Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: carli176 on April 20, 2008, 02:35:04 PM
-
can staff put ships like battleshps,destroyers,cruisers and battleships for ''flying''?????? :pray
i want to use that ships!! :lol
-
can staff put ships like battleshps,destroyers,cruisers and battleships for ''flying''?????? :pray
i want to use that ships!! :lol
Drop dead.
-
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
great post carli!! :lol :lol
oh and EskimoJoe-you drop dead.
-
can staff put ships like battleshps,destroyers,cruisers and battleships for ''flying''?????? :pray
i want to use that ships!! :lol
Err...nice first post? not...
-
:rofl :rofl :rofl :rofl
great post carli!! :lol :lol
oh and EskimoJoe-you drop dead.
No ... no ... you drop dead! (OMG ... I hope he doesn't take me seriously!) :D
-
thanks,if u want can u tell to hitech or someone of the satff??? :aok :cool:
:salute
-
i like ships like Admiral Graf Spee,Bismarck,YAMATO,Arizona,Tenesse,West Virginia...
:salute
-
West virginia :salute :rock
-
can staff put ships like battleshps,destroyers,cruisers and battleships for ''flying''?????? :pray
i want to use that ships!! :lol
:confused: :huh
-
what???u dont like the idea cuz im new??? :noid :confused: :(
-
Name: Admiral Graf Spee
Namesake: Maximilian von Spee
Laid down: October 1, 1932
Launched: June 30, 1934
Commissioned: January 6, 1936[1]
Nickname: Graf Spee
Fate: Scuttled December 17, 1939
General characteristics
Class and type: Deutschland class cruiser
Displacement: 12,100 t standard;
16,200 t full load
Length: 186 m (610 ft)[2]
Beam: 21.65 m (71.0 ft)[2]
Draught: 7.34 metres (24.1 ft)[2]
Propulsion: Eight 9-cylinder double-acting two-stroke MAN diesels
two screws, 52,050 hp (40 MW)
Speed: 28.5 knots (53 km/h)
Range: 8,900 nautical miles at 20 knots (16,500 km at 37 km/h)
Or
19,000 nautical miles at 10 knots (35,000 km at 18.5 km/h)
Complement: 1001-1,150[1]
Electronic warfare
and decoys: Early version of Seetakt radar[3]
Armament: 6 × 280 mm (11 inch)
8 × 150 mm (5.9 inch)
6 × 105 mm (4.1 inch)
8 × 37 mm
10 × 20 mm
8 × 533 mm (21 inch) torpedo tubes
Armor: turret face: (160 mm)
belt: (80 mm)
deck: 40 mm)
Aircraft carried: Two Arado 196 seaplanes, one catapult
-
an image of the Admiral Graf Spee:
(http://)admiralgrafspee
-
stop!!! to many words :rolleyes:
-
d'oh!
im not good posting images... :salute
-
why???? :noid :huh
-
cause nobody likes u
-
why???? :noid :huh
go easy on the smilies there pal.
You need to upload the images onto a hosting site then paste the hotlink in here. I use Imageshack.us to do it.
-
and u r most popular no??? :furious :noid :huh :lol :P :t :mad: :devil :mad: :frown: :salute
-
and u r most popular no??? :furious :noid :huh :lol :P :t :mad: :devil :mad: :frown: :salute
talkin to me?
well if you talkin to yourself :rofl
-
can u stop?? :huh :pray
-
i dont make the topic for quarreling
-
and u r most popular no??? :furious :noid :huh :lol :P :t :mad: :devil :mad: :frown: :salute
Smilie schitzophrenia I see.
-
ok
-
can we go back to topic???
-
So a ship that saw 1/2 year of service in WWII you want? Well heck, let's just add the Tomcat and Nimitz class carrier too!
Commissioned: January 6, 1936[1]
Nickname: Graf Spee
Fate: Scuttled December 17, 1939
-
cuz that ship had more technology than allied ships in the artillery and telemetry :P
:salute
-
that ship battle with 3 ENGLISH cruisers and one of them was several damaged
:salute
-
SQUEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEk
:salute
Why cant we have the ignore feature again
-
Jeepers Creepers, there ought to be an age limit on these boards. I have noted very poor grammar and spelling in most of his posts with a gratuitous use of random emoticons coupled with the "gimme gimme" complex. All classic indications of Squeakhood.
If you want to direct the fleet then do so as a whole with the current taskforce scheme or float around in a Elco 88' until your widdle heart is content and we can all pimp slap your PT over and over again until you quit posting random and unnecessary squeakings...... :devil
(Watch out, I registered early for Squeaker Season)
|
v
-
all days i sail in a PT Boat and its boring because is not a ship with good armament(i say,they r all machine guns) :P
:salute
-
:huh
-
the 40mm isnt a "machine gun"
-
Oh yea, If you want sub,s big guns and ships, go to a game called Navy Field. It's not worth 1/2 as much as Aces High, but it is free! Otherwise, this is a more for planes, and not for the navy.
-
A:
EskimoJoe, go to anger management class. Now.
B:
carli176, so that you do not incur the wrath of Skuzzy (the forum's resident terror, who "Skuzzifies"/edits offensive posts), I'd recommend that you do not post twice in a row. I didn't count, but it looked like you at least triple posted back there - use the "Modify" button instead: (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Themes/camo/images/icons/modify_inline.gif). Also, you should probably read the "Forum Rules", which can be found here: http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,228720.0.html (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,228720.0.html). In addition to this, please make sure that you use proper spelling and grammar in your posts - if you do so, then people won't complain about you not using correct spelling and grammar.
I know that a fair number of people here from time to time act like complete A-holes (as shown by EskimoJoe's response to your original post), but try not to overreact to them. There's nothing that you can do about it.
C:
It would be nice to see these ships (or at least some of them) in-game. However, if German ships (or ships from any country other than America, for that matter) were introduced, then those countries' destroyers would also be needed, in order to create a realistic fleet (or carrier group). Also, another argument is that since we already have American carrier groups (which were updated recently), we might as well ask for more American ships - I don't agree completely with this one, but it makes basic sense in terms of workload for HTC (I think).
<S>
Yossarian
-
thanks for the info and i dont remember to post something 3 times ;)
:salute
-
What he meant to say was this: Can the ships in the task groups each be controlled by a seperate person instead of just the c.v. task groups and the pt boats.
Bad idea!
However i would like to see either the cruiser or a second cruiser added to the task groups that could be seperately controlled by a person and independent of the task group when under that persons command. It would die with the cv group if the cv was lost unless it was under command at the time.
-
I'd like to see the addition of an Anti-Aircraft Cruiser. A light cruiser bristling with AA guns. The CV's are way too vunerable in Aces High to be realistic, or even challenging.
-
You know what would be nice is supply ships that could resupp a base in one shot. Just another diminsion added to the game. I also think that a battle ship group for each side would be really cool....Yamato class or New Jersey class, do I hear a call for a Bismark class? :aok Anyway just my thoughts.
LTARogue