Post by: Gowan on November 11, 2007, 12:32:19 AM
can we have it? (i want nookz!)
Post by: Masherbrum on November 11, 2007, 12:34:07 AM
Post by: Gowan on November 11, 2007, 12:36:21 AM
btw i put this up so i could ask a question, where is the link so i can put it up on a post without quoting someone
Post by: Wes14 on November 11, 2007, 12:51:13 AM
Don't worry here is a image of Skuzzy and Hitech working on the N00k for AH.
:noid
Post by: Masherbrum on November 11, 2007, 12:59:14 AM
Quote
Originally posted by GowanNevah!!!!
yay we have a winner!!!
btw i put this up so i could ask a question, where is the link so i can put it up on a post without quoting someone
Post by: Gowan on November 11, 2007, 01:00:47 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Masherbrum
Nevah!!!!
>_<
Post by: Rich46yo on November 11, 2007, 06:20:38 AM
I love the AH level bombers dont get me wrong. And I think AH did a great job modeling them. But we only have what? 7 of them and 1 perk bomber?? Of these the JU-88, the Boston, the B-25c, and the 234 would qualify as "Queens"? Even tho the 234 and JU are to good to be a Queen. The Boston is a true Queen, actually its closer to a 'hoe. Ive never once seen one in the air. The 25c is a Queen no doubt. Who in their right mind would take those when they could have 26s?
We deserve a 2nd perk bomber. Tho it would be hard to tear myself from those incredible KI-67s right now.;)
Post by: Major Biggles on November 11, 2007, 07:01:23 AM
faster and a much better climbrate, with a much bigger payload. bostons rock, but no-one uses them.
Post by: raider73 on November 11, 2007, 07:21:16 AM
:huh there isnt one NO NUKES for AH2
Post by: Bronk on November 11, 2007, 08:02:21 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Rich46yo
We'll never see the 29 I believe. Nor will dedicated bomber sticks, like Rodney Dangerfield, ever get true respect.
Please quote where anyone from HTC has said no to the B-29.
I love the AH level bombers dont get me wrong. And I think AH did a great job modeling them. But we only have what? 7 of them and 1 perk bomber?? Of these the JU-88, the Boston, the B-25c, and the 234 would qualify as "Queens"? Even tho the 234 and JU are to good to be a Queen. The Boston is a true Queen, actually its closer to a 'hoe. Ive never once seen one in the air. The 25c is a Queen no doubt. Who in their right mind would take those when they could have 26s?
We deserve a 2nd perk bomber. Tho it would be hard to tear myself from those incredible KI-67s right now.;)
Rich if you get the chance ask a squad to fly in an FSO with them. This game is much more than the MAs.
Post by: Latrobe on November 11, 2007, 02:16:51 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Wes14
(http://www.tunl.duke.edu/images/nuke-boom.gif)
Don't worry here is a image of Skuzzy and Hitech working on the N00k for AH.
:noid
:lol
Post by: Rich46yo on November 11, 2007, 03:55:46 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Bronk
Rich if you get the chance ask a squad to fly in an FSO with them. This game is much more than the MAs.
I was in a squad. I just am in a stage where I prefer doing my own thing right now. Ive been asked to join quite a few squads. This game is full of reall good people in a lot of real good squads.
My general impression is were never going to see the 29. I hope Im wrong cause it would be a great addition to the game.
The Boston?? The only real thing that turns me off about it is its lack of defensive guns. One .303 turret just aint going to do it for me. The KI-67 is far better defended, almost as fast, and carries almost the same bombload. The Boston was doomed from the git-go cause this is a game where guys like guns. IMOHO. But...maybe Ive been missing somthing with the Bostons.
Perked 29s would be a great addition to an already 1st class bomber lineup.
Post by: Spikes on November 11, 2007, 04:14:17 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Major Biggles
but no-one uses them.
I use them.
Post by: raider73 on November 12, 2007, 06:46:50 AM
!["Image]("http://i16.tinypic.com/8axm4ax.jpg")
) Vanscrew spawn camping as i fly over with B29
He'll never get out in time Muhahaha
:rofl :D
(http://
!["Image]("http://i4.tinypic.com/6xb2qvd.jpg")
)
Post by: raider73 on November 12, 2007, 06:52:55 AM
(http://i9.tinypic.com/8axm4ax.jpg)
:aok :aok :rofl
(http://i6.tinypic.com/6xb2qvd.jpg)
TO LATE VANS no more spawn camping for u
Post by: Rich46yo on November 12, 2007, 07:34:20 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Major Biggles
the bostons are far better than the ki67.
faster and a much better climbrate, with a much bigger payload. bostons rock, but no-one uses them.
