Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: AKIron on February 09, 2008, 10:28:26 AM

Title: Good for Cheney
Post by: AKIron on February 09, 2008, 10:28:26 AM
He wants a proper SC ruling on the DC gun ban.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,330171,00.html



I feared the SC would try to squirm out of ruling on whether the 2nd is an individual right. I didn't expect the Bush Administration to encourage them to avoid ruling on this. Wonder if it's too late for Cheney to throw his hat in the '08 ring?
Title: Good for Cheney
Post by: bsdaddict on February 09, 2008, 11:16:49 AM
Quote
the administration contends that too categorical a ruling could threaten other federal gun restrictions and wants the justices to send the case back to lower courts without deciding whether the handgun ban should fall.
...
Lawyers with long experience at the court could not recall another case in which a vice president took a position different from that of his own administration.

wow, he surprised me with this one...  WTG Cheney...
Title: Re: Good for Cheney
Post by: Sandman on February 11, 2008, 12:32:12 AM
Quote
Originally posted by AKIron
Wonder if it's too late for Cheney to throw his hat in the '08 ring?


He'll have to find a way to climb up from his ~30% approval rating, first.
Title: Good for Cheney
Post by: lazs2 on February 11, 2008, 08:14:05 AM
"Seventeen Democratic lawmakers and District of Columbia Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton urged the court to uphold the ban."

I don't see how so many here can lie about democrats position on the second amendment and gun bans.

"but we just want some sensible laws"

Yeah.. like bans and confiscation.

lazs
Title: Good for Cheney
Post by: john9001 on February 11, 2008, 09:30:50 AM
a small majority in congress want a ruling on affirming individual right.

<
They want the court to make it clear that the Second Amendment gives individuals the right to own guns for their protection.>>
Title: Good for Cheney
Post by: midnight Target on February 11, 2008, 10:55:18 AM
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
"Seventeen Democratic lawmakers and District of Columbia Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton urged the court to uphold the ban."

I don't see how so many here can lie about democrats position on the second amendment and gun bans.

"but we just want some sensible laws"

Yeah.. like bans and confiscation.

lazs


Quote
Sixty-eight Democrats in the House and nine in the Senate joined a larger Republican bloc filing the brief.


Yea, those democrats want your guns lazs.
Title: Good for Cheney
Post by: angelsandair on February 11, 2008, 01:06:13 PM
You guys know that a democrat and John McCain took away part of our rights as freedom of speech during 04 right?

Well if you dont, him and some liberal got together and made it illegal for a regular person to post a commercail regarding something negative or positive to anybody. And thats who alot of people want running for president. We had it good during the Bush administration, now its just who's gonna screw it up even more, hillary, obama, or McCain.......sad

Thats why 70% of conservatives hate John McCain. Because he isnt really a conservative.
Title: Good for Cheney
Post by: Ripsnort on February 11, 2008, 02:07:05 PM
Quote
Originally posted by angelsandair
You guys know that a democrat and John McCain took away part of our rights as freedom of speech during 04 right?

Well if you dont, him and some liberal got together and made it illegal for a regular person to post a commercail regarding something negative or positive to anybody. And thats who alot of people want running for president. We had it good during the Bush administration, now its just who's gonna screw it up even more, hillary, obama, or McCain.......sad

Thats why 70% of conservatives hate John McCain. Because he isnt really a conservative.

Correct. Liberals all over the country should celebrate with this years election, regardless of who wins the election.

(http://www.traditio.com/comment/com0504zu.jpg)


But, as Lazs said, better McCain than Hillary or Obama.
Title: Good for Cheney
Post by: lazs2 on February 11, 2008, 02:23:38 PM
MT..  one of the ways that so democrats took over both houses was for those running to claim to be strong second amendment supporters.

I don't believe them but.. this is a good start.   we will see how these new democrats vote on gun bill tho.

