Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: 007Rusty on December 05, 2008, 12:33:49 PM
-
OJ gets 15 years ... http://www.cnn.com/
-
not near enough
-
eligible for probation in 5 years. Not enough in my opinion.
-
You think he'll play on one of the prison football teams?
-
15 years for tried repossession of sports memorabilia.
All white jury and judge this time ?
-
15 years for tried repossession of sports memorabilia.
All white jury and judge this time ?
Karma is a biotch
-
AMF and I hope he gets bubba the biotch maker for a cell mate.
:mad:
-
No! Nasty Nate! No! 666, Mark of the Beast! Naughty, Jungle of Love!
-
Turn 2 humans into Pez Dispensers= Walk away
Rough up some memoribilia nerds=15 years
Sounds like a make-up call, I doubt we will see the same "Free OJ" mania on this. The guy got away with murder, EVERYONE knows it, and yet every other month he was on the news for another incident. Good riddance, you should have taken your prize and lived out the rest of your days in anonimous infamy instead of tempting fate.
-
He will walk out in two years unless he angers a gang in there.
-
He will walk out in two years unless he angers a gang in there.
I think I heard that he has to serve a minimum of 1/3 of his sentence before he is even considered for parole. Which means at least 5 years. With his ego I don't see him laying low and staying out of trouble. Perhaps karma will really kick in and he will suffer the same fate as his ex wife and her waiter.
-
karma is a squeak...enough said
-
Maybe he can bunk with Boy George.
-
Well, at least he might get to play in "The Longest Yard II"
or was that "I'm Crying in my Bunk Drinking Toilet Wine"...
I need to get my films straight.
-
I read 9 years before parole eligibility
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081205/ap_on_en_ot/oj_simpson
Simpson could serve up to 33 years but could be eligible for parole after nine years, according to Elana Roberto, the judge's clerk.
-
Hang him...
-
I'd rather poke him with a sharp stick until he hangs himself. :devil
-
He catch ball very well, maybe he can catch ball with his mouth also?
-
15 years for tried repossession of sports memorabilia.
All white jury and judge this time ?
He's lucky the G didn't go after him for income tax evasion on all the memorabilia he sold. He "owes" $ to the family of the boy he chopped up remember? As for "his" property? When you arm your posse and go after stuff you think is yours, after waving the guns around, then you'd better be able to prove its your own. Not that it matters. You generally cant jack up people with guns anyways. Most of all when all four of your posse is also a bunch of rats who will rat you out.
And dont do it in Nevada. Slick lawyer con jobs dont work there like they do in California.
Here, I found an audio tape on your guy doing the jack. http://www.tmz.com/2007/09/17/o-j-confrontation-caught-on-tape/
-
(http://punditkitchen.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/political-pictures-oj-simpson-gloves-fit.jpg)
-
I hear OJ, dropped Hertz as a sponsor and pickup up Jiffy-Lube :lol
-
He will walk out in two years unless he angers a gang in there.
:rofl
:rofl :rofl
:rofl :rofl :rofl
-
15 years for tried repossession of sports memorabilia.
All white jury and judge this time ?
Karma is what he gets. Chops off his wife's head, gets away with it, gets 15 for this.
-
Actually I just read he was sentenced to 33 years and is eligible for parole after 9. Thats a pretty good jolt, more then he would have gotten here. I caught a guy last year, gun in hand, after he'd pistol whipped a liquor store owner and had him face down on the floor and was going thru a safe when I walked in. He was allowed to plea for 12 years, and will probably be out in 6. And this guy had a decent sheet too. So 33 for a first felony conviction is not a bad whack.
But....criminals are not enabled and protected as much in places like that.
-
Karma and OJ= not a good mix.
-
I get the whole "karma" thing, but if you just look at this one case and don't let the past color it...
I don't think OJ was given a fair trial or a fair sentence.
(bear in mind i'm HAPPY this scum bag murderer is going away, but I have to say this is the second time the justice system has failed with OJ)
-
I get the whole "karma" thing, but if you just look at this one case and don't let the past color it...
I don't think OJ was given a fair trial or a fair sentence.
(bear in mind i'm HAPPY this scum bag murderer is going away, but I have to say this is the second time the justice system has failed with OJ)
How do you mean? He and a group of his friends went into a situation armed and stole things that he claimed were his, now in this country just because you think somethings yours doesn't give you the right to hold someone at gun point and take it back, thats called armed robbery, a very serious felony. Now what he did was very stupid, but stupidity is no excuse.
-
I get the whole "karma" thing, but if you just look at this one case and don't let the past color it...
I don't think OJ was given a fair trial or a fair sentence.
(bear in mind i'm HAPPY this scum bag murderer is going away, but I have to say this is the second time the justice system has failed with OJ)
On what do you base this opinion? There were recordings of the situation as it went down.
-
I get the whole "karma" thing, but if you just look at this one case and don't let the past color it...
I don't think OJ was given a fair trial or a fair sentence.
(bear in mind i'm HAPPY this scum bag murderer is going away, but I have to say this is the second time the justice system has failed with OJ)
Not only was he tape recorded but detectives are assigned, and in a case like this there is close supervision and with a States attorney office, the witnesses are questioned independently and have to be deemed "credible" before charges are approved. And especially before a case is brought to trial. And four members of his gang testified about not only OJs guilt but their own as well. Then add all the other witnesses and victims......Exactly how did justice fail?
