Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: chris3 on December 10, 2007, 08:28:31 AM
-
moin
In the arenas we have 3 bases un capturable. what did you think if the war win configuration chanche and only these 3 bases would be importend to have to win the war? the game dynamick would change i gues. only a thought...
hoppe i could explain correct what i mean....
what did you mean?
cu chris3
-
Originally posted by chris3
moin
hoppe i could explain correct what i mean....
what did you mean?
cu chris3
i verstehen nothing , you bist kaput since mucho bier octoberfest`:(
-
isint that game called Warbirds
-
I believe Chris meant to ask people's opinions on his idea where the three currently uncapturable bases would be capturable and only they would matter in winning a war.
In other words, the war would end if one country captured all those three important bases from another country.
-
Actually i think it's a cool idea.
-
would never work because of good teamwork squads like rollingthunder. 3 well thought out and planed strikes would be a easy map reset. IMO
-
Originally posted by sunfan1121
would never work because of good teamwork squads like rollingthunder. 3 well thought out and planed strikes would be a easy map reset. IMO
where the heck are the spelling police to decipher this thread?
-
This would be a great idea. It would certainly generate good fights and maybe some mass buff missions.
-
Originally posted by jhookt
where the heck are the spelling police to decipher this thread?
I waz undr the impresion that this wasent englishh clas
-
Originally posted by sunfan1121
I waz undr the impresion that this wasent englishh clas
Sloppiness and laziness breeds both.
-
This would only encourage avoiding the fight. Hell we've got maps now like on baltic (or whatever it's aclled) where you'll get 2-hour off-map NOE raids by a lanc and a goon and a single fighter to deack, kill VH, and capture the V-base nearest the enemy HQ while the front lines are 6 sectors away, and with plenty of fighting at the front lines.
It has happened numerous times before.
A rule like this would encourage people to avoid the fight and sneak/steal the base without any opposition, while the entire country is 6-8 sectors away actually defending the fields under attack.
Bad idea.
-
IMHO this could result in map resets every hour or less. Even though there are maps I wish this would happen to every time I see them I dont think it would be good for the community.
I believe it would cause too significant of a change to the game and IMHO render it just another fluff flight sim that went south.
Later,
KayBay
-
Originally posted by ghi
i verstehen nothing , you bist kaput since mucho bier octoberfest`:(
:D :D :D :D :rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
Maproom Destroyed
-
Originally posted by sunfan1121
would never work because of good teamwork squads like rollingthunder. IMO
LOL! Just up the base the Rolling Flatulence are attacking and they scatter like cockroaches caught under a light.
ack-ack
-
Originally posted by Krusty
This would only encourage avoiding the fight. Hell we've got maps now like on baltic (or whatever it's aclled) where you'll get 2-hour off-map NOE raids by a lanc and a goon and a single fighter to deack, kill VH, and capture the V-base nearest the enemy HQ while the front lines are 6 sectors away, and with plenty of fighting at the front lines.
It has happened numerous times before.
A rule like this would encourage people to avoid the fight and sneak/steal the base without any opposition, while the entire country is 6-8 sectors away actually defending the fields under attack.
Bad idea.
Maybe a little off topic, but I've done solo Vbase captures by upping a fighter with cannons, Killing the 2 auto-acks and the soft gun and bringing in troops in an M-3 or Dakota when the opposition is focused eleswhere, just to get them to react and take pressure off "the front".:aok
On topic: I agree that this idea would make for a map that lasts for an hour or less before a reset.
-
Give him a break
-
I think HT should constantly change the rules just to confuse us.............
-
Geeeeeeez folks....
How about if this game were on a German server, and YOU were required to post ONLY in GERMAN?
How is YOUR Hochdeutsch?
Or.....what if this game were on a Lithuanian server and you were required to post only in Lithuanian? Hey, I only remember DIRTY Lithuanian words.
It's fairly easy to see where he's getting at:
If instead of three uncapturable bases, those three bases HAD to be taken to win the war...the game strategy & tactics would change (instead of, in many cases...going a full week or tour in a stalemate...or one country getting boned by the other two, but the "win" requirements weren't met, and one country gets screwed and still it's a stalemate between the other two.
He's simply presenting an IDEA.
(I swear some of you would find it within reason to roast Mother Theresa on a spit if her spelling, syntax, and verb tense usage had a mistake in it.)
