Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: Murdr on November 04, 2008, 08:18:33 PM

Title: Experts still needed
Post by: Murdr on November 04, 2008, 08:18:33 PM
There are so many experts here on aircraft, engines, armament, and historical data, that I'd like to point out a format where posting that information will not scroll off the forum front page to be lost in the thread list.  Namely the 2nd tab in the navigation bar above, AHWiki (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page).

The possibilities are endless.  Just in fleshing out the initial format for the Aircraft of AHII (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/Aircraft_of_Aces_High_II) pages, I expanded from the P-38J (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/P-38J), to its .50 cal (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/M2_Browning_machine_gun), to its 20mm (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/20_mm_Hispano), and even stubbing its engine (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/Allison_V-1710), and ordnance (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/500lb_bomb).  Players like Moot (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&contribs=user&target=Moot) and Saxman (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=500&contribs=user&target=Saxman) have also made significant contributions to information for their favorite rides.  NHawk contributed an extensive number of pages on the many content creation (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/Content_Creation) utilities.  However it is open to anything aviation, PC, and WWII related besides being a resource for the game itself.



AHWiki (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page) may even eventually replace the planes, boats, and vehicle pages, and the help files on the main site once the content is filled in.  However there is still plenty of content that needs worked on.  AHWiki (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page) is open to contribution from registered BBS users, and uses the same login.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: RATTFINK on November 04, 2008, 08:32:54 PM
AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Murdr on December 06, 2008, 01:13:38 PM
Moot and I have composed a page on the SdKfz251 (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/SdKfz_251).  Pretty much all other Vehicles of AHII (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/Vehicles_of_Aces_High_II) are a blank slate and need some work if anyone is interested.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Masherbrum on December 06, 2008, 02:21:09 PM
Who did the input on "the Tony"?   I'm curious because they obviously interjected "their opinion" and struck out as far as someone "who flies it OFTEN is concerned."   

The Maneuverability section literally had me rolling I must admit.     :rofl

Although, the prankster side of me says "leave it up and continue to discourage folks from learning a plane that gives the Spit Sallies, Runstang (not you Stang), folks too scared to turn an La7, and most others fits, in the Late War Arenas.   

The reason why I posted?   When reviewing anything or drafting a "Report", the first thing that needs to be eliminated is, "opinion".   If you think quotes like the following are even remotely acceptable "as gospel":

1.  "Sustained turn-fights are not terribly good."   - Laughable at best. 
2.  "At high speeds (450mph+), the plane handles about average and really doesn't stand out."  - Very wrong
3.  "Top speed in a dive is about 500mph since the plane becomes quite heavy above this speed and difficult to control."  - Very wrong

But number 4 is the winner: "At low speeds (200mph) it tends to become very heavy and have problems maintaining a good turn rate." - I guess, but one must "disagree to agree."  I suppose if you took 100% fuel you'd have this issue.   It's been 4 years since I took that much in one.   

I'm not trying to be a downer here but stick to the FACTS, not opinion.   The write up on the Tony gives me the indication that the person who drafted it, rarely rolls the cartoon airplane.   

Murdr, the above is not directed at you personally.   But rather, the Community.   I'll turnfight a Hurricane while in the Tony and I promise, if you DO manage to shoot me down.   It will be A.) rather difficult and B) you WILL be cussing at your monitor even when you are on my 6.

If my statement offends, sorry but that isn't "opinion", it is fact.   Why?   I fly it regularly and learned from the best who flew it.   MY squaddies Helm and Goth who are IMO, better in it, than I am. 
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Murdr on December 06, 2008, 02:36:47 PM
After hearing from Pyro about what he envisioned for the Aircraft pages, I got permission from Soda to integrate his Aircraft Evaluation pages as part of the Aircraft Pages layout.  Wantok and I then made minor edits Soda's evaluations to reword or remove the subjective opinion comments for the pages where we personally copied over info from Soda's site.  Soda's info is only meant as a starting point for others to tweak though.  Someone else copied Soda's page over without any editing on that particular page though.

