Aces High Bulletin Board

General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: brady on October 18, 2000, 06:49:00 PM

Title: UBER BOMBER
Post by: brady on October 18, 2000, 06:49:00 PM
It has come to my understanding that a point systeam will be implemented to allow a player to "purchass" a super fighter (like a Ta 152,or a Volksjager). What if the same type of systeam were used to aloow those who acheaved enough points bombing targets to "purchas" a UBER bomber say an Ar 234.
  Well what do you all think it would be fun and even though it is a jet i dont think it would upset the game ballence espechaily if only small numbers were in play (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif)
       Brady
Title: UBER BOMBER
Post by: Karnak on October 18, 2000, 07:09:00 PM
Ar234C (Yes, I know its combat record).

Sisu
-Karnak
Title: UBER BOMBER
Post by: MC202 on October 19, 2000, 01:57:00 PM
Or a B-29 with any of it's historic payloads....  :-)

MC202
Dino in Reno
Title: UBER BOMBER
Post by: BUG_EAF322 on October 19, 2000, 08:29:00 PM
Yeah the "Enola dweep"
 (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)
Title: UBER BOMBER
Post by: MC202 on October 20, 2000, 12:05:00 AM

BUG_EAF said:
> Yeah the "Enola dweep"

Six or eight years ago General Paul Tibits was in Reno on a book and art signing tour. I got to speak to him.... and got him to sign his name on my '43 jeep's dash :-)

Just be glad I did not ask for a Uber Perk B-36 :-)

Remember, in real war the fighters have the fun and press, the bombers do the work. (I include "attack" aircraft in bombers)

MC202
Dino in Reno
Title: UBER BOMBER
Post by: Pyro on October 20, 2000, 10:28:00 AM
Perks will extend to bombers as well.  Obvious choices would be the Ar 234 and B-29.  A couple of other possibilities could be the A-26 and Il-10.  

------------------
Doug "Pyro" Balmos
HiTech Creations
Title: UBER BOMBER
Post by: MC202 on October 20, 2000, 11:24:00 AM

Pyro said:
> Perks will extend to bombers as well.
> Obvious choices would be the Ar 234 and
> B-29.A couple of other possibilities could
> be the A-26 and Il-10.


Of course now that I'm thinking, that will force people to save the "uberride" to counter the moves of the other side....use my TA152 or ME262 now for grins, or save it for that damm B-29 Dweeb I know will be back.....
Nice :-)

MC202
Dino in Reno
Title: UBER BOMBER
Post by: Jigster on October 20, 2000, 12:51:00 PM
 
Quote
Originally posted by Pyro:
Perks will extend to bombers as well.  Obvious choices would be the Ar 234 and B-29.  A couple of other possibilities could be the A-26 and Il-10.  


He said A-26....<drool>

Wish there would be a non-perk version of it though, with the limited gun/ordinance load for a counter-balance  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)

Title: UBER BOMBER
Post by: juzz on October 20, 2000, 12:56:00 PM
The non-perk version would be the A-20 - with four 20mm Hispanos!  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)
Title: UBER BOMBER
Post by: Ripsnort on October 20, 2000, 01:25:00 PM
So, the P61 will NOT be a perk plane!  Great news Pyro!
Title: UBER BOMBER
Post by: flakbait on October 21, 2000, 05:49:00 AM
<pops Ripsnort's ballon> how you figure? I'm all for the P-61B, or C, but how do you figure they'll not get Perked?




------------------
Flakbait
Delta 6's Flight School (http://www.worldaccessnet.com/~delta6)
"My art is the wings of an aircraft through the skies, my music the deep hum of a prop as it slices the air, my thrill the thunder of guns tearing asunder an enemy plane."
Flakbait
19 September 2000
Title: UBER BOMBER
Post by: Jigster on October 21, 2000, 02:44:00 PM
 
Quote
Originally posted by juzz:
The non-perk version would be the A-20 - with four 20mm Hispanos!   (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)

Has to have the apporiate soviet markings though  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/biggrin.gif)

(I like the 2 Hispano/ 4 .50 M2's combo better though, about 4 field mod's like that were made  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/wink.gif) )

- Jig

Title: UBER BOMBER
Post by: Rickenbacker on October 22, 2000, 01:42:00 AM
Just read an article on the A-26, and apparently it's quite a handful on landing. The pilot they interviewed stated that it had a very high speed on final, and when you got it down you had to use full rudder deflections to keep it straight, and sometimes that wasn't enough, so you'd have to use differendial braking. All this just to stay on the runway during landing  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/smile.gif).


------------------
        Rickenbacker (Ricken)

                -ISAF-
the Independent Swedish Air Force
Title: UBER BOMBER
Post by: MC202 on October 22, 2000, 06:07:00 PM
Rickenbacker said:
> Just read an article on the A-26, and apparently it's quite a handful on landing. The pilot they interviewed stated that it had a
                                > very high speed on final, and when you got it down you had to use full rudder deflections to keep it straight, and sometimes
                                > that wasn't enough, so you'd have to use differendial braking. All this just to stay on the runway during landing .
> Rickenbacker (Ricken)

Wasn't that way on the one I got to fly in :-)

Landing (and takeoff) was not a big effort to the pilot, and Galena Alaska does not have a big runway. I could see because I was sitting next to him. That was with a load of melting agent to drop on the Yukon River, to help stop ice dams from forming durring spring break-up.

MC202
Dino in Reno
Title: UBER BOMBER
Post by: Jigster on October 22, 2000, 10:59:00 PM
 
Quote
Originally posted by MC202:
Rickenbacker said:
> Just read an article on the A-26, and apparently it's quite a handful on landing. The pilot they interviewed stated that it had a
                                > very high speed on final, and when you got it down you had to use full rudder deflections to keep it straight, and sometimes
                                > that wasn't enough, so you'd have to use differendial braking. All this just to stay on the runway during landing .
> Rickenbacker (Ricken)

Wasn't that way on the one I got to fly in :-)

Landing (and takeoff) was not a big effort to the pilot, and Galena Alaska does not have a big runway. I could see because I was sitting next to him. That was with a load of melting agent to drop on the Yukon River, to help stop ice dams from forming durring spring break-up.

MC202
Dino in Reno


As was my expirence in the 26. I'd be interested in riding that fire-fighter conversion once they get through restoring it. So many good planes are waiting to be rescued for utility duty  (http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/Smileys/default/wink.gif)

That dang plane practically lands itself.

Perhaps the pilot was describing a bad cross wind landing? Bout the only time I ever heard of having to use full rudder on landing.

- Jig
Title: UBER BOMBER
Post by: MC202 on October 24, 2000, 11:30:00 AM
Jigster  said:
QUOTE
As was my expirence in the 26. I'd be interested in riding that fire-fighter conversion once they get through restoring it. So many good planes are waiting to be rescued for utility duty. That dang plane practically lands itself.
Perhaps the pilot was describing a bad cross wind landing? Bout the only time I ever heard of having to use full rudder on landing.
 - Jig
END QUOTE

That was one of the most fun rides I have had. Three G'g +, and floating after a pull-up to a wing over dive... :-)

And that lovely sound on take off.....

The pilot said it flew "like a damm big fighter" with the control forces and ballance being better than any other big twin he had flown.

MC202
Dino in Reno