Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Makarov9 on January 18, 2008, 10:40:43 AM
-
For those who's bodily functions release when they see an "evil, black AR-15", someone designed one that will make you feel all warm inside.
A guy built and painted it for his wife. They make a lovely couple. You can follow the conversation on the Calguns.net forum link:
http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=79553 (http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=79553)
DIGG also picked it up:
http://digg.com/mods/A_Hello_Kitty_assault_rifle_that_actually_exists/ (http://digg.com/mods/A_Hello_Kitty_assault_rifle_that_actually_exists/)
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2187/2127455379_1cd89dea19_b.jpg)
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2212/2131398227_bc379d844a.jpg)
-
hand grip moulded to stock? thats going to bruise some lady shoulders/
-
Originally posted by B@tfinkV
hand grip moulded to stock? thats going to bruise some lady shoulders/
The only way she get bruises from AR is if he beats her with it...
-
:rofl
-
Originally posted by B@tfinkV
hand grip moulded to stock? thats going to bruise some lady shoulders/
To make it California legal, you can not have a pistol grip with a droppable magazine. So, someone came up with a grip (MonsterMan Grips) that allows you to have a non-thumb grip and keep detachable mags.
-
Originally posted by B@tfinkV
hand grip moulded to stock? thats going to bruise some lady shoulders/
Poor Bat, how is he supposed to know these things? Its not his fault his government is manlyness chalenged :D
-
magazin has an internal block to only accept 10 rounds...
Yes the liberal limpwristed scum democrats are truly corksmoking fruitloops and shoudl be rounded up and hung
-
Originally posted by Makarov9
To make it California legal, you can not have a pistol grip with a droppable magazine. So, someone came up with a grip (MonsterMan Grips) that allows you to have a non-thumb grip and keep detachable mags.
that's similar to the retarded regs that apply to a rig like the ar15 for most shooters in new zealand. the bayonet lug and flash hider would have to go and mags are limited to 7 rounds or less, they are detatchable but they can't be physicaly large enough to hold more than 7 rounds.. no spacers or blocks in larger cap mags allowed.
free standing pistol grips arn't allowed either but thumbhole stocks are ok. a cheaper and easier way to solve the problem is to attach a link bar between the bottom of the factory grip and the butt. it's stupid but the grip is not considered free standing when the link bar is permantly attached to the rifle. it appears if you do nothing else except make a gun ugly enough the ignorant jerks who create the regs will consider it less evil.
(http://i0.ediy.co.nz/117576.jpg)
and that pink ar, garish beyond belief
-
Originally posted by Russian
The only way she get bruises from AR is if he beats her with it...
"Hey....like I TOLD HER to burn dinner..."
-
LOL I bet anyone could walk around town with that thing and everyone including cops would think its a toy
-
can any gun control nut please tell me how a pistol grip stock... or.. not having one makes the world safer or less safe for all humanity?
Bat.. the "kick" from an ar is not really even noticeable.. you could fire it with the stock resting on your jewels and not be discomfitted.
lazs
-
the "kick" from an ar is not really even noticeable.. you could fire it with the stock resting on your jewels and not be discomfitted.
:huh
-
Bat.. the "kick" from an ar is not really even noticeable.. you could fire it with the stock resting on your jewels and not be discomfitted.
I remember an instructor doing just that (or a really good spoof) as part of the initial familiarization with the M-16 in basic. That, and shooting an ammo can full of nasty holes to show that, if you weren't careful, you could do more than put an eye out with one of those things :)
Charon
-
Originally posted by lazs2
can any gun control nut please tell me how a pistol grip stock... or.. not having one makes the world safer or less safe for all humanity?
Bat.. the "kick" from an ar is not really even noticeable.. you could fire it with the stock resting on your jewels and not be discomfitted.
lazs
The first thing I noticed is the inability to change the fire/safe selector with your thumb.
How does that make this weapon "safer"?
-
Originally posted by lazs2
can any gun control nut please tell me how a pistol grip stock... or.. not having one makes the world safer or less safe for all humanity?
Bat.. the "kick" from an ar is not really even noticeable.. you could fire it with the stock resting on your jewels and not be discomfitted.
lazs
Lazs,
Guns that look like this are scary and make people kill each other:
(http://www.gunart.net/ASSRIFLElgcolor.JPG)
Guns that look like this, however, are more normal and less scary:
(http://julia.hanovercomputer.com/firearms/mar01/web/833-838.jpg)
-
thanks eskimo.. just to be safe I own some from each type.
lazs
-
Originally posted by Gunslinger
The first thing I noticed is the inability to change the fire/safe selector with your thumb.
How does that make this weapon "safer"?
oops nvmd, I noticed they moved it to the other side.
