Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Sundowner on November 12, 2007, 04:48:28 AM

Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: Sundowner on November 12, 2007, 04:48:28 AM
Heck, let's just go ahead and redefine 'freedom' while we're at it.:mad:

Regards,
Sun



Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'

WASHINGTON (AP) -- As Congress debates new rules for government eavesdropping, a top intelligence official says it is time that people in the United States change their definition of privacy.

 Privacy no longer can mean anonymity, says Donald Kerr, the principal deputy director of national intelligence. Instead, it should mean that government and businesses properly safeguard people's private communications and financial information.

Kerr's comments come as Congress is taking a second look at the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.........

.....  The committee is expected to decide this week whether its version of the bill will protect telecommunications companies. About 40 wiretapping suits are pending.

The central witness in a California lawsuit against AT&T says the government is vacuuming up billions of e-mails and phone calls as they pass through an AT&T switching station in San Francisco, California.

Mark Klein, a retired AT&T technician, helped connect a device in 2003 that he says diverted and copied onto a government supercomputer every call, e-mail, and Internet site access on AT&T lines.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, which filed the class-action suit, claims there are as many as 20 such sites in the U.S.

The White House has promised to veto any bill that does not grant immunity from sites such as this one....

http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/11/terrorist.surveillance.ap/index.html
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: lazs2 on November 12, 2007, 09:36:43 AM
sundowner.. what is the origin of your avatar?  

I think that anything you say on the phone or in an email should never be considered to be private but..   should never be able to be used against you in court.   I have never considered them to be that secure.

lazs
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: acfireguy26 on November 12, 2007, 10:04:06 AM
If you are not engaged in criminal activety what is there to worry about. We must adapt to the changing tactics of our enemies. The gov can listen to all my phone calls and read all my emails I have nothing to hide.
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: Shamus on November 12, 2007, 10:25:00 AM
Quote
Originally posted by acfireguy26
If you are not engaged in criminal activety what is there to worry about. We must adapt to the changing tactics of our enemies. The gov can listen to all my phone calls and read all my emails I have nothing to hide.


I have no contraband in my home so they can search it anytime they want.

I don't care to own firearms, so I don't see the need for you guys to own them.

If doing away with these rights saves one life its worth it, all you tin hats have to understand that this is a post 9/11 world and if you disagree with me you are hiding something and must be a criminal.

shamus
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: VOR on November 12, 2007, 10:28:24 AM
Good bait ^^^

:D
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: JB88 on November 12, 2007, 10:30:19 AM
time to redefine the term "intelligence official"
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: Saxman on November 12, 2007, 10:53:51 AM
ac and Sham:

The problem is it will NEVER just stop there. You can call it paranoia all you want, but if you start allowing the government to monitor your personal correspondence to "protect against terrorism," then it's not that much of a leap before the secret police comes knocking on your door for any critical opinion you may have about the government. It's little abuses to freedom like that "for the greater good" that are EXACTLY how police states start.

I don't care WHAT kind of world this is now. Safety and security are NOT legitimate reasons for these breaches of personal privacy that are SUPPOSED to be protected by the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and frankly I find that sort of "ZOMG WE MUST STOP THE TERRORISTS!" alarmism FAR more troubling that the "tin hats." These protections were established PRECISELY to prevent the sort of idealogical persecution that was happening in parts of Europe during the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries.

I guarantee you that if people give up one or two little freedoms in the illusion of safety without so much as a word of protest, then a whole lot of BIG freedoms will eventually follow.
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: crockett on November 12, 2007, 11:14:05 AM
Quote
Originally posted by acfireguy26
If you are not engaged in criminal activety what is there to worry about. We must adapt to the changing tactics of our enemies. The gov can listen to all my phone calls and read all my emails I have nothing to hide.


That's a pretty sad statement considering principles of which this country was founded on.
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: VonMessa on November 12, 2007, 11:41:17 AM
Quote
Originally posted by VOR
Good bait ^^^

:D


Agreed.  You can pry my firearms from my cold, dead hands is what you can do.  

101st   SCREAMING EAGLESSSSSSSSSS!     Huuah!
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: Captain Virgil Hilts on November 12, 2007, 11:44:43 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Shamus
I have no contraband in my home so they can search it anytime they want.

I don't care to own firearms, so I don't see the need for you guys to own them.

If doing away with these rights saves one life its worth it, all you tin hats have to understand that this is a post 9/11 world and if you disagree with me you are hiding something and must be a criminal.

shamus


Man, that stuff you rub on your bait REALLY stinks.
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: FBBone on November 12, 2007, 11:46:11 AM
Sax, I believe Shamus' post was tongue in cheek and aimed at acfireguy.

crockett, while this is rare, I agree with you 100%.
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: Jackal1 on November 12, 2007, 12:09:20 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Shamus
I have no contraband in my home so they can search it anytime they want.

