Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Stoney74 on August 11, 2007, 04:22:10 AM

Title: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: Stoney74 on August 11, 2007, 04:22:10 AM
Gents,

Beyond the mere sportsman-like facets of not ganging up on someone, there is a great tactical reason not to be part of the school of fish chasing the lone LA-7 around a field.  If you see two or three guys handling an enemy plane, grab some altitude and pick up the next guy that is guaranteed to come in shortly.  Maybe even intercept those bombers that are relatively low at 8,000 feet, but to the mob on the deck, seem stratospheric.

If we can't get sportsmanship, why not just try for sound tactics?  At the most, 2 v 1 odds on inbound bad guys.  Everybody else climb and intercept his buddies that are arriving piece-meal...

Just an idea...
Title: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: Gianlupo on August 11, 2007, 05:03:40 AM
I second that, Stoney! Too many times, when defending a base, I found myself outnumbered just because my 12 mates followed the lone running La7, leaving me to face 4 other incoming bad guys.... hone your SA and tactical skills, gents!
Title: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: Castedo on August 11, 2007, 05:46:13 AM
I say: Nice cheecks!
Title: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: Jack16 on August 11, 2007, 10:52:52 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Castedo
I say: Nice cheecks!


Lmao!:lol
Title: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: crockett on August 11, 2007, 11:26:32 AM
I hate to see 20 guys on a single con, but one thing you do have to remember. That single con is a threat to every fighter in that area, so any guy that's potentially at risk has the right to kill that target IMO. Why put yourself at risk by not killing a target that 'CAN' kill you?

So if I see a fight where a guy is out numbered then I watch the fight and sit on the side lines 'IF' I have alt and I'm out of danger. However if I'm co alt and in danger I'll try the take the guy out as well.

What I think is funny, is there are a few select guys that fly into the middle of a furball, then try to call out a target and expect everyone else to sit by idle. Ummm hello if you are in a furball it's every guy for himself and they should all be taking any target of opportunity.

I'm all for letting two guys fight it out 1 on 1 and most of the time (unless in a furball) I ask prior to joining an engagement. However a furball isn't the place to expect a 1 on 1 fight.

Back on the topic, depending on the plane I'm flying I quite often sit like a vulcher above a fight waiting for the right time to pick off some unsuspected poor sole. You have to be in the right plane though but it is a good way to rack up some kills.
Title: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: Spikes on August 11, 2007, 11:30:57 AM
Quote
Originally posted by crockett
I hate to see 20 guys on a single con, but one thing you do have to remember. That single con is a threat to every fighter in that area, so any guy that's potentially at risk has the right to kill that target IMO. Why put yourself at risk by not killing a target that 'CAN' kill you?

So if I see a fight where a guy is out numbered then I watch the fight and sit on the side lines 'IF' I have alt and I'm out of danger. However if I'm co alt and in danger I'll try the take the guy out as well.

What I think is funny, is there are a few select guys that fly into the middle of a furball, then try to call out a target and expect everyone else to sit by idle. Ummm hello if you are in a furball it's every guy for himself and they should all be taking any target of opportunity.

I'm all for letting two guys fight it out 1 on 1 and most of the time (unless in a furball) I ask prior to joining an engagement. However a furball isn't the place to expect a 1 on 1 fight.

Back on the topic, depending on the plane I'm flying I quite often sit like a vulcher above a fight waiting for the right time to pick off some unsuspected poor sole. You have to be in the right plane though but it is a good way to rack up some kills.


Well Said.
Title: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: Masherbrum on August 11, 2007, 11:39:51 AM
3 guys on a con's 6?    I have screenshots of 12 on my 6, and none of them could get me within a minute's time.   Strich9 dove in and got a couple before they finally got me.
Title: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: Gianlupo on August 11, 2007, 11:51:52 AM
Clerick, I have nothing against fighting many vs one. The point is that, beyond a certain number, being too many becomes just pure idiocy and a tactical suicide: it's simply stupid that 10 or 20 friendlies follow a bandit, exposing themselves or the field they're defending to attack from other bandits/directions.... 4, 5 at most, should be sufficient, the other ones should think about the bigger picture and keep their eyes open for other bandits.