-
Originally posted by DREDIOCK
LOL I bet anyone could walk around town with that thing and everyone including cops would think its a toy
heh i wouldn't bet on that, not where i am any way, not these days. the cops treat and and respond the same way to sightings of all types of guns in public places, real gun or toy. they'll asume it's real no matter how innocent it looks, and they don't mess around. stroll around any nz town with that pink ar and you will likely end up having some black ar's pointed at you and they might zap you with their new tasers just for putting them to so much trouble.
things arn't as laid back as they were 25 years ago when i walked a couple of hundred yards down a busy main street to my car carring an m1 carbine that i just picked up from a gunsmith. i forgot to bring a gun bag with me so it was in plain view, but no one battered an eyelid. i wouldn't do that these days though. today guns in public places amoungst the masses= hysteria and the cops reflect that by the way they react- or more likely over react.
-
yep excel.. when I was growing up we would have a shotgun or rifle across the handlebars of our minibikes or bikes on the way out to the field to shoot...
The cops would either ignore us or stop us to tell us we couldn't ride minibikes on the street and "You know enough to not have that winchester loaded right?"
I ask you.. were we safer back then or now? every kid had a loaded (or not) rifle or two in the closet.. we brought em to school where the NRA taught gun safety and bused us to the range.
I did notice that you said that the cops would respond with guns... they seem to feel the need for them to have em eh?
lazs
-
lazs
the restrictions keep on piling up for firearm owners. one of the most recent and unpopular for nz firearm owners is nothing but an attempt to make it more difficult and legally risky to transport a gun in a car. if you are transporting a gun in a car you are not allowed to leave the car unattended for any length of time. buy a new gun at a gunshop and stow it in a locked boot for the drive home, and while you stop off at a shop to buy a pack of smokes you’re car along with you’re new rifle is stolen… you’re in big trouble. I don’t know what the penalty is for that but knowing that a lot of the penalties for firearm offences are fairly harsh i wouldn’t be surprised if the car thief gets the lesser sentence if he gets caught.
i have bought a lot of guns over the years for different reasons but i have never bought a gun for the intended purpose of self defence, and although i consider it only a very slight chance to nil that I would get in such a situation in nz i believe that i am safer now than I was 25 years ago. The reasons being that I’m a lot better armed and somewhat more meaner than i was back then. i would not let the probable negative legal consequences put me at a disadvantage, and simply would not give a second thought before pulling a trigger on some one that i drew a bead on who i was convinced was threatening the lives of myself or my family.
the cops do need their guns but I get your point, and do agree with it. it’s not a level playing field. the police are an instrument of the state and uphold the laws of the land which in many cases are created by political ideology and as such are not in the best interests of the people as it puts them in a subservient position to the law and the state.
-
well said excel... I agree with you on the whole armed police thing. I have nothing against the police being armed.. they need to be.. just as we need to be and for the same reasons.
I meant by "feel safer" if you thought your country was a safer place to live not if you were meaner and smarter tho.. Would you feel safer if they took your guns away for instance.
I think that you put it well with the police being controlled by politics and not in the best interest of the people.
In england they at least tried... for a long time.. to keep everyone unarmed.. the police and the people.. now, more and more brit police are armed.. and.. they could all be armed in the blink of an eye.
That does not bode well for freedom.
lazs
-
I love it, you can actually walk around in a mall with it, and people would thing you just left the toy store.:eek:
-
I meant by "feel safer" if you thought your country was a safer place to live not if you were meaner and smarter tho.. Would you feel safer if they took your guns away for instance.
lazs,
the short answers are no and no.
the long answers:
25 years ago road rage was something bored kids did on long car trips with their parents, and ask someone back then what meth was and they probably would have probably told you that it's methylated spirits, plus we had more sheep and less gangs.
in 1983 nz was definitely a safer society to live in than it is now. 25 years previous to that in 1958 it was even safer still. nz just mirrors the steeply rising crime rates that other western countries, and more particularly, the other anglo countries have suffered with since the 1960s. plus many failed social experiments accounts for a lot of it as well.
i wouldn't lose my guns, well.. not all of them. but no, i wouldn't be any safer without them. "it's better to have it and not need it than need it and not have it" .. that saying is well worn but it pretty much fits my thinking.
]
-
yep... again.. I agree.. along with the saying "better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6"
The rest of the english speaking and civilized world will be going through the things the US has been going through for decades.. the drugs.. the illegal immigration.. the gangs and such. Those who depend on their government to protect their unarmed butts will be in deep do doo.
My point with england fits that... Now, more and more.. their police are being armed while the people are unarmed and helpless. their gang and immigration problems are just starting.. any tipping point... immigration or recession will be a disaster. It is all false security.
Gun control denies human nature and human rights.
lazs
-
Originally posted by lazs2
Bat.. the "kick" from an ar is not really even noticeable.. you could fire it with the stock resting on your jewels and not be discomfitted.
lazs
True statement.