Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: opposum on December 27, 2008, 10:48:29 AM

Title: valkyrie
Post by: opposum on December 27, 2008, 10:48:29 AM
I went to see Valkyrie last night, I thought it was pretty good, it seemed historically accurate to me.

did anyone else see it?

I was wondering if it was truly historically accurate and not fixed up like a lot of movies,



thanks,



opposum
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Spikes on December 27, 2008, 10:49:29 AM
I want to see it, haven't yet.
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Bosco123 on December 27, 2008, 10:50:26 AM
Wrong forum, so this will get moved. But no, I hav't seen it yet. Heard that Tom Cruise shouldn't have done that film, he was terrible.
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Max on December 27, 2008, 11:19:20 AM
Tom Cruise shouldn't have done that film, he was terrible.

Don't you be dissin' Maverick  :mad:
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: smokey23 on December 27, 2008, 01:57:39 PM
Aint seen it yet and its hard to believe the war coulda been finished much sooner if the second bundle of explosives had been armed and the sachel with the explosives was placed on the inside of the table leg instead of the outside a matter of a few inches could have saved alotta lives.
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Spikes on December 27, 2008, 01:59:58 PM
Don't you be dissin' Maverick  :mad:
:lol
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Stang on December 27, 2008, 02:04:50 PM
Maverick was actually pretty good in it, Eurotrash internet hype is no way to judge a film or the performance of it's actors.
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: RumbleB on December 27, 2008, 02:11:25 PM
Eurotrash

 :furious
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Stang on December 27, 2008, 02:12:56 PM
:furious
I didn't say metrosexual Eurotrash!

 ;)
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Tmac7 on December 27, 2008, 02:21:40 PM
I'm going to watch it tonight with my Girlfriend for some reason she wants to see it but thats ok I'm glad. I'll report to you if it seems accurate too :)
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: 19kilo10(ironnite) on December 27, 2008, 03:45:59 PM
Don't you be dissin' Maverick  :mad:
Maverick?! The guy who couldnt shake an A-4 while in an F-14? THAT Maverick?!
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: SkyTiger on December 27, 2008, 04:21:36 PM
Maverick?! The guy who couldnt shake an A-4 while in an F-14? THAT Maverick?!


 :lol
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Anaxogoras on December 27, 2008, 04:29:46 PM
I enjoyed South Park's ripping on Tom Cruise, and I enjoyed the Last Samurai.  I think I'll see Valkyrie, too.
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Max on December 27, 2008, 04:55:30 PM
Maverick?! The guy who couldnt shake an A-4 while in an F-14? THAT Maverick?!

No....the Maverick played by James Garner back in the late 50's  :rofl

Indeed, The Last Samurai was an excellent flick.
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: avionix on December 27, 2008, 08:35:39 PM
Saw Valkyrie on Christmas Day.  Must say that I was surprised at how well the movie was done.  The onyl thing I had an issue was with the use of a Spanish built 109 flying top cover with a 109 of proper vintage.  The Buchon engined 109 just didnt look right.  Again though, not a bad movie.
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Tmac7 on December 27, 2008, 09:57:51 PM
I just got home from watching it and i loved it. Most historically accurate World War 2 movie I've seen.
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Fugita on December 28, 2008, 11:18:45 AM
Saw it yesterday with the wife. I recommend it. Loved the entire movie up to the point when Maverick attempts to propel himself into Martyrdom just before execution. Kinda hokey. Can't imagine someone as supposedly hardcore as Von Stoffel screaming like a lunatic.(imo)
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: VansCrew1 on December 28, 2008, 11:29:02 AM
I went to see Valkyrie last night, I thought it was pretty good, it seemed historically accurate to me.

did anyone else see it?