Otherwise, you would frustrate your own purpose, because you would end up concentrating on one single threat (and, let me state this, not such a big threat, to be honest, because if  it has a lot of friendlies around, it can't do much damage or dropping unnoticed on your six), totally ignoring any other threat in the area, possibly much more dangerous that the one you're following.

Just take a look at this movie, you'll understand what I mean in my first paragraph:

Grits vs the Knights' horde (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWhU8PQ5ojo)
Title: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: crockett on August 11, 2007, 11:57:20 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Masherbrum
3 guys on a con's 6?    I have screenshots of 12 on my 6, and none of them could get me within a minute's time.   Strich9 dove in and got a couple before they finally got me.


Well if you watch "Dogfights" on the History Channel last night, you would know it doesn't matter how many guys are on your 6.

According to the world's leading ace fighter pilot (Col. Giora Epstein) in his words, he said it doesn't matter if it's one guy or 16 guys on your six.. Only one can be directly behind you and shoot you.  

lol so as long as you can keep all 12 of them, on your six you aren't in much danger.

:rofl
Title: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: scot12b on August 11, 2007, 01:11:48 PM
:noid :noid  points up
Title: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: Masherbrum on August 11, 2007, 01:23:07 PM
now that I'm recollecting, Strich9 saved my bacon, but at the cost of a pilot wound, two oil hits, one radiator, both flaps, and an aileron.   I landed the 38J, but it seemed like ages going from A41 to A44 on Baltic.
Title: Re: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: BaldEagl on August 11, 2007, 01:23:19 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Stoney74
Gents,

Beyond the mere sportsman-like facets of not ganging up on someone, there is a great tactical reason not to be part of the school of fish chasing the lone LA-7 around a field.  If you see two or three guys handling an enemy plane, grab some altitude and pick up the next guy that is guaranteed to come in shortly.  Maybe even intercept those bombers that are relatively low at 8,000 feet, but to the mob on the deck, seem stratospheric.

If we can't get sportsmanship, why not just try for sound tactics?  At the most, 2 v 1 odds on inbound bad guys.  Everybody else climb and intercept his buddies that are arriving piece-meal...

Just an idea...


I agree to a point.  

Usually if I'm not engaged I'm climbing for position for the next engagement but if I see 4-5 guys chasing a single con who's got some seperation I'll dive in after him knowing I'll get there before any of the others (who have likely burnt off all their E circling on the deck).
Title: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: Masherbrum on August 11, 2007, 01:23:40 PM
Quote
Originally posted by scot12b
:noid :noid  points up
You gonna be on tonight?   Be good to have some laughs again. < scot
Title: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: bj229r on August 11, 2007, 01:49:44 PM
I think anytime some puke in a Lghey is spotted, all other gameplay should cease until said puke is hunted down and neutralized:aok
Title: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: SkyRock on August 11, 2007, 02:00:53 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Gianlupo
I second that, Stoney! Too many times, when defending a base, I found myself outnumbered just because my 12 mates followed the lone running La7, leaving me to face 4 other incoming bad guys.... hone your SA and tactical skills, gents!

I hope your avatar is of a female, if it is, grrrrrrrrrrrrrr, yummy!:aok
Title: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: tedrbr on August 11, 2007, 04:18:17 PM
Quote
Originally posted by crockett
Well if you watch "Dogfights" on the History Channel last night, you would know it doesn't matter how many guys are on your 6.

According to the world's leading ace fighter pilot (Col. Giora Epstein) in his words, he said it doesn't matter if it's one guy or 16 guys on your six.. Only one can be directly behind you and shoot you.  

lol so as long as you can keep all 12 of them, on your six you aren't in much danger.


Only if those pilots won't shoot past one another, risking a killshooter hit, to land hits on the lone enemy plane leading the pack.  And you have to worry about anyone trying for a snapshot.  

At most, IMHO, 3 on a single target.  More than that, I break and look elsewhere.  As I play for countries with lower populations against the horde, another half dozen will be along shortly anyways.  