Actually I checked last night. The Boston has a lousy bombload, only 2,000lbs. The KI-67s is 1,780 lbs so its almost the same. Even better in that it has a 8 100kg bombload option, "220 lbs".
Four 250 lb bombs or 4 500 lb bombs and one dual .303 top turret with a lot of blind spots. The thing is basically undefendable. The top turret has lousy rotation and gunnery views.
I myself have never once seen one in the air. I nominate the Boston as the ultimate "Hangar Queen".
Post by: TUXC on November 12, 2007, 07:51:15 AM
http://forums.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=212085
Post by: Iron_Cross on November 12, 2007, 01:24:39 PM
Sheesh, people don't think about tactics anymore. All the thumb twitching, weed whacking, squeeking, Quake players are down low. It is the fastest way to get to the closest enemy base. That EverCrack mentality they have, can work to your advantage, if you just think about how to get around their playing style.
I love taking Bostons into "meat grinders" because it generally means that I can fly over their base with impunity at 17K and drop any target I want and get home unscathed.
Post by: Rich46yo on November 12, 2007, 01:53:19 PM
"Speed" brings the fight into the horizontal. And bomber sticks have no fear of the horizontal.
Ive taken Bostons up in the TA a few times. The lack of rotation and coverage of that top turret, as well as the puny cartridge, frankly, makes me nervous. I like big guns, being an American, and that top cannon of the KI makes me feel like Dirty Harry Callahan.
"Ya feel lucky"? "Weeell dooya punk"?
Post by: Bronk on November 12, 2007, 04:32:43 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Rich46yo
I was in a squad. I just am in a stage where I prefer doing my own thing right now. Ive been asked to join quite a few squads. This game is full of reall good people in a lot of real good squads.
You are missing the point. Fly a Friday night Squad Op and see what some of these "hanger queens" can do with a historical match up.
Post by: Wes14 on November 12, 2007, 04:37:00 PM
Quote
Originally posted by raider73
(http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z283/MercenaryAXIII/uhoh.jpg)
*cough* might wanna watch out before skuzzy blasts you a new one with his perked apache.. :noid
-Sorry Hijack over-
Post by: Rich46yo on November 12, 2007, 04:50:52 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Bronk
You are missing the point. Fly a Friday night Squad Op and see what some of these "hanger queens" can do with a historical match up.
Cool, I'd love to. Maybe this Friday. Thanks!
Post by: Karnak on November 12, 2007, 04:58:34 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Bronk
You are missing the point. Fly a Friday night Squad Op and see what some of these "hanger queens" can do with a historical match up.
Usually fly at full throttle rather than any sort of historical cruise setting, making them out to be much better than they were.
There is a reason Boston III squads were delighted to get Mosquito IVs, but from AH you'd hardly know why.
Post by: Bronk on November 12, 2007, 05:10:09 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
Usually fly at full throttle rather than any sort of historical cruise setting, making them out to be much better than they were.
True but it's a little closer than MA match ups.
Post by: Spikes on November 12, 2007, 05:16:17 PM
Quote
Originally posted by raider73
VANSCREW SPAWN CAMPING AND ME OVER HEAD HIGH ALT IN B29 CLEARING HIM OUT
IMG
:aok :aok :rofl
IMG
TO LATE VANS no more spawn camping for u
(http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/b1c5f76059.gif)
Post by: Wes14 on November 12, 2007, 05:20:49 PM
Quote
Originally posted by SpikesX
(http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/b1c5f76059.gif)
:rofl
Post by: raider73 on November 12, 2007, 06:27:12 PM
Post by: Redlegs on November 12, 2007, 06:30:13 PM
Post by: raider73 on November 12, 2007, 06:31:26 PM
Post by: Spikes on November 12, 2007, 06:48:30 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Wes14
:rofl
Thought SOMEONE would like it. :cool:
Post by: Denholm on November 13, 2007, 08:56:17 AM
You make it Spikes?
Post by: MjTalon on November 13, 2007, 11:56:43 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Wes14
(http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z283/MercenaryAXIII/uhoh.jpg)
*cough* might wanna watch out before skuzzy blasts you a new one with his perked apache.. :noid
-Sorry Hijack over-
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
Post by: zoozoo on November 14, 2007, 03:40:41 PM
Post by: MadMan on November 16, 2007, 03:59:30 PM
Post by: Wes14 on November 16, 2007, 04:34:20 PM
Quote
Originally posted by MadMan
can we get one B-29 thread without a nook request?
When pigs fly? :confused: