Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: mipoikel on February 16, 2009, 08:03:47 AM

Title: Submarine crash
Post by: mipoikel on February 16, 2009, 08:03:47 AM
wtg guys.   :huh

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/article2240543.ece
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: Shamus on February 16, 2009, 08:44:08 AM
They should have had lookouts watching out the window.

shamus
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: Fishu on February 16, 2009, 11:34:09 AM
I'm only amazed the british submarine didn't sink. It must have been just a graze on the paint.
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: oakranger on February 16, 2009, 11:36:53 AM
must have been drunk.
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: Curlew on February 16, 2009, 12:35:29 PM
 :rofl :aok
Atta boy chaps!
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: crazyivan on February 16, 2009, 12:36:46 PM
Who was following who? And who put the brakes on ? :rolleyes:
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: Chalenge on February 16, 2009, 12:41:42 PM
Did anyone surrender?  :D
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: Rich46yo on February 16, 2009, 12:45:30 PM
What are the odds yathink?

Sounds to me like they were playing cutsie with each other. In case your wondering the Frenchie SSBM can take out about 96 targets, each warhead blowing at about 150 kt, "Hiroshima was 16 kt". And the Bloody Brit boat is loaded with 16 Yank Trident D-5s, each one capable of delivering up to 12 MIRV'ed warheads that blow at 450 kt. Thats 192 city busters!

Good Lord find a different bloody boat to play arse grab with.
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: Fulmar on February 16, 2009, 12:47:05 PM
Surprised when I heard it was a French and UK sub.  I figured an old Chinese sub would have be involved.  Ya know, probably in the left turn lane with its right blinker on for the last 5 miles going about 10 knots under the posted speed limit.

/I'm here all week
//try the fish
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: thrila on February 16, 2009, 12:54:49 PM
and yet despite this i still want to join the navy. :D

Trident FTW :aok
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: B4Buster on February 16, 2009, 01:06:43 PM
Didn't read the article, but you would think with all that top-notch radar this could have easily been avoided
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: Rich46yo on February 16, 2009, 01:19:10 PM
Didn't read the article, but you would think with all that top-notch radar this could have easily been avoided

Submarines, most of all SSBMs, hate to use sonar for anything. Im not a navy guy but I know they like to become black holes in the ocean. Our Ohio class boats are so quiet even we cant find them.

We had a fair share of collisons playing arse grab with the commies but we would pick them up outside their ports and stay with them. Two SSNs I could understand because they are like the fighter jocks under the waves. But two SSBMs? I dont think its ever happened before.
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: Gman on February 16, 2009, 01:22:33 PM
Quote
Submarines, most of all SLBMs, hate to use sonar for anything

Active sonar, yes.  Passive sonar is an SSN/SSBN 's bread and butter.
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: Rich46yo on February 16, 2009, 01:30:27 PM
Active sonar, yes.  Passive sonar is an SSN/SSBN 's bread and butter.

Sonar is sonar. You send radio waves thru the ocean like you do radar. I dont think you would call "passive detection" "sonar". Anyway its all called a "combat system" in the end, using both active and passive sensors. Which is why I think both boats, both very capable boats, were playing grab arse with each other and crashed. I cant see either not knowing the other was out there when so close.

But...I'm not a navy guy. Maybe those who were/are could clarify.
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: Phaser11 on February 16, 2009, 01:32:38 PM
"CON Sonar", "CRAZY IVAN!!!!"
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: Rino on February 16, 2009, 01:58:41 PM
     Man there are alot on uninformed opinions in this thread.  I wasn't navy either,
but I know submerged boomers don't use radar.  There is also a big difference between
active sonar and keeping a listening watch.  You don't have to generate sound to hear
another vessel's self generated noises.  Reactors and screws make noise all by themselves.

     Traditionally missile subs have had some of the best sonar crews in the navy as the whole
point is to hear the other guy before he hears you.  The problem is that both subs are designed
to be very quiet, so they may not have been aware of each other's location.
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: Vulcan on February 16, 2009, 03:11:40 PM
I'm surprised they couldn't smell the french sub coming :D
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: Nilsen on February 16, 2009, 03:30:00 PM
A passive sonar is still a sonar.

And every sub mentioned in this thread has been heard even if Discovery channel claims that so and so has never been tracked.

Back in topic. Subs have boxes they patrol in to avoid collisions even if the chanses to crash by accident (unless they are chasing eachother) is around one million to one. Nato has a system where they inform other member nations that operate in the same ocean what "box" they will be in. If two or more subs operate in the same box they will have a different depth to operate in to avoid a fender bender. I know the french are not really in Nato, but id be suprised if they were not in on this system.
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: Shuffler on February 16, 2009, 03:34:47 PM
Maybe the french boat was running from a sea bass.   :t
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: bcadoo on February 16, 2009, 07:30:35 PM
Maybe the french boat was running from a sea bass.   :t

Nah...more likely sharks with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads!!
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: humble on February 16, 2009, 07:44:27 PM
French do not coordinate with NATO, as per the why...subs like to operate where thermal differences distort or mask sound transmission. Subs can be very close but on different sides of a thermal barrier without detecting each other. So to sub drivers in the same area may approach thermal anomalies from a different direction and never here each other till they collide. It's actually happened more then once...
Title: Re: Submarine crash
Post by: 68Wooley on February 16, 2009, 08:16:23 PM
The frenchies will have been driving on the wrong side of the road.

Seriously though, I suspect a previously glittering Royal Navy career just came to an end.