Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: Yossarian on November 30, 2007, 02:26:21 PM

Title: NOT a request for a B-29
Post by: Yossarian on November 30, 2007, 02:26:21 PM
sry about posting another B-29 thread, but can some1 please reply and tell me clearly and logically the reasons against having a B-29, WITHOUT using the work 'SQUEAK', or any of its variations?
Title: NOT a request for a B-29
Post by: Latrobe on November 30, 2007, 02:46:00 PM
It's not that we don't want the B-29 in AH2. It's just that there are so many other bombers that many other players want first (He-111 is a popular one). The truth is, HT may actually add the B-29 in the future, but not too soon. The only thing about the B-29 that won't be added ever is the NOOK.
Title: NOT a request for a B-29
Post by: Yossarian on November 30, 2007, 02:49:30 PM
Ok, thanks for telling me :aok
Title: NOT a request for a B-29
Post by: stephen on December 01, 2007, 03:46:45 AM
A-26 is a more popular one, and the Do17 which is a much sexier early war ride than the 111, oooh and the ju52 dropped bombs in one variant...
Of course we havent even mentiond the halifax have we?... etc etc.
Title: NOT a request for a B-29
Post by: Spikes on December 01, 2007, 08:18:24 AM
It is because we need more bombers of other countries first. And, when we get the B-29 I would not doubt bases would get taken down in 1-2 passes.
Title: NOT a request for a B-29
Post by: thndregg on December 01, 2007, 09:30:56 AM
Quote
Originally posted by SpikesX
It is because we need more bombers of other countries first.


I agree with this. I would love to see more German, Russian, British etc... level bombers represented, no matter how badly their defensive capabilities were (such as the Stuka and Ju88 we already have). I'd still fly 'em.
Title: NOT a request for a B-29
Post by: Yossarian on December 01, 2007, 10:11:25 AM
Did the Italians make any WWII bombers?
Title: NOT a request for a B-29
Post by: Redlegs on December 01, 2007, 10:12:43 AM
SM. 81 is only one I can think of but I know they had more.
Title: NOT a request for a B-29
Post by: Helm on December 01, 2007, 03:36:59 PM
B-29 is a pig to fly....we don not have a runway long enuff to get one up


How about a russian SB3 ....or Pe2?
Title: NOT a request for a B-29
Post by: Cypher on December 01, 2007, 06:50:01 PM
How about the Russian TU-4
Title: NOT a request for a B-29
Post by: Gowan on December 01, 2007, 07:32:43 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Helm
B-29 is a pig to fly....we don not have a runway long enuff to get one up

drop it off a cliff?

*ms paint representation of this coming soon*
Title: NOT a request for a B-29
Post by: EagleEyes on December 03, 2007, 12:10:50 AM
A lot has to do with the fact the B-29 had remote controlled guns.  So it would have to be coded in and a lot of other stuff.  Probably one of the most difficult planes to model!
Title: NOT a request for a B-29
Post by: Wingnutt on December 03, 2007, 12:17:24 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Yossarian
Did the Italians make any WWII bombers?



yes, but its bomb bay only carried linked sausage.
Title: NOT a request for a B-29
Post by: Denholm on December 03, 2007, 09:53:40 AM
Not Salami?:cry
Title: NOT a request for a B-29
Post by: AirFlyer on December 03, 2007, 09:58:50 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Yossarian
Did the Italians make any WWII bombers?


http://forums.hitechcreations.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=214269&highlight=Italians+Bomber

Here's a thread of a few good one's that I would vote for given the choice.