Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: SFRT - Frenchy on July 28, 2007, 06:18:23 PM
-
Happy we are getting along :D
video (http://www.defense.gouv.fr/marine/base/mediatheque/videos/rafale_sur_uss_enterprise)
forum link with pictures (http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?t=116910)
-
Pretty cool! :)
-
See they had to practice a few times. :D
-
Yep, those American carriers are way too small for us.:p
-
They sure are gorgeous birds, no question.
-
Kick bellybutton looking plane. Nice to see to cooperation.
-
are they defecting?:D
-
They're surrendering. :D
-
Assuming form was an influence, it's satisfying when form and function come together. Cool looking plane. :aok
-
And specs on the Rafael?
Mach 2 and carrier aircraft? Strike, defence or multi role?
Looks utterly cool.
-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dassault_Rafale
-
Ive always loved the looks of the Rafales. Not bad specs either! :)
-
The Rafale is a cool looking plane although I do like the looks of the Su-37 far better. :)
-
Originally posted by OOZ662
They're surrendering. :D
:rofl :rofl :rofl :aok
-
its amazing that they were capatable with the uss enterprises catapult system i though french carriers used ramps or are thes british carriers
-
Originally posted by evenhaim
its amazing that they were capatable with the uss enterprises catapult system i though french carriers used ramps or are thes british carriers
british, thai, spanish, italian, russian and indian (soon) cvs use ramps. French use regular catapults
-
I've always woundered if the French ever used our CVs for operations. Pretty cool to see that.
Now I would love to see a Su-37 land on one of our CVs, but I don't think we could catapult it off :(
Now for an F-18 to land on the DeGaul!
-
cc thnx nilsen:aok
-
Great looking plane! And Angus, how could you miss that one-don't you mean udderly cool? :rofl
-
Cool stuff, thanks for posting it.
-
Nice looking bird. Isn't it getting a bit long in the tooth at this point?
-
Originally posted by Maverick
Nice looking bird. Isn't it getting a bit long in the tooth at this point?
Huh? It entered service a couple of years ago.
-
Originally posted by Maverick
Nice looking bird. Isn't it getting a bit long in the tooth at this point?
Your thinking of the Dassault Etendard/ Super Etendard.
-
Originally posted by evenhaim
its amazing that they were capatable with the uss enterprises catapult system i though french carriers used ramps or are thes british carriers
The Royal Navy currently operates 3 Invincible class carriers. This use ramps to launch Harrier GR7s.
Contracts have just been awarded to a consortium led by BAE and Thales to replace these with two new, larger ships operating the STOVL version of F35. These ships will initially have ramps but are being designed to allow conversion to catapult/arrest operations at a later date (i.e. when the F35 is retired).
There's an interesting article here (http://www.royal-navy.mod.uk/server/show/nav.2226) about the new ships. Current expectations are that they'll be smalller than Nimitz class boats, but larger than the Charles de Gaulle. It also shows how small the Invincible boats are by comparison.
-
The Invincible class is more comparable to the USS Wasp class amphibious assault ships (that also carry a number of Harriers in addition to its helicopters). The Invincible is a "budget" carrier.
-
Originally posted by VooWho
Your thinking of the Dassault Etendard/ Super Etendard.
Yup, my bad. :(
-
Originally posted by evenhaim
its amazing that they were capatable with the uss enterprises catapult system i though french carriers used ramps or are thes british carriers
Traditionaly the French carriers used to have a catapult but they attached a steel cable to the catapult/under wings for launch. The cable would then fly into the water.:huh
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b0/Super-Etendard_1.jpg)
But on the new carrier, and I bet as a standardization process, they use the :
As a former catapult officer, I can attest how this would have generated a fair amount of interest from the air and flight-deck crews, if for nothing else than to be a break from the every-day monotony of launching flight operations. Having the French carrier Charles De Gaulle's catapult and arresting gear systems designed and installed by our NAVAIR guys and gals from Lakehurst, NJ helps in that the systems used by both French naval aircraft and our our aircraft are similar (if not almost identical).
-
Seems like that would make the planes lighter, no need to beef up the nose gear so much. But perhaps the recycle time between cat shoots is higher?
-
It's the same set-up used for the F-4 Phantom.
(http://www.history.navy.mil/photos/images/h97000/h97718.jpg)
-
Thx RPM, I didn't know that.
-
The landing problem was probably caused by the carrier going in the wrong direction...... I read somewhere that the French aircraft launch off the stern so they can get home quicker.
:p