Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: wooly15 on February 06, 2009, 01:24:17 PM

Title: Engine vs. Bird test
Post by: wooly15 on February 06, 2009, 01:24:17 PM
 :O

http://break.com/index/duck-vs-jet-engine.html
Title: Re: Engine vs. Bird test
Post by: zoozoo on February 06, 2009, 01:52:02 PM
DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNN NNNNNNGGGGGGGGGGGG
 :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O
Title: Re: Engine vs. Bird test
Post by: avionix on February 06, 2009, 02:36:01 PM
Yeah!!!!  That's nice. 
Title: Re: Engine vs. Bird test
Post by: WilldCrd on February 06, 2009, 02:43:24 PM
Duck vs. Jet = both FAIL!!!! :O

anybody see the video's underneath this one? they had one of a plane loosing its wings
Title: Re: Engine vs. Bird test
Post by: wooly15 on February 06, 2009, 02:44:31 PM
I saw that too...looks like somebody doing aerobatics in something not designed to.
Title: Re: Engine vs. Bird test
Post by: Seafit on February 06, 2009, 03:23:55 PM
I don't think that video is labeled correctly.
It looks more like a compressor blade containment test. Look at the start and you can see a blade clearly marked in high visibility markings, that blade is then broken/released and the test is to make sure it is contained within the engine (rather than fly off and rip the aircraft apart).
I've seen similar tests (TV not in person) when they were demonstrating the new A380 engines.

Pretty spectacular though!
Title: Re: Engine vs. Bird test
Post by: Curlew on February 06, 2009, 03:28:18 PM
 :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O
Title: Re: Engine vs. Bird test
Post by: AWwrgwy on February 06, 2009, 03:47:12 PM
Duck vs. Jet = both FAIL!!!! :O

anybody see the video's underneath this one? they had one of a plane loosing its wings

A-20ish



wrongway
Title: Re: Engine vs. Bird test
Post by: wooly15 on February 06, 2009, 06:11:52 PM
I don't think that video is labeled correctly.
It looks more like a compressor blade containment test. Look at the start and you can see a blade clearly marked in high visibility markings, that blade is then broken/released and the test is to make sure it is contained within the engine (rather than fly off and rip the aircraft apart).
I've seen similar tests (TV not in person) when they were demonstrating the new A380 engines.

Pretty spectacular though!

I agree...as hard as I looked, I could not see anything thrown in the intake,
Title: Re: Engine vs. Bird test
Post by: CyranoAH on February 07, 2009, 11:53:11 AM
No duck was harmed in the production of this video. As Seafit correctly noted, it's a blade failure test, and this engine passed it  (it did not disintegrate or threw shrapnel)

Daniel
Title: Re: Engine vs. Bird test
Post by: eagl on February 07, 2009, 10:15:47 PM
I think that the plane with the wings that fell off was an aero commander.  I think Bud Anderson flew that exact same kind of plane for years on the airshow circuit, and it turns out that the plane had a design flaw the whole time and he was probably half a G from ripping the wings off.  Some other guy just did it first, and after the investigation Anderson never flew that plane in a demo again.  I heard he was pissed at the company for having him basically be a flying salesman doing aerobatics in a plane with a weak wing.

Edit:  Yea it was Bob Hoover, not Anderson.  My mistake.
Title: Re: Engine vs. Bird test
Post by: Chalenge on February 07, 2009, 10:17:45 PM
I think you are thinking of Bob Hoover.
Title: Re: Engine vs. Bird test
Post by: eagl on February 07, 2009, 10:21:02 PM
I think you are thinking of Bob Hoover.

Whoops, you're right.  It was Hoover.
Title: Re: Engine vs. Bird test
Post by: MoeRon on February 08, 2009, 12:35:48 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enTOcEbCtR8 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enTOcEbCtR8)



wow
Title: Re: Engine vs. Bird test
Post by: Spikes on February 08, 2009, 12:39:32 PM
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,257976.0.html

:)
Title: Re: Engine vs. Bird test
Post by: Allen Rune on February 08, 2009, 12:43:03 PM
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,257976.0.html

:)

Beat me to it.