Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Wishlist => Topic started by: cp101 on March 15, 2009, 05:10:18 PM

Title: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: cp101 on March 15, 2009, 05:10:18 PM
i think we should add a twin mustang sure no amny no about hem but they seem good :salute cp101 out (http://)
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: AWwrgwy on March 15, 2009, 05:14:34 PM
Why should we add it?  Why does it seem good?  What would be good about it?  Please explain.  Be concise.  Support your arguments with facts.

Due Tuesday.


I want to see some support with these wishes.  Back them up.  Sell me.  More importantly, sell those that matter.



(Post war.  Did not see service in WW2.)
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: Karnak on March 15, 2009, 06:03:47 PM
i think we should add a twin mustang sure no amny no about hem but they seem good :salute cp101 out ()
It isn't a WWII aircraft, so no, HTC shouldn't add it.
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: AWwrgwy on March 15, 2009, 08:54:25 PM
Speaking of crazy things that really, really never saw the light of day that someone will wish for, check this out:

(http://www.geocities.com/h_zoeller/ju635_a1.jpg)


Although, I think the proposal was for high altitude reconnaissance.  No guns.



wrongway
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: 1pLUs44 on March 15, 2009, 09:26:32 PM
i think we should add a twin mustang sure no amny no about hem but they seem good :salute cp101 out ()

What?  :huh
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: FYB on March 15, 2009, 09:28:17 PM
What?  :huh
Agreed.

-FYB
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: Cthulhu on March 16, 2009, 12:10:02 PM
OOOOHHHH, a Dornier 670!! We gotta have that!! :rock

Seriously though, what's with the two different canopies and asymmetric drag??  :confused:
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: Lusche on March 16, 2009, 12:33:38 PM
Seriously though, what's with the two different canopies and asymmetric drag??  :confused:

Could be worse...

(http://www.airventure.de/historypics/bv_141.jpg)
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: Cthulhu on March 16, 2009, 12:37:43 PM
Could be worse...

(http://www.airventure.de/historypics/bv_141.jpg)
Can't get much worse than a 141. Ok, I officially request that HTC add the BV-141. Wrongway, Lusche, was that twin 335 concept ever given a designation?
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: Lusche on March 16, 2009, 12:39:53 PM
Wrongway, Lusche, was that twin 335 concept ever given a designation?

Yes, Do 635

When the project went to Junkers, the development was continued as Ju 635 but didn't get far.
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: Cthulhu on March 16, 2009, 12:49:12 PM
Yes, Do 635

When the project went to Junkers, the development was continued as Ju 635 but didn't get far.
I see, started out as Do 335Z. That one I should have guessed.

Thx Lusche
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: LLogann on March 16, 2009, 01:02:46 PM
Be perfect for the EW Arena in Korea High II..................

i think we should add a twin mustang sure no amny no about hem but they seem good :salute cp101 out ()
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: Bronk on March 16, 2009, 03:17:45 PM
(http://farm1.static.flickr.com/206/500764130_8e4cb0a43b.jpg?v=0)
 :noid
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: Bosco123 on March 16, 2009, 04:10:11 PM
 :O
Looks like two 109s! :D
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: Babalonian on March 16, 2009, 07:11:31 PM
(http://farm1.static.flickr.com/206/500764130_8e4cb0a43b.jpg?v=0)
 :noid


Fake...




the pilot should be in the one on the right side.
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: stroker71 on March 16, 2009, 08:39:32 PM

Fake...




the pilot should be in the one on the right side.

Well that depends on if the pilot is left handed or right handed....DUH...your an idiot :rolleyes: :noid
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: ImMoreBetter on March 16, 2009, 10:10:37 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bf109Z_3Seiten_neu.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bf109Z_3Seiten_neu.jpg)

(http://f1.aaa.livedoor.jp/~ediok/aircraft/9t_f04.jpg)

Looks like it's on the left to me...

Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: FYB on March 16, 2009, 10:30:28 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bf109Z_3Seiten_neu.jpg (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bf109Z_3Seiten_neu.jpg)

(http://f1.aaa.livedoor.jp/~ediok/aircraft/9t_f04.jpg)

Looks like it's on the left to me...


looks like its missing 2 "little wings" on the bottom.

