel about Iwo Jima. I think it was the show Battlefront. I could be wrong, as could the rest of ya.
-
Yeah, the Brits used the Firefly as a flamethrower tank when they took Iwo Jima.
Apparently the Germans were terrified.
-
:rofl :rofl
note to self: do not eat hamburger while reading bbs
-
M4A3R3 was the only version of the Sherman equiped with a flame thrower. It was used in Europe as well as the Pacific but was not produced in large numbers.
The Firefly we have in the game now was given that name by the Brits. It was a standard Sherman tank modified to carry the Brit 17lbr anti tank gun. Not a flame thower.
-
Originally posted by Hornet33
The Firefly we have in the game now was given that name by the Brits. It was a standard Sherman tank modified to carry the Brit 17lbr anti tank gun. Not a flame thower.
but...but...it has "Fire" in its name :confused:
-
Aaolds.. you are wrong.
-
Originally posted by AAolds
Look it up
I forecast that comment coming back to haunt you:D
-
Originally posted by hubsonfire
I think he's confusing the Sherman VC Firefly with the Sherman CG Weber. The Weber has a flamethrower, and is prone to tipping over in high winds, on rough terrain, or when you're drinking too much to be using it.
and when it blew up, you had a nice Weber Grill to BBQ on.
ack-ack
-
Originally posted by Furball
Yeah, the Brits used the Firefly as a flamethrower tank when they took Iwo Jima.
Apparently the Germans were terrified.
You do know that the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor, right? Saw it in a movie once.
ack-ack
-
Originally posted by AAolds
I could be wrong, as could the rest of ya.
Well in this case it's only one person in this thread that is incorrect...
Medium Tank M4 (General Sherman)
M4A3R3 - Sherman tank used during Operation Overlord (1944) and in the Battle of Iwo Jima (1945)
M4 Crocodile - four M4 tanks converted by British for US 2nd Armored Division in NW Europe with the same armored fuel trailer as used on Churchill but the fuel line went over the hull.
Sherman Badger - Canada's replacement of its Ram Badger, the Sherman Badger was a turretless M4A2 HVSS Sherman with Wasp IIC flamethrower in place of hull machine gun, developed sometime from 1945 to 1949. The 150 gallons at 250 psi was effective to 125 yards, with elevation of +30 to -10 degrees and traverse of 30 degrees left and 23 degrees right. This inspired the US T68.
Tank, Infantry, Mk IV (A22) (Churchill)
Churchill OKE - Churchill II with "Ronson" flamethrower. 3 used at Dieppe in 1942.
Churchill Crocodile - Churchill VII with an armored fuel trailer. The flamethrower replaced the hull machine gun leaving the main armament unaffected. Used after the Normandy landings (1944)
Tank, Infantry, Mk II, Matilda II (A12)
Matilda Frog (25) - 25 Matilda II tanks converted to flame tanks by the Australians in late 1944.
Matilda Murray - Australian improvement over the Frog, produced in 1945.
ack-ack
-
Originally posted by Furball
Yeah, the Brits used the Firefly as a flamethrower tank when they took Iwo Jima.
Apparently the Germans were terrified.
:lol
-
Telling Guppy to "look it up" is like going to a museum and saying that they've got a Fw-190 labeled as a P-47.
-
Easy boys; its obvious to us that we have a collective knowlege base to put Wikipedia out of business, but he's only got 30 posts.
The young sprout will learn to be humble, or he will drown.
AA, welcome to the big leagues: But since you are here, these are the ground rules to be taken seriously:
1. You gotta back up your claims with hard, verifiable fact; and the Military Channel isn't known for labeling **** correctly.
The rest of the rules you'll learn as you go.
Wolf
-
Originally posted by Wolfala
the Military Channel isn't known for labeling **** correctly.
The rest of the rules you'll learn as you go.
Wolf
Amen! Ive found myself SCREAMING at the TV more than once on that particular channel...
-
Originally posted by Guppy35
Flamethrower?
Gonna have to explain that comment. Don't recall a Firefly having a Flamethrower.
Maybe he means a blinking butt.
(http://www.gifs.net/Animation11/Animals/Insects/Firefly_3.gif)
wrngway
-
Get back on topic. Fireflies did have flamethrowers. This thread is about tipping over. Argue elsewhere.
-
Originally posted by AAolds
Get back on topic. Fireflies did have flamethrowers. This thread is about tipping over. Argue elsewhere.
ROTFL... give up!.. the firefly never had a flamethrower :lol
-
Originally posted by AAolds
Get back on topic. Fireflies did have flamethrowers.
They didnt.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sherman_Firefly
http://www.onwar.com/tanks/uk/data/firefly.htm
http://www.panzerlexikon.de/
http://freespace.virgin.net/shermanic.firefly/home3.htm
http://afvdb.50megs.com/usa/m4sherman.html
http://www.wwiivehicles.com/unitedkingdom/foreign/m4-medium.asp
Or maybe take a look into this book:
British and American Tanks of World War Two: The Complete Illustrated History of British, American and Commonwealth Tanks, 1939-45 by Peter Chamberlain & Chris Ellis.
-
But he saw it on the military channel so it MUST be true. Never mind the fact that they never showed a Firefly with a flame thrower and to the best of my knowledge no firefly's were used in the PTO.
I suppose he thinks ALL Shermans were firefly's.
-
Is the military channel by any chanse related to Discovery Channel?
-
Originally posted by Nilsen
Is the military channel by any chanse related to Discovery Channel?
