Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: MajIssue on September 26, 2008, 01:48:38 PM
-
'nuff said
-
I see a visit from Skuzzy in this thread's future.
-
I think his posts are intelligent and thought provoking. Also, if we all agreed, then what would be the point of debating.
-
ouch baby....ouch.
Go Palin, Go McCain :aok
-
Very interesting..
-
(http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/forum/stop.gif)
-
LINk?
-
I see a visit from Skuzzy in this thread's future.
He'd have to visit a lot of threads then. Dos's threads tend to be devoid of commentary, to the extent it's not hard to imagine he's just a clever script that snags headlines and posts them to multiple forums.
-
I agree but I am sooooo IN
-
IN woot!
heh I can see skuzzy now shaking his head thinking "all joo guys are idiots!!"
note: the above is not meant as a personal attack on anyone....just a lil skuzzy humor before the inevitable lock!
-
As I've stated IN other threads, he'll get it sooner or later... :D
(http://poliology.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/dosx.jpg)
-
IN!!!! :devil
-
This just in
MajIssue is chicken!!!!!
changing the topic so skuzzy dont smack ya...or atleast not so hard :rofl
dont be a wuss man!! c;mon stick it to da man!!!! :rock
j/k cause im a big wuss around the skuzzster
-
As I've stated IN other threads, he'll get it sooner or later... :D
(http://poliology.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/dosx.jpg)
Yeah Jag, you know, maybe some new material? This is getting old in every thread.
-
Yeah Jag, you know, maybe some new material? This is getting old in every thread.
Not every thread, just the ones started by... oh well... you know... :D
Here... Just for you! :devil
(http://www.britsincancun.com/images/Dos-Equis-Girls.jpg)
-
:O The one on the right looks creepy, (i think it might be a dude)
-
:O The one on the right looks creepy, (i think it might be a dude)
If that's a dude, God help us all! :D :D :D
-
This just in
MajIssue is chicken!!!!!
changing the topic so skuzzy dont smack ya...or atleast not so hard :rofl
dont be a wuss man!! c;mon stick it to da man!!!! :rock
j/k cause im a big wuss around the skuzzster
I read the Rules... and revised the title so that it was more accurate. I would rather make a correction that better reflected that reality of the situation... After all I don't know Dos Equis and can only assume that he is afflicted with BDS and/or PDS (Bush/Palin Derangement Syndrome). By the tone of his posts, it is clear that he is a hyper partisan with a bent toward establishing the United States as the successor to the USSR with a dictatorship of the proletariat, headed by the anointed and all merciful Barak Obama, God praise his name. Reality will not effect his world view. (BTW, Che Guevara is dead.) For all I know he could occupy the Physics Chair at Oxford.
-
Can you add Crockette to this list and Twentyfo too.
-
By the tone of his posts, it is clear that he is a hyper partisan with a bent toward establishing the United States as the successor to the USSR with a dictatorship of the proletariat, headed by the anointed and all merciful Barak Obama, God praise his name.
And...You're not partisan yourself? You've just proved you are by launching a personal attack on a member that is actively posting opinions' and facts contrary to what you believe IN.
-
This is a BS thread.
-
By the tone of his posts, it is clear that he is a hyper partisan with a bent toward establishing the United States as the successor to the USSR with a dictatorship of the proletariat, headed by the anointed and all merciful Barak Obama, God praise his name. Reality will not effect his world view. (BTW, Che Guevara is dead.) For all I know he could occupy the Physics Chair at Oxford.
Considering that the Republican party and George Bush want to nationalize the debt, with WaMu falling yesterday being partially sold to JP Morgan Chase and partially nationalized - i would say the Bush Administration is doing a fine job of following in the USSR foot steps.
-
Not every thread, just the ones started by... oh well... you know... :D
Here... Just for you! :devil
(http://www.britsincancun.com/images/Dos-Equis-Girls.jpg)
Better, but doesn't that one look like she just got a thump in the eye?
Guess that's the thing these days.. :lol
-
Considering that the Republican party and George Bush want to nationalize the debt, with WaMu falling yesterday being partially sold to JP Morgan Chase and partially nationalized - i would say the Bush Administration is doing a fine job of following in the USSR foot steps.
you better find a new news source, it is the democrats that want to throw money at the problem (what else is new?), it's the republicans that said, no way, come up with a better deal.
-
you better find a new news source, it is the democrats that want to throw money at the problem (what else is new?), it's the republicans that said, no way, come up with a better deal.