You are more than welcome to edit that page or any other page with better information that you are knowledgable about.  That's how wiki is supposed to work ;)  Moot for instance re-wrote much of the Ta152 page since he is an expert on that plane.  Likewise Saxman edited F4U pages, and I the P-38 and P-47 pages.

I think you fit the bill of one of the "experts" that are needed in regards to the Ki-61 (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/Ki-61-I-KAIc) info  :salute
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Masherbrum on December 06, 2008, 02:49:43 PM
After hearing from Pyro about what he envisioned for the Aircraft pages, I got permission from Soda to integrate his Aircraft Evaluation pages as part of the Aircraft Pages layout.  Wantok and I then made minor edits Soda's evaluations to reword or remove the subjective opinion comments for the pages where we personally copied over info from Soda's site.  Soda's info is only meant as a starting point for others to tweak though.  Someone else copied Soda's page over without any editing on that particular page though.

You are more than welcome to edit that page or any other page with better information that you are knowledgable about.  That's how wiki is supposed to work ;)  Moot for instance re-wrote much of the Ta152 page since he is an expert on that plane.  Likewise Saxman edited F4U pages, and I the P-38 and P-47 pages.

I think you fit the bill of one of the "experts" that are needed in regards to the Ki-61 (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/Ki-61-I-KAIc) info  :salute

I will.   I just wanted to inform others that they need to exercise caution when writing these things.    Wait, you know stuff about the 38?   How?    :D

<<S>> Murdr.   :devil
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Murdr on December 06, 2008, 02:54:49 PM
I will.   I just wanted to inform others that they need to exercise caution when writing these things.    Wait, you know stuff about the 38?   How?    :D

<<S>> Murdr.   :devil

Yes, that's a good point.  First person opinion isn't appropriate for the format, and comparitive statments should be specific enough to be useful.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: moot on December 06, 2008, 03:02:33 PM
I was going to finish the 152 page but it's been long enough that I'd want to fly it again before speaking from old memory.. Will it be ok to upload some films to illustrate parts of the wiki article, or is it better to have em elsewhere on the net? Would direct links to those pages/films be ok within the article?
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Masherbrum on December 06, 2008, 03:06:14 PM
I was going to finish the 152 page but it's been long enough that I'd want to fly it again before speaking from old memory.. Will it be ok to upload some films to illustrate parts of the wiki article, or is it better to have em elsewhere on the net? Would direct links to those pages/films be ok within the article?

I would say we should implement a "Films section" for each ride.   That'd be close to "all-inclusive".
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Murdr on December 06, 2008, 03:06:42 PM
I was going to finish the 152 page but it's been long enough that I'd want to fly it again before speaking from old memory.. Will it be ok to upload some films to illustrate parts of the wiki article, or is it better to have em elsewhere on the net? Would direct links to those pages/films be ok within the article?

Only png, jpg, bmp, gif, and tga file types can be uploaded to the AHWiki server.  External links to films should be fine if they expand on the article topic.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: dirt911 on March 07, 2009, 01:24:08 PM
im a pretty good expert on ww2 i study it alot my uncle fought in th pacific
as far as i know hes still alive to :salute but if you want i could do a little bit too if you want
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Murdr on March 24, 2009, 03:01:55 AM
Links to historical documents (Pilot's notes, training manuals, flight operational manuals, ect.) added to the following aircraft pages.