I was wondering if it was truly historically accurate and not fixed up like a lot of movies,



thanks,



opposum

I seen it. It was good i think.
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: CAVPFCDD on December 28, 2008, 11:33:58 PM
just got back from the theater, pretty cool movie, not sure how historically acurate it was (not going to spoil the plot for others) visually it looked really nice and historical, there were details in the plot i don't think actually happened... All in all very cool movie, Tom Cruise was horribly miscast though... but i managed to look past that

it was entertaining, i suggest it for everyone
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: llama on December 29, 2008, 11:28:08 AM
just got back from the theater, pretty cool movie, not sure how historically acurate it was (not going to spoil the plot for others) visually it looked really nice and historical, there were details in the plot i don't think actually happened... All in all very cool movie, Tom Cruise was horribly miscast though... but i managed to look past that

it was entertaining, i suggest it for everyone

Thanks for not spoiling the plot for us. I'm just assuming that the plot to kill Hitler went off exactly as planned, right? ;-)

-Llama
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Treize69 on December 29, 2008, 11:32:21 AM
Thanks for not spoiling the plot for us. I'm just assuming that the plot to kill Hitler went off exactly as planned, right? ;-)

-Llama

Yup, war ended in July of '44.  ;)
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: rabbidrabbit on December 29, 2008, 11:35:03 AM
Here's your sign!
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Treize69 on December 29, 2008, 11:36:04 AM
Nah, just trading sarcastic witticisms. :)
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Maverick on December 29, 2008, 11:36:08 AM
Ya want history and accuracy, read a book. Don't go to some hollywierd box office entertainment fantasy and expect history.  :huh
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: CAVPFCDD on December 29, 2008, 11:40:41 AM
Ya want history and accuracy, read a book. Don't go to some hollywierd box office entertainment fantasy and expect history.  :huh

yeah I know, it was still an entertaining movie, if you can look past Tom Cruise being a crazy scientologist

speaking of scientology, their world headquarters are in clearwater FL and driving past that place is creepy, i swear it's a cult, they all dress the same....

anywho cool movie, just saw the history channel show on the actual events and I was right, some of the plot was hollywood-ized, but all in all decently close to the actual events, it was cool, go see, you will all enjoy
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Fugita on December 30, 2008, 05:10:33 AM
Ya want history and accuracy, read a book. Don't go to some hollywierd box office entertainment fantasy and expect history.  :huh


And we can all sit around a crackling fire and read to one another :) OOOohhhh, How cozy :)


Thanks for not spoiling the plot for us. I'm just assuming that the plot to kill Hitler went off exactly as planned, right? ;-)

-Llama


 :rofl :rofl :rofl
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Anaxogoras on December 30, 2008, 10:00:23 AM
I saw the movie.

Whatever you think of Cruise (I thought he did well), the movie has a lot of talented supporting actors.  Historical accuracy is hard to judge as I'm not an expert on Hitler assassination plots, but as a piece of semi-historical entertainment the movie is good, though not excellent (few movies reach that mark).  I thought the story could have benefited from more character development for Staufenberg.  It begins in Africa in early '43, so you don't have any sense of the character's origins, what kind of man he is, where he grew up, etc.  The Merlin-engined 109 in the hangar is kind of a pity, but what are ya gonna do?  For that matter, it's not a movie to see if you're one of those that love to identify military hardware.
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: CAVPFCDD on December 30, 2008, 11:36:50 AM
I saw the movie.

Whatever you think of Cruise (I thought he did well), the movie has a lot of talented supporting actors.  Historical accuracy is hard to judge as I'm not an expert on Hitler assassination plots, but as a piece of semi-historical entertainment the movie is good, though not excellent (few movies reach that mark).  I thought the story could have benefited from more character development for Staufenberg.  It begins in Africa in early '43, so you don't have any sense of the character's origins, what kind of man he is, where he grew up, etc.  The Merlin-engined 109 in the hangar is kind of a pity, but what are ya gonna do?  For that matter, it's not a movie to see if you're one of those that love to identify military hardware.


keep checking the history channels listings, they did a really good show on the plot and the making of the movie, really detailed, I loved it

it happened to be on tv 10 minutes after I got home from the theater, the movie did a pretty good job with just some minor embelishments, but thats to be expected

some of the scenes outside of the war ministry were actually shot on location in Berlin.

My complaint with the movie was the varying accents, some people had German accents, some American and some British, Cruise did do good but I still think there could have been someone else.

oh yeah and how can you tell a merlin 109 from a regular one?

Oh yeah and what was with Hitlers plane being covered by 2 109s? Shouldn't there like 30 of them?
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Chalenge on December 30, 2008, 11:47:54 AM
Oh yeah and what was with Hitlers plane being covered by 2 109s? Shouldn't there like 30 of them?

