Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: rabbidrabbit on September 23, 2007, 10:44:05 AM
-
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article2512380.ece
If true, its a twisted world.
-
Now we know what Freezman has been up to.. :noid
-
You've got to admire their balls, you really do.
-
Syria is going to ensure they ostracize themselves from the rest of the Arab World and put them further into Iran's camp.
-
I thought they already were in Iran's camp.
-
Funny how the US media has remained somewhat silent about this since the initial reports I heard on Thursday, 9/20.
-
Originally posted by Wes14
Now we know what Freezman has been up to.. :noid
:rolleyes:
-
Originally posted by Bodhi
Syria is going to ensure they ostracize themselves from the rest of the Arab World and put them further into Iran's camp.
Originally posted by Yknurd
I thought they already were in Iran's camp.
How can anyone believe that Sunni-Arab Syria can be in "camp" with Shi'ite-Persian Iran?
There's one born every minute.
-
Originally posted by Viking
How can anyone believe that Sunni-Arab Syria can be in "camp" with Shi'ite-Persian Iran?
There's one born every minute.
You're absolutly right. And furthermore, how can anyone believe that the fiercely democratic societies of America and Britain would EVER ally themselves with Stalinist Russia?
There is truely one born every minute.
:cool:
Wab
-
I think they siezed more than material.
I bet a dollar that there are one or more North Korean chaps cooling their heels somewhere in an Israeli security installation.
Three hots and a cot, only a moderate amount of torture.... it's probably the best they've ever had it.
:cool:
Wab
-
Originally posted by AKWabbit
Three hots and a cot, only a moderate amount of torture.... it's probably the best they've ever had it.
:cool:
Wab
They should feel right at home, a vacation even.
-
Originally posted by rabbidrabbit
They should feel right at home, a vacation even.
"Tell us everything about your mission...or....or...we'll send you BACK!"
:lol
Wab
-
Originally posted by AKWabbit
I think they siezed more than material.
I bet a dollar that there are one or more North Korean chaps cooling their heels somewhere in an Israeli security installation.
Three hots and a cot, only a moderate amount of torture.... it's probably the best they've ever had it.
:cool:
Wab
HA!
good one.
-
Zimbabwians seized Albanian sperm bank in Uganda.
Shalom, muchachos!
What the hell is that "Times online"? Must be a Pravda.ru franchise.
-
Originally posted by Boroda
Zimbabwians seized Albanian sperm bank in Uganda.
Shalom, muchachos!
What the hell is that "Times online"? Must be a Pravda.ru franchise.
:confused: ?
-
Yet we do nothing but make deals with North Korea and Iran.. and we attack Iraq.
This is what I've said since the start off all this BS.. Iran, North Korea, Syria and Saudi Arabia are bigger threats than Iraq ever could have dreamed of being.
Yet we wasted our military in Iraq and can now do nothing about the actual real threats.
-
Originally posted by Viking
How can anyone believe that Sunni-Arab Syria can be in "camp" with Shi'ite-Persian Iran?
There's one born every minute.
The Assad family is part of the minority Alawite sect, a Shi'ite Muslim faction.
ack-ack
-
I suspect that if Syria had a secret nuclear programme, Israel would have attacked it so hard we wouldn't be left wondering whether they'd attacked at all.
-
Originally posted by Nashwan
I suspect that if Syria had a secret nuclear programme, Israel would have attacked it so hard we wouldn't be left wondering whether they'd attacked at all.
we did:aok
-
Originally posted by evenhaim
:confused: ?
The thread title looks like a hallucination.
"Timesonline" - it's Sunday Times? It's not the Times, is it?
-
Originally posted by crockett
Yet we do nothing but make deals with North Korea and Iran.. and we attack Iraq.
This is what I've said since the start off all this BS.. Iran, North Korea, Syria and Saudi Arabia are bigger threats than Iraq ever could have dreamed of being.
Yet we wasted our military in Iraq and can now do nothing about the actual real threats.
If we had attacked one of them instead, you would be hollering that it was the wrong thing to do.
-
Originally posted by evenhaim
we did:aok
Best of luck and God-speed to you guys, evenhaim.:)
Sir
Regards,
Sun
-
Originally posted by Tango
If we had attacked one of them instead, you would be hollering that it was the wrong thing to do.