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/P-38G
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/F6F-5
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/Tempest_Mk_V
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/Spitfire_Mk_IX
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/P-39Q
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/P-38J
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/P-38L
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/Typhoon_Mk_I
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/P-51D
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/P-39D
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/P-47D-11
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/P-47D-40
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/P-47D-25
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/P-47N
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/Mosquito_Mk_VI
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/Me_262
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/B-25C
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/F4U-1D
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/F4U-1
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/F4U-1A
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/F4U-1C
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/FM-2
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/F4F-4


Note:  A few .pdfs are tens of megabytes, and are not optimized for downloading.  They will eventually (several minutes) load and display in a browser, or you can right-click to save.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: dirt911 on March 24, 2009, 10:11:09 PM
right now im currently working on some tanks and trying to get more info on them havent found much i dont already know
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Murdr on March 25, 2009, 12:43:00 AM
By the way, regarding vehicles.  The armor thicknesses by chassie location are posted by Pyro on each vehicles discussion page.  The thickness values just need transfered over to the infobox.  The SdKfz_251 (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/SdKfz_251) page is the most complete example of a vehicle page, if anyone is looking to contribute to tank/vehicle pages.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Scherf on March 25, 2009, 04:58:08 AM
I've got stuff I suppose I can upload for the Mossie - will AH host them or do I have to use my own space?
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: RTHolmes on March 25, 2009, 07:37:28 AM
the sdk page is good, but still missing the most important info - the rocket range at 23deg and 45deg...
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Skuzzy on March 25, 2009, 08:01:00 AM
I've got stuff I suppose I can upload for the Mossie - will AH host them or do I have to use my own space?

You can upload everything to the Wiki.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Murdr on March 25, 2009, 08:44:27 AM
holmes, you're welcome to figure it out and add that info to the page :) 
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: RTHolmes on March 25, 2009, 10:57:25 AM
just as soon as HT adds the rangefinder ;)
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: moot on March 25, 2009, 11:02:12 AM
the sdk page is good, but still missing the most important info - the rocket range at 23deg and 45deg...
Yep, I'd done the ranging but somehow forgot to add it when I wrote it. Saw that myself today. Gonna add it in a bit.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Murdr on March 25, 2009, 11:12:41 AM
All you need is a buddy in the TA to drive out to the crater.  Range is on his icon.  We (AHTC) come  with much info by running our own tests.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Murdr on March 25, 2009, 11:16:12 AM
Come to thhink of it Ive gotten ranges offline by firing next to a gv drone, and driving out to the craters myself.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: RTHolmes on March 25, 2009, 11:25:21 AM
Come to thhink of it Ive gotten ranges offline by firing next to a gv drone, and driving out to the craters myself.

ah that sounds easier :aok
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Murdr on March 25, 2009, 11:28:22 AM
(Cant edit from phone)
And then there is the .target tool that cannot only measure range but width and heigth too.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: moot on March 25, 2009, 11:48:57 AM
Yes Target does it.  IIRC it's 1.9 and 2.2K.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: RTHolmes on March 25, 2009, 11:49:36 AM
Come to thhink of it Ive gotten ranges offline by firing next to a gv drone, and driving out to the craters myself.

got 950yd @23deg and 2.2k @45deg :)

how would you do it with .target?
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Scherf on March 25, 2009, 03:15:00 PM
You can upload everything to the Wiki.

Thanks Skuzzy, will see if I can figure it out.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: dirt911 on March 25, 2009, 04:20:39 PM
i also belive that the sdkfz 251 also had a package (terms for the arnament in ah) of an mg 42 im actually sure of this because germany ritired mg 34 on vehicles for a heavier weapon (mg 42)
By the way, regarding vehicles.  The armor thicknesses by chassie location are posted by Pyro on each vehicles discussion page.  The thickness values just need transfered over to the infobox.  The SdKfz_251 (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/SdKfz_251) page is the most complete example of a vehicle page, if anyone is looking to contribute to tank/vehicle pages.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Murdr on March 25, 2009, 04:26:47 PM
I've got stuff I suppose I can upload for the Mossie - will AH host them or do I have to use my own space?

What kind of stuff?  Many of the historical documents (pdf) I linked from wiki pages are hosted on the trainers site server.

Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: dirt911 on March 25, 2009, 04:28:53 PM
  encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Stuart tank)
Jump to: navigation, search
Light Tank M3A3 (Stuart V)

M5A1 at Worthington Tank Museum
Type Light tank
Place of origin United States
Production history
Produced 1941-1943
Specifications
Weight 14.7 tonnes (32,400 lb)
Length 4.5 m (14.8 ft)
Width 2.46 m (8.1 ft)
Height 2.3 m (7.5 ft)
Crew 4 (Commander, gunner, driver, co-driver)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Armor 13 - 51 mm
Primary
armament 37 mm M6 in M44 mount
174 rounds
Secondary
armament 3 x .30-06 Browning M1919A4 MG
7,500 rounds
 
Engine air-cooled Continental-Wright radial petrol
250 hp (186 kW)
Power/weight 17.82 hp/tonne
Suspension Vertical volute spring
Operational
range 120 km (74 mi)
Speed 58 km/h (36 mph) (road)
30 km/h (18 mph) (off-road)
 This article includes a list of references or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate.

The M3 Stuart, formally Light Tank M3 was an American light tank of World War II. It was used by British and Commonwealth forces prior to the entry of the USA into the war, and thereafter by US and Allied forces until the end of the war. The name General Stuart or Stuart given by the British comes from the American Civil War General J.E.B. Stuart and was used for both the M3 and M5 Light Tank; in British service it also had the unofficial nickname of Honey. To the United States Army the tanks were officially known only as Light Tank M3 and Light Tank M5.


 History
Observing events in Europe, American tank designers realized that the Light Tank M2 was becoming obsolete and set about improving it. The upgraded design, with thicker armor, modified suspension and new gun recoil system was called "Light Tank M3". Production of the vehicle started in March 1941 and continued until October 1943. Like its direct predecessor, the M2A4, the M3 was armed with a 37 mm M5 gun and 5 .30-06 Browning M1919A4 machine guns: coaxial with the gun, on top of the turret in an M20 AA mount, in a ball mount in right bow, in the right and left hull sponsons.

To relieve the demand for the radial aero-engines used in the M3, a new version was developed using twin Cadillac V-8 automobile engines. The new model (initially called M4 but redesignated M5 to avoid confusion with the M4 Sherman) also featured a redesigned hull with sloped glacis plate and driver's hatches moved to the top. Although the main criticism from the using units was that the Stuarts lacked firepower, the improved M5 series kept the same 37 mm gun. The M5 gradually replaced the M3 in production from 1942 and was in turn succeeded by the Light Tank M24 in 1944.


 Combat history


  
  
  
  
  
  


  
  
  
  
  
  
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: dirt911 on March 25, 2009, 04:29:55 PM
i can get info on tanks and aircraft of course ive gotten to drive basic sherman but would love to see stuart added to ah
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: RTHolmes on March 25, 2009, 05:28:41 PM
 encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Stuart tank)

etc...


this thread is about experts adding useful info to the AHWiki. why have you just pasted the wikipedia entry for a vehicle which doesnt even appear in AH? :huh
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Murdr on March 25, 2009, 05:48:49 PM
Any registered AHbbs member is able to edit the AHWiki.  The content will only be as good as the effort community members put into providing and reviewing it.  My intention was to point out that the AHWiki aircraft and vehicle pages are linked to from the main page.  An informed contribution there will impart information to much more people than posting similar information in a thread on this board.

I do have to grin everytime I see someone respond to reading an AHWiki page with a comment on how it "should be" so to speak.  Again, editing is open to bbs members.  If someone feels something should be added or changed, they have the ability to do so.  :salute
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: dirt911 on March 25, 2009, 10:13:35 PM
still though im just trying to prove a point
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: moot on March 25, 2009, 10:44:38 PM
Dirt911 add that info on its own page and don't just quote another website.  Cite your sources. If the article you make is good, it'll be kept.  It's no use "making your point" in this thread.

