Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: qqqqq on September 10, 2001, 08:19:00 AM
-
anyone like the idea of having computer controlled buff guns when ur flying without a gunner?
-
Not me. Not in the least.
Westy
-
No thanks.
I like doing it myself.
-
i think itd be a nice i dont mean take away manual control but make it an option say for when ur in bombadier mode
-
IF you add realistic norden, IF you tone down .50 buff turbolasers, IF you add drift and wobble to dropping bombs, IF you get rid of in-flight AWACS+GPS, IF you get rid of the magic perf-o-matic convergence, IF you are unable to fire through solid surfaces of your own buff....still NO, thks :)
Cheers,
Pepe
[edited cause I'm too lazy to use spellchecker :(]
[ 09-10-2001: Message edited by: Pepe ]
-
ahh i say u just like buff killing to be easy
-
easy...hehe, don't go there !
-
No.
Totally agree with Pepe too as long as blast damage is modelled.
-
No Otto!
-
Just say No to Otto.
-
i don't want some retarded ai wasting all my ammo!!!!
-
I like the IDEA of it but it never seems to work. I have never tried to write an algorithm for gun aiming but it seems that it is very difficult to create one which has all the flaws of a human gunner.
-
No to Otto guns.
MiG
-
no...No...nO.... and NO NO NO again!
Otto would be fine if it had the weakness of a human gunner, but like Funked said, I haven't seen an algorithm yet that even comes close.
Otto sucks!
-
How about the ability to load more than 1 gunner... only one bogey can be engaged at any 1 time...
SKurj