68ROX
-
It's apparently not that easy, Rox. I think he's talking about only 3 fields being capturable, not just 3 more fields to be captured, which your interpretation seems to indicate. A reverse of the current setup, to put it simply.
Also, the only guy poking fun at Chris's English is Count Chocula, which is somewhat ironic.
Warmest regards from a native English speaker who only makes fun of illiterate Americans and Brits,
-
Originally posted by hubsonfire
Also, the only guy poking fun at Chris's English is Count Chocula, which is somewhat ironic.
Count Chocula he says.
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
-
Originally posted by hubsonfire
It's apparently not that easy, Rox. I think he's talking about only 3 fields being capturable, not just 3 more fields to be captured, which your interpretation seems to indicate. A reverse of the current setup, to put it simply.
Also, the only guy poking fun at Chris's English is Count Chocula, which is somewhat ironic.
Warmest regards from a native English speaker who only makes fun of illiterate Americans and Brits,
no no, i meant all bases are capturable but only these 3 are importent for the reset. so the main statecic is: geting deapper and deaper into enemy teritory until the 3 main bases are attack able. i think it would be rise the fight on the way to the enemy centre. exspesiali on some map i think the ground war starts to bekomme more fun....
cu chris3
-
Originally posted by hubsonfire
Also, the only guy poking fun at Chris's English is Count Chocula, which is somewhat ironic.
I've never been bish, but that's what I have heard.
:eek:
68ROX
-
Originally posted by chris3
no no, i meant all bases are capturable but only these 3 are importent for the reset. so the main statecic is: geting deapper and deaper into enemy teritory until the 3 main bases are attack able. i think it would be rise the fight on the way to the enemy centre. exspesiali on some map i think the ground war starts to bekomme more fun....
cu chris3
Again, I agree.
Can you imagine the fight that would develop if one of these bases were to be captured. The other side that just lost it would fight like mad to get it back. It certainly would focus fighting.
There would be no point in a long range NOE to take one as there would be no way to keep it if it was surrounded by other friendly fields.
-
Originally posted by chris3
no no, i meant all bases are capturable but only these 3 are importent for the reset. so the main statecic is: geting deapper and deaper into enemy teritory until the 3 main bases are attack able. i think it would be rise the fight on the way to the enemy centre. exspesiali on some map i think the ground war starts to bekomme more fun....
cu chris3
I stand corrected.
-
Chris
my apologize, mein entschuldigen Sie sich, i didn't mean to be rude, anyway i speak way worst than you spell, with my Lou Doobs broken border english ,
Aufviedersehen! viva la francaise!
-
I liked it better long ago when all bases were capturable
-
Originally posted by Meatwad
I liked it better long ago when all bases were capturable
And what exactly would be better when all bases are capturable?
-
Originally posted by ghi
Chris
my apologize, mein entschuldigen Sie sich, i didn't mean to be rude, anyway i speak way worst than you spell, with my Lou Doobs broken border english ,
Aufviedersehen! viva la francaise!
Moin
no problem ghi, didnt were beleidigt :-).
but i hope it bekommes a litel bit clear what i want to say.
sure the fight bekomms realy hard if one of these base is captured and that is the point.
i remember the days as the country was down to 3 bases and the fight was realy hard in the smal combat zone over the enemy teritory, it was always fun to enter these small compatzone.
and now i guse these setup wuld be a better compromis between old styl war win system and the new styl war win system. the best of these two systems...
The main point is, every country did have a main target to work for so it could rise the teamwork in game a bit.
dam i dont like my english.....
hope again, you understand me right lol
cu chris3
-
What you propose is interesting indeed.
It would promote aggressive attack and defence of the three key bases for those chasing and preventing a quick reset, as well as supporting a more conventional style of base capture for those hoping to maintain control of the captured bases.
For it to be more effective in the terms of gameplay, the three key bases should be held continuously for a set period of time. This would help to prevent the lightning capture and reset by the more experienced strat squads.
-
Originally posted by jhookt
where the heck are the spelling police to decipher this thread?
I was thinking the same thing and then noticed he is from Germany so I gave him a free pass. However, there is no excuse for Sunfan to be spelling Isn't as isint.
