Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: DREDIOCK on December 16, 2007, 01:08:12 PM
-
What kind of batteries does this thing need/ take?
-
Most likely lithium ion.
-
sorry
I ment
Size as well as type.
I dont feel like unwrapping this thing to find out LOL
-
Why don't you just check the Canon website?
-
Originally posted by Viking
Why don't you just check the Canon website?
shhhh, you'll ruin the surprise.
-
it comes with a proprietary battery and charger, but you will have to buy a memory card.
-
Originally posted by Viking
Why don't you just check the Canon website?
What. And miss the creative responces I know Ill get here?
Not on your life!
Besides that would be too easy
-
what store did you by it from or did you order it off the internet?
-
Originally posted by kilz
what store did you by it from or did you order it off the internet?
Circuit City.
But bought it online
They had it marked down from $799 to $699 as most stores are offering now.
BUT on the website they offered an additional deal that I got in on yesterday which seemed to be the last day.
Picked it up for $589.99 + tax ( final price was $630.96 after tax) and all I had to do was pick it up at the store.
-
Next question.
On the CF memory cards.
There seems to be a pretty wide price variation depending on brand on the same amount of memory
Example. on 2 MB cards I've seen prices as high as over $100
And as low as $40
Whats the difference. Does it really matter for the non professional casual user?
-
Any major brand - Sandisk, Kingston etc - would be perfectly safe and there's no reason to choose one over another.
Stay away from eBay , except when buying from a known reputable store. Many, many cards sold on eBay are fakes.
the price difference is probably due to the write speed of the card which should not matter to you. Pros need a fast card because sometimes they shoot multiple frames of the same shot.
-
This is the Cannon I got and I really like it. I like the Sandisk memory cards. I tried another brand that someone reccomended and it went belly up in just a couple of months. It had a bunch of pics on it too. Sandisk sells some faster memory for a higher price but I've been using their 2 gig memory that costs something under or around $40. Been happy with it.
Good luck! It's a sweet camera.
Mark
-
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
Next question.
On the CF memory cards.
There seems to be a pretty wide price variation depending on brand on the same amount of memory
Example. on 2 MB cards I've seen prices as high as over $100
And as low as $40
Whats the difference. Does it really matter for the non professional casual user?
The memory card should have a minimum of 20ns write time.
Toshiba make an excellent one. If you must go sandisk get a sandisk ultra.
-
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
Next question.
On the CF memory cards.
There seems to be a pretty wide price variation depending on brand on the same amount of memory
Example. on 2 MB cards I've seen prices as high as over $100
And as low as $40
Whats the difference. Does it really matter for the non professional casual user?
Try this site for the info:
Rob Galbraith CF/SD data (http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=6007-7699)
-
Thank you all very much
-
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
Circuit City.
But bought it online
They had it marked down from $799 to $699 as most stores are offering now.
BUT on the website they offered an additional deal that I got in on yesterday which seemed to be the last day.
Picked it up for $589.99 + tax ( final price was $630.96 after tax) and all I had to do was pick it up at the store.
Man, you sure got a killer deal there on a great camera.
Canon is definitely the best digital camera company there is, in my opinion. I love both my my Canons, especially my new Powershot SX100IS. Both of my cameras take standard AA batteries, which is really nice. The new Duracell NiMH rechargeable AA batteries recharge in only 15 minutes, and will hold their charge now for many months. And they are most reasonably priced, too.
Here are some photos of my new SX100IS next to my older and larger Powershot S3 IS:
(http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s272/lanceJOregon/Canon/canon4.jpg)
(http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s272/lanceJOregon/Canon/canon3.jpg)
(http://i154.photobucket.com/albums/s272/lanceJOregon/Canon/canon1.jpg)
I've had the S3 IS for over 1 1/2 years now. The SX100 IS is a brand new model, and just came out two months ago. It takes great photos even when used in full automatic mode.
Here is a snapshot I took with it of two flesh eating Zombies that approached me on Halloween eve this year. This was a spur of the moment shot that I just quickly snapped in full auto mode, as they approached me. Yet focus, detail, and exposure all came out very well.
