Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: angelsandair on June 05, 2008, 11:56:44 PM

Title: P-39N?
Post by: angelsandair on June 05, 2008, 11:56:44 PM
I was browsing through some pictures of P-39s when I caught 2 pictures side by side. 1 was of a Russian P-39N and the other of a P-400 in the pacific. They both looked like they carried 20mms.  Did P-39Ns ever have 20mms? And If they did, lets put em in. I'm not a good enough shot with the 37mm :D
Title: Re: P-39N?
Post by: Motherland on June 06, 2008, 12:38:43 AM
As I've come to understand, a P39D with a 20mm hub gun is more or less a P400.
Title: Re: P-39N?
Post by: angelsandair on June 06, 2008, 02:54:49 AM
Yea, I think P-400s had less armour though, but still, I wanna find this out. I want a P-39 with 20mms AND Wep. I know that the P-39D-4 had wep, but I doubt HTC will put it in. If the P-39Q had 20mms, that would be my #1 MA ride of choice, instead, I can only use P-39Ds under certain circumstances. (when fights arent too high which almost never happens) :aok
Title: Re: P-39N?
Post by: Krusty on June 06, 2008, 09:01:55 AM
No, the P-400 was a small subset of the normal line of models. Almost all the others had some variation on the 37mm gun. Some might have had something larger (can't recall the latest end-of-war models right now)
Title: Re: P-39N?
Post by: Denniss on June 06, 2008, 01:49:36 PM
AFAIR several soviet units didn't like the 37 mm gun and it was sometimes replaced by a gun in the 20mm range. Either they had some spare Hispanos or used their own-built guns.
Title: Re: P-39N?
Post by: Krusty on June 06, 2008, 02:03:41 PM
HTC doesn't model field modifications and non-standard (non-factory) based enhancements like that.
Title: Re: P-39N?
Post by: Bronk on June 06, 2008, 03:08:46 PM
IIRC
The P-39-Q-30 I believe was the last model. Also, the Q variants were all the field fixes/modifications of the N model.

Now the 1590 hp D-2, K and L would be a nice future addition.
Title: Re: P-39N?
Post by: Krusty on June 06, 2008, 03:35:17 PM
Er, no the Qs weren't all field mods of Ns. They were rolled off the factory as Q models. They had the exact same engine as the N, however, and some of the changes (wing gun removal, etc) were also done in the field by the Soviets, who disliked the wing guns. Other modifications no doubt brought the -Ns up to the -Q level akin to early P-47s being retro-fitted to later standards in the field.
Title: Re: P-39N?
Post by: Motherland on June 06, 2008, 04:18:31 PM
Er, no the Qs weren't all field mods of Ns. They were rolled off the factory as Q models. They had the exact same engine as the N, however, and some of the changes (wing gun removal, etc) were also done in the field by the Soviets, who disliked the wing guns. Other modifications no doubt brought the -Ns up to the -Q level akin to early P-47s being retro-fitted to later standards in the field.
So, our P39Q is basically an N if you fly without the gondolas?
Title: Re: P-39N?
Post by: BaDkaRmA158Th on June 06, 2008, 04:46:52 PM
    * P-39D-1: Built for the RAF, and fitted with a 20 mm cannon in stead of the 37 mm one. (519 built)
    * P-39D-2: Powered with 1 × Alison V-1710-63 , rated at 1,325 hp (988 kW)

The British aircraft were declared unfit for the Western European theatre, and shipped to Russia to aid them. A couple of the originals were held back by the USAAF, and the were refitted and redesigned to:

    * P-39D-3: Additional armor protection under the fuselage (26 converted)
    * P-39D-4: Adopted for photo-reconnaissance, and fitted with a K24 and K-25 camera (11 converted)

http://www.xs4all.nl/~fbonne/warbirds/ww2htmls/bellp39.html


Why do you want a D-4???


Ask for a D-2 ;)
Title: Re: P-39N?
Post by: Bronk on June 06, 2008, 05:13:36 PM
Er, no the Qs weren't all field mods of Ns. They were rolled off the factory as Q models. They had the exact same engine as the N, however, and some of the changes (wing gun removal, etc) were also done in the field by the Soviets, who disliked the wing guns. Other modifications no doubt brought the -Ns up to the -Q level akin to early P-47s being retro-fitted to later standards in the field.
Krusty you misunderstand. I meant they based the Q on all the field mod/fixes of the N. I didn't mean it as the Q is just a fixed up N. Sorry for the confusion.
Title: Re: P-39N?
Post by: Squire on June 06, 2008, 05:47:38 PM
The only nose mounted guns in the P-400/P-39 were 20mm Hispano and the 37mm Oldsmobile gun.

No version of the P-39N/Q ever had anything other than a 37mm in the nose. The only varients to have the 20mm option, with its very limited 60 rounds of ammo, were the P-400, and P-39D-1, and a small # of the P-39Ds (several versions) that were field modified in 1942 with non standard 20mm's, mostly in New Guinea and Gualdacanal.

The P-39Q is the best over all varient of the series, for performance, and power vs weight.

Embrace the 37mm. It loves you. 
Title: Re: P-39N?
Post by: Krusty on June 07, 2008, 12:43:41 AM
I'm sorry Bronk, you're right. I misunderstood you.
Title: Re: P-39N?
Post by: Bronk on June 07, 2008, 08:59:08 AM
   
    * P-39D-2: Powered with 1 × Alison V-1710-63 , rated at 1,325 hp (988 kW)

AHT quotes 1325 hp for take off power and 1590 with wep at 2500 ft. If thats not MA worthy not sure what is.
Title: Re: P-39N?
Post by: BaDkaRmA158Th on June 07, 2008, 04:22:37 PM
If anything we need 4 p-39 options.

p-400 "only 20mm option"
p-39D-1 "20mm & 37mm option"
p-39D-2 "37mm option x2 50's and removable .30 option"
P-39Q "same deal"

"I would even go with the k or l (?), because it has six rocket tubes"
but i am not sure that last request is a field mod or not.
Title: Re: P-39N?
Post by: angelsandair on June 09, 2008, 03:20:11 PM
P-63? :(

Lets some of those. Much faster, stronger and could handle itself at higher altitudes compared to the other P-39s. Could also out run the La-7. So instead of La dweeb, it would be.... "you P-63 Dweeb, you Ho'd me!!"  :D