Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: oakranger on January 23, 2008, 07:54:54 PM
-
Here is a 109 for you all. Hope AH will get this one.[IMG]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messerschmitt_Bf_109
http://www.csd.uwo.ca/Elevon/baugher_other/grzepp.html
-
:confused:
Correct link? (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d0/Bf109T_3Seiten_neu.jpg)
-
Trying to get image. I guess it work.
-
Originally posted by Wes14
:confused:
Correct link? (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d0/Bf109T_3Seiten_neu.jpg)
holy s--- !!!! thats some high res line drawings! :O :eek:
you got anything of that quality for other planes??? specifically I have thought about re-doing my 190D I made and would love that quality for making a template.
-
No sir, just went snooping with the link oakranger gave and got that.
Could look for you, but not sure if i could find anything for ya
-
naw, I'm too lazy to look in-depth, and wouldn't ask anyone do to my footwork for me.
links like that are FEW and FAR between from what I have seen.
oh yeah, on topic, the 109T has been known in the community a looong time, and been asked for repeatedly, but since there never was a German CV, well, no go in-game :(
It would really be a great addition, and the luftweenies like me would fly it off a CV a ton
-
Yea. your right JB73.
Edit: Was it a Emil with the hook gear? or was it a special made 109?
-
Originally posted by Wes14
Yea. your right JB73.
Edit: Was it a Emil with the hook gear? or was it a special made 109?
Looks to be a modified 109E.
"It was basically a Bf 109E-1 with a larger wing, an attachment point for catapult points underneath the fuselage, and an arrester hook underneath the aft fuselage. A breakpoint was incorporated in the wing spar outboard of the gun bays to permit manual folding of the wings. However, the wing folding process was complicated by the need to detach the flaps prior to folding. The landing gear still retracted outwards, but the undercarriage legs were made stronger in order to accommodate the faster sink rates involved in carrier landings. Armament was to consist of two fuselage-mounted 7.9-mm MG 17 machine guns and either two MG-17 machine guns or two 20-mm MG-FF cannon in the wings. The engine was the Daimler Benz DB 601A."
-from the link
It does mention a de-navalized version the was used on short strips.
"Stripped of naval equipment and fitted with a rack for a 66 Imp gal drop tank, 4 110-lb bombs, or a single 551-lb bomb, the planes were redesignated Bf 109T-2. It was concluded that the Bf 109T-2 would be ideal for operation from small, exposed airstrips such as those from which the Jagdflieger were forced to operate in Norway. Several units operated with the Bf 109T-2 in Norway. However, it never operated in its intended shipboard role."
The T-2 version would be an interesting add, but not very high on my priority list now.
-
those are high res but they are pretty innacurate panel and rivet lines unfortunately.
-
Originally posted by Citabria
those are high res but they are pretty innacurate panel and rivet lines unfortunately.
serious?
I'll delete it to not spread inaccuracies, but I am curious as to what is so off?
-
i if you go to one of the web site, you can get a better image. I had no ideal that the germans had a CV.
AH should consider doing a 109 E and T. And maybe that 109 Z. Heck they might as well add the p-82, twin mustan.
-
Originally posted by oakranger
i if you go to one of the web site, you can get a better image. I had no ideal that the germans had a CV.
AH should consider doing a 109 E and T. And maybe that 109 Z. Heck they might as well add the p-82, twin mustan.
The Germans Did NOT have a CV, it was never finished. We have an 109E, and the P-82 was a Korean war fighter, not WW2.
IMO, we have enough 109's for now, theres other gaping holes that need filling first.
-
I agree. there needs other to fill in the gap.