RTHolmes - the target shows you impacts.  Just keep moving it till you get just under the range where the impacts reach the ground.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: MOSQ on March 26, 2009, 12:02:20 AM
I've been thinking about adding all my aircraft test data to the WIKI. It's the same data Dokgonzo uses on his website, but I've been frustrated because Dok's implementation of the data on a few planes got messed up. Most notably the turn radius of the Spits are not right. I've tried contacting him several times to fix it, but he never replies.

So as an experiment I added my data to the Ki-61 Wiki page. Ya'll take a look and give me some feedback on the good, bad, ugly. If the community in general likes the idea and we can put together a format folks like, I'll work on adding the data to all  the planes pages.


Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Murdr on March 26, 2009, 08:50:53 AM
mosq, I'll take a look this evening when I'm home.  I could easily add new data fields to the infobox to display turn data.  Or maybe even make a new infobox template just for turn data.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Murdr on March 26, 2009, 06:06:45 PM
So as an experiment I added my data to the Ki-61 Wiki page. Ya'll take a look and give me some feedback on the good, bad, ugly. If the community in general likes the idea and we can put together a format folks like, I'll work on adding the data to all  the planes pages.


Take a look.  I made a new template to display that type of info.  There is flexability to add more data fields or switch the layout around.
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/Ki-61-I-KAIc
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: MOSQ on March 26, 2009, 11:21:30 PM
Take a look.  I made a new template to display that type of info.  There is flexability to add more data fields or switch the layout around.
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/Ki-61-I-KAIc
I like it. I see you have a copy of the secret spreadsheet! The source you quoted, my old turn list, is little outdated, there are new planes and I think some flight models have changed. And thanks to Badboy I have a more accurate formula for computing the results than I used back then.  I'll have to redo the sheet with the new data so we can post the correct source. I'll also retest a few planes.

I'm good with the format. I'll start adding the data to each plane as I get time if you'll make the template a standard on the pages.

Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Murdr on March 26, 2009, 11:45:34 PM
It's easy to add the new infobox to a page.  Copy/paste this code into the page just after "===Aces High II Performance Charts==="
Quote
{{Infobox_AH_Aircraft_Performance
|sustainedclean =<!-- Clean w/25% fuel at sea level sustained turn radius-->
|sustainedcleandps =<!-- Clean w/25% fuel at sea level sustained turn rate in degrees per sec-->
|cornervelocity =<!-- Clean w/25% fuel at sea level corner velocity -->
|cornervelocitydps    =<!-- turn rate at CV in degrees per sec -->
|stallspeed     =<!-- Clean w/25% fuel at sea level stall speed -->
|sustainedflaps =<!-- Full flaps w/25% fuel at sea level turn radius -->
|sustainedflapsdps =<!-- full flaps turn rate in degrees per sec -->
|stallspeedflaps =<!-- full flaps stall speed -->
|150to200       =<!-- time from 150 to 200mph -->
|150to250       =<!-- time from 150 to 250mph -->
|200to250       =<!-- time from 200 to 250mph -->
|150to300       =<!-- time from 150 to 300mph -->
|300to350       =<!-- time from 300 to 350mph -->
|source1      =<!-- optional text or link to source -->
|source2      =<!-- optional text or link to source -->}}

Then replace the <!--Remarks--> tags with the data.  If you don't have data for a field, just leave it as is.  I coded the template to skip displaying fields if no value was entered.

Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Murdr on March 27, 2009, 12:12:57 AM
The source you quoted, my old turn list, is little outdated, there are new planes and I think some flight models have changed. And thanks to Badboy I have a more accurate formula for computing the results than I used back then.  I'll have to redo the sheet with the new data so we can post the correct source. I'll also retest a few planes.