(http://i4.tinypic.com/6jcnugz.jpg)
They were mumbling "Brains, must eat brains", but I did not hang around to ask them about that.
SIG 220
-
I have that exact camera. The battery lasts a very long time when charged and with a 2 gig memory card you can get hundreds of pics even on the largest setting. At the smallest you can get thousands.
-
I think I charge my batteries once every 6 months. :D
(http://pic4.picturetrail.com/VOL767/2726312/8668097/253901257.jpg)
Honestly though, I shot about 1000 pictures in 6 games, as well as 276 portrait photos (Team and portraits for a total of roughly 6500 pictures)with flash this past fall, and I just charged the camera batteries recently (2).
-
Originally posted by Ripsnort
I think I charge my batteries once every 6 months. :D
Yes, but comparing these cameras is like comparing Apples to Oranges. A camera that costs $1,600 for just the body is in an entirely different league. The configuration that you own that you show in your photo here that would also throw in Nikon's Multi Power Battery Pack, as well as a lens, would come to well over 3 times what DREDIOCK paid for his Canon.
98% of Amateur Photographers would also not want to add all of the extra weight and bulk that the Nikon battery pack for the D200 has.
SIG 220
-
Originally posted by SIG220
Yes, but comparing these cameras is like comparing Apples to Oranges. A camera that costs $1,600 for just the body is in an entirely different league. The configuration that you own that you show in your photo here that would also throw in Nikon's Multi Power Battery Pack, as well as a lens, would come to well over 3 times what DREDIOCK paid for his Canon.
98% of Amateur Photographers would also not want to add all of the extra weight and bulk that the Nikon battery pack for the D200 has.
SIG 220
It easily converts to a single battery without the grip, but the grip really makes handling the camera in portrait mode a breeze due to the additional shutter button in vertical aspect as well as twin dials for adjusting aperature and shutter speed. :aok Now that I've used it a full football season, that extra bulk is a non-issue for the extra gadgets.
I still have my D70s if I want to go ultra-light.
Incidently, I've used various models of both Canon and Nikon, and I like them the same. Both are great brands that offer a wide choice in lenses.
-
Shameless plug for Sony A700.
:cool:
-
picked up the Nikon D80 with the 18 - 135mm kit lens for the wife and I last weekend.
now I just have to figure out how to use it.
-
Originally posted by Eagler
picked up the Nikon D80 with the 18 - 135mm kit lens for the wife and I last weekend.
now I just have to figure out how to use it.
You'll be very happy with the D80. If you have any questions feel free to PM me.
-
Originally posted by Ripsnort
You'll be very happy with the D80. If you have any questions feel free to PM me.
thanks Rip
-
Originally posted by Ripsnort
It easily converts to a single battery without the grip, but the grip really makes handling the camera in portrait mode a breeze due to the additional shutter button in vertical aspect as well as twin dials for adjusting aperature and shutter speed. :aok Now that I've used it a full football season, that extra bulk is a non-issue for the extra gadgets.
I still have my D70s if I want to go ultra-light.
Incidently, I've used various models of both Canon and Nikon, and I like them the same. Both are great brands that offer a wide choice in lenses.
My only point is that your D200 is a semi-professional model. Only a very advanced and dedicated photographer would own it. Either a professional, or a truly devoted amateur who is extremely serious about his hobby.
Many believe that Canon and Nikon have both been the leaders since the beginning of Digital Photography. All the other companies have been playing catch up, but to no avail ( in my opinion ). So I fully agree with all that you say here.
SIG220
-
Originally posted by Eagler
picked up the Nikon D80 with the 18 - 135mm kit lens for the wife and I last weekend.
now I just have to figure out how to use it.
Eagler, I also just purchased the D80 as well. The set-up I got also came with an informational DVD. A lot of real good info on there. I can try and burn a copy (if its not copyrighted) for you and send it. Just give me a day or two to see if I can burn it. I'll PM you with the results.
Keep your fingers crossed. The last time I tried to burn a dvd, I ended up with 2 hours of the Wiggles Show.:D
Obie
-
thanks Obie
My low light pictures look like I'm in a "Wiggles Show", didn't realize how hard it is to hold a camera steady :)