Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: crnbrd1 on September 06, 2008, 05:26:26 AM
-
This would be a little bonus like the m3 only it a copter it could carry supplies and all sorts of stuff. So i was thinking HT could add this as a perk plane Also this was used quite often.
(http://www.scientistsandfriends.com/images/scans/Fa223-1.jpg)
-
Why not just use a C-47?
-
Cause a C-47 can't hover :D
-
Why don't add instead the well known Junkers 52?
Above all the JU-52 had a mortar, wich make it able to land near a target and, giving coords, fire on it.
-
But why do you need to hover? The C-47 can parachute supplies anywhere they are needed and can even land pretty much any terrain and unload them. It is also a lot faster than the helicopter and can carry a lot more supplies. The only possible reason for using the helicopter would be if they were made available at vehicle bases.
-
Please implement this. My Ostie, WW or FG would eat this like a peanut. Please bring it on! Only a moron would think of "hovering" in that POS in this game.
-
Whats with everyones thing on Helicopters? They totally suck in early stages. They were practically a slug in the air, and it would be absolutly the easiest thing to shoot down in the game.
-
Amen.
-
Whats with everyones thing on Helicopters? They totally suck in early stages. They were practically a slug in the air, and it would be absolutly the easiest thing to shoot down in the game.
:aok
-
First off, why would you want a chopper added to the game to resupply bases, gvs, and troops drop on towns when a C-47 (and even maybe the 251) can do it twice as fast? Second, why would you want it PERKED if it was added? If anything it would have a eny of 60!
-
i think that its use would be for v-bases and task groups.
-
Whats with everyones thing on Helicopters? They totally suck in early stages. They were practically a slug in the air, and it would be absolutly the easiest thing to shoot down in the game.
I agree with heilos not being effective but he is just trying to improve the game by having everything from WW2, good idea but we need some other things first.
:salute
-
We need Iron Annie. The Junkers must come first.
-
I agree with heilos not being effective but he is just trying to improve the game by having everything from WW2, good idea but we need some other things first.
:salute
I think thats the absolute last thing we need.
-
We need Iron Annie. The Junkers must come first.
I changed my mind, no Junkers! Bring on the Me-223! :devil
-
I changed my mind, no Junkers! Bring on the Me-223! :devil
I'm assuming you meant 323, and, no.
-
i call it "the flying dump"
:lol
-
Whats with everyones thing on Helicopters? They totally suck in early stages. They were practically a slug in the air, and it would be absolutly the easiest thing to shoot down in the game.
then who cares right, you get more perks, so why argue, people would have their advantages to it
-
then who cares right, you get more perks, so why argue, people would have their advantages to it
Thats not the point, its the last thing ever that we need in the game. That comes a long a whole line with the HE111, the G.55, all of the Remodeling, 3D water/subs, Biplanes, A26. Pretty much anything that you can think of, it comes before it.
-
Thats not the point, its the last thing ever that we need in the game. That comes a long a whole line with the HE111, the G.55, all of the Remodeling, 3D water/subs, Biplanes, A26. Pretty much anything that you can think of, it comes before it.
just out of curiosity will things go a lot, a lot lot faster when CT comes out?
-
I'm not even worried about CT. As people say, its been in the works for the past 2 years, why should we hold our breath now?
-
Because it's just around the corner! :O
-
Denholm is correct! Why just yesterday I heard Pyro say it was just about 2 weeks.... :rock
Because it's just around the corner! :O
-
Denholm is correct! Why just yesterday I heard Pyro say it was just about 2 weeks.... :rock
iv herd 2 weeks a year ago, but if it was from pyro himself who knows :noid
-
I like the idea and the variety it would add. :aok
-
*Smirks at P1*
-
*Smirks at P1*
:D
-
did anyone hear about that freak accident that when a 223 was taking off, a soldiers gun went off and hit the 223 engine and shut down one engine and it droped like a friggin rock. BRING IT ON MY D3A WILL EAT THAT THING UP!!!!
-
did anyone hear about that freak accident that when a 223 was taking off, a soldiers gun went off and hit the 223 engine and shut down one engine and it droped like a friggin rock. BRING IT ON MY D3A WILL EAT THAT THING UP!!!!
the same thing would happen with a modern helo if the back rotor was hit, it would spin uncontrollably and if you moved the stick it would overturn, and i know you guys are going to say thats the exact reason that we shouldn't have it, but who cares you guys wont die if it happens
-
Uhm... no. If you hit an engine a generator goes out. Only if you hit the engine to the rotor will it drop like a rock.
-
i want the me-323 ..... and a cookie
-
Please implement this. My Ostie, WW or FG would eat this like a peanut. Please bring it on! Only a moron would think of "hovering" in that POS in this game.
lol
something for pintle guns to shoot
-
Uhm... no. If you hit an engine a generator goes out. Only if you hit the engine to the rotor will it drop like a rock.
explain that to where i can understand that, to me it seemed kind of mixed up :huh