This was a slam dunk. With a jury 1/2 way honest, responsible, and following the rules, this was an easy one for a States Attorney. They had four of OJs own buddies testify against him and have to stand up to cross examination by his latest dream team.
It was, however, within the States Attorneys rights to not hit him with all those charges. I guess they decided OJ didn't warrant a pass, nor were they required to give him one. And they wouldn't give any of us a pass either, nor could we afford legal dream teams. So why would you feel sorry for OJ ? The guy beat a double murder and thought he was bullet proof. And the state of Nevada taught him different.
Its really kinda funny when you think about it, and I'm sure Maverick understands. But here are all these people feeling sorry for OJ but if a cop screws up once, even if hes spent a career serving faithfully, then the Public is calling for his head to be chopped off. :lol Ive seen blocks of ghetto houses empty to protect/support gangstas were locking up, even tho those same gangstas are tearing their community apart. They see a copper slapping one of them upside the head and their all lunging for their handycams and calling the news. :lol
Hahahah, I love this job. The longer you do it the more you :lol. Sometimes I drive around for hours laughing hysterically.
See below.
-
IIRC the jury based their decision on the tape recordings and not on any testimony. When they talked to the Jurors afterwards they said their guilty plea was solely based on that recording, and pretty much ignored everything the Defence threw out there. Sounds kinda biased to me.
The guy who pulled the gun testified that OJ had no prior knowledge that he even had a gun, and that no plan what so ever to was premeditated to "rob" the people.
And HOW can you have a Jury of your Peers w/o any people of your same race?
Not to mention how can OJ steal something that was supposedly stolen from him in the 1st place?
From what little I saw of the Defences arguments, it would have more than enough to put a "reasonable" doubt in my mind re: the charges if I was on that Jury.
I just had a sense from the get go that the State of Nevada was gunning hard for OJ. I think if he was just an "average joe" there would have been diff. charges and a diff. sentence.
-
I dont remember the Constitution saying anything about affirmative action and juries.
Sadly had their been "people of his same race" in the jury maybe OJ would have gotten off. Ive seen many a predator released back into society like that, mostly back into the same community that gave them a pass. Its like "victims" dont even matter to people nowdays. They just want to make their little political statements. Its a sad, sad reality when prosecutors begin to hate bringing trials to juries because they are afraid personal motives of jurists will release the criminal. Thats why where I work armed robbery pleas go for far less then what OJ got. Ive seen killers get less then OJ in plea bargains.
Its why in his double murder trial the victims meant nothing. They meant nothing to nobody except to their families and friends. Gee, where have I seen that before?
Both guys who had the guns testified OJ told them to bring them. 3 of the posse testified OJ said to, "bring some heat". Do you even know what your talking about?
From what little I saw of the Defences arguments, it would have more than enough to put a "reasonable" doubt in my mind re: the charges if I was on that Jury.
"From what little I saw"? :huh
I just had a sense from the get go that the State of Nevada was gunning hard for OJ.
Poor OJ. :cry Let me ask you this. If you were up on a robbery trial you think OJ would care about you? Anyway, I'm done with the Judge Judy thing. I myself think its hilarious this rat gets to spend his golden years in a cage.
-
The tapes were direct evidence of what happened as it happened. The only better evidence would have been a video. Hell yes it's better evidence than the stories and fabrications of the defence attornies tossed out there. What is better than the defendants own voice and comments DURING the crime??
If he wanted to recover his property he should have made a police report and let the Police handle it. Instead he decided to steal what he has to date not been able to show was in fact not lawfully taken from him.
-
I dont remember the Constitution saying anything about affirmative action and juries.
Sadly had their been "people of his same race" in the jury maybe OJ would have gotten off. Ive seen many a predator released back into society like that, mostly back into the same community that gave them a pass. Its like "victims" dont even matter to people nowdays. They just want to make their little political statements. Its a sad, sad reality when prosecutors begin to hate bringing trials to juries because they are afraid personal motives of jurists will release the criminal. Thats why where I work armed robbery pleas go for far less then what OJ got. Ive seen killers get less then OJ in plea bargains.
Its why in his double murder trial the victims meant nothing. They meant nothing to nobody except to their families and friends. Gee, where have I seen that before?
Both guys who had the guns testified OJ told them to bring them. 3 of the posse testified OJ said to, "bring some heat". Do you even know what your talking about?
"From what little I saw"? :huh
Poor OJ. :cry Let me ask you this. If you were up on a robbery trial you think OJ would care about you? Anyway, I'm done with the Judge Judy thing. I myself think its hilarious this rat gets to spend his golden years in a cage.
I'll admitt i've paid very little attention to OJ and he is the least of my concern at the moment.
It is quite possible the only blurb I watched about the trial was biased towards OJ so my info/opinion could be squewed.
The two things that really stuck out to me were the timing of the verdict, and being convicted by an all white jury.
Those two things alone gave me pause.
To be honest though, I could really care less what happens to OJ.
-
Also another thing, OJ didn't just take things that were his, he took everything, including things that weren't his, so saying he was just taking back what was his is misleading. Now he later tried to give the things back that weren't his, but the damage had already been done by him taking them.