Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: yodad585 on November 21, 2008, 03:24:36 PM

Title: another junker
Post by: yodad585 on November 21, 2008, 03:24:36 PM
we need another junker. ju 52 the info is right here.
Role Military transport aircraft
Manufacturer Junkers
First flight 13 October 1930
Introduced 1931
Primary users Luftwaffe
Spain
France
Switzerland
Produced 1931–1945 (German production)
1945–1947 (France)
1945–1952 (Spain)
Number built 4,845 ...
it is another goon and could carry upto 17 paratroopers it has 3 engines and i think we need it
Title: Re: another junker
Post by: halo342 on November 21, 2008, 03:30:54 PM
has been asked for many times, but it would help for AvA setups

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,225329.0.html
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,213978.0.html
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,211109.0.html
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,158579.0.html
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,62807.0.html
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,240888.0.html
Title: Re: another junker
Post by: Spikes on November 21, 2008, 03:33:29 PM
Ahh, gotta love the copy and pastes from Wiki.
Title: Re: another junker
Post by: LLogann on November 21, 2008, 03:36:37 PM
It'll still carry 10 troops dude. In the real world, SkyTrain could carry 28 btw.

There really is no practical reason for adding another troop transport (in the air)......... BUT, I do like the idea of having choices!

Title: Re: another junker
Post by: macleod01 on November 21, 2008, 03:37:29 PM
it has 3 engines

You just gotta LOVE a reason to have it like that!
Title: Re: another junker
Post by: LLogann on November 21, 2008, 03:38:36 PM
Extra engine, yet still slower then the Goonie Bird..... Go figure! 
You just gotta LOVE a reason to have it like that!
Title: Re: another junker
Post by: Denholm on November 21, 2008, 04:21:17 PM
How about a Heinkel? A Heinkel-111. :D
Title: Re: another junker
Post by: CAVPFCDD on November 21, 2008, 04:51:29 PM
i prefered the suggestion of the russian goon that had a gun on it
Title: Re: another junker
Post by: TwinBoom on November 22, 2008, 02:27:53 PM
How about a Heinkel? A Heinkel-111. :D

surprising yet another he111 hijack from you


ju-52 +1
Title: Re: another junker
Post by: yodad585 on November 22, 2008, 03:04:05 PM
i prefered the suggestion of the russian goon that had a gun on it
it has a gun in the back by the rudder kind of like the ball turret
Title: Re: another junker
Post by: RMrider on November 22, 2008, 03:15:49 PM
JU 51:

has a gun

Is German  :rock

ANDDD most important, is sooo damn ugly, its SEXIII.  :t

 :salute
Title: Re: another junker
Post by: NEARY on November 22, 2008, 04:20:23 PM
The ju-52 may be slower but it was an important part of the war.
it could be used in the AVA and The SEA.

here is a picture


(http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f60/emidioneto/c2ab0f50.jpg)
Title: Re: another junker
Post by: yodad585 on November 23, 2008, 03:02:15 PM
exactly get rid of goon we got now cause the thing is deffence less and throw the junker in. makes everything alot easier and i can gun instead of trying to out run bullets that i cant throw back. come on the goon we have now is like throwing a clay pigeon up for a marksmen. clay pigeon is plane the marksmen is all ground deffences n other planes. we need to get rid of the ticking time bomb, and put in a goon with armament
Title: Re: another junker
Post by: Latrobe on November 23, 2008, 03:10:53 PM
Get rid of the goon? Why? The only way you get shot down in it is if you try to take a base that still has fighters over it, or ack/gvs still up. You don't need a gun if you're not going to need to shoot anything. Plus, isn't the JU-52's gun just another 7.92mm gun? by the time you do enough damage to the plane on your six you'll be in the tower. JU-52 would be a great addition, but why would you get rid of the C-47??
Title: Re: another junker
Post by: Lye-El on November 23, 2008, 03:43:16 PM
exactly get rid of goon we got now cause the thing is deffence less and throw the junker in. <snip> and put in a goon with armament

A Goon i.e. Gooney Bird, IS a C-47.
Title: Re: another junker
Post by: HighTone on November 23, 2008, 04:16:02 PM
I'd like to see it sometime as an option, but I wouldn't fly it
Title: Re: another junker
Post by: frank3 on November 25, 2008, 05:41:12 AM
The few guns that it would carry wouldn't be much help against an attacking fighter, but it's nice to be able to do SOMETHING instead