Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: brad13 on September 28, 2008, 12:59:15 PM

Title: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: brad13 on September 28, 2008, 12:59:15 PM
My dad had a whole collection of books on WWII aircraft that he passed on to me. I got to looking through them this morning and found a specific book on spitfire's. I know spitfire is a dweeb plane but I personally like the Spitfire. Anyways we need a spitfire MK 24!! Heres some specs on the 24:

Max speed:454mph at 26,000ft
Time to 20,000ft(6,100m): 8 Minutes
Service cieling: 43,500ft (13,250m)
maximum range: 880mls with 210Imp. gal
Wieght: 9,900lbs
Dimensions:
Span: 36ft 11in
Length: 32ft 11in
Height: 13ft 6in
Wing area: 244sq. ft
Armament: 4  20mm hispano-suiza cannons


I think this would be an awesome addition to AH!! Maybe even perk it like the tempest because of its abililty! Let me know what you guys think! <S>   :rock
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: glock89 on September 28, 2008, 01:01:19 PM
My dad had a whole collection of books on WWII aircraft that he passed on to me. I got to looking through them this morning and found a specific book on spitfire's. I know spitfire is a dweeb plane but I personally like the Spitfire. Anyways we need a spitfire MK 24!! Heres some specs on the 24:

Max speed:454mph at 26,000ft
Time to 20,000ft(6,100m): 8 Minutes
Service cieling: 43,500ft (13,250m)
:furious
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Chalenge on September 28, 2008, 01:37:21 PM
I think the idea is to have planes that flew during WWII.  :)
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: nipper on September 28, 2008, 01:38:41 PM
Dont think the Spit 24 was produced until 1946 so doesn't qualify for addition.
Only 54 were produced, they were part of the post war ocupation force and didn't see WW2 service.
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: brad13 on September 28, 2008, 01:46:55 PM
Oh crud! ;) You guys are right! guess i should have done more research! Sorry! Well I gave it a try! <S> and thank you for the corrections! ;)  :frown:
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Bruv119 on September 28, 2008, 02:40:45 PM
hey Brad  I know wiki isn't the best source but it does show all the different variants.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermarine_Spitfire_variants_part_two

Spit 21 was the latest wartime Spit.

 
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Guppy35 on September 28, 2008, 03:07:55 PM
Give me the Spit XII first.  1943-44 bird.

Spit 21 saw little combat, no air to air and was only with 91 Squadron.
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: MjTalon on September 28, 2008, 03:33:25 PM
nope. We have enough spitfires, aren't you satisfied with the Spik Mk I?






 :noid
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Noir on September 28, 2008, 03:41:00 PM
clipped wings spit XII  :O
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: brad13 on September 28, 2008, 03:46:31 PM
Yeah spit 21 would be a neat airplane to have but it was only used with the 91 squadron and had no air to air kills. spitXII Would be neat to have with the clipped wings and all
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Bronk on September 28, 2008, 03:46:54 PM
Give me the Spit XII first.  1943-44 bird.


low alt griff.....what's not to like?
 :aok
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: thrila on September 28, 2008, 04:14:27 PM
To be fair there are 5 F4u and 6 spitfires.   The spitfire IX had been in combat for 6 months before the f4u had seen any, yet the spitfire only has 1 more varient.
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: 71313 on September 28, 2008, 04:25:37 PM
 :noid why do we need another spit. are you kinding me :mad:
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Golfer on September 28, 2008, 07:20:13 PM
Yeah spit 21 would be a neat airplane to have but it was only used with the 91 squadron and had no air to air kills. spitXII Would be neat to have with the clipped wings and all


So how's that deployment going?
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Spikes on September 28, 2008, 07:28:07 PM
:noid why do we need another spit. are you kinding me :mad:
Yes, he's kinding you.


