Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: Ace8765 on July 05, 2007, 09:14:12 PM

Title: Tank suggestions
Post by: Ace8765 on July 05, 2007, 09:14:12 PM

Because there are only a few tanks on AHII, i was coming up with a list of tanks that could be added for a better experience. I mean when you play you only see 2 tanks being played (Tigers and Shermans). Yes i do know its called Aces High but still its a WWII battlefield and it should be as realistic as possible

M26 Pershing
King Tiger
Comet
Crocidile
Churchill
Panther
Stalin-II (dont know proper name sry =[ )
StumTiger (Massive tiger tank with a Navel cannon)
M18 Hellcat
StugIII (Anti Tank gun)
M5 Stuart
Pz2
Panzer MKIII

thats my list... plz comment.            AND PLZ STAY ON TOPIC

Title: Tanks
Post by: Spikes on July 05, 2007, 09:48:04 PM

Search button is awesome.

Title: Tanks
Post by: Meatwad on July 05, 2007, 10:04:21 PM

I want the He-111 tank please :)

And a Tu-2/Pe-2 for flavor

Title: Tanks
Post by: kennyhayes on July 05, 2007, 10:05:19 PM

what about a mk.viii british tank

Title: Tanks
Post by: E25280 on July 05, 2007, 10:09:36 PM

Before anything else -- how could you NOT list the Wirbelwind?????

After the Wirbelwind, I would like to see the earlier armor filled out before adding a bunch of late war uber-tanks . . . or at least armor that would be significantly different than what we already have in the game.

Pershing -- in game terms, not too different from the Tiger.
King Tiger -- eh, very rare, I personally could do without it.
Comet -- again, in game terms, not much different than the Firefly.
Crocodile -- no need for a flame-throwing tank.
Churchill -- many variants to choose from.  Slower than the current set, very heavy armor, relatively weak weapon -- would at least add variety.
Panther -- would love to see it, heavily perked.
Stalin JS-II (or IS-II) -- Large HE shell, but again, hard time seeing the difference in game terms vs. the Tiger (except for the inferior optics).
Sturmtiger -- not really.  I thought it was more an experimental vehicle.
M-18 Hellcat -- Sure.
StGIII -- I would prefer the Hetzer myself, but there are a wide array of assault guns to choose from, and the StGIII would be as good as any.
M5 Stuart -- Yes.

If I ruled the universe, aside from immediately smiting my enemies, I would add a few variants of the Sherman first (early M4 with the 75mm, M4A3 with the 76mm gun, one of the 105mm variants, perhaps the Calliope) because you get some decent variety off the same chassis.

Then I would add a few more PzkwIV variants (C, D, and F versions) for the same reason.

Then maybe the T-34/85.

Then the truly early war tanks such as the PzkwIII, Pzkw 38(t), Matilda, Crusader, BT-7, T-26, S-35, Char-b1, M-3 Grant/Lee and M-3 Stuart. . . not necessarily in that order.

Title: Tanks
Post by: Ace8765 on July 05, 2007, 10:16:52 PM

Quote

Originally posted by E25280
Before anything else -- how could you NOT list the Wirbelwind?????

After the Wirbelwind, I would like to see the earlier armor filled out before adding a bunch of late war uber-tanks . . . or at least armor that would be significantly different than what we already have in the game.

 

      The Wirbelwind is alrdy added its the german flak gun but with only 1 cannon and i know the Wirbelwind your talking about has 4 cannons and i 100% agree that HTC should update their Wirbelwind.

Title: Tanks
Post by: Meatwad on July 05, 2007, 10:33:54 PM

I can hear Moil coming now that you said his favorite word :D

Title: Tanks
Post by: Larry on July 05, 2007, 11:01:39 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Ace8765
The Wirbelwind is alrdy added its the german flak gun but with only 1 cannon and i know the Wirbelwind your talking about has 4 cannons and i 100% agree that HTC should update their Wirbelwind.

Nope, what we have in game is the "3.7 cm Flak 43 auf Flakpanzer IV "Ostwind". We need the "Wirbelwind "Whirlwind" with the 4x 2cm FlaK 38.

I dont know if my source is wrong but the production numbers for the "Ostwind" is around 50, but the "Wirblewind's" numbers are around 225. As I said I dont know if the numbers are right but if they are I think our ostwind should be made into a wirblewind.