I have not seen the movie but... If you have ever covered a bomber you would realize that you cant sit on top of it to cover it.
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Anaxogoras on December 30, 2008, 12:41:37 PM
This is a Merlin-engined 109:
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1436/926831542_c32f99049b.jpg)

This one has/had a real Daimler-Benz:
(http://www.taphilo.com/Photo/Pictures/BF109-Duxford.jpg)
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Saxman on December 30, 2008, 01:17:37 PM
That first one looks like the lovechild of a 109 and a P-40.
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: CAVPFCDD on December 30, 2008, 01:36:22 PM
gotcha big difference between the two, didn't really notice that in the movie (i wasn't really paying attention that closely to detail, i was just like, oh cool some 109s) , you said that was the one sitting in the hanger? I could have sworn I saw at least one of the damiler benz ones in the movie, maybe im wrong, i just recall seeing that big old air intake pipe or what ever that cylindrical thing is coming out of the side of the engine

That first one looks like the lovechild of a 109 and a P-40.

lol yeah, i think that thing looks more like a p 40 than a 109. I'm sure they just found whatever 109's they could that were still in flying condition
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Anaxogoras on December 30, 2008, 03:50:55 PM
In the movie, one of the two escorts with the Ju-52s has an original DB engine, so far as could tell.
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Lusche on December 30, 2008, 03:58:56 PM
.

(I really wish for a "delete" button)
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: FLOOB on March 13, 2014, 08:43:37 PM
Just watched the movie on netflix. I think it succeeded as a film. I was pleased with the attention to detail of the nazi party beauracracy and minutiae. Any historical impresicion, and i dont know that there is any, can be forgiven. Because the point of the film can be summed up by one line in the film, "Let's show the world that we are not all like him(hitler)." I'll admit, I did not know that there was a monument in Germany honoring the wwii german resistance, and I bet I wasnt the only one.
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Saxman on March 13, 2014, 10:17:28 PM
(http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100102171045/asdf/images/1/1c/Necro2.jpg)
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Brooke on March 13, 2014, 10:44:31 PM
I liked the movie.  I didn't know much of the history of it to know if there are historical inaccuracies.  Movies about historical events usually have lots of historical inaccuracies, but I don't mind that unless the stuff they change makes it a worse movie instead of a better one (like the changes made to Enemy At the Gates, for example). 

Yes, the post reopened this old topic, but the topic is about the movie he saw, so it seems the appropriate topic to me.
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: zack1234 on March 14, 2014, 02:28:29 AM
Just watched the movie on netflix. I think it succeeded as a film. I was pleased with the attention to detail of the nazi party beauracracy and minutiae. Any historical impresicion, and i dont know that there is any, can be forgiven. Because the point of the film can be summed up by one line in the film, "Let's show the world that we are not all like him(hitler)." I'll admit, I did not know that there was a monument in Germany honoring the wwii german resistance, and I bet I wasnt the only one.

gibberish!

The officer class was kissing Adolf Hitler's butt when they were winning against the disorganised allies when the allies got organised and ut went pear shaped for the Germans  they turned into turncoats, Staffenburg was a traiter.

The German army committed more genocides than the SS

The film is gibberish like that film the Sound of music, you cant sing and dance while climbing mountains :old:
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Rich46yo on March 14, 2014, 03:53:44 AM
The JU-52 was worth the price of the ticket alone. I cant remember, its been years, but the P40s that strafed him in the beginning? Were they real or models?
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Devil 505 on March 14, 2014, 09:37:42 AM
The film is gibberish like that film the Sound of music, you cant sing and dance while climbing mountains :old:
Dont worry, their escape path brings them strait to Berchtesgaden, not exactly the best place to avoid Nazi's.  :devil
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: zack1234 on March 14, 2014, 01:07:53 PM
 :rofl
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Megalodon on March 14, 2014, 02:39:05 PM
No....the Maverick played by James Garner back in the late 50's  :rofl


 great show...loved it  :aok  ...


after that the Wild Wild West... but that would be off topic  :lol
Title: Re: valkyrie
Post by: Masherbrum on March 16, 2014, 07:57:08 AM
IBTL!