Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Pooh21 on April 29, 2007, 04:26:30 PM

Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: Pooh21 on April 29, 2007, 04:26:30 PM
Fire fueled by only gasoline cant melt steel!
truth!
its George Bush with his hand on thedetonator! (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070429/ap_on_re_us/highway_collapse_9)
Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: Toad on April 29, 2007, 04:32:46 PM
Yeah, I heard that. I think the CIA actually set the explosive charges to bring the freeway down, although the Air Force may have shot a cruise missile into it. Too early to tell.
Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: soda72 on April 29, 2007, 04:44:23 PM
:D
Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: Dago on April 29, 2007, 05:06:33 PM
I guess Rosie never heard of oxy-acetylene welding.  Or metal temper.  Or Prozac.
Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: Maverick on April 29, 2007, 05:28:01 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Dago
I guess Rosie never heard of oxy-acetylene welding.  Or metal temper.  Or Prozac.


Or double digit IQ's either.
Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: john9001 on April 29, 2007, 05:45:37 PM
i can bend steel with my bare hands,

well, i can if it's thin enough. :lol
Title: Re: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: Masherbrum on April 29, 2007, 07:49:11 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Pooh21
Fire fueled by only gasoline cant melt steel!
truth!


Ok, if you say so.
Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: Maverick on April 29, 2007, 08:34:51 PM
Mash, that was sarcasm there......
Title: Re: Re: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: Pooh21 on April 29, 2007, 10:29:06 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Masherbrum
Ok, if you say so.


welcome to the wide world of sarcasm little buddy.

this post was made for the lulz
Title: Re: Re: Re: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: Masherbrum on April 30, 2007, 06:29:30 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Pooh21
welcome to the wide world of sarcasm little buddy.

this post was made for the lulz


I knew you were being sarcastic.  You can breathe deep and relax now Pooh.  :aok
Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: Shamus on April 30, 2007, 09:16:56 AM
Quit being so sarcastic Karaya.

shamus
Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: Masherbrum on April 30, 2007, 09:20:08 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Shamus
Quit being so sarcastic Karaya.

shamus


Me?!!!  Sarcastic?!!!   Nawww, whoodathunkit?!! :)
Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: Chairboy on April 30, 2007, 09:22:56 AM
Can anyone remember who on this board is a 'loose change'-ist?  As in, who here buys the "wtc was teh demolished!" and "9/11 was a US job!" theories?

It would be interesting to hear their analysis of this collapse, considering how the "gasoline fires can't hurt steel" assertion is the base of their conspipracy theory.
Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: WilldCrd on April 30, 2007, 09:36:35 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Chairboy
Can anyone remember who on this board is a 'loose change'-ist?  As in, who here buys the "wtc was teh demolished!" and "9/11 was a US job!" theories?

It would be interesting to hear their analysis of this collapse, considering how the "gasoline fires can't hurt steel" assertion is the base of their conspipracy theory.




i could be wrong BUT, doesnt jp5 ,AKA jet fuel burn hotter than regular gasoline?
Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: Chairboy on April 30, 2007, 09:44:28 AM
Quote
Originally posted by WilldCrd
i could be wrong BUT, doesnt jp5 ,AKA jet fuel burn hotter than regular gasoline?
That'd be even better, considering how it was jet fuel in the WTC incident.  But don't worry, the 9/11 conspiracists never let anything as prosaic as science get in their way.  :D
Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: SAS_KID on April 30, 2007, 09:55:55 AM
It wasn't steel that melted... it was part of the freeway that was "draped" across the interchange.
Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: WilldCrd on April 30, 2007, 10:00:18 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Chairboy
That'd be even better, considering how it was jet fuel in the WTC incident.  But don't worry, the 9/11 conspiracists never let anything as prosaic as science get in their way.  :D



Science is SOOOOOO overrated
If scientists were sooooo smart then how come every few years they have to "rewrite" the so called book??
Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: Maverick on April 30, 2007, 10:07:13 AM
Quote
Originally posted by SAS_KID
It wasn't steel that melted... it was part of the freeway that was "draped" across the interchange.


I see, and what was the material used to hold that overhead section of freeway up? It couldn't have been steel in the form of girders, kind of just like the support structure for the WTC towers could it???  
:rolleyes:
Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: Masherbrum on April 30, 2007, 12:00:58 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SAS_KID
It wasn't steel that melted... it was part of the freeway that was "draped" across the interchange.


I think you need to look underneath an overpass more closely.   The steel GIRDERS melted causing metal fatigue, and the weight of the concrete caused catastrophic failure.
Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: allmetal on April 30, 2007, 12:18:06 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Dago
I guess Rosie never heard of oxy-acetylene welding.  Or metal temper.  Or Prozac.
:rofl :rofl :rofl


:noid
Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: Maverick on April 30, 2007, 02:50:29 PM
The steel does not have to get to the point where it runs in liquid form to cause damae. All it has to do is lose enough tensile strength where it can't support the weight. Then the supported structure collapses under the force of gravity.

Unless you feel that 9/11 and this fire are strictly unsupported by reality and physics in which case it's booshes fault.

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :noid :O :noid
Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: Gunslinger on April 30, 2007, 06:37:40 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Chairboy
Can anyone remember who on this board is a 'loose change'-ist?  As in, who here buys the "wtc was teh demolished!" and "9/11 was a US job!" theories?

It would be interesting to hear their analysis of this collapse, considering how the "gasoline fires can't hurt steel" assertion is the base of their conspipracy theory.


Chair I think it was the "go ahead and ban me" whitehawk
Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: Masherbrum on April 30, 2007, 08:35:16 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Gunslinger
Chair I think it was the "go ahead and ban me" whitehawk


Gunslinger would be correct.
Title: Controlled Demolition strikes again
Post by: Gunslinger on May 01, 2007, 09:26:22 PM
429truth.org has figured this all out.


Via Fark.com


(http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/566/429trutheb9nl7.jpg)


Of course all this conjecture is based on scientific testing
(http://img103.imageshack.us/img103/8046/pnchallengexi8.jpg)

 (http://img79.imageshack.us/img79/8295/429truth2kd3.jpg)

(http://img399.imageshack.us/img399/718/429truth3fi5.jpg)



Funny bellybutton thread

http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink=2772159