Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: DiabloTX on May 21, 2007, 08:18:01 PM
-
Can we have a sticky for the B-29 stating that there is no B-29, there is no damn nOOk, and there is no B-29 with a gawddamned n00k?
If the B-29 ever does start getting developed it can be updated on the sticky. If this sticky is never created we'll take it as a hint that the B-29 with n00k is currently in developement.
Thank you.
EDIT - And that we will expect the B-29 and nOOk in 2 weeks. Or when the Combat Tour is released, which ever comes first.
-
:huh nook you spell it like this nuke:aok
-
STFU nOOb.
-
idiot omg its nuke
-
^^^^^^^^^^^^^ OMG NOOB
-
we need b29 but with no nook
-
Jesus they need to stop leting people from the special ed class download AH. 7714 shut up we all know how to spell nuke, after all we are about about three times older then you. You're the idiot that thinks the B25 will come out in two weeks. N00k is "733t" speak. The last thing we need is a B29 and if you think we do you're a little n00b that needs to goto summer school. Plus theres no dot commands for plaens other then RV8.
-
Originally posted by Larry
Jesus they need to stop leting people from the special ed class download AH. 7714 shut up we all know how to spell nuke, after all we are about about three times older then you. You're the idiot that thinks the B25 will come out in two weeks. N00k is "733t" speak. The last thing we need is a B29 and if you think we do you're a little n00b that needs to goto summer school. Plus theres no dot commands for plaens other then RV8.
Well said.
-
i dont see whats wrong with a nuke, it was used in ww2... as long as its perked.
-
it was used twice.:furious
add it to AH you have 500+ morons divebombing in B-29's Nuking every ****ing lil thing!!!:furious :furious
-
Originally posted by folkwufe
i dont see whats wrong with a nuke, it was used in ww2... as long as its perked.
IT WAS USED TWICE!!!
HTC already siad there will be no nuke EVER put in the game.
-
beat you to it :p
-
lol
-
Originally posted by 7714
:huh nook you spell it like this nuke:aok
Search for "nook" in the Search Function. It's above this. Eyes up. Between the rusty "F.A.Q." (Frequently Asked Questions) button and "Log Out" button.
That's the one.
Settle in for a lot of reading about the same thing over and over and over and over again.
And DiabloTX, I think they plan on creating that sticky two weeks after they've updated the Game Info -> Planes Vehicles Boats screen...... which is supposed to be done 2 weeks after the B-25 is added....... about two weeks after CT is released.
Be patient.
-
p51srule:aok
-
2 weeks..... again ;)
-
I think this could have been handled better. 7714 is clearly new to the forums and perhaps to the game. It's one thing to say "2 weeks" and have him believe it (forgivable until he realizes how that works), but come on, I was about to correct Diablo's spelling myself. [EDIT: As I was reading this I mean, this is the first time I read this thread]
You can chew him out for requesting stupid stuff (like nukes), and for really expecting things to be here in 2 weeks (if you must), but don't start telling a newbie to shut up just because he doesn't like "leet" speak (aka "poser speak").
Matter of fact, you should be saying "shut up" to those that do use that manner of spelling.
No wonder we get so many rude squeaker newbies, y'all scare off the normal ones!
P.S. If this were the first post of Diablo's I'd ever read, including his first reply, I'd also call him an idiot. This 7714 guy doesn't get that Diablo's just trying for a laugh.
-
Originally posted by Larry
IT WAS USED TWICE!!!
HTC already siad there will be no nuke EVER put in the game.
and twice was enough... how many times did you suggest it was used, im just saying it was used and adding it to a game would not be unrealistic.
-
Also, consider the following: There were only 2 made. The war ended before any more were made. They had 2, they used 2. They were bluffing that they had many more.
They didn't have a production line for them like normal bombs. In this game we don't have special 1-off bombs. You don't see the Grand Slams, the Dam Buster, and other "specialty" bombs.
Aside from that, HTC has said they won't include a bomb any larger than the 4k "cookie" we already have on the lancaster.