Title: Tanks
Post by: MWL on July 06, 2007, 03:19:38 AM

Greetings,

  Perhaps instead of immediately going to the Wirblewind, perhaps we should start with something a bit, shall we say, lighter and more stately... and there were 300+ of them produced.

[http://www.panzer-reich.co.uk/2cm-flakvierling-38-auf-selbstfahrlafette-sdkfz.7-1.htm

  Just a thought.....






:noid

Regards,

Title: Tanks
Post by: MOIL on July 06, 2007, 03:43:51 PM

Did I hear someone say WIRBELWIND
I love you guys!!!

(http://www.hobbybunker.com/images/products/80027.jpg)

Title: Tanks
Post by: Meatwad on July 06, 2007, 05:33:58 PM

There he is :D

Title: Tanks
Post by: Ace8765 on July 09, 2007, 03:37:47 AM

i have come up with a more revised list



M4 Sherman with rocket pods (rockets r short range but powerful if up close)
M5 Stuart
M3 Grant Lee
Wirbelwind-because of alot of suggestions =)
Panther
Pz-2
Kv-1
Matilda II
Panzer models 1-3
Katusha Rocket launcher   --- Yes i know its not a tank but we need arty dont you think???
Sfdkz Howling Stuka (german arty with the Sfdkz halftrack body)

Title: Re: Tank suggestions
Post by: 64kills on July 09, 2007, 06:58:03 AM

Quote

Originally posted by Ace8765
Because there are only a few tanks on AHII, i was coming up with a list of tanks that could be added for a better experience. I mean when you play you only see 2 tanks being played (Tigers and Shermans). Yes i do know its called Aces High but still its a WWII battlefield and it should be as realistic as possible

M26 Pershing
King Tiger
Comet
Crocidile
Churchill
Panther
Stalin-II (dont know proper name sry =[ )
StumTiger (Massive tiger tank with a Navel cannon)
M18 Hellcat
StugIII (Anti Tank gun)
M5 Stuart
Pz2
Panzer MKIII

thats my list... plz comment.            AND PLZ STAY ON TOPIC

your right but i would like to ad the sherman the ones that the americans used they have shorter barrels and do maore damage

Title: Tanks
Post by: 64kills on July 09, 2007, 06:59:54 AM

and flamethrowers like for japanese arena's

Title: Tanks
Post by: 64kills on July 09, 2007, 07:02:10 AM

Quote

Originally posted by Larry
Nope, what we have in game is the "3.7 cm Flak 43 auf Flakpanzer IV "Ostwind". We need the "Wirbelwind "Whirlwind" with the 4x 2cm FlaK 38.

I dont know if my source is wrong but the production numbers for the "Ostwind" is around 50, but the "Wirblewind's" numbers are around 225. As I said I dont know if the numbers are right but if they are I think our ostwind should be made into a wirblewind.

heres an idea just ask to be a designer and then do that

Title: Re: Re: Tank suggestions
Post by: WMDnow on July 09, 2007, 10:00:43 AM

Quote

Originally posted by 64kills
your right but i would like to ad the sherman the ones that the americans used they have shorter barrels and do maore damage

British did more damage, duh.

Title: Tanks
Post by: WMDnow on July 09, 2007, 10:01:23 AM

Quote

Originally posted by 64kills
and flamethrowers like for japanese arena's

No, we won't add flame throwers, absolutely no need for them.

Title: Tanks
Post by: WMDnow on July 09, 2007, 10:02:13 AM

Quote

Originally posted by 64kills
heres an idea just ask to be a designer and then do that

You can't just 'Ask' you have to be a friend of HT, and be very good at it.

Title: Tanks
Post by: WMDnow on July 09, 2007, 10:05:47 AM

Quote

Originally posted by Ace8765
i have come up with a more revised list



M4 Sherman with rocket pods (rockets r short range but powerful if up close)
M5 Stuart
M3 Grant Lee
Wirbelwind-because of alot of suggestions =)
Panther
Pz-2
Kv-1
Matilda II
Panzer models 1-3
Katusha Rocket launcher   --- Yes i know its not a tank but we need arty dont you think???
Sfdkz Howling Stuka (german arty with the Sfdkz halftrack body)

M4 with those prototype rocket pods? Enough Battlefield 1942 secret weapons for you.  I'd rather have a Preist than a katyusha, better damage amounts.  Why Hanomag?  Which was the one the germans used in Africa?