Seriously, john9001, how do you say that straight up? How can you?
Paulsen is former Goldman Sachs, a revolving door he's going to head back to once he raids the US Treasury. Bernake is a Bush appointment. Bush went on TV, and said "pass this plan as it is written, or there will be a recession". What he implied was depression.
What we have here is an issue that needs to transcend party politics. Some Dems are falling in line, some GOP are defecting from Bush and saying hold up.
Support for the plan, and what form the plan takes - is not forming along party lines. But the proposal comes from a Republican executive branch. The democratically held House and Senate did not propose this plan.
The Secretary of the Treasury sits on the President's cabinet. He is a member of the NSC.
I should also point out that the Federal Reserve is neither Federal or a reserve. The Federal reserve is as private as Federal Express is.
If you want to draw a line on this fight - it is the legislative vs. the executive branch of government, with the money masters on Bush's side. But the executive branch is Republican held.
I should put the GOP attacks aside now. Because BushCo is no longer a Republican or a conservative. There is nothing in that man that Barry Goldwater or Ronald Reagan would recognize. He's a profiteering thief.
It would make me very happy to have the OC wake up and agree with that. But I know many of them can't bring themselves to it.
-
I think his posts are intelligent and thought provoking. Also, if we all agreed, then what would be the point of debating.
He says the voting system is all a huge scheme by republicans to steal the race from the democraps and that all they do is steal votes. When Democraps are responsible for about 90% of the voter fraud in big cities.
That's just nutty.
-
and Twentyfo too.
:rofl
-
the house republicans did not like the bush deal.
-
He says the voting system is all a huge scheme by republicans to steal the race from the democraps and that all they do is steal votes. When Democraps are responsible for about 90% of the voter fraud in big cities.
That's just nutty.
I don't deny that in the 1960s and 1970s, inner city vote corruption existed. In cities like Chicago, where I live, it came from the Teamsters and the Knights of Columbus, which was a front for the Irish mob. It helped Kennedy in 1960 immensely.
But that was then.
Now:
"I am committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year." - Walden O'Dell, CEO of Diebold in 2004.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0828-08.htm
I will debate you on any point of merit that you wish that vote fraud happened, and will happen this election.
Florida in 2000:
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0310/S00211.htm#appendix3
Ohio 2004:
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/2004votefraud_ohio.html
-
a) Could someone please add me to this list?
b) Original post reported
c): you better find a new news source, it is the democrats that want to throw money at the problem (what else is new?), it's the republicans that said, no way, come up with a better deal.
I don't know which particular 'problem' you're talking about, but I would like to notify you about the $10 Billion PER MONTH cost of the war in Iraq.
-
I don't deny that in the 1960s and 1970s, inner city vote corruption existed. In cities like Chicago, where I live, it came from the Teamsters and the Knights of Columbus, which was a front for the Irish mob. It helped Kennedy in 1960 immensely.
But that was then.
Now:
"I am committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president next year." - Walden O'Dell, CEO of Diebold in 2004.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0828-08.htm
I will debate you on any point of merit that you wish that vote fraud happened, and will happen this election.
Florida in 2000:
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0310/S00211.htm#appendix3
Ohio 2004:
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/2004votefraud_ohio.html
Kerry got ownt in '04, plain and simple. And the 'deal' with the 2000 election was that the people voting democrat voted for the wrong person. There isn't republican voter fraud. We dont go into the ghettos and pick up black people and make them vote 5 or 6 times.
-
Kerry got ownt in '04, plain and simple. And the 'deal' with the 2000 election was that the people voting democrat voted for the wrong person. There isn't republican voter fraud. We dont go into the ghettos and pick up black people and make them vote 5 or 6 times.
The '04 election was as close as 2000. I wouldn't exactly call that 'own't'. It was decided in Ohio, and even with the allegations' of voter fraud, Kerry graciously conceded.
Nominee George W. Bush John Kerry
Party Republican Democratic
Home state Texas Massachusetts
Running mate Dick Cheney-Wyoming John Edwards-North Carolina
Electoral vote 286 252
States carried 31 19+DC
Popular vote 62,040,610 59,028,444
Percentage 50.7% 48.3%
-
Kerry was a complete idiot, everyone I knew was saying that Kerry was going to lose. That was the most I remember of the '04 election. I remember that our school had a little 'election' and of like 1000 kids, 850 voted Bush and only about 30 or 40 voted John Kerry. Everyone else voted that other guy who ran then.
-
a) Could someone please add me to this list?
b) Original post reported
c):
I don't know which particular 'problem' you're talking about, but I would like to notify you about the $10 Billion PER MONTH cost of the war in Iraq.
could you give me a break down of that cost, IE, how much for troops pay, food, ammo, fuel, repair parts, transportation, housing, replacement of equipment, recrecreation, mail, etc.
-
could you give me a break down of that cost, IE, how much for troops pay, food, ammo, fuel, repair parts, transportation, housing, replacement of equipment, recrecreation, mail, etc.
Why? It's all still gonna cost 10 Billion a month.
-
could you give me a break down of that cost, IE, how much for troops pay, food, ammo, fuel, repair parts, transportation, housing, replacement of equipment, recrecreation, mail, etc.
a) No, because I don't have access to that sort of information.
b) No, because even if I did, it would probably be classified anyway.
c) No, because if it were available, you could do it yourself.
d) As Frode said, the final cost will be the same.
-
a) Could someone please add me to this list?
b) Original post reported
c):
I don't know which particular 'problem' you're talking about, but I would like to notify you about the $10 Billion PER MONTH cost of the war in Iraq.
What exactly does that have to do with the Democrats wanting to throw money at this current financial issue?
-
The '04 election was as close as 2000. I wouldn't exactly call that 'own't'. It was decided in Ohio, and even with the allegations' of voter fraud, Kerry graciously conceded.
Did anything ever come of those allegations? Or did they remain just that, allegations? For some reason I don't recall ever hearing anything more about it.
-
'nuff said
LMAO
Based on some of the posts I see on this board.
85% of the posters here are party hacks and knew who they were voting for before the candidates themselves knew they were running
-
Did anything ever come of those allegations? Or did they remain just that, allegations? For some reason I don't recall ever hearing anything more about it.
I haven't heard anything more than what happened. Here's a clip about it from Wiki:
[edit] Legal challenges
Election watchers and political analysts forecast a number of contested election results in a manner similar to the Florida voting recount of 2000. Various states grappled with their own legal issues that could have affected the outcome of the vote, while both of the major political parties and a number of independent groups like the ACLU marshaled numbers of lawyers.
In several states including Ohio, Colorado, Florida, and Nevada, there were lawsuits or other disputes about such issues as “voter challenging”, voter registration, and absentee ballots. These were considered unlikely to change the Electoral College result. In Florida, for example, multiple lawsuits were filed even before the election, but few observers expected any of them to change the official result that Bush had outpolled Kerry by roughly 400,000 votes. As of the morning of November 3 the deciding state in the electoral vote count was Ohio, where Bush held a 136,000 vote lead. Democrats' hopes rested on the approximately 135,000 provisional ballots that had yet to be counted. Nevertheless, after concluding that a recount would not change the election results, Kerry conceded defeat at about 11:00 EST that morning, and George W. Bush declared victory the afternoon of the same day.
The Green Party and Libertarian Party presidential candidates, David Cobb and Michael Badnarik, filed for a recount of the Ohio vote. After announcing their intention and soliciting donations, they quickly raised $150,000 to cover the state's required fee and other costs. A statewide recount of the presidential vote was completed under the watch of thousands of elections observers organized by the Cobb campaign. Based on reports filed by these observers, some voting rights advocates claim that the recount was conducted improperly, and illegally, and have filed a new lawsuit, which is currently pending. The Congressional Democrats who objected to the counting of Ohio's electoral votes relied on part on information about voting irregularities provided by observers working for the Cobb campaign.
[urlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._presidential_election,_2004][/url]
-
LMAO
Based on some of the posts I see on this board.
85% of the posters here are party hacks and knew who they were voting for before the candidates themselves knew they were running
QFT
-
LMAO
Based on some of the posts I see on this board.
85% of the posters here are party hacks and knew who they were voting for before the candidates themselves knew they were running
Well....there you go again ;)
you know what they say about satistics :aok
I doubt more than 25% of us on this board have declared party affiliations, even though we hold them in our thoughts. It is true that most of us have already cast our votes in our hearts.
That fact results in a defacto summation of a total value of zero with regards to our bantering and arguing here on the bsb. In that facet, you are correct.
PS: what does QFT stand for?
-
PS: what does QFT stand for?
QFT= Quoted For Truth