Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: 100goon on August 22, 2008, 11:35:22 AM

Title: C 46 Commando
Post by: 100goon on August 22, 2008, 11:35:22 AM: i really say we need the c 46 commando

http://www.warbirdalley.com/c46.htm

^^^^^^click on the link^^^^^^^^
Title: Re: C 46 Commando
Post by: 1sum41 on August 22, 2008, 11:36:16 AM: YES :aok
Title: Re: C 46 Commando
Post by: 100goon on August 22, 2008, 11:37:35 AM: now let me finish, have you ever been trying to re sup a base and 1 cargo crate at a time is taking to long well this is heavier and ever want some extra troops in your c 47 this tthing carriers 18 troops now i dont want this before the russian goon or the he 111 so it can go on back burner but i think it should eventuly get into the game
Title: Re: C 46 Commando
Post by: 100goon on August 22, 2008, 11:38:51 AM: this link goes to the 47 compare the difrence

http://www.warbirdalley.com/c47.htm
Title: Re: C 46 Commando
Post by: Denholm on August 22, 2008, 11:48:19 AM: Four words:

TOO MANY AMERICAN PLANES.

At least on the bomber/transport side of the house. Start looking into Axis transports and bombers, we don't have enough.
Title: Re: C 46 Commando
Post by: glock89 on August 22, 2008, 12:11:46 PM: Quote from: Denholm on August 22, 2008, 11:48:19 AM
Four words:

TOO MANY AMERICAN PLANES.

At least on the bomber/transport side of the house. Start looking into Axis transports and bombers, we don't have enough.
YOUR RIGHT. Need some axis planes :pray
Title: Re: C 46 Commando
Post by: 100goon on August 22, 2008, 12:41:52 PM: we do but the site i didnt see any axis transport planes evexept the me what ever # gitantic
Title: Re: C 46 Commando
Post by: Motherland on August 22, 2008, 12:46:18 PM: Junkers Ju52/3m.
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/01/JU_52_3M.jpg)

Depending on the version it had a couple MG15's and sometimes an MG131.
Title: Re: C 46 Commando
Post by: 100goon on August 22, 2008, 01:00:50 PM: yea i saw that in wings of the luftwaffe knew it was a transport but didnt know the name

and i like the russian goon idea we dont have many russian planes
Title: Re: C 46 Commando
Post by: glock89 on August 22, 2008, 02:40:38 PM: Quote from: 100goon on August 22, 2008, 01:00:50 PM
yea i saw that in wings of the luftwaffe knew it was a transport but didnt know the name

and i like the russian goon idea we dont have many russian planes

we have Russian planes. You mean transport no a bomber Russian need 1
Title: Re: C 46 Commando
Post by: KTM520guy on August 22, 2008, 03:49:30 PM: My grandfather flew C46's in Burma. Therefore we need this plane.

:noid

Axis transports are horrible little turd balls.

:noid :noid
Title: Re: C 46 Commando
Post by: glock89 on August 22, 2008, 03:57:27 PM: Quote from: KTM520guy on August 22, 2008, 03:49:30 PM
My grandfather flew C46's in Burma. Therefore we need this plane.

:noid

Axis transports are horrible little turd balls.

:noid :noid
:aok
Title: Re: C 46 Commando
Post by: glock89 on August 22, 2008, 04:00:37 PM: So your telling me to add planes that our dads flew. :huh So that why we need a c46 great thinking. :aok
Title: Re: C 46 Commando
Post by: Banshee7 on August 22, 2008, 04:17:22 PM: Quote from: Motherland on August 22, 2008, 12:46:18 PM
Junkers Ju52/3m.
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/01/JU_52_3M.jpg)

Depending on the version it had a couple MG15's and sometimes an MG131.

Bingo
Title: Re: C 46 Commando
Post by: Denholm on August 22, 2008, 05:07:04 PM: Looks like glock has two personalities fighting each other. :uhoh
Title: Re: C 46 Commando
Post by: glock89 on August 22, 2008, 05:11:28 PM: Quote from: Denholm on August 22, 2008, 05:07:04 PM
Looks like glock has two personalities fighting each other. :uhoh
How did you find out my serect. :noid
Title: Re: C 46 Commando
Post by: Denholm on August 22, 2008, 05:15:13 PM: *Deletes Sub7*

What was that?