-
Originally posted by 7714
:huh nook you spell it like this nuke:aok
Does that mean one spells n00b like nube too? :D
-
The "non-retarded" way of spelling it is "newb" (short from "newbie")
-
Usually, the biggest n00bs are people calling others that
-
Originally posted by Krusty
I think this could have been handled better. 7714 is clearly new to the forums and perhaps to the game. It's one thing to say "2 weeks" and have him believe it (forgivable until he realizes how that works), but come on, I was about to correct Diablo's spelling myself. [EDIT: As I was reading this I mean, this is the first time I read this thread]
You can chew him out for requesting stupid stuff (like nukes), and for really expecting things to be here in 2 weeks (if you must), but don't start telling a newbie to shut up just because he doesn't like "leet" speak (aka "poser speak").
Read my initial post again and see what I was asking for. I'll give you a hint; it's the very first sentence.
-
Originally posted by frank3
Usually, the biggest n00bs are people calling others that
NOOB.
-
:lol
-
Originally posted by Makoyouidiot
Well said.
I concur
-
Originally posted by folkwufe
and twice was enough... how many times did you suggest it was used, im just saying it was used and adding it to a game would not be unrealistic.
Are you blind or retarded?
HTC already siad there will be no nuke EVER put in the game.
If you dont know who HTC are then you need a good slap in the face.
-
ROFL
-
My guess there will never be a n00k, nuke, or nuclear bomb of any kind in AH because they weren't even invented during World War II.
That being said, it was PYRO who stated that there will never be an Atomic bomb in Aces High...
In this thread:
http://forums.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=202154&highlight=atomic
-
Originally posted by folkwufe
i dont see whats wrong with a nuke, it was used in ww2... as long as its perked.
(http://www.thesmilies.com/smilies/sign0104.gif) (http://www.thesmilies.com)
-
[SIZE=100]Please use the dam search button it looks like this[/SIZE] >>(http://forums.hitechcreations.com/forums/images/top_search.gif)<<
:cool: i think they will get that(finally)
:noid
Edit:noid every thread i see about B29's imma say this
-
HaHaHa!!!! The mental visual of guys Divebombing with a B29 and dropping a Fatman is just hilarious...... LOL!!!!:rofl
No nukes PLEASE!!!!!
OG
-
Originally posted by JB73
My guess there will never be a n00k, nuke, or nuclear bomb of any kind in AH because they weren't even invented during World War II.
Huh??????????:huh I honestly hope your trying to make a joke with this statement.
-
Well hes right there wasn't a "nuclear" bomb in WW2, but there were two atomic bombs.
-
Originally posted by Hornet33
Huh??????????:huh I honestly hope your trying to make a joke with this statement.
umm just to give you an idea, though take nothing from wikipedia as fact
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_bomb
VS.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_bombings_of_Hiroshima_and_Nagasaki
Make sure to read the part on the nuclear weapon page about the types of bombs, fission VS. fusion.
-
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c62/Masherbrum/nookie.gif)
-
Originally posted by Larry
Well hes right there wasn't a "nuclear" bomb in WW2, but there were two atomic bombs.
And what's the differance? Fission or fusion? Both types of reactions are nuclear in nature. Atoms are being split and releasing huge amounts of energy. The only differance is the method used to release that energy. Little Boy and Fat Man were in fact nuclear weapons. Calling them by a different name doesn't change what they really are.
-
hornet's right technically, atomic or nuclear, neither define fission or fusion...
-
The two bombs used in WWII were "atomic" . Read any book or watch any film thats what they are called. Calling them nukes is like calling them H- bombs. They are the same, but at the same different.
"The original atomic bomb used nuclear fission, in which big atoms (uranium or plutonium) were split into littler ones in a chain reaction, releasing vast amounts of energy. The hydrogen bomb employs nuclear fusion, in which little atoms (various forms of hydrogen) fuse together to make bigger ones (helium), essentially the same process that occurs in the sun."
-
Originally posted by Larry
The two bombs used in WWII were "atomic" . Read any book or watch any film thats what they are called. Calling them nukes is like calling them H- bombs. They are the same, but at the same different.
"The original atomic bomb used nuclear fission, in which big atoms (uranium or plutonium) were split into littler ones in a chain reaction, releasing vast amounts of energy. The hydrogen bomb employs nuclear fusion, in which little atoms (various forms of hydrogen) fuse together to make bigger ones (helium), essentially the same process that occurs in the sun."