Title: Tanks
Post by: Rino on July 09, 2007, 02:15:16 PM

Quote

Originally posted by WMDnow
M4 with those prototype rocket pods? Enough Battlefield 1942 secret weapons for you.  I'd rather have a Preist than a katyusha, better damage amounts.  Why Hanomag?  Which was the one the germans used in Africa?

     Actually the Sherman "Calliope" was employed..just not very many of
them.

(http://www.secondworldwarhistory.com/imgs/m4_shermand.jpg)

     The Hanomag was the main Wehrmacht halftrack during the entire war
with at least 22 variants .

     Not that any of these would be very useful with tanks capable of hitting
things beyond 3200 yards.

Title: Tanks
Post by: Ace8765 on July 09, 2007, 11:14:01 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Rino
Actually the Sherman "Calliope" was employed..just not very many of
them.

Ty for the support guys

Title: Tanks
Post by: Ace8765 on July 09, 2007, 11:17:21 PM

Quote

Originally posted by 64kills
and flamethrowers like for japanese arena's

NO FLAMETANKS PLZ i alrdy had that chat with a senior member and he said that AHII doesnt need a flamethrowing tank (it would pwn too much when up close =]  )

Title: Tanks
Post by: Scca on July 10, 2007, 07:05:05 AM

Quote

Originally posted by MOIL
Did I hear someone say WIRBELWIND
I love you guys!!!

(http://www.hobbybunker.com/images/products/80027.jpg)

Oh boy...  You got him started...  

Just what we need.  One of these in the hands of an LTAR...sheeze..

They are bad enough in the Osti's..

Chant with me now "no Wirbelwind, no Wirbelwind, no Wirbelwind, no Wirbelwind......"

Title: Tanks
Post by: CAF001 on July 10, 2007, 04:06:43 PM

Wirbelwind!! Wirbelwind!! Wirbelwind!! Wirbelwind!! Wirbelwind!! Wirbelwind!! Wirbelwind!! Wirbelwind!!

:t :t :t :t

Title: Tanks
Post by: Wes14 on July 10, 2007, 04:12:06 PM

Wirbelwind! Wirbelwind! Wirbelwind! Wirbelwind! Wirbelwind! Wirbelwind! Wirbelwind! Wirbelwind! :noid

Title: Tanks
Post by: MOIL on July 11, 2007, 02:07:11 PM

I still love you guys!!!!

(http://www.azymut.waw.pl/ciekawostki/zagan/wirbel.jpg)

Title: Tanks
Post by: rednex21 on July 11, 2007, 07:08:17 PM

We definetly need more British tanks.

I think the following would be good enought:

A12 Matilda II - 1 x 40mm main gun (67 rnds); 1 x 7.92 in BESA coaxial MG
A22 Churchill Mk III - 1 x 57mm main gun (57 rnds); 2 x 7.92 ^ mg
*A34 Comet - 1 x QF 77mm main gun (61 rnds); 1 x coaxial+1 x hull ^ mgs

Then American Tank:

M3 Grant/Lee - too many weapons to list(making it a beast):t

These are just some of my suggestions...i think all of them were already listed but thought I'd chime in with some info:aok

Title: Tanks
Post by: rednex21 on July 11, 2007, 07:09:42 PM

(http://www.azymut.waw.pl/ciekawostki/zagan/wirbel.jpg) [/B][/QUOTE]

:O  We definetly need that!!!!!!!:t   I need as much Ground-to-Air help as i can get

Title: Tanks
Post by: Ace8765 on July 12, 2007, 03:58:46 AM

Quote

Originally posted by rednex21
We definetly need more British tanks.

I think the following would be good enought:

A12 Matilda II - 1 x 40mm main gun (67 rnds); 1 x 7.92 in BESA coaxial MG
A22 Churchill Mk III - 1 x 57mm main gun (57 rnds); 2 x 7.92 ^ mg
*A34 Comet - 1 x QF 77mm main gun (61 rnds); 1 x coaxial+1 x hull ^ mgs

Then American Tank:

M3 Grant/Lee - too many weapons to list(making it a beast):t

These are just some of my suggestions...i think all of them were already listed but thought I'd chime in with some info:aok

Comet... in map terms not much different from tiger
M3 ya
Matilda ya but no churchill...

Title: Tanks
Post by: rednex21 on July 13, 2007, 06:00:27 PM

You yourself said the Churchill and Comet.....just reinforcing.:aok

The M3 Grant/Lee was a bad tank.  This are the speicifacations i have on it:

Country of Origin: U.S.A.