Otherwise, Id rather focus on new planes than more variants.
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: macerxgp on September 28, 2008, 07:55:14 PM
What we need: More French and Italian fighters (REALLY want an updated c.205), more German bombers (He-111 :pray ), more British carrier fighters, and some additional tanks. (Char 35, anyone? ;) )

What we DON'T need: Moar dweebfires, BEE TWEENTAH NIEEEENZ
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: 1pLUs44 on September 28, 2008, 08:30:28 PM
Spit Mk XII would be nice, I wouldn't mind if HTC were so nice as to add one. :rock
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: brad13 on September 28, 2008, 09:49:05 PM
No deployment for me, golfer sir!!! Wifes pregnant so I get to stay home this time 'round! At least for a little while!  :)  :salute
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Anaxogoras on September 29, 2008, 12:05:19 AM
To be fair there are 5 F4u and 6 spitfires.   The spitfire IX had been in combat for 6 months before the f4u had seen any, yet the spitfire only has 1 more varient.

I think the Seafire counts as a 7th Spitfire variant, which makes it the aircraft with the most variants in AH.  The 109 saw combat years before the Spitfire but has less variants in the game, so no complaining please. :P
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: thrila on September 29, 2008, 05:39:31 AM
You maythink it's a spitfire varient all you wish, it clearly does not have the designation spitfire. ;)  The 109 saw combat years before the spitfire i admit, i'm more than happy for the 109B/D series to be modelled. :D
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: vonKrimm on September 29, 2008, 08:00:51 AM
No, all we need is the ability to carry bombs on the Spit5.  If that were allowed, or even the option for 2x250lb on the Seafire, then all would be well in SpitLand. :aok
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Kev367th on September 29, 2008, 08:40:17 AM
I think the Seafire counts as a 7th Spitfire variant, which makes it the aircraft with the most variants in AH.  The 109 saw combat years before the Spitfire but has less variants in the game, so no complaining please. :P

Your forgetting one -
Fair enough if you include the Seafire, Tempest, Tiffy and the Hurricanes you have a total of 11 British frontline fighters. Remember we were limited in resources so didn't have the luxury of developing and building lots of different aircraft.

So yes you would expect the major plane in the RAF frontline fighters to be the Spitfire series.

For me the perfect RAF Spit line up is -

I
Vb
Vc
IX
VIII
XII
XIV - doubles quite effectively for a 1943 LF IX or mid 44 LF IXe
XVI - free
F.21 - perked
Seafire LIIc or III (not current one)

10 variants that cover from 1940 through till the very last engagement of WWII.
More importantly every major development (XII was first use of the Griffon), and most manufactured Spits. Would also give the RAF a true 1945 based aircraft, the F.21. which it is lacking at the moment.

These with the other ones would give a total of 14 British frontline fighters.

Try adding up the German and U.S. frontline fighters. I believe the U.S. ones already stand at possibly over 20.

Considering the 109 AND 190 were the Spits main adversaries, you can't seperate them, they should be added together also. Add to them the Me262, Me163 the LW isn't that bad off either.

So its not quite as easy as saying there's 10 and thats enough.
 
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Denholm on September 29, 2008, 10:25:53 AM
What we need: More French and Italian fighters (REALLY want an updated c.205), more German bombers (He-111 :pray )...

Agreed. A few more spitfires would also make a lovely addition. :)
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Anaxogoras on September 29, 2008, 12:05:45 PM
You maythink it's a spitfire varient all you wish, it clearly does not have the designation spitfire. ;)  The 109 saw combat years before the spitfire i admit, i'm more than happy for the 109B/D series to be modelled. :D

Give us back the 109G-10 and you can have any Spit you want that saw combat.
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Denholm on September 29, 2008, 12:06:25 PM
Can we switch out your K4 with the G-10? :D
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: waystin2 on September 29, 2008, 12:09:44 PM
I am all for the Spit 7.  If we have to compromise on this decision let's consider the DUKW! :D
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Bronk on September 29, 2008, 04:57:46 PM
Your forgetting one -
Fair enough if you include the Seafire, Tempest, Tiffy and the Hurricanes you have a total of 11 British frontline fighters. Remember we were limited in resources so didn't have the luxury of developing and building lots of different aircraft.