Yes. Both are owned by Discovery Communications Inc.
-
Originally posted by AAolds
Get back on topic. Fireflies did have flamethrowers.
Did Not..... :furious
-
Originally posted by Nilsen
Is the military channel by any chanse related to Discovery Channel?
It used to be called Discovery Wings. And AAolds you might wanna give up and hide under a rock for a while because the Sherman Firefly did not have a flamethrower. I have seen almost every program on the military channel and the history channel and have seen the sermans with flamethrowers but they arent the fireflys and they didnt call them that on TV eather. Your just assuming that because the firefly has FIRE is its name that its the verson with the flamethrower on it and your wrong.
-
Hehe I asked Aaolds in the MA today if he had seen any fireflys with flamethrowers latley.. he said yes.
It went downhill from there.
Sorry Aaolds. I didnt know you were so young so i apologise.
-
Originally posted by Nilsen
Hehe I asked Aaolds in the MA today if he had seen any fireflys with flamethrowers latley.. he said yes.
It went downhill from there.
Sorry Aaolds. I didnt know you were so young so i apologise.
LoL figures how old nelson 11-12? Is he so young that when he talks in the mic all you hear is SWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE K!!!!! because it cant handle the high pitched voice?
-
I dunno if he is as i am on another chesspiece.
Doesnt matter now, just dont threaten folks or go completly overboard because someone sais "lol" or "rofl" Aaolds.... I actually thought you were kidding for awhile there until you and your mate lost it completly.
Puts out hand towards AAolds.
:)
-
Originally posted by Ack-Ack
You do know that the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor, right? Saw it in a movie once.
That'll be the same movie where the Americans capture the Enigma code.
-
Ive tried to be accomodating, I have not at any point claimed to be completely 100% right on this matter. I agree that online research does not confirm this. If I find facts that conclusively answer this matter, Ill post it and eat my crow with it, until then, im done with the matter.
-
Originally posted by Nilsen
I dunno if he is as i am on another chesspiece.
Doesnt matter now, just dont threaten folks or go completly overboard because someone sais "lol" or "rofl" Aaolds.... I actually thought you were kidding for awhile there until you and your mate lost it completly.
Puts out hand towards AAolds.
:)
I was just answering you and being playful as you were. No hard feelings on my part.
-
I am sure you did mean this tank:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flame_tank#Medium_Tank_M4_.28General_Sherman.29
Its just that its not the Firefly, but a variant of the M4 Sherman.
-
Originally posted by AAolds
Ive tried to be accomodating, I have not at any point claimed to be completely 100% right on this matter. I agree that online research does not confirm this. If I find facts that conclusively answer this matter, Ill post it and eat my crow with it, until then, im done with the matter.
you are 100% wrong about this. There was a serman with a flame thrower but it wasnt the firefly. You will not find any research that will prove you right. Yet there have been a few people that posted links proving you wrong.
-
After bugging my Uncle more about the matter (cost me a 6 pack, well worth the cost), he confirmed that his tank was not a "firefly". I had heard him wrong, his tank did have a flamethrower as he was on Iwo Jima and he said that it sure did make the fire fly on the Japanese.
I WAS WRONG. Now go back to having fun or I'll be wrong about something else.
-
Originally posted by Furball
Apparently the Germans were terrified.
Ummm. Americans didn't fight Germans at Iwo Jima. :rofl
-
Originally posted by spikes
Ummm. Americans didn't fight Germans at Iwo Jima. :rofl
:rofl ehh... me thinks he was joking and you just fell into the pit :D
-
Originally posted by AAolds
Get back on topic. Fireflies did have flamethrowers. This thread is about tipping over. Argue elsewhere.
You started this thread with the flamethrower thing..admit error or
deal with it :aok
-
Originally posted by Rino
You started this thread with the flamethrower thing..admit error or
deal with it :aok
Your're a bit late... he already did and the brawl is long over.
-
Originally posted by Lusche
Your're a bit late... he already did and the brawl is long over.
Must have missed the post that admitted error..my bad.
-
Originally posted by Whisky58
Originally posted by Ack-Ack
You do know that the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor, right? Saw it in a movie once.
That'll be the same movie where the Americans capture the Enigma code.
No, it was a movie where a future US senator tried to rally his college mates after being kicked off campus. Might have been before your time.
ack-ack
-
Originally posted by Nilsen
:rofl ehh... me thinks he was joking and you just fell into the pit :D
Oh darn! Fell for it again. :confused:
-
Originally posted by Ack-Ack
No, it was a movie where a future US senator tried to rally his college mates after being kicked off campus. Might have been before your time.
ack-ack
Remember Ack, one of the rules of writing is know your audience... probably should keep movie and tv references to nothing older than 1999
-
Originally posted by spikes
Ummm. Americans didn't fight Germans at Iwo Jima. :rofl
I know.
The British did.
In their flamethrower Firefly tanks.
-
Originally posted by Furball
I know.
The British did.
In their ninja scuba sniper flamethrower Firefly tanks.
Fixed :D
-
Originally posted by Ack-Ack
No, it was a movie where a future US senator tried to rally his college mates after being kicked off campus. Might have been before your time.
Just a gentle dig at Hollywood Ack-ack. Possibly before my time but since I'm 50 next birthday probably unlikely, altho I confess to not having seen that one.
Regards
-
Originally posted by Furball
Yeah, the Brits used the Firefly as a flamethrower tank when they took Iwo Jima.
Apparently the Germans were terrified.
Now that is funny!:aok