Type: medium tank

In Service: 1941-1944

Combat Weight: 60,000 lbs.

Dimensions: lenght 18.5 ft.; width 8.9 ft.; height 10.3 ft.

Engine: Wright Continental R-975-EC2 nine-cylinder air-cooled
petrol engine (340hp @ 2400 rpm)

Perfomance: road speed 26mph; cross-country speed 16mph' range 120 miles; trench 6.3ft; gradient 60%

Ground Pressure: 13.4lb/sq in

Power-to-Weight: ratio 12.7hp/ton

Armour: 0.5in minimum; 1.5in maximum

Weapons: 1 x 75mm M2/M3 gun(hull sponson); 1 x 37mm M5/M6 gun in turret; 1 x 0.30in M1919A4 coaxial MG; 2 x 0.30in M1919A4 MG in bow(fixed mounting)

Ammunition: 75mm - 41 rounds

(the British version also had a .30 on the turret roof)

Title: Tanks
Post by: rednex21 on July 13, 2007, 06:04:10 PM

I also have specifics on other tanks....but not many.

Does anyone know of a book that has nothing but WW2 aircraft and Ground vehicles in it? (preferibally one that has most of the planes and tanks that were in WW2...not just the ones that had a major effect)

A website would do fine too:aok

Title: Tanks
Post by: 64kills on July 13, 2007, 06:21:45 PM

you know how they posted that pic how do you do that with iy showing the pic instead of the x

Title: Tanks
Post by: 68slayr on July 13, 2007, 06:56:22 PM

i would like to see the firefly re modeled or atleast its modeling checked...i have had them take tigr shells 800 on the side.  Then they turn there gun pop you in the face and you are dead

tanks would be nice but i would rather see the the LWs combined into a single MA ;)

Title: Tanks
Post by: MWL on July 13, 2007, 07:23:24 PM

Greetings,

  Here is a WWII GV site.  The author is focused on Advanced Squad Leader.  He does provide footnotes and references.

http://www.wwiivehicles.com/

Regards,

Title: Tanks
Post by: Ace8765 on July 14, 2007, 07:11:19 AM

nice website
very nice

Title: Tanks
Post by: Larry on July 14, 2007, 07:57:37 AM

Yep thats the site I use when looking up tanks.

Title: Tanks
Post by: boingg on July 14, 2007, 11:22:58 PM

how about the Jagpanther   or the Jagdpanzer IV either would add some serious firepower along with the limitation of a turretless design maybe throw in the su122 for something different

Title: Tanks
Post by: Bosco123 on July 15, 2007, 07:33:10 AM

you talked about the M18 hellcat.

I would be for it other than the problem would be that it was lightly armored and had a vey small tank shell which was a 70mm round it could only blow up in the face of the tiger or panther.

we wont have it for that reason

Title: Tanks
Post by: Larry on July 15, 2007, 07:54:15 AM

Quote

Originally posted by Bosco123
you talked about the M18 hellcat.

I would be for it other than the problem would be that it was lightly armored and had a vey small tank shell which was a 70mm round it could only blow up in the face of the tiger or panther.

we wont have it for that reason

ahem 76mm with HVAP rounds?  Thing is with most US tank killers is they sacrificed armor for speed. 45mph is good and all but not when a M8 can kill you with one or two hits.

Title: Tanks
Post by: VWE on July 15, 2007, 08:04:17 AM

All you tankers need one good thing, a 500lbs bomb dropped on ur little heads every time you spawn... now go grab an airplane you dweebs!

Title: Tanks
Post by: storch on July 15, 2007, 08:19:55 AM

Quote

Originally posted by VWE
All you tankers need one good thing, a 500lbs bomb dropped on ur little heads every time you spawn... now go grab an airplane you dweebs!

Tbarone and I did precisely that for most of yesterday.  I had a blast dropping 500kgers from my 110 of love into the cupola of the aces low crowd and preventing the recapture of several bases simultaneously.