I don't care to own firearms, so I don't see the need for you guys to own them.

If doing away with these rights saves one life its worth it, all you tin hats have to understand that this is a post 9/11 world and if you disagree with me you are hiding something and must be a criminal.

shamus


Mr Bill`s or Catfish Charlie???????
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: Urchin on November 12, 2007, 01:24:02 PM
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
sundowner.. what is the origin of your avatar?  

I think that anything you say on the phone or in an email should never be considered to be private but..   should never be able to be used against you in court.   I have never considered them to be that secure.

lazs


Lazs, it looks to me like his avatar is an illustration of the Dark Tower - from the Stephen King books.
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: Fishu on November 12, 2007, 01:52:49 PM
The concept of privacy wasn't invented without a good reason. Why are we willing to go through the process again to find out what the reason was?
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: Airscrew on November 12, 2007, 01:55:53 PM
Quote
Originally posted by JB88
time to redefine the term "intelligence official"

yep, my thought too...
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: acfireguy26 on November 12, 2007, 02:55:32 PM
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
I think that anything you say on the phone or in an email should never be considered to be private but..   should never be able to be used against you in court.   I have never considered them to be that secure.

lazs



Maybe I should have been a little more specific. I agree with the above post. I beleive the taps should be for info gathering only not admissable in courts. Only used as a means for gathering intel on clandestine criminal activeties. Something has to be done other than burying your head in the sand and thinking that the bad guys are not here in america and using the the loop holes in our laws and our ample freedoms against us.
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: rpm on November 12, 2007, 02:58:05 PM
Were'nt we trying to get away from an powermad  totalitarian named George? I guess history does repeat it's self. I think they knew dang well what they ment by "privacy" when they wrote the Constitution.
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: Pooh21 on November 12, 2007, 03:24:32 PM
Ive always assumed since Iwas little that the gov listened in on my calls and read my emails.


But if we wish to know where the badguys are now head down to the local mosque.
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: acfireguy26 on November 12, 2007, 03:25:22 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Pooh21
Ive always assumed since Iwas little that the gov listened in on my calls and read my emails.


But if we wish to know where the badguys are now head down to the local mosque.


Amen!

A good muslim cannot by definition be a good American.
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: Mr No Name on November 12, 2007, 04:53:16 PM
Quote
Originally posted by acfireguy26
Amen!

A good muslim cannot by definition be a good American.



It wasn't the swedish bikini team attacking us primarily since 1979... 1 or 2 whackjobs outside of the muslim mold... thats about it.
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: Saxman on November 12, 2007, 05:24:59 PM
Quote
Originally posted by acfireguy26
Amen!

A good muslim cannot by definition be a good American.


Maybe you should look up a little period of our history between 1942-1945, where that same brand of absolutism was targeted at ANOTHER group of American citizens for no reason other than race.

Quite frankly, it's about as un-American an ideal as you can have.
Title: Frightening....
Post by: TalonX on November 12, 2007, 05:39:00 PM
Quote
Originally posted by acfireguy26
If you are not engaged in criminal activety what is there to worry about. We must adapt to the changing tactics of our enemies. The gov can listen to all my phone calls and read all my emails I have nothing to hide.


Benjamin Franklin addressed this very comment, oh so many years ago...

Something about, anyone who would give up some freedom for some security, deserves neither.

The words above are exactly what the Communists said to the people they had to fence in....

Title: WOW- 2 in one thread???
Post by: TalonX on November 12, 2007, 05:41:01 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Shamus
I have no contraband in my home so they can search it anytime they want.

I don't care to own firearms, so I don't see the need for you guys to own them.

If doing away with these rights saves one life its worth it, all you tin hats have to understand that this is a post 9/11 world and if you disagree with me you are hiding something and must be a criminal.

shamus


OMG.   And how many innocent lives will be lost with this stupidity?    Read my post above, it applies here, too.

Really really sad.

On the bright side, I suggest you move to Korea (North) or Cuba.  You will fit right in and feel very comfortable.

Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: Sundowner on November 12, 2007, 07:28:54 PM
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
sundowner.. what is the origin of your avatar?

lazs


Hey lazs,

It's a painting from book 7 of The Dark Tower series by Stephen King.

Regards,
Sun
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: acfireguy26 on November 12, 2007, 07:41:47 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Saxman
Maybe you should look up a little period of our history between 1942-1945, where that same brand of absolutism was targeted at ANOTHER group of American citizens for no reason other than race.

Quite frankly, it's about as un-American an ideal as you can have.


Its not race its religion and it is a fact.Ever read the Quran?
Title: Re: Frightening....
Post by: acfireguy26 on November 12, 2007, 07:45:26 PM
Quote
Originally posted by TalonX
Benjamin Franklin addressed this very comment, oh so many years ago...