I believe the use of "nuclear" and "atomic" are more about common usage in language, and not about strict technical differences in the terms. The use of "atomic" bombs goes back through science fiction and comic books to the 1930's and maybe the 1920's. So, when fusion bombs came about, they were talked about using the term "nuclear" to differentiate between them and earlier bombs.
Then there are neutron bombs (enhanced radiation weapons) which are often considered a third category, and separate from thermonuclear bombs.
Its the kinds of distinctions that are made when you are going before Congress for appropriation funding hearings.
-
Fat Man - Spontaneous Fission (because of the Polonium core)
Little Boy - Fission (not Spontaneous, as this was a Uranium based weapon)
They were both Fission.
-
Originally posted by DiabloTX
STFU nOOb.
lmfao...dont mess with Diablo
-
Originally posted by DiabloTX
Can we have a sticky for the B-29 stating that there is no B-29, there is no damn nOOk, and there is no B-29 with a gawddamned n00k?
If the B-29 ever does start getting developed it can be updated on the sticky. If this sticky is never created we'll take it as a hint that the B-29 with n00k is currently in developement.
Thank you.
EDIT - And that we will expect the B-29 and nOOk in 2 weeks. Or when the Combat Tour is released, which ever comes first.
AMEN!:cool:
-
Originally posted by Hornet33
And what's the differance? Fission or fusion? Both types of reactions are nuclear in nature. Atoms are being split and releasing huge amounts of energy. The only differance is the method used to release that energy. Little Boy and Fat Man were in fact nuclear weapons. Calling them by a different name doesn't change what they really are.
NOOB
-
Originally posted by kennyhayes
we need b29 but with no nook
newb,noob,n3wb,n00b.. no matter how you spell it you are a newb.:cool:
-
Originally posted by Masherbrum
Fat Man - Spontaneous Fission (because of the Polonium core)
Little Boy - Fission (not Spontaneous, as this was a Uranium based weapon)
They were both Fission.
Polonium? :)
Plutonium, which was actually derived from Uranium in the first place.
Both bombs were fission devices.
-
I have a different opinion than most I guess. I feel the b-29 should be added to AH2. However, after many other holes in the plane set are filled. The B-29 was indeed used in many missions and roles in the PT. Last time I checked even the F4U-1C and Seafire were used in far less numbers than the B-29. If you want to complain about how high and fast it flies fine but I think a hefty perk price will make it a worthy target to the enemy (200ish a set?).
Half of me wants the atomic bomb the other half doesnt. In my line of thinking you will have a very expensive bird with a 500-1000 perk bombload. I dont know about you but I would sweat every dot I saw. The idea of a 600 perk worthless sortie is stomach churning. The other half tells me that the bomb would be abused and lead to other harmful gameplay. Youd see alot more milkrunning buffs then!
B29....yes....enventually!!
Little Boy/Fat Man..............no!
CFYA
-
Originally posted by Larry
Jesus they need to stop leting people from the special ed class download AH. 7714 shut up we all know how to spell nuke, after all we are about about three times older then you. You're the idiot that thinks the B25 will come out in two weeks. N00k is "733t" speak. The last thing we need is a B29 and if you think we do you're a little n00b that needs to goto summer school. Plus theres no dot commands for plaens other then RV8.
:rofl :rofl lmao nice one:rofl :rofl
-
Originally posted by Hornet33
And what's the differance? Fission or fusion? Both types of reactions are nuclear in nature. Atoms are being split and releasing huge amounts of energy.
[Science]
Ummm! I beg to differ. Fission is as you described. Fusion takes two atoms and "smashes" them together. The resulting atom is slightly less massive than the two seperate ones, and that "lost" mass is converted into energy. This is what is happening in the center of stars.
[/Science]
-
Originally posted by 7714
:huh nook you spell it like this nuke:aok
Originally posted by 7714
idiot omg its nuke
(http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c312/alohajoe_/squeakerlicenseva1.jpg)
:cool:
-
In regards to 7714......