Title: Tanks
Post by: T99LMG on July 15, 2007, 09:16:11 AM

Quote

Originally posted by 64kills
and flamethrowers like for japanese arena's

STOP POSTING YOUR BEING STUPID!:mad:  dont try to post everywere to raise your post number!:furious

Title: Tanks
Post by: boingg on July 15, 2007, 09:19:50 AM

any of the 251 series Hanomags would be a good addition  as an alternative to the LVT or the  M3  for troops   could have an armament package as well   some were dedicated pak vehicles others air defence  maybe add the 2.5 ton six wheel truck  to cover the soviet  troop carrier soft skinned and pretty useless in the light of the  mentioned 3600 meter main gun range   as far as tank destroyers the m 36 would be a nice addition 90 mm but a lightly armored turret

Title: Tanks
Post by: Bosco123 on July 15, 2007, 12:48:09 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Larry
ahem 76mm with HVAP rounds?  Thing is with most US tank killers is they sacrificed armor for speed. 45mph is good and all but not when a M8 can kill you with one or two hits.

that is what im saying you can get killed with one bullet easy

Title: Tanks
Post by: PanzerIV on July 15, 2007, 07:00:24 PM

I want IS-2, Panthers, Pershing, and a Japanese tank.

Title: Tanks
Post by: Ace8765 on July 21, 2007, 07:46:07 AM

IS-2 is just like the Tiger
Panther yes :)
Pershing no agian its just like the tiger
Jap tank, why???? they suck anyway 1 shot from sherman they burst into flames

Title: Re: Tank suggestions
Post by: PanzerIV on July 21, 2007, 05:48:04 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Ace8765
Because there are only a few tanks on AHII, i was coming up with a list of tanks that could be added for a better experience. I mean when you play you only see 2 tanks being played (Tigers and Shermans). Yes i do know its called Aces High but still its a WWII battlefield and it should be as realistic as possible

M26 Pershing
King Tiger
Comet
Crocidile
Churchill
Panther
Stalin-II (dont know proper name sry =[ )
StumTiger (Massive tiger tank with a Navel cannon)
M18 Hellcat
StugIII (Anti Tank gun)
M5 Stuart
Pz2
Panzer MKIII

thats my list... plz comment.            AND PLZ STAY ON TOPIC

Stalin-II is the IS-2!

You changed your mind about the Pershing?

Title: Tanks
Post by: battel gnome94 on July 21, 2007, 07:45:46 PM

why dont we get some AT guns and some jappans tanks and italyian tanks would be cool.

also the Crocidile is a flame thrower tanks made to take out bunkers not much els.

Title: Tanks
Post by: Ace8765 on July 23, 2007, 02:40:55 PM

Quote

Originally posted by battel gnome94
why dont we get some AT guns and some jappans tanks and italyian tanks would be cool.

also the Crocidile is a flame thrower tanks made to take out bunkers not much els.

Italian tanks: not very many of em and they wernt very good
Japan Tanks: Same as italy
AT guns: im for it maybe add the M18 Hellcat or the Jagedpather or StugIII

Title: Duel Drive Tanks (DD)
Post by: Ace8765 on July 23, 2007, 02:44:06 PM

There were specailized tanks during the D-Day invasion that the US called Duel Drives because, they could go into water and not sink. They had Canvas Skirting to protect its real surprize :D       HTC could add this to the CVs to give them more firepower when doing amphibous landings :D

Title: Tanks
Post by: 64kills on July 23, 2007, 03:15:11 PM

Quote

Originally posted by T99LMG
STOP POSTING YOUR BEING STUPID!:mad:  dont try to post everywere to raise your post number!:furious

SHUT UP LEAVE ME ALONE I"M NOT AND STOP GETTING ON EVERY POST I MAKE YOUR ACTING LIKE MY GRNDMOTHER :mad: :furious  AND I MEAN FOR LIKE THE AMERICAN VS. JAP ARENAS

Title: Tanks
Post by: Wes14 on July 23, 2007, 04:41:15 PM

:rolleyes:

Title: Tanks
Post by: Ace8765 on July 24, 2007, 12:19:05 PM

again the game doesnt need a flamethrowing tank.... it was ment for bunker busting anyway
:D

Title: Tanks
Post by: kilz on July 24, 2007, 07:47:17 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Scca
Oh boy...  You got him started...  

Just what we need.  One of these in the hands of an LTAR...sheeze..

They are bad enough in the Osti's..