Something about, anyone who would give up some freedom for some security, deserves neither.

The words above are exactly what the Communists said to the people they had to fence in....



Did you read further down?
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: Saxman on November 12, 2007, 09:12:11 PM
Which edition did YOU read? The one The whack jobs blowing up buildings hand out, or the one that the millions of Muslims actually living in peace with people of other faiths use?

I've got some advice for you: The nice men wearing the white sheets and funny tall pointy white hats aren't the most reliable people to take their opinion from.

I'm starting to hear banjos...
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: acfireguy26 on November 12, 2007, 09:55:04 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Saxman
Which edition did YOU read? The one The whack jobs blowing up buildings hand out, or the one that the millions of Muslims actually living in peace with people of other faiths use?

I've got some advice for you: The nice men wearing the white sheets and funny tall pointy white hats aren't the most reliable people to take their opinion from.

I'm starting to hear banjos...


Get your head out of the sand. Here are some direct quotes from the quoran. (the one all Muslims read.)


Believers, take neither the Jews nor the Christians for your friends. They are friends with one another. Whoever of you seeks their friendship shall become one of their number. Allah does not guide the wrongdoers. Sura 5:51

When the sacred months have passed away, THEN SLAY THE IDOLATERS WHEREVER YOU FIND THEM, AND TAKE THEM CAPTIVES AND BESIEGE THEM AND LIE IN WAIT FOR THEM IN EVERY AMBUSH, then if they repent and keep up prayer [become believers] and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them (9:5)


ANNOUNCE PAINFUL PUNISHMENT TO THOSE WHO DISBELIEVE (9:3)

O Prophet! urge the believers to war; if there are twenty patient ones of you they shall overcome two hundred... (8:65)

Surely the vilest of animals in Allah's sight are those who disbelieve (8:55)

"Fight those who do not believe in Allah...And the Jews say Ezra is the son of God;  and the Christians say Christ is the son of God; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; Allah's curse be on them; how they are turned away!" (Koran 9:29-30)  

And fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah (8:39)

FIGHT THEM: ALLAH WILL PUNISH THEM BY YOUR HANDS AND BRING THEM TO DISGRACE, AND ASSIST YOU AGAINST THEM. (9:14)

FIGHT THOSE WHO DO NOT BELIEVE IN ALLAH, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Messenger have prohibited, NOR FOLLOW THE RELIGION OF TRUTH, OUT OF THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE BOOK [Christians and Jews], until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and THEY ARE IN A STATE OF SUBJECTION. (9:29)

There is more.
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: Tumor on November 12, 2007, 10:12:26 PM
All those emails/calls etc etc being "monitored" (lol) and we still gots criminamals on the streets.  :lol
Title: Re: WOW- 2 in one thread???
Post by: Shamus on November 12, 2007, 10:40:22 PM
Quote
Originally posted by TalonX
OMG.   And how many innocent lives will be lost with this stupidity?    Read my post above, it applies here, too.

Really really sad.

On the bright side, I suggest you move to Korea (North) or Cuba.  You will fit right in and feel very comfortable.



Hehe......got one :)

shamus
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: moot on November 13, 2007, 05:47:19 AM
ACFireguy - you don't know what you're talking about.
An analogy you can relate to:  "God hates studmuffins", and other extremist and/or unwholesome interpretations of the Bible/divine word.
Title: Intelligence official: Time to redefine 'privacy'
Post by: Saxman on November 13, 2007, 07:39:10 AM
Islam acknowledges the role of Moses as a prophet

Islam acknowledges the role of Jesus as a prophet, they just don't recognize his divinity

The Virgin Mary is a HIGHLY revered figure in many forms of Islam, in some cases more than even Christianity.

True Shariah Law is NOT the extreme misogynistic tyranny that factions like the Taliban made it. These extremists actually REVOKED many of the rights for women that Shariah Law GAVE them.

Significant parts of Islam were actually DRAWN by Muhammad from Christianity and Judaism.

The same Christian biblical text that teaches peace and love has ALSO been used FOR CENTURIES as an excuse to torture and forcibly convert "nonbelievers." Or do you not recall that little thing called the Spanish Inquisition.

Even in Christianity, God has been and STILL IS being used as justification for the persecution of Jews, murder, assault, violence, slavery and racism.

You're letting extremists define your perspective, and it's a disturbing and DANGEROUS thought when so many people are allowing that to happen. They think they're being smart and wary, but all that ends up happening is the cycle of hate is perpetuated.

The "Us or them" attitude is only going to make things WORSE, and it's already happening in our own country, just bleating sheople like you are too blind to see just how bad it's becoming.

Land of tolerance indeed.