There have been a few changes.  New planes, the P-38s flaps were bugged when you tested, a few specific drag and weight values were tweaked.  But for the most part according to tests the trainers have done, your old values hold up pretty good within a margin of error.  Rest assured your tests have been of value, and would be a great addition to the wiki pages  :salute
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: MOSQ on March 29, 2009, 11:20:15 PM
Thanks for the kudos.

I started by modifying the P-39 Q and D, since they weren't in the old test sheet. Take a look and see if the data sheet ended up in the right place of if I did something wrong. They didn't place the same as the one you did with the KI-61, but I think that's because there's no content in the writeups for the P-39s.

I also have to work on creating a new data sheet to link to.

Thanks, Mosq
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Murdr on March 30, 2009, 05:48:24 PM
 :aok Looks like you got it.  And yes, the lack of text content does affect how the infobox displays.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Scherf on April 23, 2009, 06:37:31 AM
Added original CG table and chart to Mosquito page.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Scherf on May 27, 2009, 08:44:40 PM
Uploaded Merlin power & boost curves to Mosquito page, though I confess I thought max power in both MS and FS gears would be at slightly higher altitude.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: james on June 11, 2009, 01:46:18 AM
I have an encyclopedia of world aircraft. Its huge, seems correct so far, and has a lot of info in it. It covers from the Wright Brothers to the f22. Would scanning and pasting the pages cause problems over speed numbers or anything? Would it be anything wanted in the wiki? I was going to post one every couple weeks in the aircraft section like the Wednesday babe gets posted in the oclub. I need a list of what planes were added from beginning to end since ah was made and would follow that list or go backwards. Interested at all?
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Murdr on June 11, 2009, 07:47:39 PM
Would scanning and pasting the pages cause problems

This notice is on every editing page...
Quote
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see AHWiki:Copyrights for details). DO NOT SUBMIT COPYRIGHTED WORK WITHOUT PERMISSION!

Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: james on June 11, 2009, 08:23:26 PM
I've never used it before I didn't realize it was like that on wiki. Nevermind just wanted to keep the dust from collecting on this book. It really is put together well.

Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Scherf on July 04, 2009, 10:13:57 AM
Uploaded drag coefficient info for the Mossie and assorted other birds.

The Mosquito FB.VI is externally identical to the Mosquito F.II.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: AirFlyer on July 16, 2009, 06:28:53 AM
Attempted to give the A6M5b an in game photo and seemed to fail no matter what I tried. Image is hosted and such just doesn't want to view properly. Figured I'd say something so someone who knows what their doing and could fix it.

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/wiki/index.php/A6M5b
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: moot on July 16, 2009, 06:53:52 PM
Do you have a bigger copy of that picture?
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: AirFlyer on July 17, 2009, 12:49:56 AM
Not anymore, I deleted the original photo I cropped it out from but I could easily take an other screenshot like it.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: TonyJoey on July 17, 2009, 01:38:54 AM
Just reporting that I think someone messed with the "Fighting in the P-47D-40". Currently it says "You will soon notice that nearly any enemy will be easy to get." Just notifying someone who has a clue about modifying it. :lol




Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: AirFlyer on July 18, 2009, 07:01:43 AM
http://www.mediafire.com/download.php?32fwmzminjm

Here's a bigger picture then Moot. I decided to go with a similar angle of the real life photo of the A6M5b as I think it offers a nice comparison of the two.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Murdr on July 21, 2009, 11:57:19 AM
Just reporting that I think someone messed with the "Fighting in the P-47D-40". Currently it says "You will soon notice that nearly any enemy will be easy to get." Just notifying someone who has a clue about modifying it. :lol