Chant with me now "no Wirbelwind, no Wirbelwind, no Wirbelwind, no Wirbelwind......"

shut up you

Title: Tanks
Post by: Spikes on July 24, 2007, 08:55:40 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Wes14
:rolleyes:

Tell me about it...lol

Title: Tanks
Post by: 64kills on July 25, 2007, 11:59:58 AM

wes  will you plz stop signing off every time i send you and IM  and skins anyone got some computer that they don't use anymore thats still can run AH(http://www.jeboavatars.com angry_pc_user)

Title: Tanks
Post by: Wes14 on July 25, 2007, 12:16:56 PM

Dude, leave me alone, go annoy Spy15 or Ack-Ack, or anyone else, i dont care, just go away :furious

Title: Tanks
Post by: 64kills on July 25, 2007, 12:38:22 PM

ok the after ever post i make stop puttingGolly-geen

Title: Tanks
Post by: Wes14 on July 25, 2007, 12:47:23 PM

Quote

Originally posted by 64kills
ok the after ever post i make stop puttingGolly-geen

:confused:

:rolleyes:=godamn?

Title: Tanks
Post by: tedrbr on July 25, 2007, 12:47:29 PM

First, I'd like to know why the German 88mm FlaK36 (http://forums.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=198029&highlight=German+88mm)  did not make the list.  Long range, direct fire 88mm plus long range indirect artillery, plus manned puffy ack ability to over 30K altitude.

Second, whenever I see long wish lists, I remember that we've had 12 additions in the past 37 months.  Three in the last 20 months.  

04/2007 ver 2.10 Added Sherman Firefly
11/2006 ver 2.09 Added F4UA1
03/2006 ver 2.07 Added the Jeep, B-17 updated
11/2005 ver 2.06 Spit and 109 lineup changes: Added Bf 109G-14, Spitfire XVI, Spitfire VIII. Changed the 109G-10 to a 109K-4. Changed the Spitfire Vc to a Vb
07/2005 ver 2.04 P47N (?)
01/2005 ver 2.02 Added P38 F (? later G) and J
11/2004 ver 2.01 Added B24J, T34, and Ki84
06/2004 ver 2.00
before that was Beta

How realistic is it we'll get a long laundry list of additions?

Title: Tanks
Post by: Scca on July 25, 2007, 12:55:57 PM

Quote

Originally posted by LTARkilz
shut up you

Ok, no problem...


no Wirbelwind, no Wirbelwind, no Wirbelwind, no Wirbelwind

Title: Tanks
Post by: 64kills on July 25, 2007, 01:03:19 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Wes14
:confused:

:rolleyes:=godamn?

call:rolleyes: what you want but i'm getting tired of you doing that so sssssssstttttttttooooooooooooooooppppppppppppppppppp and tes i'm a squeaker

Title: Tanks
Post by: Wes14 on July 25, 2007, 01:23:06 PM

i will stop,if you promise to be a little less annoying(being annoying is my job! :mad: ) :D

Title: Tanks
Post by: 64kills on July 25, 2007, 01:26:09 PM

ok deal but do you know whatn program to use to make maps

Title: Tanks
Post by: 64kills on July 25, 2007, 01:28:51 PM

have you ever noticed that some newu's are beter at somthing that you are and then you thought you where the best dang some of them are good anyone that knows what program to use to make maps plz tell me

Title: Tanks
Post by: Wes14 on July 25, 2007, 01:34:51 PM

i dont know any progams other then Gimp (dunno the url to download it) and MS paint

Title: Tanks
Post by: 64kills on July 25, 2007, 01:39:06 PM

unlike you i don't annoy newu's

Title: Tanks
Post by: Wes14 on July 25, 2007, 01:44:44 PM

but you annoy Forum users. :p

Title: Tanks
Post by: 64kills on July 25, 2007, 01:56:26 PM

would you pay to get me away from you

Title: Tanks
Post by: Wes14 on July 25, 2007, 02:33:55 PM

Quote

Originally posted by 64kills
would you pay to get me away from you

:D  i don't have to pay anything to make it so i cant see what you post :p

Title: Tanks
Post by: kennyhayes on July 25, 2007, 03:26:06 PM

BRING ME THE MK.VIII
it was used in operation market garden
big BIG BIG!

Title: Tanks
Post by: Ace8765 on August 09, 2007, 10:52:48 PM

Quote

Originally posted by Larry
ahem 76mm with HVAP rounds?  Thing is with most US tank killers is they sacrificed armor for speed. 45mph is good and all but not when a M8 can kill you with one or two hits.

50mph btw and it can kill tigers very fast with HVAP rounds
i also heard that the Hellcat could turn its turret so fast that it could run away and shoot to its rear in less then 30 seconds