Spazz
-
Maybe we're just behind the curve:
For example, in Year 1 that useless letter "c" would be dropped to be replased either by "k" or "s", and likewise "x" would no longer be part of the alphabet. The only kase in which "c" would be retained would be the "ch" formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2 might reform "w" spelling, so that "which" and "one" would take the same konsonant, wile Year 3 might well abolish "y" replasing it with "i" and Iear 4 might fiks the "g/j" anomali wonse and for all. Jenerally, then, the improvement would kontinue iear bai iear with Iear 5 doing awai with useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12 or so modifaiing vowlz and the rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants. Bai Iear 15 or sou, it wud fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez "c", "y" and "x" — bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez — tu riplais "ch", "sh", and "th" rispektivli. Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt xe Ingliy-spiking werld.
From: A letter to "The Economist", written by one M.J. Shields (or M.J. Yilz, by the end of the letter).
-
If you only have 3 bases left, the chances of you staging a comeback are slim to none. Honestly, don't seeing it changing anything at all, other than 3 more bases to horde. In this case, I don't really blame the horde, I've been told in the past, everyone either logs off, changes arena, or changes team when they are about to lose.
-
Originally posted by Ack-Ack
LOL! Just up the base the Rolling Flatulence are attacking and they scatter like cockroaches caught under a light.
ack-ack
Always a good sign when people make fun of ones squad..Means we must be doing something right.. :D :aok
Kevin
-
Your squadron is doing nothing right and it's not a sign of your squadron's "skill" but rather lack of. No offense, but when your entire squadron hides in the tower from one lone enemy, it's hard not to make fun of them.
ack-ack
-
Originally posted by Ack-Ack
Your squadron is doing nothing right and it's not a sign of your squadron's "skill" but rather lack of. No offense, but when your entire squadron hides in the tower from one lone enemy, it's hard not to make fun of them.
ack-ack
wow,more of it,we must really be doing well.
Kevin :aok
-
ACK-ACK WHO? I thank you for your criticism, however unprovoked it may be.
-
Originally posted by pluck
If you only have 3 bases left, the chances of you staging a comeback are slim to none. Honestly, don't seeing it changing anything at all, other than 3 more bases to horde. In this case, I don't really blame the horde, I've been told in the past, everyone either logs off, changes arena, or changes team when they are about to lose.
No requirement to be down to last 3 bases. In fact, only those 3 bases would have to be captured. The other bases would only be needed as a way to those 3 bases. Interesting idea and one I wouldn't mind seeing tried.
Regards,
Hammer
-
Originally posted by falcon23
Always a good sign when people make fun of ones squad..Means we must be doing something right.. :D :aok
Kevin
No. People whose squad is made fun of tend to think this because it makes them feel better.
Regards,
Hammer
-
Originally posted by hammer
No. People whose squad is made fun of tend to think this because it makes them feel better.
Regards,
Hammer
zing
-
I take it as a compliment,,, since the person doing the talking is on the outside and does not know the facts.
There is always two sides to each story, and everyone has one.
Thanks:lol
-
Dads....
It was fun running into your NOE mission the other day....with our own NOE....Funny stuff.
-
It was a suprise for all of us Im sure.... lol
-
Originally posted by Dadsguns
It was a suprise for all of us Im sure.... lol
Oh my goodness yes....One of my squaddies went APE **** on the VOX.....and the party went from there....anyway....fun times.
Cya Up sometime.....
-
Gute Idee. Wäre einen Versuch wert.
Good idea. Worth a try.
Digging deep into enemy territory. Open flanks which favour counter attacks. Probably interesting on big maps above all.
-
Originally posted by hammer
No. People whose squad is made fun of tend to think this because it makes them feel better.
Regards,
Hammer
No hammer,it means ack has no idea what he is talking about.He does not know how we operate totally as a squad..hence he has no reason to come at it as he did,other than to try and make us look bad..He threw dirt,and those who throw dirt tend to get dirty themselves.
And hammer,your thought about my tendency is wrong.
I feel GREAT about our squad and myself.we may be relatively new,but to have someone saying what ack did is a pip,and a shot in the arm....:aok
Kevin
-
Originally posted by sunfan1121
would never work because of good teamwork squads like rollingthunder.
Teamwork squad?
More like a horde squad.
-
interesting that ack ack is trying to be offensive,but has the nerve to put 'no offence' in his post.You wouldnt even be in our squad with an attitude like that,and i certainly wouldnt want walking attitude problems like you on my wing.
