Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: sullie363 on August 09, 2007, 02:02:47 AM

Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: sullie363 on August 09, 2007, 02:02:47 AM
Basically I think that the list of available aircraft for the CVs is a little light.  So I'd request (whether done by vote or an in house decision) that the next new aircraft to be added be one built for carriers.  Perhaps if done by vote that all the choices are sea based planes (sea hurricane, firefly, seafury...)  

I would request at the very least though that the sea hurricane be added when the hurri is eventually overhauled.
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: thndregg on August 09, 2007, 07:46:06 AM
Agreed.
Title: :)
Post by: opposum on August 09, 2007, 08:47:48 AM
sounds awesome i agree  :aok
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: Karnak on August 09, 2007, 11:44:53 AM
Seafury is postwar.

Firefly, D4Y or some such would be nice though.
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: Sikboy on August 09, 2007, 11:50:42 AM
my fingers are cramping... can someone say it for me?

-Sik
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: WMDnow on August 09, 2007, 11:51:18 AM
And, Hurricat used a catapult,  lol.  Learn your history before posting.
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: WMDnow on August 09, 2007, 11:52:07 AM
I will, Sik,  SEARCH! AHHH
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: AAolds on August 09, 2007, 12:27:58 PM
Some sea capable tanks would be cool too, like the ones used at normandy, granted most sank before reaching the shore.
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: Sikboy on August 09, 2007, 01:01:43 PM
Quote
Originally posted by WMDnow
I will, Sik,  SEARCH! AHHH


Actually, I was aiming for....


JUDY JUDY JUDY

-Sik
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: rogerdee on August 09, 2007, 01:24:16 PM
most of the tanks that sank were at the american beach the english and canadians made theres work sucsefully.
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: AAolds on August 09, 2007, 01:34:47 PM
Quote
Originally posted by rogerdee
most of the tanks that sank were at the american beach the english and canadians made theres work sucsefully.


Was it design issues of the American tanks at normandy or field conditions?
Title: Re: Something for the carriers
Post by: tedrbr on August 09, 2007, 01:55:56 PM
Quote
Originally posted by sullie363
Basically I think that the list of available aircraft for the CVs is a little light.  So I'd request (whether done by vote or an in house decision) that the next new aircraft to be added be one built for carriers.  Perhaps if done by vote that all the choices are sea based planes (sea hurricane, firefly, seafury...)  
 


If you leave it to a vote, you'll just end up with another F4U of some sort.

Judy is the best offensive weapon the blue water plane set could probably get.  A dive bomber with enough speed to actually get to target.
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: AAolds on August 09, 2007, 02:02:15 PM
Another thing that would be nice for carriers is to be able to resupply them.
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: Solar10 on August 09, 2007, 02:03:59 PM
Quote
Originally posted by WMDnow
And, Hurricat used a catapult,  lol.  Learn your history before posting.


Ironic.  Sullie has a History Degree.
Title: Re: Re: Something for the carriers
Post by: Karnak on August 09, 2007, 02:07:09 PM
Quote
Originally posted by tedrbr
Judy is the best offensive weapon the blue water plane set could probably get.  A dive bomber with enough speed to actually get to target.

Firefly wasn't a dive bomber, a fighter/bomber rather, but it did 316mph and coulds carry two 1,000lb bombs while being armed with four Hispanos.
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: Krusty on August 09, 2007, 02:09:58 PM
Quote
Originally posted by WMDnow
And, Hurricat used a catapult,  lol.  Learn your history before posting.


How about reading comprehension?


He didn't say hurricat. He said sea hurricane. The hurricat was a dilapidated Hurr1 stuck on a rocket and ditched when done. A sea hurricane was a plane refitted with arrestor gear and the equipment for CV operations.

There's a difference. :aok
Title: Re: Re: Re: Something for the carriers
Post by: tedrbr on August 09, 2007, 02:14:56 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
Firefly wasn't a dive bomber, a fighter/bomber rather, but it did 316mph and coulds carry two 1,000lb bombs while being armed with four Hispanos.