So yes you would expect the major plane in the RAF frontline fighters to be the Spitfire series.

For me the perfect RAF Spit line up is -

I
Vb
Vc
IX
VIII
XII
XIV - doubles quite effectively for a 1943 LF IX or mid 44 LF IXeIsn't LF low alt variant?
XVI - free It is>
F.21 - perked
Seafire LIIc or III (not current one)

10 variants that cover from 1940 through till the very last engagement of WWII.
More importantly every major development (XII was first use of the Griffon), and most manufactured Spits. Would also give the RAF a true 1945 based aircraft, the F.21. which it is lacking at the moment.

These with the other ones would give a total of 14 British frontline fighters.

Try adding up the German and U.S. frontline fighters. I believe the U.S. ones already stand at possibly over 20.

Considering the 109 AND 190 were the Spits main adversaries, you can't seperate them, they should be added together also. Add to them the Me262, Me163 the LW isn't that bad off either.

So its not quite as easy as saying there's 10 and thats enough.
 

Think you transposed those kev.
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Anaxogoras on September 29, 2008, 05:29:32 PM
Can we switch out your K4 with the G-10? :D
NNNNNNNooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!! :cry

 :rofl
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: thndregg on September 29, 2008, 05:56:22 PM
Expanding the plane set of those countries represented that have little in Aces High (Italy comes to mind) would be a prudent thing to do, along with remodeling the rest of the planes we already have (as HTC is already doing). Even with my next-to-no knowledge about how HTC does things, it makes sense that it simply takes a lot of time. Be patient. Seems people get stuck in the "I want what I want when I want it" mode.
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Kev367th on September 30, 2008, 02:57:57 AM
Think you transposed those kev.

Yup I did, thanks. :)
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Kazaa on October 02, 2008, 09:04:05 PM
A new Spitfire would be a nice change. But HTC have only been adding hanger queens lately.
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: 1Boner on October 02, 2008, 09:30:54 PM
What we really need is the La-7B.

478mph cruise speed--- 4 wing mounted 20mm--3 nose mounted 30mm and it is impervious to any type of ammo.

We simply must have this plane.


Oh yeah!

It also can be retro fitted with RATO for quick base defense.

Non perked of course.
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: vonKrimm on October 03, 2008, 07:12:33 AM
What we really need is the La-7B.

478mph cruise speed--- 4 wing mounted 20mm--3 nose mounted 30mm and it is impervious to any type of ammo.

We simply must have this plane.


Oh yeah!

It also can be retro fitted with RATO for quick base defense.

Non perked of course.

Could you please provide a reference or two for this wonder lala?  Year production began, numbers produced, squadron deployments, etc...?  I do not claim to be an expert on Lavochkin fighters (i is MiG dweeb), but the above just does not match up with any of my reputable reference sources.

Are you sure this is not a plane out of Crimson Skies?

yes, i got the joke btw; just added my own to it
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Anaxogoras on October 03, 2008, 08:20:43 AM
Could you please provide a reference or two for this wonder lala?  Year production began, numbers produced, squadron deployments, etc...?  I do not claim to be an expert on Lavochkin fighters (i is MiG dweeb), but the above just does not match up with any of my reputable reference sources.

Are you sure this is not a plane out of Crimson Skies?

Where's your sarcasm detector? :P
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Denholm on October 03, 2008, 08:55:17 AM
Lame.....
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Lukanian-7 on October 03, 2008, 08:21:16 PM
omg I did'nt even bother to read the responses, We don't need another Spitfire.

We Have Spitties out the bellybutton as it is.
No Need For Dr Watson Postmortem Uber Von Spitty XVIIXIV!!!1!eleony!
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Bronk on October 04, 2008, 08:07:00 AM
(http://www.amazingheritage.com/models/images/supermarine_spitfire_mkXII.jpg)

drooooool
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Kev367th on October 04, 2008, 09:10:43 AM
omg I did'nt even bother to read the responses, We don't need another Spitfire.