Who knows.. maybe the democrats are learning their lesson about what a whiny loser road gun control is..  how much it is hurting them..

Maybe they are learning to say no to the women.

lazs
Title: Re: Re: Good for Cheney
Post by: Eagler on February 11, 2008, 04:31:24 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
He'll have to find a way to climb up from his ~30% approval rating, first.


he'd have a shorter climb than your two senators running for the dem nom and McCain considering their approval ratings as a whole are worse
Title: Re: Re: Re: Good for Cheney
Post by: Arlo on February 11, 2008, 04:43:58 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Eagler
he'd have a shorter climb than your two senators running for the dem nom and McCain considering their approval ratings as a whole are worse


Ummmm .... says who or what other than you? ;)
Title: Good for Cheney
Post by: Captain Virgil Hilts on February 11, 2008, 07:04:09 PM
Well, the approval ratings for the President are a lot better than those for Congress. Which is not saying anything great about Bush OR Cheney, but it says a lot less about Congress.
Title: Good for Cheney
Post by: Arlo on February 11, 2008, 07:05:40 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Captain Virgil Hilts
Well, the approval ratings for the President are a lot better than those for Congress. Which is not saying anything great about Bush OR Cheney, but it says a lot less about Congress.


The candidate's approval rating is seperate from congress' overall.
Title: Good for Cheney
Post by: Druss on February 11, 2008, 07:18:09 PM
I'll give up my gun when they pry from my cold, dead buttocks! :mad:
Title: Good for Cheney
Post by: AKIron on February 11, 2008, 07:19:38 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Druss
I'll give up my gun when they pry from my cold, dead buttocks! :mad:


I bet they let you keep it.
Title: Good for Cheney
Post by: Druss on February 11, 2008, 07:50:49 PM
That reminds me, I'm going to have a colonoscopy tommorrow afternoon. They want me to drink the gallon of Colyte tonight, but I think I'll wait until an hour before the procedure. You know, make 'em EARN their fee!

Hah! I bet we'll all have a good laugh while the bio-hazard team hoses us down!
Title: Good for Cheney
Post by: Ripsnort on February 11, 2008, 09:09:06 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Druss
That reminds me, I'm going to have a colonoscopy tommorrow afternoon. They want me to drink the gallon of Colyte tonight, but I think I'll wait until an hour before the procedure. You know, make 'em EARN their fee!

Hah! I bet we'll all have a good laugh while the bio-hazard team hoses us down!
You're having a colonoscopy in Wyoming!? Doesn't that involve a milking machine and a generator? :huh :lol
Title: Good for Cheney
Post by: rpm on February 11, 2008, 09:34:03 PM
I'm sorry. I must have missed the part in the Constitution that says the Veep tells the SCOTUS how to rule.

Oh, that's right... Bush bought and paid for this SCOTUS, my bad.
Title: Good for Cheney
Post by: Druss on February 11, 2008, 09:41:40 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Ripsnort
You're having a colonoscopy in Wyoming!? Doesn't that involve a milking machine and a generator? :huh :lol


Yes. Yes it does. But with all the sheep milling around the exam table in the stall, I probably won't even notice.
;)
Title: Good for Cheney
Post by: Ripsnort on February 11, 2008, 09:47:49 PM
Quote
Originally posted by Druss
Yes. Yes it does. But with all the sheep milling around the exam table in the stall, I probably won't even notice.
;)

Eeeeewwwe!~ Never thought of that! ;)
Title: Good for Cheney
Post by: john9001 on February 11, 2008, 10:16:12 PM
Quote
Originally posted by rpm
I'm sorry. I must have missed the part in the Constitution that says the Veep tells the SCOTUS how to rule.

Oh, that's right... Bush bought and paid for this SCOTUS, my bad.


i guess you did, the VP (who is a member of the senate) and congress filed a Friend-of-the-Court brief with the supreme court, they are not telling the court how to rule, they are giving their opinion to the court.