Late-model Firefly edges out the MW Judy in performance as to top speed, ammo load, and heavier guns, but Japanese plane-set needs a lot more help in general, and for PTO SEA even more.
Title: Re: Something for the carriers
Post by: Mexicana MXA on August 09, 2007, 03:46:15 PM
Quote
Originally posted by sullie363
Basically I think that the list of available aircraft for the CVs is a little light.  So I'd request (whether done by vote or an in house decision) that the next new aircraft to be added be one built for carriers.  Perhaps if done by vote that all the choices are sea based planes (sea hurricane, firefly, seafury...)  

I would request at the very least though that the sea hurricane be added when the hurri is eventually overhauled.


I agree with you mate perhaps carrier scout plane soemthing of that sort:aok
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: Denholm on August 09, 2007, 03:59:18 PM
Hello Movie, how's life?
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: sullie363 on August 10, 2007, 01:10:34 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
Seafury is postwar.


Whoops.


Yeah, big yes to the Judy, forgot about that one.

Quote
Originally posted by Solar10
Ironic. Sullie has a History Degree.


Indeed.  Did you know that Captain Kirk never actually said "Beam me up Scotty."  Also, London used to have about 100,000 full and part time prostitutes.
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: C(Sea)Bass on August 10, 2007, 01:26:58 AM
Quote
Originally posted by WMDnow
And, Hurricat used a catapult,  lol.  Learn your history before posting.


not all sea hurricnes were hurricats. Hurricat was a special version created for merchant marine defense.

http://www.fleetairarmarchive.net/aircraft/seahurricane.htm

plus it would be virtually useless, it was armed with 8 .303's, may kill some troops and scratch your paint but not much else.
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: Spikes on August 10, 2007, 09:03:57 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Sikboy
my fingers are cramping... can someone say it for me?

-Sik


JUDY JUDY JUDY!

am i right?
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: Spikes on August 10, 2007, 09:05:26 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Sikboy
Actually, I was aiming for....


JUDY JUDY JUDY

-Sik


oh...I did not read down far enough to see this...but, I guessed it right!
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: rogerdee on August 10, 2007, 12:09:57 PM
the tanks failed for a number of reasons.

the sea was very rough and they were droped off too early and too far from land,also the tanks tried to swim across the current instead of with it so soon become swamped and sank.
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: Tiger on August 10, 2007, 12:38:24 PM
mmmmm  more sea planes would be sweet.

How about we turn on formations for CV based bombers... and actually make it so they can dive bomb and climb out without losing the drones
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: Sikboy on August 10, 2007, 01:00:57 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SpikesX
JUDY JUDY JUDY!

am i right?


Word.

-Sik
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: tedrbr on August 10, 2007, 03:42:56 PM
Quote
Originally posted by sullie363
 Also, London used to have about 100,000 full and part time prostitutes.


Is that counting Parliament and the Royal Family?
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: whiteman on August 10, 2007, 04:07:14 PM
Quote
Originally posted by rogerdee
the tanks failed for a number of reasons.

the sea was very rough and they were droped off too early and too far from land,also the tanks tried to swim across the current instead of with it so soon become swamped and sank.


i saw a show on either the Histroy or Military channel that said the orders for the tanks to not be sent in never made it, thus the rough waters sunk them.
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: Bosco123 on August 11, 2007, 04:52:39 PM
we have about 10 carrier aircraft, we have 2 italian airplanes.

WE NEED MORE ITALIANS!!!:furious :D
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: tedrbr on August 11, 2007, 05:14:28 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Bosco123
we have about 10 carrier aircraft, we have 2 italian airplanes.

WE NEED MORE ITALIANS!!!:furious :D


We held a vote.  No one wanted an Italian plane that was well liked at the time, and reportedly preformed better than most, if not all, similar German 109's, and had 3 x 20mm cannons with a large ammo load out.  And b-be guns.  It was called the G.55 and it lost out in the very first round of voting.  Just too uber I suppose.... would have been a threat to all the lgays, splixteens, runstangs, and niki-hos in the game.   Would have been a threat to bombers too.  Can't have that.
Title: Something for the carriers
Post by: Bosco123 on August 11, 2007, 07:23:30 PM
well the G55 would be my first vote for the italians, always. but perk it a little to that the ponys nikis and spixteens are al under pressure