(http://www.debbieohi.com/trek/pics/05deadjim.jpg)
-
The Fatman was a subcritical sphere of plutonium imploded to a supercritical mass with a pollonium-beryllium initatior in the core. The pollonium was used as a neutron emitter to kick start the fission process when the sphere was imploded. There was a uranium tamper around the core to reduce turbulence and reflect neutrons back into the supercritcal mass. The Fat Man was a technical marvel at the time using many new non-nuclear technologies.
The Little Boy used a gun assembly device firing a two subcritcal masses into each other by explosives down a howizter barrel using uranium as the fission material. Both were fission type devices however the Little boy used far more fissionable material than Fatman for the same explosion. Both were nuclear or atomic in nature using different methods and materials with the same end result. The release of neutrons and energy via splitting of atoms.
CFYA
-
Originally posted by Makoyouidiot
Polonium? :)
Plutonium, which was actually derived from Uranium in the first place.
Both bombs were fission devices.
Yes Polonium.
-
Meatwad->:rofl :lol
-
1st of all polonium isnt even a element!
2nd, there were only 2 atomic bombs made in WW2!
3rd the Ar234 flys high and fast so B29 shouldnt be that bad!
4th, if we dropped atomic bombs in even the largest MA places half the arena would be flattened and everybody would be fried!
5th, youd see B29s with atomic bombs landing 200+ kills.
6th, Napalm is a better and funner alternative to atomic weapons!
7th, we would have newbs in B29s blowing themselves up with atomic bombs!
8th, why dont you people get real and quit asking for atom bombs!
9th, 7714 isnt dead, hes in a looney house!
10th, we cant get the B29 until we get the He 111!
Listen to these 10 things and you arent stupid!
:D :D :D :aok :D :D :D
-
Originally posted by Capt.Joe
(http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c312/alohajoe_/squeakerlicenseva1.jpg)
:cool:
:rofl
-
1.Polonium is a chemical element in the periodic table that has the symbol Po and atomic number 84. A rare and highly radioactive metalloid[1], polonium is chemically similar to tellurium and bismuth, and it occurs in uranium ores. Polonium has been studied for possible use in heating spacecraft. It is unstable; all isotopes of polonium are radioactive.
Amazing what 5 seconds comes up with.:noid
2. Technically there were 3 atomic bombs in WW2......Trinity Test???
3.The AR 234 doesnt care 20,000 plus lbs of ord with defensive guns sticking out of it.
4. The atomic bomb dropped in WW2 only had a effective blast radius of 2-3 miles. Hardly a map wiper.
5. Whens the last time you saw 200 people in a 2 mile radius?
6.Funner isnt a word....
7. Noobs wouldnt be able to afford the nuke....heavy perk price?
8. The atom bomb only ended the war..........who cares right.....the most important technological advancement in warfare at the time.
9. Did he ever leave?
10. We do need other planesets filled first.
11. Panzer5 struck out on 8 out of 10.....all in all poor post!
CFYA
-
Originally posted by 7714
:huh nook you spell it like this nuke:aok
(http://i36.photobucket.com/albums/e31/davizzzle/f1c9afc0.jpg)
-
Yet you must agree, napalm would be fun for ground targets such as goons.
-
back a while ago i posted something on napalm i got negative posts.
-
Ya know, I dont know why any of you want a nuclear weapon on AH! Only 2 were used in combat! It would be a bunch of Kim Jong Ils, Ayatollah Khomeinis, and Stalins running around yelling they got atomic bombs and arent afraid to use them!
HTC said we arent going to get any special bombs on this game!
So you special people who wanna use atomic weapons can give it a rest or move to North Korea and make atom bombs for Kim!
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/3/3d/Kim_Jong_il.jpg)
:aok
-
No apologies? I feel cheated........I spent a whole 2 minutes disproving your whole post.:cry
If HTC said NO special bombs.....why do you even care? It a WISHLIST. I dont know about you but just about NONE of my wishes come true. So what exactly are you afraid of? Opinions different than yours?
CFYA
-
Nah, you ALL have it wrong, I think he means we should have a B29 with a COOK. That would be awesome.
"Chef, where are my damn pancakes? I NEED MY PANCAKES NOW!"