-
Originally posted by MstWntd
Teamwork squad?
More like a horde squad.
LOL....huh....careful there....pot may meet kettle Sir:D
MOST squads are horde squads....and yours is no exception.
-
Originally posted by Lusche
And what exactly would be better when all bases are capturable?
The fun part where you are either attacking/defending a base that you up 163's out of.
Stealing their 163's and then attacking them with it
or
Defending your next base while 163's try to dogfight
-
Originally posted by Spazzter
I was thinking the same thing and then noticed he is from Germany so I gave him a free pass. However, there is no excuse for Sunfan to be spelling Isn't as isint.
Spazz
(http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa211/crzwhiteboy1121/114570oTvS_w.jpg)
-
Originally posted by sunfan1121
(http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa211/crzwhiteboy1121/114570oTvS_w.jpg)
That is great nice find. :aok
Spazz
PS. Steve Nash Rules. Best all around point guard in the NBA.
-
Originally posted by Spazzter
PS. Steve Nash Rules. Best all around point guard in the NBA.
I agree
-
...mmmh maybe you all lost the point of this post?????
cu chris3
-
Originally posted by minke
interesting that ack ack is trying to be offensive,but has the nerve to put 'no offence' in his post.You wouldnt even be in our squad with an attitude like that,and i certainly wouldnt want walking attitude problems like you on my wing.
First off, I would never think to join a squadron like the Rolling Flatulence. Why? Because as an entire squadron, the Rolling Flatulence are useless and rather timid. No offense intended but a lone defender is sufficient enough to stop your milk running. How do I know? Because I was the player that your entire squadron was hiding in the tower from.
I wouldn't want you flying on my wing either, I would rather have someone that is more skilled than you or any of your Rolling Flatulence squadron mates on my wing.
Face it, when it comes to easy kills, you can't find any that is easier than a member of the Rolling Flatulence. ^__^
ack-ack
-
Originally posted by Ack-Ack
First off, I would never think to join a squadron like the Rolling Flatulence.
Now now, before saying something like that, think about it for a second. I'm sure they fly your favorite bomber all the time, so maybe you'd be a great fit!
;)
-
Originally posted by Stang
Now now, before saying something like that, think about it for a second. I'm sure they fly your favorite bomber all the time, so maybe you'd be a great fit!
;)
LOL! I don't think any of these guys have ever seen a fighter, let alone what a P-38 looks like. Well, that's not true, they tend to only see the front of a fighter while they're looking back.
ack-ack
-
I kinda like Chris3's idea.
To break up the monotony on some maps...have different ways to win some times, not the same way every map. The way to win a certan map might easily be explained on a MOTD when you enter.
Might make uterus and Baltic maps more bearable of there were different ways to win (and get rid of it by reset).
If you get fixated on the front and the NME sneaks into your hinterland and steals the 3 key bases...ya deserve to lose.
I think his idea would force greater attention to the key bases as well as regular patrols looking for NOE missions.
Can you imagine how many kills you could rack up finding 25 low and slow NME planes on an NOE run?
68ROX
-
I think HT should constantly change the rules just to confuse us.............
Then it really would be WarBirds!!
-
Face it, when it comes to easy kills
ack-ack
easy kill?...LOL... :rolleyes:
-
nikoman, don't you have anything better to do than dredge up a 5 month old flame war that's long since been replaced by other, newer, flame wars?
-
:P
-
I believe Chris meant to ask people's opinions on his idea where the three currently uncapturable bases would be capturable and only they would matter in winning a war.
In other words, the war would end if one country captured all those three important bases from another country.
I believe your correct..... and he was clearer than many who post here :)
-
Would work in main maybe. But in early and mid war, it should be team must capture every base but the last 6 uncaptureable bases. Now 1 person at 2-6am eastern can caputre early and reset map alone, and in mid war if 5 guys all rooks reset map every night cause no one on. And by milking they get 25 perks. while others have to work for it does seem unfair. So i would make it in early war and mid war u have to have all but the last 3 bases of both sides or 60% of each teams bases not the 33% it is now.