Change it ;)   ...that "editor" was given a long break for excessive posting of nonsense by the way.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: moot on July 21, 2009, 02:22:26 PM
Fyvsix?
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Wedge1126 on August 13, 2009, 06:11:50 PM
Whoever has permission should add the I-16 and Brewster to the list of planes on the wiki.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Scherf on October 03, 2009, 06:21:41 AM
Is there a "brains trust" where we can upload / store data relating to aircraft and vehicles not currently in AH, but which might, possibly, eventually, show up? I mean, I've assorted Me 410 stuff, some He 219 stuff, think I even have a docco on the optics in the JS-2 tank...
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Digr1 on April 30, 2010, 02:49:24 PM
Is there a "brains trust" where we can upload / store data relating to aircraft and vehicles not currently in AH, but which might, possibly, eventually, show up? I mean, I've assorted Me 410 stuff, some He 219 stuff, think I even have a docco on the optics in the JS-2 tank...

The 410 showed up too late in the war and the HE 219 were built in such small numbers and was a dedicated night fighter, so that wont work. But the Owl did have the first production ejection seat, that would be fun to see the pilot rocket out of the plane as it was going down
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Scherf on April 30, 2010, 04:32:10 PM
*cough*

Me 410 was in action from mid-43 onwards.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Wolfala on October 04, 2010, 10:18:56 AM
If HTC has the hosting ability, I will donate them my scans of the pilots manuals for the P-47-D, P-47N, P-38L, P-40e, A-26, P-51D/H. I scanned these back in 2003, are color and weigh on average 50 megs.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: WING47 on November 01, 2010, 10:39:14 PM
       I may have some useful infomation on many aircraft sutch as the P-51,La 7,109,190, and Spitfire variants. I also will gladly find information on any other about other aircraft. So if anyone wants some info just look me up. :airplane:
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Butcher on July 25, 2011, 01:02:08 PM
How can I upload or Create a page on the Aces high Wiki? I was going to upload some information on ground vehicles like the Panther G.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Butcher on July 25, 2011, 06:02:36 PM
Ok I am going to start adding various stuff - for example the Panther G, could anyone take a look and give me a few pointers, I would like to contribute as much as I can, however Im new to this wiki.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: moot on August 10, 2011, 11:30:11 AM
Just try and mimic the other wiki pages' conventions.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Butcher on August 10, 2011, 12:16:17 PM
Just try and mimic the other wiki pages' conventions.

How can I get it added to the pages? For example the Panther page is pretty much almost ready - I want to add it to the vehicle list?
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: moot on August 10, 2011, 04:36:27 PM
I can create the page and stick the template in there for you.  What's the formal/in-game name for the Panther? 
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Butcher on August 10, 2011, 06:13:10 PM
I can create the page and stick the template in there for you.  What's the formal/in-game name for the Panther? 

I named it Panther G
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Tank-Ace on August 10, 2011, 06:26:01 PM
I don't see it up there
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Daddkev on November 27, 2011, 04:05:49 PM
 :bhead
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: seraphim07 on November 28, 2011, 03:00:33 PM
I've spent pretty much my whole life learning about WWII in all it's aspects, with a focus on aviation. I am sure I can help with the wiki, if so please PM me. 
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: pervert on November 28, 2011, 03:03:09 PM
I've spent pretty much my whole life learning about WWII in all it's aspects, with a focus on aviation. I am sure I can help with the wiki, if so please PM me. 

You don't need anyone's permission to edit it, just get an account at the AHWIKI and get started.  :salute
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: seraphim07 on November 28, 2011, 03:56:43 PM
Ahhh, I see, that's even better!!! I will get started right away! Thanks for the information.   :salute
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Butcher on December 20, 2011, 10:20:26 AM
is anyone approving any updates to the wiki? I have been trying to update it, for example I added the Panther G but nobody has added it yet or reviewed it.

Blah the Page was deleted, I need to recreate it.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: Butcher on December 21, 2011, 11:51:32 AM
Panther G Created and finished, going to work on the M18 next.
Title: Re: Experts still needed
Post by: B-17 on February 19, 2012, 07:47:16 PM
I know virtually nothing of true value on technical specs/armament, but I'm open to editing grammar, spelling, wording etc. :)