Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: DYNAMITE on August 08, 2008, 03:54:36 PM

Title: Guess who's not gonna be VP
Post by: DYNAMITE on August 08, 2008, 03:54:36 PM
Looks like John Edwards has a problem keeping it in his pants... *sigh*

Well, I guess that's one name we can scratch off the potential Dem VEEP list...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26095810?GT1=43001
Title: Re: Guess who's not gonna be VP
Post by: Rich46yo on August 08, 2008, 03:57:50 PM
Looks like John Edwards has a problem keeping it in his pants... *sigh*

Well, I guess that's one name we can scratch off the potential Dem VEEP list...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26095810?GT1=43001

Since when did that ever bother a Democrat?

I dont think having "Leave it to Beaver" type family values are real high in importance for Obama supporters. :rofl
Title: Re: Guess who's not gonna be VP
Post by: DYNAMITE on August 08, 2008, 04:12:21 PM
 :rofl

You're right... only Dems have affairs  :pray  I forgot  :rofl
Title: Re: Guess who's not gonna be VP
Post by: 007Rusty on August 08, 2008, 04:17:01 PM
 what a azz  :rofl  i'm not that babys daddy lol wtg jon  :rofl


Looks like John Edwards has a problem keeping it in his pants... *sigh*

Well, I guess that's one name we can scratch off the potential Dem VEEP list...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26095810?GT1=43001
Title: Re: Guess who's not gonna be VP
Post by: Fulmar on August 08, 2008, 04:20:32 PM
Damn, I thought this thread was going to be about Hillary.
/somewhat dissapointed.
Title: Re: Guess who's not gonna be VP
Post by: Shuckins on August 08, 2008, 04:24:49 PM
Well, all this proves is that John Edwards is a human being, and has human failings.  This affair is not really one that should lend itself to levity.  In an ideal world he would have led a celibic life while his wife was fighting her battle against cancer.  However, this is not an ideal world.  At best, he and his family are going to go through a time of great difficulty.  

They deserve our prayers, and let us hope he will emerge from this a chastened and wiser man.
Title: Re: Guess who's not gonna be VP
Post by: Bronk on August 08, 2008, 04:25:49 PM
Huh, I think he'd balance the ticket nicely. Especially with this story.
Title: Re: Guess who's not gonna be VP
Post by: Jester on August 08, 2008, 06:37:26 PM
Never did like him. Always got the feeling when I saw him he was just a "Little" to Slick.

Kinda like the ORIGINAL Slick Willie - Bill Clinton.   :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Guess who's not gonna be VP
Post by: Slamfire on August 08, 2008, 06:54:20 PM
Since when did that ever bother a Democrat?

I dont think having "Leave it to Beaver" type family values are real high in importance for Obama supporters. :rofl
'

Yep - it didn't do a darn thing to Bill "Velcro Fly" Clinton.
Title: Re: Guess who's not gonna be VP
Post by: john9001 on August 08, 2008, 07:01:56 PM
'

Yep - it didn't do a darn thing to Bill "Velcro Fly" Clinton.

"i never had sex with that women, not one time",  opps sorry, wrong demorat. 
Title: Re: Guess who's not gonna be VP
Post by: Jester on August 08, 2008, 07:02:09 PM
Yep - it didn't do a darn thing to Bill "Velcro Fly" Clinton.

that's "SUPER FLY"   :P
Title: Re: Guess who's not gonna be VP
Post by: Motherland on August 08, 2008, 07:26:41 PM
Nowhere close to the caliber of a Republican scandal, it was with an adult female :lol
Title: Re: Guess who's not gonna be VP
Post by: AKIron on August 08, 2008, 07:30:36 PM
Nowhere close to the caliber of a Republican scandal, it was with an adult female :lol

Uh, democrats set the bar.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerry_Studds
Title: Re: Guess who's not gonna be VP
Post by: Motherland on August 08, 2008, 07:45:42 PM
Then the Republicans raised it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Foley_scandal (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Foley_scandal)
Title: Re: Guess who's not gonna be VP
Post by: AKIron on August 08, 2008, 08:18:48 PM
Then the Republicans raised it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Foley_scandal (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Foley_scandal)

I wouldn't say he raised it, just more of the same. However, there were a whole lot more between those two, by politicians in both parties.