-
where the heck are the spelling police to decipher this thread?
who cares are the spellin B police :rofl I say get a life or is it live cant rememmper
-
how about getting rid of "winning the war" altogether have the maps rotate randomly and if a map is up in the other arena it is excluded from this rotation,fighters can still fight, bombers can still bomb, GVs can do... well whatever they do,
no base captures
no winning the war
we could all just fight in peace.
-
easy kill?...LOL... :rolleyes:
Kinda like "someone who punted this thread Today" and was running from an La7 for 1/2 a sector in a 109K4 and was in the tower after 3 turns/loops. I wonder who I'm talking about? :eek:
-
Kinda like "someone who punted this thread Today" and was running from an La7 for 1/2 a sector in a 109K4 and was in the tower after 3 turns/loops. I wonder who I'm talking about? :eek:
LOL! I think he posted after he cherry picked me one night while I was in a 3v1. Believe he was in a K4 that came in and got me then talked nonsense on the radio about how he "finally" got me. I like how he neglects to point out the 3 or so 1v1 he's lost prior to me. So, yeah, easy kill is a correct statement on my part.
ack-ack
-
First off, I would never think to join a squadron like the Rolling Flatulence. Why? Because as an entire squadron, the Rolling Flatulence are useless and rather timid. No offense intended but a lone defender is sufficient enough to stop your milk running. How do I know? Because I was the player that your entire squadron was hiding in the tower from.
I wouldn't want you flying on my wing either, I would rather have someone that is more skilled than you or any of your Rolling Flatulence squadron mates on my wing.
Face it, when it comes to easy kills, you can't find any that is easier than a member of the Rolling Flatulence. ^__^
ack-ack
Put ROLLINGTHUNDER in a thread again and I'll die from overlaughing :) I like finding where they are, good targets :)
-
dam this thread is old... I cant believe I actually called rolling blunder a good squad :noid
-
mommy -men
-
Put ROLLINGTHUNDER in a thread again and I'll die from overlaughing :) I like finding where they are, good targets :)
I find you and TACK-TACK talk about all the killing you do, yet I dont see you around when we come to town, much less even can recall fighting you. Action speaks louder than words and would love to give you the oppurtunity to walk the walk.
Oh the Tack was for TACT, you may want to learn to use it some time, you sir should at least have some type of respect for others if you ever want someone to give you any respect. Your mouth preceeds you.
-
This thread is months old.
-
glad to see you know your numbers,
-
First off, I would never think to join a squadron like the Rolling Flatulence. Why? Because as an entire squadron, the Rolling Flatulence are useless and rather timid. No offense intended but a lone defender is sufficient enough to stop your milk running. How do I know? Because I was the player that your entire squadron was hiding in the tower from.
I wouldn't want you flying on my wing either, I would rather have someone that is more skilled than you or any of your Rolling Flatulence squadron mates on my wing.
Face it, when it comes to easy kills, you can't find any that is easier than a member of the Rolling Flatulence. ^__^
ack-ack
1- Posts are to be made in the relevant forum. Users are asked to read the forum descriptions before posting.
2- Threads should remain on topic, do not "hijack" topics.
3- Do not open a new thread that duplicates a current topic.
4- Members should post in a way that is respectful of other users and HTC. Flaming or abusing users is not tolerated.
5- Flamebaiting, trolling, or posting to incite or annoy is not allowed.
6- Members are asked to not act as "back seat moderators". Issues with any breach of rules should be brought to HTC's attention via email at support@hitechcreations.com.
7- Members should remember this board is aimed at a general audience. Posting pornographic or generally offensive text, images, links, etc. will not be tolerated. This includes attempts to bypass the profanity filter.
8- Cheating allegations or descriptions are not allowed. Email support@hitechcreations.com to report any issues regarding this. HTC permanently bans anyone caught cheating in Aces High. We take cheating and allegations of cheating very seriously.
9- Complaints about a player's behavior online should be emailed to support@hitechcreations.com rather than posted to this board.
10- Spam is not tolerated here under any circumstance.
11- Deprecated.
12 - Users are permitted to upload one of their own avatars. Avatars must be in good taste and consistent with the other rules of this board.
13- Do not punt topics. Punting would be making a non-substantive post for the express purpose of bring the thread to the top of the thread list.
14- Members should post in a way which is consistent with "normal writing". That is users should not post excessive numbers of emoticons, large, small or coloured text, etc. Similarly users should not SHOUT or use excessive punctuation (e.g. ! and ?) in topic titles or posts.
