Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: wrag on December 13, 2007, 09:49:33 AM

Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: wrag on December 13, 2007, 09:49:33 AM
Someone did a little home work on Hillary?

Seems that way!

This article SEEMS to say a considerable amount about her political philosophy...

http://mensnewsdaily.com/2007/12/13/hillary-clinton-cultural-marxist/

AND it seem to fit right in with several of her quotes.
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: Mickey1992 on December 13, 2007, 10:14:52 AM
I don't like Hillary, but who gives a crap what she did 38 years ago while she was at Yale?
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: RATTFINK on December 13, 2007, 10:25:48 AM
(http://www.passionateamerica.com/pictures/The_Real_Hillary.jpg)
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: midnight Target on December 13, 2007, 10:26:55 AM
That article is complete crap. Political propoganda at its worst.

This is the kind of "swiftboat" tactics that deminishes our political process to idiocy. I find it sad and repelling that anyone would take this kind of article seriously.
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: ChickenHawk on December 13, 2007, 11:11:59 AM
If you don't like Hillary, there is plenty of ammo available without writing a weak and pathetic commentary like this.

You need to fine another site to post articles from, this one is getting a little stale.
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: AKIron on December 13, 2007, 11:15:39 AM
The "swiftboat tatics" were legitimate and relevent. With regard to Hillary though, it's one thing to politically murder your opponent and quite another to murder your political opponent.
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: lasersailor184 on December 13, 2007, 12:04:52 PM
Quote
Originally posted by AKIron
The "swiftboat tatics" were legitimate and relevent. With regard to Hillary though, it's one thing to politically murder your opponent and quite another to murder your political opponent.


Correct.  The most deplorable side of the swiftboat tactics is the truth.  Democrats can't stand it.
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: Mickey1992 on December 13, 2007, 12:38:11 PM
Quote
Originally posted by AKIron
The "swiftboat tatics" were legitimate and relevent.


If by legitimate and relevent [sic] you mean dishonorable and untruthful, you are correct.
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: john9001 on December 13, 2007, 12:41:30 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Mickey1992
If by legitimate and relevent [sic] you mean dishonorable and untruthful, you are correct.


kerry's testimony before congress was dishonorable and untruthful.
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: AKIron on December 13, 2007, 01:17:29 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Mickey1992
If by legitimate and relevent [sic] you mean dishonorable and untruthful, you are correct.


It was only dishonorable if it wasn't true. What part wasn't true exactly?
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: Yeager on December 13, 2007, 01:32:30 PM
Kerry is an ***hat with no equal.  He got taken out for being a traitor to his men and his country.  It is a sad legacy that john kerry has forever damaged through both word and deed the honor and sacrifice of all Swiftboat crews.
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: lasersailor184 on December 13, 2007, 01:35:31 PM
Quote
Originally posted by AKIron
It was only dishonorable if it wasn't true. What part wasn't true exactly?


Look up Winter Soldiers (I think it was).
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: AKIron on December 13, 2007, 02:01:51 PM
Quote
Originally posted by lasersailor184
Look up Winter Soldiers (I think it was).


Nothing there disproving the "swift boaters" claims against JK.
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: lazs2 on December 13, 2007, 02:07:13 PM
wait a minute..   you guys defending her are not trying to say that she isn't a marxist are you?

lazs
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: midnight Target on December 13, 2007, 02:12:37 PM
She isn't a marxist.
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: midnight Target on December 13, 2007, 02:13:16 PM
Believe it or not, she isn't even the anti-christ.
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: AKIron on December 13, 2007, 02:24:41 PM
Quote
Originally posted by midnight Target
Believe it or not, she isn't even the anti-christ.


Not "the" anti-christ, just one of them.
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: john9001 on December 13, 2007, 02:28:19 PM
hillary is not a marxist, she is a communist, i am a marxist.

OK, actually a rightwing, marxist, anarchist, libertarian, semi-hippy, biker dude. And confused.
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: lazs2 on December 13, 2007, 02:37:25 PM
Of course she is a marxist.   A total commie.  doesn't even hide it well.

can't wait for the obligatory shots of her with a shotgun at the skeet range.

lazs
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: Sabre on December 13, 2007, 04:04:52 PM
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
Of course she is a marxist.   A total commie.  doesn't even hide it well.

can't wait for the obligatory shots of her with a shotgun at the skeet range.

lazs


Hey, maybe Dick Cheney will give her some tips on handling a shot gun?  Seriously, Hillary is a Socialist.  Has been from her earliest days and she hasn't changed her spots (just tried to hide them, and not very well at that).
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: AKIron on December 13, 2007, 04:06:36 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Sabre
Hey, maybe Dick Cheney will give her some tips on handling a shot gun?  Seriously, Hillary is a Socialist.  Has been from her earliest days and she hasn't changed her spots (just tried to hide them, and not very well at that).


Here's to her hunting with Bill. :aok
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: AKIron on December 13, 2007, 04:16:56 PM
New variation on an old joke:


A woman died and went to heaven.  As she stood in front of St. Peter
at the Pearly Gates, she saw a huge wall of clocks behind him.  She asked,
"What are all those clocks?"

St. Peter answered, "Those are Lie-Clocks.  Everyone on Earth has a
Lie-Clock.  Every time you lie the hands on your clock will move."
 
"Oh," said the woman, "whose clock is that?"
 
"That's Mother Teresa's. The hands have never moved, indicating that
she never told a lie."

"Incredible," said the woman. "And whose clock is that one?"
 
St. Peter responded, "That's Abraham Lincoln's clock. The hands have
moved twice, telling us that Abe told only two lies in his entire life."
 
"Where's Hillary Clinton's clock?" asked the woman.

"Hillary's clock is in Jesus' office.  He's using it as a ceiling
fan."
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: crockett on December 13, 2007, 04:37:14 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Mickey1992
I don't like Hillary, but who gives a crap what she did 38 years ago while she was at Yale?


Oh if it's a Democrat it's ok to bring up what they did 30 years ago. If it's a Republican then it's just dirty campaign tactics to say things like Bush had DUI's, a coke problem and was a draft dodger ect ect. Or for instance Rudy likes to wear dresses.

It's only dirty politics if you say bad things about Republicans..
Title: A new take on Hillary?
Post by: john9001 on December 13, 2007, 05:23:46 PM
well hillary....excuse me, hillary's "staff" is bringing up obama's drug use. Hillary (the smartest women in the world) never seems to know what her staff is doing. ( i didn't know about the planted questions, my staff did it)

 How can this women run the country if she can't even keep control of her staff?