Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: splitatom on December 15, 2007, 09:41:29 PM
-
re arm pads at vb we could use those especialy for tank towns or a small dirt runway with a re arm pad at the ends
-
Originally posted by splitatom
re arm pads at vb we could use those especialy for tank towns or a small dirt runway with a re arm pad at the ends
No. A Runway defeats the purpose of a V-base.
And do you really think Panzer divisions in WWII had bombs, plane fuel, and rockets handy?
-
re arm pads at vbases would come in handy, historical or not. They wouldnt need to add a runway its easy enough to take off from a vbase.
-
most american armored divisions had a the ability to call in air strikes and close air suport and most wars they had small air strips near the front lines and i want them only so you can rearm planes and land them for emergencies it is mainly for tank town you cannot take planes off:)
-
Originally posted by splitatom
Most American armored divisions had the ability to call in air strikes, also close air support. In most wars they had small air strips near the front lines. I want them only so you can rearm planes and land them for emergencies. It is mainly for tank town, you cannot take planes off.
With a little editing...
Yes but my point is, in the war I doubt planes could land in the middle of nowhere, have these tank guys strap bombs/rockets THE CORRECT WAY onto the plane. The same with V-bases, do you think they had bombs and rockets laying around? (Other than craters :D )
-
they had forword air bases that wer normaly located near the front the v bases are normaly the front lines aka they had maintnece people at the small air strips
-
Rearm pads at V-bases = bad
Just respawn and your good to go.
-
who says i am useing a veicle:p
-
Watch your gas so you can get back to an airbase then?
-
No rearm for aircraft at V bases. I don't have any problem with GVs
using them though.
-
Originally posted by splitatom
they had forword air bases that wer normaly located near the front the v bases are normaly the front lines aka they had maintnece people at the small air strips
But they were airfields .
And, historically, if, say a 4th FG P-51 had to land at a forward airfield, more often than not, the pilot either left his plane there and hitched a ride home in a transport going his way or it took hours if not days to get him back on his way to his home airfield .
wrngway
-
hmmm lets see a re-arm pad, to load more bombs, to kill GV's.
I can think of quite a few hardcore GV heavyweights who would whine all day long if someone could keep loading bombs.
Do you really think this would not add to the frustrations of the disgruntled GV driver?
If you want air support fly it in from a different field or maybe wish for a spotter plane that doesnt have any ammo or bombs. That could be launched from a V base hangar.
-
IMO all re arm pads are gamey anachronisms left over from AH1 beta.
Enabling fuel and amunition supplies for stationary ac would be sufficient, indeed this would enable many other game play (rather than gamey)oppurtunities.
-
Originally posted by Bruv119
hmmm lets see a re-arm pad, to load more bombs, to kill GV's.
I can think of quite a few hardcore GV heavyweights who would whine all day long if someone could keep loading bombs.
Do you really think this would not add to the frustrations of the disgruntled GV driver?
If you want air support fly it in from a different field or maybe wish for a spotter plane that doesnt have any ammo or bombs. That could be launched from a V base hangar.
i have asked for spoter planes before
-
Originally posted by Bruv119
If you want air support fly it in from a different field or maybe wish for a spotter plane that doesnt have any ammo or bombs. That could be launched from a V base hangar.
I wanted this at one point.
Have say, spit1's or Hurri1's be able to up out of Ports and Vbases.
-
maybe we should have tiny one hanger refuel bases with one man ack and two auto. or no hanger and just a rearm pad ammo bunkers and fuel bunkers. and instead of the 75% fuel limiter have it down to 25%. also, you cannot land kills there. these bases would be sort of out of the way but closer to places where fighting would be. they would give a new angle to the game. Just a daydream idea so feel free to critisize:)
-
Originally posted by Ceaser Nikoli
maybe we should have tiny one hanger refuel bases with one man ack and two auto. or no hanger and just a rearm pad ammo bunkers and fuel bunkers. and instead of the 75% fuel limiter have it down to 25%. also, you cannot land kills there. these bases would be sort of out of the way but closer to places where fighting would be. they would give a new angle to the game. Just a daydream idea so feel free to critisize:)
thats an interesting idea
-
Originally posted by Ceaser Nikoli
maybe we should have tiny one hanger refuel bases with one man ack and two auto. or no hanger and just a rearm pad ammo bunkers and fuel bunkers. and instead of the 75% fuel limiter have it down to 25%. also, you cannot land kills there. these bases would be sort of out of the way but closer to places where fighting would be. they would give a new angle to the game. Just a daydream idea so feel free to critisize:)
I like this idea.
Tie them in with zone bases.
-
Simply add aircraft supplies. Someone could just run an M3 out the hanger and you pick it up same as a tank but keep rearm at 30 seconds to keep it more like a rearm pad.
-
Originally posted by Ceaser Nikoli
maybe we should have tiny one hanger refuel bases with one man ack and two auto. or no hanger and just a rearm pad ammo bunkers and fuel bunkers. and instead of the 75% fuel limiter have it down to 25%. also, you cannot land kills there. these bases would be sort of out of the way but closer to places where fighting would be. they would give a new angle to the game. Just a daydream idea so feel free to critisize:)
search button, its been thought of many times and shot down a whole lot more (dont ask me how)
-
I'm pretty sure you could find some MG ammo and some sort of fuel your plane could fly on laying around a V-base.
-
Originally posted by Ceaser Nikoli
maybe we should have tiny one hanger refuel bases with one man ack and two auto. or no hanger and just a rearm pad ammo bunkers and fuel bunkers. and instead of the 75% fuel limiter have it down to 25%. also, you cannot land kills there. these bases would be sort of out of the way but closer to places where fighting would be. they would give a new angle to the game. Just a daydream idea so feel free to critisize:)
I prefer the above idea over the ideas from DakOne and MadMan.
-
Well if you put the area where the pad is just left of the main pad as you come out of the VH.Just put it their were the gas trucks are. And it's up to the pilot to land it safe and take back off.It's a risk but it would be worth it if you can land re-arm and take back off with no problem.
-
I suppose even making re arm pads into "destructable objects" (objects which can be blown up) in a terrains settings would be some advance.
Would still like to get rid of them and rely on "aircraft/vehicle supplies"
-
I think that would be a good idea.1000lbs to kill it maybe.Stays down for 15 min. Not alot of people rearm if they have kills and the base is under attack.
-
I agree that the re-arm pads need to be destructible. I mean come on! There's fuel tanks in the open on those pads.