-
Originally posted by Denholm
ground targets such as goons.
This thread is t3h r0xx0rz.
-
Originally posted by Wes14
Please use the dam search button it looks like this >>(http://forums.hitechcreations.com/forums/images/top_search.gif)<<
If somebody will try to search for "nook" word, forum will crash through overflow.
-
Originally posted by PanzerIV
Ya know, I dont know why any of you want a nuclear weapon on AH! Only 2 were used in combat! It would be a bunch of Kim Jong Ils, Ayatollah Khomeinis, and Stalins running around yelling they got atomic bombs and arent afraid to use them!
HTC said we arent going to get any special bombs on this game!
So you special people who wanna use atomic weapons can give it a rest or move to North Korea and make atom bombs for Kim!
The simi retarded kids who ask for B29s with n00ks cant even make a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, let alone put a nuclear weapon together.
Pyro (co-founder of AH) has said that the n00k will never be put into the game.
I wish that HTC employed big bouncer type guys that, when you seriously ask for a nuke, come to your house at 6am, knock on your door, and while you answer,still rubbing the sleep out of your eyes, get six inches from your face. Take a deep breath and yell NOOOOO. Then stand back up, because they had to bend down to reach a 12yr old level, reach back and slap you a good one. Mabey then all this will stop.
-
Originally posted by EskimoJoe
Nah, you ALL have it wrong, I think he means we should have a B29 with a COOK. That would be awesome.
"Chef, where are my damn pancakes? I NEED MY PANCAKES NOW!"
Awww man, I LOVE pancakes. What was this thread about, anyway?
-
Originally posted by PanzerIV
1st of all polonium isnt even a element!
2nd, there were only 2 atomic bombs made in WW2!
3rd the Ar234 flys high and fast so B29 shouldnt be that bad!
4th, if we dropped atomic bombs in even the largest MA places half the arena would be flattened and everybody would be fried!
5th, youd see B29s with atomic bombs landing 200+ kills.
6th, Napalm is a better and funner alternative to atomic weapons!
7th, we would have newbs in B29s blowing themselves up with atomic bombs!
8th, why dont you people get real and quit asking for atom bombs!
9th, 7714 isnt dead, hes in a looney house!
10th, we cant get the B29 until we get the He 111!
Listen to these 10 things and you arent stupid!
1. Yes it is, look it up
2. True
3. idk what u said lol
4. Yeah, no fun
5. lmao yeah
6. HELL YEAH! NAPALM OWNS! BURN THOSE DAMN GOONS lol
7. lol yeah
8. seriously
9. idk about that
10. After we get B29 we get Ju390 lol
-
Originally posted by CFYA
1.Polonium is a chemical element in the periodic table that has the symbol Po and atomic number 84. A rare and highly radioactive metalloid[1], polonium is chemically similar to tellurium and bismuth, and it occurs in uranium ores. Polonium has been studied for possible use in heating spacecraft. It is unstable; all isotopes of polonium are radioactive.
Amazing what 5 seconds comes up with.:noid
2. Technically there were 3 atomic bombs in WW2......Trinity Test???
3.The AR 234 doesnt care 20,000 plus lbs of ord with defensive guns sticking out of it.
4. The atomic bomb dropped in WW2 only had a effective blast radius of 2-3 miles. Hardly a map wiper.
5. Whens the last time you saw 200 people in a 2 mile radius?
6.Funner isnt a word....
7. Noobs wouldnt be able to afford the nuke....heavy perk price?
8. The atom bomb only ended the war..........who cares right.....the most important technological advancement in warfare at the time.
9. Did he ever leave?
10. We do need other planesets filled first.
11. Panzer5 struck out on 8 out of 10.....all in all poor post!
CFYA
2. Trinity was a TEST, wasnt deployed in an act of war
3. speed makes up for it
4. it destroyed 90% of Hiroshima
5. On Heroes of the Pacific lol
6. o well lol
7. if u play on 8 player theres no perk points
8. ended the war and started another one (cold war)
9. idk lol
10. i want the I-16, Ki27, Ki43, Meteor, H8K, a kamikaze plane lol, F1M Pete, and the F6F-5 with real life guns (4x .50cals and 2x 20mms) before we get the B29
-
Originally posted by loser
Awww man, I LOVE pancakes. What was this thread about, anyway?
