Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: Sincraft on March 07, 2009, 12:40:36 AM

Title: HOW LONG will it take for a decent jet sim?!
Post by: Sincraft on March 07, 2009, 12:40:36 AM

Back in the day, I remember flying jet sim after jet sim on the Amiga and Commodore 64.
I thought by now, we would have such realism, we would all be flying jet sims by now.

I tried so many, that were nothing but buggy pieces of junk with what seemed to be 12 year olds creating the flight physics. 

So I have to ask, are there any sims in the works or even vaporware that are worth looking forward to?

Title: Re: HOW LONG will it take for a decent jet sim?!
Post by: JunkyII on March 07, 2009, 01:25:36 AM

why would you want to fly jets when ACES HIGH OWNS EVERYTHING :devil

Title: Re: HOW LONG will it take for a decent jet sim?!
Post by: SirFrancis on March 07, 2009, 02:04:52 AM

maybe this can help...

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,259876.0.html

Title: Re: HOW LONG will it take for a decent jet sim?!
Post by: Treize69 on March 07, 2009, 06:44:58 AM

Jets? JETS!?

The "cleaners" have your IP and are on the way as we speak...

Title: Re: HOW LONG will it take for a decent jet sim?!
Post by: Ghosth on March 07, 2009, 08:12:51 AM

Contradiction in terms. No such thing as a "decent" jet sim.

Lots of boxed games though.

Title: Re: HOW LONG will it take for a decent jet sim?!
Post by: WilldCrd on March 07, 2009, 08:21:05 AM

JETS?? didnt you hear, since  the age of jets the dogfight is OVER!
so why would they make a jet sim to fly around at 35-40k just to shoot a missle at a bomber thats bvr (beyond visual range)?  :huh

just ask any of the "experts" at the pentagon  :rofl :rofl

Title: Re: HOW LONG will it take for a decent jet sim?!
Post by: Sincraft on March 07, 2009, 11:10:05 AM

Hey thanks for that thread link!

Title: Re: HOW LONG will it take for a decent jet sim?!
Post by: Wolfala on March 07, 2009, 11:19:56 AM

http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,253210.0.html

Link discussed prior to the previous link. Wow that is actually a sentence.