Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aces High General Discussion => Topic started by: Citabria on January 25, 2001, 01:59:00 AM

Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: Citabria on January 25, 2001, 01:59:00 AM
since it was only crewed by 1 it wouldn't be justified.
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: Voss on January 25, 2001, 02:05:00 AM
I was thinking the same thing on the other thread, Cit. I'll dive in on one of these in a heartbeat, if it doesn't have F3 view. If it does, forget it.

Voss 13th T.A.S.
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: Fishu on January 25, 2001, 02:08:00 AM
I wonder how they're going to set up 6 view, when they had those periscopes..
they dont have periscopes in tanks either  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/frown.gif)
(tank commander does not have little peering holes)
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: LJK Raubvogel on January 25, 2001, 02:34:00 AM
Here come the whines   (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)

No other bomber had crewman sitting outside the bomber either, eh?   (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/wink.gif)

------------------
LJK_Raubvogel
LuftJägerKorps (http://www.luftjagerkorps.com)

 (http://content.communities.msn.com/isapi/fetch.dll?action=view_photo&ID_Community=Raubspics&ID_Topic=2&ID_Message=30)

[This message has been edited by LJK Raubvogel (edited 01-25-2001).]
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: SFRT - Frenchy on January 25, 2001, 02:37:00 AM
like when u take a close up picture of ur car rear view mirror. What u see? You see very well behind you and the side of the picture is the mirror frame.

I don't see where the problem is. As for Cit question, I think it will have no external view, who will sure make the perkie pilot freack out  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: Staga on January 25, 2001, 02:55:00 AM
Maybe one of the num-pad views is for periscope ?
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: Fishu on January 25, 2001, 03:24:00 AM
Nobody in here is complaining that miss of external view, or is there?
You people are assuming too much
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: Jay_76 on January 25, 2001, 05:47:00 AM
I don't imagine a periscope view, if modelled, would be much different (or more difficult) than the bombsite view we have now from F6.

Where's the controversy?

Jay.
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: eagl on January 25, 2001, 05:56:00 AM
I want it to have external view just so that scary man named VoSs won't dive in behind me.  Fate worse than death ya know.



------------------
eagl <squealing Pigs> BYA
Oink Oink To War!!!
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: Fariz on January 25, 2001, 02:12:00 PM
 
Quote
Originally posted by eagl:
I want it to have external view just so that scary man named VoSs won't dive in behind me.  Fate worse than death ya know.

hehe
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: Fury on January 25, 2001, 03:15:00 PM
Why does a crew of one determine if it gets an outside view or not?

Either way, one or two people, outside views are not normal (would love all F3s removed).  They don't "simultate" more than one eye on the sky...that's what gunner positions are for.  F3 views are simple game-the-game views.

Fury
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: AKDejaVu on January 25, 2001, 03:24:00 PM
The outside view is a tradeoff for planes that normally had several sets of eyes looking in several directions.

AKDejaVu
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: SKurj on January 25, 2001, 05:05:00 PM
Fury.. in an actual 17 there would be comms stating where the cons are.  If there were no F3 view in the buffs the pilot would have to leave the wheel, run to say the top turret take a look, then run back to the cockpit..
In RL the gunner would just report over the intercomm, permitting the pilot to keep an eye on his aircraft..

F3 is a decent compromise IMO

SKurj
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: pzvg on January 25, 2001, 05:39:00 PM
Fishu, maybe Finnish tanks don't have periscopes, our sure do, aside from that,it shouldn't need an external view, anything behind it is gonna stay behind it, a looong way behind it, (until a 51H or something shows up)

------------------
pzvg- "5 years and I still can't shoot"
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: pzvg on January 25, 2001, 05:48:00 PM
Fishu, maybe Finnish tanks don't have periscopes, ours sure do, aside from that,it shouldn't need an external view, anything behind it is gonna stay behind it, a looong way behind it, (until a 51H or something shows up)

------------------
pzvg- "5 years and I still can't shoot"
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: Fishu on January 25, 2001, 10:09:00 PM
 
Quote
Originally posted by pzvg:
Fishu, maybe Finnish tanks don't have periscopes, ours sure do, aside from that,it shouldn't need an external view, anything behind it is gonna stay behind it, a looong way behind it, (until a 51H or something shows up)


Oh.. do we have periscopes in the AH tanks?
Thats what I were talking of, AH tanks
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: pzvg on January 26, 2001, 11:16:00 AM
I stand corrected Fishu, OTOH, AH panzers don't need periscopes, since I do not recall any one ever coming under arty or sniper fire while driving one, Ja?

------------------
pzvg- "5 years and I still can't shoot"
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: Fishu on January 26, 2001, 11:37:00 AM
 
Quote
Originally posted by pzvg:
I stand corrected Fishu, OTOH, AH panzers don't need periscopes, since I do not recall any one ever coming under arty or sniper fire while driving one, Ja?


I never were wanting ones..
I was just wondering what they're going to do with this talked periscope of arado when it probably wont have exteranl view...
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: Fury on January 26, 2001, 12:13:00 PM
I understand better now, about the simulating the multiple sets of eyes, and I agree that's an o.k. compromise.  I still don't like F3 views tho, because they show you what you could never see with multiple sets of eyes.  For instance, the B26 has no bottom turret...yet with F3 I can see who is under me, when he starts his climb, and get into the rear gun just in time to waste him.  That's the part I don't like, F3 gives you views you would not normally have even with multiple eyes.

Fury
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: sling322 on January 26, 2001, 12:53:00 PM
Not necessarily true Fury.  What keeps the waist gunners on the B26 from looking down out their window and seeing the con below the plane?  Just because the guns wont track there doesnt mean the gunners couldnt see there.   (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: Fury on January 26, 2001, 02:26:00 PM
<gives up, defeated>

Thanks for the rational explanations guys.  Maybe now I will learn how to not feel guilty about using F3  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)

Fury
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: 715 on January 27, 2001, 02:42:00 AM
 
Quote
Originally posted by Voss:
I was thinking the same thing on the other thread, Cit. I'll dive in on one of these in a heartbeat, if it doesn't have F3 view. If it does, forget it.

Voss 13th T.A.S.

Dive with what?  These things have a top speed of 460 mph and can fly at 30,000ft.  Aren't they going to be pretty much untouchable?

I have a question: some (not all) Ar234s had twin 20 mm rear firing cannons.  But with only the pilot on board- who aimed them?  Is that what the little periscope is for?

715
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: GRUNHERZ on January 27, 2001, 03:17:00 AM
sling the 350mph wind of the diving and or looping, or rolling, split S'ing, immelmaning, B26 just might do that.  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)
Title: no external view for ar234?
Post by: Toad on January 27, 2001, 06:18:00 AM
The bomb load is external and the resulting drag slowed them to about 410 at 20k. Fuel burn down low limited their range to about 200 miles, so if the fuel modifier is applied equally range could also be a problem.

It will be interesting but I don't think they'll be "untouchable".