Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: DEAR98 on December 14, 2007, 07:05:27 PM

Title: A new bombers
Post by: DEAR98 on December 14, 2007, 07:05:27 PM
the list of them is so small its funney so mabye whould chould get the
Hell Diver and B-32 or eney outher bombers whould be nice mabye a jet
have fun
Title: A new bombers
Post by: Redlegs on December 14, 2007, 07:09:47 PM
Who wants to go first?
Title: A new bombers
Post by: AirFlyer on December 14, 2007, 07:26:00 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Redlegs
Who wants to go first?


Too easy...
Title: A new bombers
Post by: Motherland on December 14, 2007, 07:43:27 PM
NO MORE AMERICAN BOMBERS.
















He-111 FTW.




BTW We have a jet bomber, the Ar234.
Title: A new bombers
Post by: hubsonfire on December 14, 2007, 08:05:03 PM
Aw c'mon guys, he's 9. Just let it go. There are plenty of other ideas to mock from people who have no excuse.
Title: A new bombers
Post by: DEAR98 on December 14, 2007, 08:09:54 PM
ok?
Title: A new bombers
Post by: Bosco123 on December 14, 2007, 09:07:15 PM
How about this?:
(http://www.raf.mod.uk/downloads/wallpapers/1944/meteor31024.jpg)
It acually flew in WW2 but only for V1's. All of the History people would have wanted to see what the 262 and this, the Gloster Meteor would do if they met eachother.
Title: A new bombers
Post by: Gowan on December 14, 2007, 09:10:34 PM
OI!

i already suggested the b32 this tour none the less, USE THE SEARCH BUTTON!!! RAWR!!!!!
Title: A new bombers
Post by: SgtPappy on December 14, 2007, 10:06:39 PM
Bosco123... tell me where you got that avatar/emoticon.

I
need
that.

:eek:
Title: A new bombers
Post by: Rich46yo on December 14, 2007, 11:28:42 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Motherland
NO MORE AMERICAN BOMBERS
He-111 FTW.
BTW We have a jet bomber, the Ar234.


                           I would have interest in it if we could arm it with glide bombs. Other then that? The JU-88 looks and flys like a Ferrari compared to the He-111 and since the JU-88 is already a hangar queen what would the slower and less capable He-111 be?

                         OK maybe the JU-88 isnt a HQ, or, doesnt deserve to be. Its a very nice bomber to fly but the fact is you dont see it in the air to often and I'd bet you'd never see the He-111.

                       What we really need is the TU-2.
Title: A new bombers
Post by: Motherland on December 14, 2007, 11:45:04 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Rich46yo
I would have interest in it if we could arm it with glide bombs. Other then that? The JU-88 looks and flys like a Ferrari compared to the He-111 and since the JU-88 is already a hangar queen what would the slower and less capable He-111 be?.

So? ANY new bomber we get, beside maybe a B29(doubt its gonna happen any time soon) and the Tu2, will be a 'hangar queen' compared to the Lancaster or B24. So that point is irrelevent.
The He-111 in any case has a better defensive armament than the Ju-88, with 7 .30's that were sometimes replaced with MG131's and MGFF's. Plus, it was a major German bomber and played a large role in the war.
Title: A new bombers
Post by: GoldenP51 on December 15, 2007, 04:06:34 AM
Quote
Originally posted by Motherland
So? ANY new bomber we get, beside maybe a B29(doubt its gonna happen any time soon) and the Tu2, will be a 'hangar queen' compared to the Lancaster or B24. So that point is irrelevent.
The He-111 in any case has a better defensive armament than the Ju-88, with 7 .30's that were sometimes replaced with MG131's and MGFF's. Plus, it was a major German bomber and played a large role in the war.



what?? did someone say we are getting the B29?
Title: A new bombers
Post by: Bosco123 on December 15, 2007, 08:55:57 AM
Quote
Originally posted by SgtPappy
Bosco123... tell me where you got that avatar/emoticon.

I
need
that.

:eek:

Sgt Papy Check ur PMs
Title: A new bombers
Post by: Redlegs on December 15, 2007, 09:30:38 AM
Bosco did you get that from a post of mine in the AHXARL forum?
Title: A new bombers
Post by: Bosco123 on December 15, 2007, 11:00:41 AM
Yea I did I thought that that was a bit funny as well. (http://www.z4-forum.com/forum/images/smilies/iamwithstupid.gif)
Title: A new bombers
Post by: Motherland on December 15, 2007, 11:22:52 AM
Quote
Originally posted by GoldenP51
what?? did someone say we are getting the B29?


Who said that?
Title: A new bombers
Post by: Redlegs on December 15, 2007, 12:21:00 PM
Well (http://www.z4-forum.com/forum/images/smilies/hat_tip.gif)

Your Welcome!!
Title: A new bombers
Post by: Rich46yo on December 15, 2007, 12:29:13 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Motherland
So? ANY new bomber we get, beside maybe a B29(doubt its gonna happen any time soon) and the Tu2, will be a 'hangar queen' compared to the Lancaster or B24. So that point is irrelevent.
The He-111 in any case has a better defensive armament than the Ju-88, with 7 .30's that were sometimes replaced with MG131's and MGFF's. Plus, it was a major German bomber and played a large role in the war.


                              The only cannon it sported was up front which in this game is almost useless. The fully loaded 111 went like 240 mph and it was a tomato in the BOB let alone late war. And the JU-88 handled much better and dived much better.

                            But yes, it was a very successful transport plane. As long as no-one was in a hurry and there were no enemy fighters around to shoot you down. Geez, I'd rather see the Mits Betty and even that would be a queen. Think of the Betty as a slower B-26 with 1/2 the bombload that one well placed shot would set it on fire.

                          The TU-2 would be no more a queen then the KI-67 is. Even less so, and the KI-67 is the best 30 eny bomber the world has ever seen. The TU-2 is fast, had wing mounted 20mm cannon, 3 0.50s canopy,dorsal, ventral, was tough as nails, and had a bombload like that of the B-26. Best of all it was an accomplished dive bomber too.

                     And how does 340 mph grab you? No my friend, the TU-2 was a winner and would be here in AH too. I know I want it cause it suits my game style but I'll bet many will jump in the thing. Its got a hangar busting bomb load, its climbs well, and its fast!
Title: A new bombers
Post by: Meatwad on December 15, 2007, 12:29:32 PM
Quote
Originally posted by GoldenP51
what?? did someone say we are getting the B29?


Thats classified