We Have Spitties out the bellybutton as it is.
No Need For Dr Watson Postmortem Uber Von Spitty XVIIXIV!!!1!eleony!

Spitfire in all its various marks was Britains MOST produced aircraft, of course there will be a lot of them!!!!

Only needs -
Vc
XII
Seafire LIIc or LIII instead of the IIc, and you have a complete line-up of Spits as you could reasonably ask for or expect.
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Kazaa on October 08, 2008, 02:16:25 PM
We can all dream Kev.  :aok
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Enker on October 08, 2008, 04:09:05 PM
(http://www.amazingheritage.com/models/images/supermarine_spitfire_mkXII.jpg)

drooooool
(http://metamedia.stanford.edu/imagebin/SkyCaptain-02.jpg) Super-droooooool.(And yes I realize we have a P-40 already, but we also have a Spitfire. Don't get greedy or the overworked HiTech and his cronies will smite you with the excuses-stick!)
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Bronk on October 08, 2008, 04:59:04 PM
(http://metamedia.stanford.edu/imagebin/SkyCaptain-02.jpg) Super-droooooool.(And yes I realize we have a P-40 already, but we also have a Spitfire. Don't get greedy or the overworked HiTech and his cronies will smite you with the excuses-stick!)
Listen, I've been given the bribe quote to get the Mk XII in game. Just need to sell a kidney now.
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Guppy35 on October 08, 2008, 08:26:56 PM
omg I did'nt even bother to read the responses, We don't need another Spitfire.

We Have Spitties out the bellybutton as it is.
No Need For Dr Watson Postmortem Uber Von Spitty XVIIXIV!!!1!eleony!

You are suggesting that a 1943 Spitfire XII is uber? :)
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: jolly22 on October 09, 2008, 08:13:37 PM
spit is definitly not a dweeb plane i was watching worlds greatest fighters on the military channel and it said that the spit was #6 and by the way the p-51 mustang was #1  :O :aok
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: uptown on October 09, 2008, 09:56:58 PM
I think the idea is to have planes that flew during WWII.  :)

 :rofl :rofl :aok
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: oakranger on October 09, 2008, 10:06:12 PM
My dad had a whole collection of books on WWII aircraft that he passed on to me. I got to looking through them this morning and found a specific book on spitfire's. I know spitfire is a dweeb plane but I personally like the Spitfire. Anyways we need a spitfire MK 24!! Heres some specs on the 24:

Max speed:454mph at 26,000ft
Time to 20,000ft(6,100m): 8 Minutes
Service cieling: 43,500ft (13,250m)
maximum range: 880mls with 210Imp. gal
Wieght: 9,900lbs
Dimensions:
Span: 36ft 11in
Length: 32ft 11in
Height: 13ft 6in
Wing area: 244sq. ft
Armament: 4  20mm hispano-suiza cannons


I think this would be an awesome addition to AH!! Maybe even perk it like the tempest because of its abililty! Let me know what you guys think! <S>   :rock



YEAAA, i would perk the S&^&*( out of that plan.  But it was develope in the late 1940s
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Noir on October 10, 2008, 12:07:30 AM
spit is definitly not a dweeb plane i was watching worlds greatest fighters on the military channel and it said that the spit was #6 and by the way the p-51 mustang was #1  :O :aok

LMAO  :rofl
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Kazaa on October 14, 2008, 04:39:55 AM
Would be so cool to have a spitfire with a bubble canopy :aok
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Bronk on October 14, 2008, 04:58:16 PM
Would be so cool to have a spitfire with a bubble canopy :aok
Or a Malcolm hood even. :D
Title: Re: Another spitfire needed!!!
Post by: Kev367th on October 15, 2008, 07:00:59 AM
Would be so cool to have a spitfire with a bubble canopy :aok

Suggested that when the XIV got re-modelled.