Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: niklas on February 20, 2001, 04:23:00 PM
-
ok the H1 is heavier maybe. But else?
Different engine maybe?
niklas
-
MW50
-
In short, due to production difficulties, the H0 did not have high pressure MW50 or GM1.
I think maybe a few of the H0s may have had low pressure MW50, but I would have to check to be sure.
------------------
Vermillion
**MOL**, Men of Leisure
-
Interestingly enough nearly all the weight difference between H-0 and H-1 was due to the H-1s greater fuel storage in wing tanks, empty weight is within 100-200lbs for both. this should be one hell of a high alt turner and climber, as the H-0 models were vs P51s and 47s up high. Too bad buff guns are still garbage when attacking the 30k b17 dweebs.
-
Was the name of the 152 H0 engine jumo213E0 then, and for the H1 213E1?
Or did both 152 have the E1 engine?
niklas
-
AFAIK, the only appreciable difference is in fuel tanks.
Ta 152H-0
Fuselage: 594l main + 115l rear.
Wings: none.
Ta 152H-1
Fuselage: 594l main + 85l GM-1.
Wings: 400l(5 tanks) + 70l MW 50.
-
woopla thats almost 40% more in H1. Good, because with the fuel modifier I had my doubhts that it would be able to climb to the optimal altitude.
the H1 definitely will have enough (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)