-FYB
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: Plazus on March 17, 2009, 07:36:49 PM
Lol I like that twin 109 concept. Seems the Germans wished they had something as cool as the P38.
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: Cthulhu on March 18, 2009, 10:45:26 AM
Lol I like that twin 109 concept. Seems the Germans wished they had something as cool as the P38.
At that late stage in the war, they just wished they could stop the Allies from bombing the toejam out of them 24/7.

Twin boom configuration was nothing new. Granted, it's not a fighter, but the Fw-189 flew a year earler than the P-38.
(http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/81/fw1891.jpg) (http://img26.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fw1891.jpg)
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: Bronk on March 18, 2009, 02:56:25 PM
At that late stage in the war, they just wished they could stop the Allies from bombing the noodles out of them 24/7.

Twin boom configuration was nothing new. Granted, it's not a fighter, but the Fw-189 flew a year earler than the P-38.
(http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/81/fw1891.jpg) (http://img26.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fw1891.jpg)

IIRC correctly pilots loved the handling of the 189.
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: Cthulhu on March 18, 2009, 03:18:27 PM
IIRC correctly pilots loved the handling of the 189.
Yeah, I understand it flew very well.

Note to Skuzzy: Noodles?!??  Come on now. Change my wording... fair enough. But noodles? That just makes me look stupid, and I'm quite capable of doing that myself.  :salute
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: SectorNine50 on March 18, 2009, 05:07:49 PM
Yeah, I understand it flew very well.

Note to Skuzzy: Noodles?!??  Come on now. Change my wording... fair enough. But noodles? That just makes me look stupid, and I'm quite capable of doing that myself.  :salute
Hahaha I was actually sitting here wondering about your word choice there... That's fantastic, I'm going to start saying that...
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: Cthulhu on March 18, 2009, 05:45:02 PM
Hahaha I was actually sitting here wondering about your word choice there... That's fantastic, I'm going to start saying that...
Roger that. :aok  From now on "noodles" can be substituted for any word you want. (Just as long as I get my royalty check  :D)
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: Ack-Ack on March 18, 2009, 07:23:52 PM
IIRC correctly pilots loved the handling of the 189.

Unfortunately, it was a tad on the slow side and very lightly armed but it relied more on its maneuvering ability for defense than gun.  From what I read, the main tactic was to go into tight lufberry turns when bounced by fighters.  The FW 189 turned so tightly that it was able to frustrate attacking fighters and it was also very durable despite it's light air frame. 

I would actually like to see this plane in the game sometime down the line.

ack-ack
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: Cthulhu on March 19, 2009, 01:35:02 AM
I would actually like to see this plane in the game sometime down the line.

ack-ack
Same here, although I'm not sure what we'd do with it in the current MA environment.
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: Enker on March 21, 2009, 09:25:36 PM
Same here, although I'm not sure what we'd do with it in the current MA environment.
Same thing we do with Goons armed with airfield supplies...make the enemy cons auger with sheer skills without a z.
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: Plazus on March 22, 2009, 08:45:21 PM
At that late stage in the war, they just wished they could stop the Allies from bombing the noodles out of them 24/7.

Twin boom configuration was nothing new. Granted, it's not a fighter, but the Fw-189 flew a year earler than the P-38.
(http://img26.imageshack.us/img26/81/fw1891.jpg) (http://img26.imageshack.us/my.php?image=fw1891.jpg)

Pretty interesting plane. Ive never seen it before. What was its role in the war? Perhaps HTC could make that plane available in the game...?
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: AWwrgwy on March 22, 2009, 10:52:39 PM
Pretty interesting plane. Ive never seen it before. What was its role in the war? Perhaps HTC could make that plane available in the game...?

Germany's "eye in the sky".  Tactical Reconnaissance.


wrongway
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: phatzo on March 22, 2009, 11:48:42 PM
Yeah, I understand it flew very well.

Note to Skuzzy: Noodles?!??  Come on now. Change my wording... fair enough. But noodles? That just makes me look stupid, and I'm quite capable of doing that myself.  :salute

You think noodles is bad
look at my sig
i
i
i
i
V
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: Cthulhu on March 23, 2009, 09:48:33 AM
You think noodles is bad
look at my sig
i
i
i
i
V
So that explains your sig. I noticed that earlier, but didn't want to comment on it. I was afraid that maybe your mom made you sleep with a helmet on, and that you actually found your sig hilarious. :D

j/k Man
Title: Re: p-82 twin mustang
Post by: thedudee95 on March 24, 2009, 12:52:50 AM
No thats il2, not fake :)