OTOH, if I find myself the lone enemy plane up front, I'll do my best to drag the conga line down to the deck and away from the field they are attacking/defending..... or drag them through friendly ack a few times.    I'm not going to out-fly a half dozen L-Gay7's, Splixteens, Runstangs, and Nikdweebs with the planes I generally take up (La5, Yak, Ki-84, C.205,...) so I might as well do as much damage as possible in other ways.
Title: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: Sketch on August 11, 2007, 06:32:34 PM
Oh man he's using the avatar I sent him!!!!  Man I miss Italy.... :cry
Title: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: Zazen13 on August 11, 2007, 06:34:46 PM
One of my former Squaddies had a saying I liked that describes this, a great rule to apply...

"If there's 2 there's room for you..."

"If there's 3 then let 'em be..."

Words to live by, unless your teammates are incredibly inept and/or the one guy is incredibly great, 3 on 1 is plenty. The only exception I can think of is if none of those three have the E to catch a dragster like an La7, and you just dive in to turn him for them, taking a shot if one presents itself then zooming back up...
Title: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: DoNKeY on August 11, 2007, 07:08:18 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Gianlupo
Clerick, I have nothing against fighting many vs one. The point is that, beyond a certain number, being too many becomes just pure idiocy and a tactical suicide: it's simply stupid that 10 or 20 friendlies follow a bandit, exposing themselves or the field they're defending to attack from other bandits/directions.... 4, 5 at most, should be sufficient, the other ones should think about the bigger picture and keep their eyes open for other bandits.

Otherwise, you would frustrate your own purpose, because you would end up concentrating on one single threat (and, let me state this, not such a big threat, to be honest, because if  it has a lot of friendlies around, it can't do much damage or dropping unnoticed on your six), totally ignoring any other threat in the area, possibly much more dangerous that the one you're following.

Just take a look at this movie, you'll understand what I mean in my first paragraph:

Grits vs the Knights' horde (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gWhU8PQ5ojo)


lol at first i was like you actually asked for help:O
Title: I wish I had a dime...
Post by: TalonX on August 11, 2007, 08:05:31 PM
For everytime I have circled a field and watched up to 10 of my countrymen chase the lone fighter....

I always ask on range, "Do you think you 7 guys have that con covered?".

It's embarassing.

Title: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: DaddyAck on August 12, 2007, 01:21:28 AM
Ahh yes, cant you just hear the "mine mine mine mine" as you look behind your plane. :rofl   I have had 6 or more chase my plane at times, then I just laugh thinking how sad it was it took that many to kill one plane.  The kicker is before they all chase me, on the "merge" they all HOed in sucession!  I can usually force 1 maby 2 over shoots  and get out a snapshot but then one of the gaggle of dweebs pops me. :p
Title: Re: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: Hap on August 12, 2007, 01:29:35 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Stoney74
Gents,

Beyond the mere sportsman-like facets of not ganging up on someone, there is a great tactical reason not to be part of the school of fish chasing the lone LA-7 around a field.  If you see two or three guys handling an enemy plane, grab some altitude and pick up the next guy that is guaranteed to come in shortly.  Maybe even intercept those bombers that are relatively low at 8,000 feet, but to the mob on the deck, seem stratospheric.

If we can't get sportsmanship, why not just try for sound tactics?  At the most, 2 v 1 odds on inbound bad guys.  Everybody else climb and intercept his buddies that are arriving piece-meal...

Just an idea...


:aok
Title: A Purely Tactical Reason For Not Gang-Banging
Post by: Gianlupo on August 12, 2007, 05:42:59 AM
Quote
Originally posted by SkyRock
I hope your avatar is of a female, if it is, grrrrrrrrrrrrrr, yummy!:aok


Skycrock, if you can't recognize a female bottom... you really need glasses!!!! :D Btw, why in the world everyone always concentrate on my avatar and not on what I'm saying??? I'm not a blonde!!!!! :furious

Oh, and say thanks to Sketch, yeah, it's the avatar he sent me. :)

Quote
Originally posted by Sketch
Oh man he's using the avatar I sent him!!!!  Man I miss Italy.... :cry


Come back, then, they (the chickens) are all waiting for you! :D

Quote
Originally posted by DoNKeY
lol at first i was like you actually asked for help:O


There must be something really wrong with my english...... :confused: