Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: brady on January 01, 2001, 12:36:00 PM
-
???
(http://content.communities.msn.com/isapi/fetch.dll?action=MyPhotos_GetPubPhoto&photoId=nHwCwcBQJFHLEU!KiUoDjUOCDT4KDh!ompdgliz6uDfzkJUh7PabiRHqRN!podqGR)
P.S. Happy New Year (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)
------------------
(http://content.communities.msn.com/isapi/fetch.dll?action=MyPhotos_GetPubPhoto&photoId=nHwCwcPsI127zdfQrpnUcxlA3JwdurswdyuKkL2b1oC9IifgHlGH10m2*!jtTQ!E7)
[This message has been edited by brady (edited 01-01-2001).]
[This message has been edited by brady (edited 01-01-2001).]
-
Alright... that is a Halifax heavy bomber. It was the precursor to the Lancaster, and was actually quite successful, but it's always been overshadowed by it's big sister. It usually made up the bulk of British night raids until 1944 or so.
-
No, that is Shorts Stirling, first four engined plane of RAF Bomber Command.
------------------
jochen
Kids today! Why can't they fetishize Fascist military hardware like normal people?
Ladysmith wants you forthwith to come to her relief
Burn your briefs you leave for France tonight
Carefully cut the straps of the booby-traps and set the captives free
But don't shoot 'til you see her big blue eyes
-
No, that is Shorts Stirling, first four engined plane of RAF Bomber Command.
What he said (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)
Brady
------------------
(http://content.communities.msn.com/isapi/fetch.dll?action=MyPhotos_GetPubPhoto&photoId=nHwCwcPsI127zdfQrpnUcxlA3JwdurswdyuKkL2b1oC9IifgHlGH10m2*!jtTQ!E7)
[This message has been edited by brady (edited 01-01-2001).]
-
Right!
This puppy couldn't climb worth a hoot. Anyone know why?
Andy
-
Actually you are both wrong! It's Short not Short(s)!
Short Stirling
I win.
-
Hi
Andy does it have something to do with RAF standard hangar size?? (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)
thanks GRUNHERZ
-
Andy, weren't the wings not big enough to give enough lift at anything above 15,000ft?
Nexx
-
replicant we seem to be on the right track here if we both think of the same thing
-
Several reasons why the Stirling had a poor climb and a worse ceiling than the Lancaster or the Halifax. Once the Halifax got its longer wings the Stirling had the shortest span of the 3 at 99'1".(ahem, hanger door reference there) However it also had about 15% more wing area than the others giving a lot more surface drag. It also had the heaviest empty weight of the three and the engines produced less power than the Halifax engines. Oh yeah the bombay was too small for the bigger bombs of the later part of the war. More weight + inefficient wing + more drag + mediocre power = lousy performance in comparison to the other Brit 4 engine bombers. Last flew active raid in Sept 1944.
Pageflip
-
Grunherz
Yep...now there's some brilliant thinking for you!
Talk about the tail wagging the dog!
Andy
-
Blast! (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/mad.gif)
(http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/wink.gif)