15- Threads started or, posts made, with the intent to inflame, incite will be considered trolling and not allowed.
16- All posts, in public forums, should be made in the English language.
17- Threads started devoid of commentary will not be allowed (i.e. links, cut-n-pastes, clicky, read this...)
Posts and threads may be edited, deleted, or locked for violations of these rules. Continued or blatant violation of these rules may result in a temporary or permanent ban.
Its evident that some violations can be made repeatedly by some individuals. Continue to hide in the BB's, its the safest place for you.
-
What?.......What?.........WHAT?
(http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:poJoJiLfpjBLSM:http://www.starstore.com/acatalog/WWE-Austin-SP0520.jpg)
-
1- Posts are to be made in the relevant forum. Users are asked to read the forum descriptions before posting.
2- Threads should remain on topic, do not "hijack" topics.
3- Do not open a new thread that duplicates a current topic.
4- Members should post in a way that is respectful of other users and HTC. Flaming or abusing users is not tolerated.
5- Flamebaiting, trolling, or posting to incite or annoy is not allowed.
6- Members are asked to not act as "back seat moderators". Issues with any breach of rules should be brought to HTC's attention via email at support@hitechcreations.com.
7- Members should remember this board is aimed at a general audience. Posting pornographic or generally offensive text, images, links, etc. will not be tolerated. This includes attempts to bypass the profanity filter.
8- Cheating allegations or descriptions are not allowed. Email support@hitechcreations.com to report any issues regarding this. HTC permanently bans anyone caught cheating in Aces High. We take cheating and allegations of cheating very seriously.
9- Complaints about a player's behavior online should be emailed to support@hitechcreations.com rather than posted to this board.
10- Spam is not tolerated here under any circumstance.
11- Deprecated.
12 - Users are permitted to upload one of their own avatars. Avatars must be in good taste and consistent with the other rules of this board.
13- Do not punt topics. Punting would be making a non-substantive post for the express purpose of bring the thread to the top of the thread list.
14- Members should post in a way which is consistent with "normal writing". That is users should not post excessive numbers of emoticons, large, small or coloured text, etc. Similarly users should not SHOUT or use excessive punctuation (e.g. ! and ?) in topic titles or posts.
15- Threads started or, posts made, with the intent to inflame, incite will be considered trolling and not allowed.
16- All posts, in public forums, should be made in the English language.
17- Threads started devoid of commentary will not be allowed (i.e. links, cut-n-pastes, clicky, read this...)
Posts and threads may be edited, deleted, or locked for violations of these rules. Continued or blatant violation of these rules may result in a temporary or permanent ban.
Its evident that some violations can be made repeatedly by some individuals. Continue to hide in the BB's, its the safest place for you.
Interesting you posted the rules, as you broke #s 6 and 13. Just pointing that out.
-
welcome to the club,,,,
-
I'm up for it, but under 3 conditions:
1. The Radar ring for thos bases are twice as big.
2. Town is twice as big.
3. Put them where they are already in the map.
:aok
-
I find you and TACK-TACK talk about all the killing you do, yet I dont see you around when we come to town, much less even can recall fighting you. Action speaks louder than words and would love to give you the oppurtunity to walk the walk.
Oh the Tack was for TACT, you may want to learn to use it some time, you sir should at least have some type of respect for others if you ever want someone to give you any respect. Your mouth preceeds you.
LOL! After all these months this still upsets you? My, aren't we thenthative. If you want to give me the 'opportunity to walk the walk' I can be found most days in the Mid War arena or late nights in the Late War arena. You are also more than welcome to send me a PM to arrange the 'opportunity' you so graciously offered me.
ack-ack
-
5er on ack-ack
-
:uhoh
-
5er on ack-ack
Only 5? Ye have little faith.
-
back on topic
i think it would be fun too try ! don't know how well it would work, but if you tried to fly a large mission across a mass area then there would be plenty of chances at an intercept!
also a change of tactics, if you could not get thru, you might try to breach a single line of attack thru only the minimun amount of bases in order too form a corridor of attack!the only down side i see is when the arena is almost deserted, then it would not work well because of the side balance, I.E. one side has most or all the players!
-
5er on ack-ack
$20 on Ack
-
$50 on Ack or SirNuke :aok