Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: rpm on June 26, 2007, 05:54:00 AM
-
link (http://www.stateportpilot.com/stories/6-20%20Teacher%20Student%20Snow.htm)
This is ****ed up.
On a side note, the Arkansas and Alabama Chambers of Commerce have sent wedding gifts.
-
But wait! It was legal. The girls parents signed their consent. Don't you want to uphold this Constitutional right? Or do you just pick and choose.
-
Originally posted by cav58d
But wait! It was legal. The girls parents signed their consent. Don't you want to uphold this Constitutional right? Or do you just pick and choose.
from the link
The Hagers said they believed that left the school system responsible for handling the situation.
My read is that RPM is taking exception that the school district did not take seriously it's obligation to exercise parental authority in the situation.
[head scratch]wait... [/head scratch]
-
Holden is dead on. The school is guardian and responsable in one instance and not in another.
How convenient!
(http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g285/catholiclouisiana/church_lady.jpg)
(note for clarity: the parents are dipspits)
-
If her parents didnt want them to get married, why didnt they just say NO to the consent instead of saying YES then acting like the victims.
Wonder if she is a trailer skank. Betcha she is knocked up right now
-
Having read the link, I am wondering what the beef is? The offending teacher was investigated by the police and the school administration. Evidence showed that the student and teacher were exchanging e-mails and text messages, but yet nothing inappropriate was indicated by either investigation.
Had there been evidence of law-breaking, action could have been taken. The man was innocent until proven guilty, right? He could not be fired without substantiated cause.
I'm not unsympathetic to the desire to fire a teacher who is prone to manipulate his students. There was an incident similar to this several years ago at my old school.
The teacher in question had been caught in three inappropriate situations with students in as many years. Incident one: He bought hard liquor for two female students while on a week long field trip to the Grand Canyon. Incident two: He wrote love letters to, and gave a ring to, a 14 year old girl, promising to divorce his wife and marry her. Incident three: he retrieved a note from a female student, during class and in full view of several students, which she had secreted away inside her brazziere.
The parents of the girl in incident two were friends of mine. The girl's adoptive father was a fellow teacher at the same school. Yet our superintendent and his wife, also friends of mine, were so agog over the offender's teaching ability, they ran interference for him.
The second incident alone should have gotten him fired. Yet, it took the third incident to get the job done, and then it only happened because the girl with the booby note was related to a school board member.
Even at that, he was "allowed" to tender his resignation at the END of the school year, and nothing was ever written into his record.
The wife of the superintendent, who was and is a close friend, thought he was the victim of a witch-hunt, and she was angry with me for a while because I didn't give him any sympathy. I'm unrepentent in my views on the subject. The bastage needed to go. If he had manipulated a daughter of mine the way he did the girl in the second incident, blood would have flowed.
Yet, even HE deserved a hearing, and since all three incidents took place at or during school functions, the school board and administration were obligated to do something.
The difference rpm, between this man and the teacher cited in your link, is that one provided plenty of evidence of wrongdoing, while the authorities could find no evidence in the other.
You cannot convict without evidence.
Regards, Shuckins
-
wow... a pervert public school teacher! next you will be finding necrophiliacs in the undertaker trade.
lazs
-
Lazs, I haven't spoken to the man in years, and do not intend to. My skin crawls every time I see him.
I always will believe he banged the 14 year old.
-
RPM is pisssed cuz he's NOT a Teacher.
And can't play Sports!
:D
Mac
-
Alaska and South Carolina might just operate under a different set of laws, but that's only a wild effing guess. How inconvenient! :D (That's not to say the school shouldn't have fired the perv for texting a student in the middle of the night in the first place.)
Maybe I'm old fashioned, but this girl's father was negligent in his duty to protect his daughter. He should have made some hard decisions and "convinced" this teacher that he was no longer interested in the girl. The whole thing is disgusting.
-
Shuckins, do some more research on the guy. He's pure sleaze and the school knew about his "relationship".
-
Originally posted by VOR
Alaska and South Carolina might just operate under a different set of laws, but that's only a wild effing guess. How inconvenient! :D (That's not to say the school shouldn't have fired the perv for texting a student in the middle of the night in the first place.)
Maybe I'm old fashioned, but this girl's father was negligent in his duty to protect his daughter. He should have made some hard decisions and "convinced" this teacher that he was no longer interested in the girl. The whole thing is disgusting.
yup. I don't think a jury would convict you. it's the perfect setup for a jury nullification and all but the most imbecillic prosectuing attorneys know this.
-
I'll take your word for it rpm. I don't doubt that he was pure sleaze. Yet the link you provided stated flatly that neither the school authorities nor the police could find any evidence of inappropriate activities.
Provide hard evidence of child molestation and I will be first in line with a rope. Well, figuratively at least....but if it was a daughter of mine I'd kick his nads so hard they'd become close friends with his tonsils (Howdy ya'll! Nice ta meet ya! Why ya'll so bruised up?).
Regards
-
I remember seeing that article last week.
What's the age of consent over there?
You know, if this gal was in love with a musician or actor...it wouldnt be so big a deal. Unusual, yes...but not unheard of. But her own coach? Ehh...dang weird.
I agree with the point made previously, why didnt her own parents do more to block her from seeing him?
Weird.
-
Originally posted by Shuckins
I'll take your word for it rpm. I don't doubt that he was pure sleaze. Yet the link you provided stated flatly that neither the school authorities nor the police could find any evidence of inappropriate activities.
Provide hard evidence of child molestation and I will be first in line with a rope. Well, figuratively at least....but if it was a daughter of mine I'd kick his nads so hard they'd become close friends with his tonsils (Howdy ya'll! Nice ta meet ya! Why ya'll so bruised up?).
Regards
I read some links in the local NC papers last week when the story broke but I can't find them this morning. There were posts from students and parents of South Brunswick all stating Wuchae's activities were well known but his success as a coach kept the school from digging into the allegations.
-
^^^:rofl
besides,
Betty said Tuesday that Windy’s intention to marry Wuchae came as a shock, but she and Dennis agreed to sign a consent form because they didn’t know what else to do.
How bout saying NO! (http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t92/Airscrew/FunnyFace6.gif)
I think the big mistake here was allowing these two people to breed in the first place...
(http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t92/Airscrew/WeirdEyes.gif)
-
The wife loves to watch the show entitled The Super Nanny.
Believe me, you would never go broke betting on the cluelessness of modern parents. Hand wringers over how to discipline a four-year-old brat.
My momma didn't waste any time agonizing over how to handle me. Neither did my dad. Whoo-eee...:D
-
my wife and my daughter like to watch one of those Nanny shows, I forget which one. I leave the room, I just get filled with this overwhelming desire to smack the **** out of one or both of the parents
-
Originally posted by Airscrew
^^^:rofl
besides,
How bout saying NO! (http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t92/Airscrew/FunnyFace6.gif)
I think the big mistake here was allowing these two people to breed in the first place...
(http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t92/Airscrew/WeirdEyes.gif)
agreed and to think that they still have a son. if you can't steer your 16 y/o daughter from a 40 y/o man then you lack parenting skills.