Something about nooks, cooks, and pancakes. Maybe pancakes made of napalm, or napalm on pancakes...:huh
-
On #2 I agree but he said and I quote "There were only 2 bombs made in WW2" Which is not accurate because there were 3 made including the Trinity test.
On #3 Sorry I will take the extra 18 tons(or so) of ord thank you very much!
On #4 I agree but Hiroshima only covered 3-4 mile area even now its not much bigger.
On #5 How dare you mention that name!
On #7 Not that I am advocating the nuke but you could disable it in H2H.
On #8 While the creation of the nuclear bomb did start a cold war it would have happened eventually anyway. The Russians exploded there very own only a few years later. The Germans had research going before the end of the war as well. Either way SOMEONE was going to let the nuclear genie about of the bottle.
On #10 I agree completly. There are many wholes that need to be filled in the planeset first. However.....you cant deny the impact the B-29 had in a convential attack. Also there are many planes that were made in less numbers that are currently in the game.
B-29 IN
Nuke NOT IN
CFYA
-
Anything other than the 234 would be helpful to spend my bomber perks on. Or make it convertable to fighter perks (but not at a 1:1 ratio, maybe like 1:3 or 1:2).
-
Originally posted by CFYA
On #2 I agree but he said and I quote "There were only 2 bombs made in WW2" Which is not accurate because there were 3 made including the Trinity test.
On #3 Sorry I will take the extra 18 tons(or so) of ord thank you very much!
On #4 I agree but Hiroshima only covered 3-4 mile area even now its not much bigger.
On #5 How dare you mention that name!
On #7 Not that I am advocating the nuke but you could disable it in H2H.
On #8 While the creation of the nuclear bomb did start a cold war it would have happened eventually anyway. The Russians exploded there very own only a few years later. The Germans had research going before the end of the war as well. Either way SOMEONE was going to let the nuclear genie about of the bottle.
On #10 I agree completly. There are many wholes that need to be filled in the planeset first. However.....you cant deny the impact the B-29 had in a convential attack. Also there are many planes that were made in less numbers that are currently in the game.
CFYA
5. Why lol
-
Originally posted by PanzerIV
1st of all polonium isnt even a element!
2nd, there were only 2 atomic bombs made in WW2!
3rd the Ar234 flys high and fast so B29 shouldnt be that bad!
4th, if we dropped atomic bombs in even the largest MA places half the arena would be flattened and everybody would be fried!
5th, youd see B29s with atomic bombs landing 200+ kills.
6th, Napalm is a better and funner alternative to atomic weapons!
7th, we would have newbs in B29s blowing themselves up with atomic bombs!
8th, why dont you people get real and quit asking for atom bombs!
9th, 7714 isnt dead, hes in a looney house!
10th, we cant get the B29 until we get the He 111!
#1: Wrong, yes it is. Its number 94 on the periodic table. Uranium being number 92.
#2: Wrong, there were three but only two were used in combat
#3: The Ar234 carrys about 3300lbs of bombs and only has two guns.
#4: There would be alot of people using them but the A bombs droped in WWII were crap and didnt do much damage outside of 3-5miles.
#5: Unless there were 200 people taking off from a field when it got nuked, no.
#6: Not really.
#7: Nuke will NEVER be in the game, but if they were they would be about 10,000 perks, so no.
#8: N00Bs ask for n00ks about ever month so it wont stop.
#9: Who cares about that little squeeker. Im glad he got PNGed.
#10: How things are going we'll have ever US bomber that ever flew in WWII before we get the He-111.
-
Wow Larry......your a day late and a dollar short.
FYI Its atomic number is 84.
Wait......maybe if you actually READ the posts before, you might have seen I posted that already along with half your other points.
Zzzzzzz
CFYA
-
Nuclear bomb used 500 times guessing (including tests)
put B29 on regular ordnance with 20mm tail cannon remote control turret 20,000lbs of bombs in each ship 3 planes hq destructor mega cv killer TG killer plane
-
Wrong......all total there 1100 or so full nuclear detonations by the United States ALONEThis includes surface, subsurface, low and high altitude tests. The most powerful being the 50 megaton (designed to yeild 100 but was detuned for fallout concerns) tested by the Soviets.
There were only 3 detonated before the close of WW2 tho.
-
good god...
-
Originally posted by CFYA
Wow Larry......your a day late and a dollar short.
FYI Its atomic number is 84.
Wait......maybe if you actually READ the posts before, you might have seen I posted that already along with half your other points.
Zzzzzzz
CFYA
Oh im sry noob but I though the other noob misspelled Plutonium.
Are you still mad about the other day? Mabey one of these days youll stop scorepotatoing and learn how to fly. Well now that I think about it no you wont.
So Im sorry if i got your panties all bunched up. Do I have to call you mommie to help you with them?
-
i want da nook so i can fly my B29 and bomb stuff while i take my ridalin! then da non-noobs will fear my squeaking voice when i use my mic !
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/6/6f/Movie_date_movie_napoleon.jpg)
kid who nooked the Bishops last knight in late-war orange arena!
-
I will gladly quit this game if anyone can provide one film of me score whoring.
ANYONE????
Im sorry I can score better than you just flying normally..........you still wont DA either. The only reason I fly EW, or MW is to keep the score tards from steam rolling bases.
-
Film of you scorewhoring? LOL
Im sorry but I dont scorepotato. I fly untill I run out fuel and ammo and still have a better rank then you. And I dont DA little smack talking noobs becuase I know Ill just beat you down.
Lets see heres a quick look at the score page (just for ****s and giggles)
(Note Im useing "TrueKill" because Iv had my other name for 2days and have been screwing around over the weekend.)
CFYA
Fighter
K/D 2.40
K/S 1.41
Rank - 107
Attack
K/D 1.84
K/S 1.23
Rank - 371
TrueKill
Fighter
K/D 3.68
K/S 1.89
Rank - 97
Attack
K/D 3.30
K/S 2.00
Rank - 94
Wow kid your L33T! Also Id like to note his main ride is the Spit IX and Tempest. So good luck being a little noob and flying around in easymode planes. If you ever want to learn how to fly tell my Ill take you to the TA and tech you something. Untill then shut your mouth and go milk some more.
-
LOL....you call me the score tard yet you are the one posting stats! Why dont you post the rest of the stats to show you why I fly tempests? Maybe its because I fly alone over enemy territory with 5-10 guys around? As fas a k/d and k/s....they are worthless. I cant count how many times I have ditched to go defend another base in EW/MW. My average tempest sortie is 8-10 kills flown in the worst places on the map. Ya know the ones where theres a full red dar bar with little or no green. I wont even up a tempest unless the friendlies are out numbered 2 to 1 or MORE. Ask anyone whos been killed by me in a temp. 99 or 100 will tell you I was alone or very out numbered. You dodged the original question...why wont you DA? I suck...it should be easy!
Like I said post film of me score whoring or flying a tempest in easy mode and I will walk. I make this assurance because NO ONE can disprove me. You dodge the real questions yet post trash on other subjects. No one cares about you or the JG54s. As for me.....I could careless what you or anyone else thinks about what, how, and where I fly.
DA for account close?
CFYA
-
all you lame NOOK noobs make the people who want the 29 added for practical and historic purposes always hi jack these threads.
go back to CS or WOW
-
Originally posted by MadMan
all you lame NOOK noobs make the people who want the 29 added for practical and historic purposes always hi jack these threads.
go back to CS or WOW
Thanks for bringing up this thread.
-
Are you speaking sarcasticly? :)
Regards,
Subway
-
Originally posted by SuBWaYCH
Are you speaking sarcasticly? :)
Regards,
Subway
(http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z283/MercenaryAXIII/duh_Garfield.jpg)
Sorry had to :)
-
Originally posted by SuBWaYCH
Are you speaking sarcasticly? :)
Yes.
-
nuff said LOL
-
Where's my mother ****ing sticky at biatches?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
-
Originally posted by DiabloTX
Where's my mother ****ing sticky at biatches?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Loaded question if there ever was one, bro. Heh.