No because I said from the start of the BS that Iraq was the wrong target. You seem to misunderstand why I am upset about Iraq.
It's not because I don't think our military should be used to solve problems, or because I'm a tree hugging liberal. I don't support Iraq because it's never been about "the war on terror" or a "real threat" it's "always" been the wrong target.
Add to that, we didn't finish the job in Afghanistan before we pulled the needed troops out to go to the useless war in Iraq. I've always supported the war in Afghanistan because it was a "real" part of the war on terror. However I have never supported the way it was mismanaged under Bush and co and the fact that they pulled troops out to go start the war in Iraq.
I knew Afghanistan would go to **** as soon as we started pulling troops out to go to Iraq. Guess what, it sure as hell did.
I've never been against us going to war to fight our foes. However I will never support the BS in Iraq because it was never a "real" threat rather just an excuse for certain people in our govt to set forth their own agenda for the region. A agenda which was descant to fail and is failing miserably at the sake of our troops and 600 billion in US tax payers funds.
-
we didn't finish the job in Afghanistan before we pulled the needed troops out to go to the useless war in Iraq. I've always supported the war in Afghanistan because it was a "real" part of the war on terror. However I have never supported the way it was mismanaged under Bush and co and the fact that they pulled troops out to go start the war in Iraq.
Can you puppet ANY new DNC talking points? Afghanistan was NEVER intended to be a 'large footprint' type of deal (Take note of the Soviet Union's 'large footprint' plan of the 70's) Afghanistan, aside from the initial invasion, was and IS a Special Forces kind of operation. What our people CAN'T do is go onto the Pakistan side of the border and attack these salamanders in their hideouts---many of their bases are so high up, our helicopters cant even get up there...Pakistan lost 600 of its OWN troops trying to go in there....they don't go there any more.
-
Face it, Crockett. You are not following the Bush idiology. Therefore, you ARE a treehugging liberal. Why do you hate America?
-
Originally posted by Sundowner
Best of luck and God-speed to you guys, evenhaim.:)
Sir
Regards,
Sun
ty but were used to it ;)
-
Keep Honking im reloading!! :noid
(random)
-
Originally posted by Irwink!
Funny how the US media has remained somewhat silent about this since the initial reports I heard on Thursday, 9/20.
It's not funny at all. Just about the entire western media got burned ****ing hard over the WMD in Iraq. No wonder they are twice shy.
What the hell does "nuclear material seized" stated by "well-placed sources", mean any way?
-
Originally posted by Viking
How can anyone believe that Sunni-Arab Syria can be in "camp" with Shi'ite-Persian Iran?
There's one born every minute.
Iran and Syria are traditional allies, because of a common enemy: Saddam Hussein.
When Saddam was the "good guy" some decades ago and even US politicians like Rumsfeld travelled to Bagdad to shake the hand of this butcher, Iran and Syria were the enemy of Saddams Iraq.
Iran - simply because it was attacked by the invasion attempt of Saddam.
Syria - because there was a deep hate between Saddam and Assad.
Also its important to know that the Assad family are members of the alewite minority.
During the Iran- Iraq-War Syria was one of the few arab countries which helped the non-arab Iran.
When the US-trained iranian pilotes performed their devastating attack against the iraqi airbase H3/Al Wallid (10 F-4E Phantoms of the IRIAF destroyed around 50 iraqi planes on the ground, including french build Mirage fighters and heavy Tupolev bombers.) one iranian F-4E was damaged and hat to fly to syrian territory. The following iraqi fighters were pushed away by syrian MiG´s which then escorted the iranian F-4 to a syrian air base. After the iranian plane was repaired it was allowed to fly back to Iran.
The other arab countries considered the syrian help to a non-arab country as treachery and isolated Syria. So they pushed Syria closer to Iran and in these years until today the cooperation of both countries developped.
So indeed there is the strange situation that the sunnite Syria and the shi ite Iran are working together.
But thats how political decisions create strange allies. In the Azerbeidjan-Armenian-War there was a similiar situation: The islamic Iran supported the christian Armenia instead of the muslim Azerbeidjan.
-
Originally posted by evenhaim
ty but were used to it ;)
:D
Sun
-
Thanks for posting Babek.