Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: bustr on August 27, 2007, 06:54:58 PM
-
New York city seems not to have any statute to protect women from a peeping Tom standing under public stairs and looking up their skirts.
I have gone to a number of locations to read the viewers threads concerning the article I linked. The activity as outlined in the article draws a dividing line between the thread posters idelogoies for what some males would call a public unspoken sport and others a moral offence.
I know we all look to a degree. "Degree" is the pivot word. I have not thought about how one would enforce a public code against it. With out looking it gets tough meeting...and so on.......
Walking around in public we cannot be garunteed others won't look at us for their own amusment or lust. How do you draw a line for peepers who abuse/game the innocence of the activity or the moral personal propriety of the female subjects?
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/KevinMcCullough/2007/08/26/why_liberals_always_protect_perverts
-
I know I get ticked off when the babes at the beach keep looking at me. I'm not just a piece of meat you know.. I have feelings too..
Some say if you wear a speedo you are expecting to be looked at and should just expect it. However I don't buy that because they are just so comfortable.
-
bustr, I would suggest you stop wearing women's skirts then.
-
Dividing...
-
Dividing yes........but I wonder if women care as long as they don't know, or if every one who walked those stairs during that gentelmans morning sports session, how they would react. The ones in skirts........
Crokett the issue is not one of speedos and beaches but one of women dressing to not have their silken coverd derriers observed in public. I conceed their are bars all over the U.S. where women enter sans under garments and want the view enjoyed.
I suspect this article is addressing the portion of our female population who would be loth to have any male peep other than their significant other. I do beleive they have the right to that vestage of their dignity, unless your speedo quip is a path to your inner minds unspoken and hidden true feelings about women and the sport of not getting caught peeking up their skirts.....? Do you peek Crokett or did you not enhale also?
The article poses an interesting conudrum of how to enforce peeping statuts. The gentelman peeping up skirts under the stairs in a public area is an interesting situation. For it to make the news he had to have been caught in the act. Do we just tell women to wear sack cloth and be done with it? Or do women in America have the right to expect some modicom of personal privacy in public where their nickers and skirts are concerned?
Crokett dosent this also fall under a womans "choice"?
-
It must really be a slow day in hell.
-
Originally posted by Yknurd
bustr, I would suggest you stop wearing women's skirts then.
Are you a lumberjack?