Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: JB88 on March 06, 2008, 10:57:57 AM

Title: no flash embed?
Post by: JB88 on March 06, 2008, 10:57:57 AM

bummer.  i had worked up a great little nilsen test for it.

 :(

any chance we can get that one enabled skuzzy? 

(please please please)

Title: Re: no flash embed?
Post by: soda72 on March 06, 2008, 11:19:17 AM

http://flash tag

It still has it as an insert option... Does it not work?

Title: Re: no flash embed?
Post by: ZetaNine on March 06, 2008, 11:25:50 AM

am I the only one diggin the "clean" look...without all the graphics explosions?

Title: Re: no flash embed?
Post by: JB88 on March 06, 2008, 11:34:05 AM

Quote from: ZetaNine on March 06, 2008, 11:25:50 AM

am I the only one diggin the "clean" look...without all the graphics explosions?

what graphics explosions?   :confused:

people can already do animated gifs. always could...but flash files are much smaller, more efficient and in my case easier to do.

(and funner)

Title: Re: no flash embed?
Post by: Rolex on March 06, 2008, 05:48:54 PM

No user flash files for me, thank you. Just asking for trouble. I have it disabled in my browser.

Title: Re: no flash embed?
Post by: rpm on March 06, 2008, 10:07:37 PM

It would be nice to embed youtube stuff. Just sayin'...

Title: Re: no flash embed?
Post by: RATTFINK on March 06, 2008, 10:42:37 PM

embedding stuff would mean that we would have to have HTML format

Title: Re: no flash embed?
Post by: vorticon on March 06, 2008, 11:12:04 PM

no thanks, its mostly an annoyance on the boards that have it. it wont add anything here, and if its that important, people will click the link.

Title: Re: no flash embed?
Post by: OOZ662 on March 07, 2008, 12:15:05 AM

Allowing users to put Flash on would result in cool things, sure, but it's just another venue for an invisible virus dumper.

Title: Re: no flash embed?
Post by: Murdr on March 07, 2008, 12:19:21 AM

Quote from: Skuzzy on March 06, 2008, 12:54:17 PM

Flash should have never been available.  It was internally disabled but the ICON still showed up.  That has been corrected.

Sounds like a final answer to me.